Summary
The practice of systems engineering has been said to be both an art and a science. While the scientific part is necessary to produce actual designs, the artistic one seems to drive the value of the underlying system structure. Should certain aspects of art be integrated with engineering? Interestingly, systems engineers and master painters seem to use a similar set of rules to effectively manage complexity, balancing rules that reduce noise with rules that add meaning. Furthermore, there is a strong resemblance between the problem context and the solution processes of large artistic endeavors, such as original film scores and theatre productions and large engineering projects. In this chapter, we explore how the arts can be leveraged to design effective interfaces. There are many cases that the complexity of the interaction between a user and a system mostly occurs at the interface level. We suggest that any interface contains a set of messages for the users as encoded by the designer and that the proper encoding of this information is critical in enabling a satisfying level of interaction. In this sense, an interface design, as creating an art piece, is a communicative act, where both artists and engineers package information to deliver meaning. In this chapter, we show, supported by examples, that such meaning delivery can be more efficient and effective if the aesthetic value is incorporated in the interface’s design.
“I like the rule that corrects the emotion. I like the emotion that corrects the rule.”
Georges Braque
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
SEBoK (2020) Introduction to systems engineering [cited 2020 14 July 2020]
Salado A (2018) An elemental decomposition of systems engineering. In: 2018 IEEE international systems engineering symposium (ISSE)
INCOSE (2015) Systems engineering handbook: a guide for system life cycle processes and activities, version 4.0, ed. 2015. Sons, Hoboken
Ryschkewitsch M, Shaible D, Larson WJ (2009) The art and science of systems engineering. Syst Res Forum 03(02):81–100
Jansma PAT (2012) Exploring the art and science of systems engineering. In: IEEE aerospace conference. Big Sky, MT, USA, (2012)
Muirhead BK, Thomas D (2010) The art and science of systems engineering tightly coupled programs. SAE Int J Passeng Cars Electron Electr Syst 3(2), 117–130 (2010)
McDermott T, Folds D (2019) Creating well-rounded and whole-brain engineers. In: 2019 international symposium on systems engineering (ISSE) (2019)
McDermott T, Salado A (2019) A perspective on systems thinking, architecting, and art. Syst Res Behav Sci 36(5):648–655
Griffin MD (2010) How do we fix systems engineering? In: 61st International Astronautical Congress. Prague, Czech Republic (2010)
Frosch RA (1969) A new look at systems engineering. IEEE Spectrum, pp 24–28 (1969)
Ramachandran VS (2011) The tell-tale brain: a neuroscientist's quest for what makes us human. Norton & Company, New York
Iandoli L et al (2018) Elegance as complexity reduction in systems design. Complexity 2018:10
Maier MW, Rechtin E (2009) The art of system architecting. CRC Press (2009)
Salado A, Iandoli L, Zollo G (2016) Painting systems: from art to systems architecting. In: INCOSE international symposium 26(1):773–787
McDermott T, Salado A (2017) Improving the systems thinking skills of the systems architect via aesthetic interpretation of art. In: INCOSE international symposium, 27(1): 1340–1354
McDermott T, Salado A (2018) Art and architecture: effectively communicating models of systems. In: 2018 Annual IEEE international systems conference (SysCon). Vancouver, Canada
Iandoli L, Salado A, Zollo G (2020) The role of aesthetic reasoning in knowledge management: the case of elegant systems architecture design. Knowl Manag Res Pract 18:93–109
Salado A, Salado C (2015) Systems engineering practices exhibited in the creation of a film original score. In: INCOSE international symposium 25(1), 1147–1158
Palma G, Mesmer B, Guerin A (2019) Relating theater and systems engineering: experiences of a systems engineer in theater courses. In: ASEE annual conference and exposition. Tampa, FL
Pariser E (2011) The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin
Fogg BJ (2002) Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity (2)
Kuang C, Fabricant R (2019) User friendly: how the hidden rules of design are changing the way we live, work, and play. MCD (2019)
Maeda J (2006) The laws of simplicity. MIT Press
Rams D (2009) Dieter Rams: ten principles for good design
Gell-Mann M, Lloyd S (2010) Effective complexity. Murray Gell-Mann: Selected papers, pp 391–402
Calvino I, Palomar (1983) Einaudi
Damasio A (2006) Descartes’ error. Random House
Gombrich EH (1960) Art and illusion. a study of psychology of pictorial representation. Phaidon
Schank R, Abelson RP (1995) Knowledge and memory: the real story. In: Wyer RS (ed) Knowledge and memory: the real story. Psychology Press, New York, pp 1–85
Hekkert P (2006) Design aesthertics: principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science 48:157
Harari YN (2012) From animals into gods: a brief history of humankind. CreateSpace (2012)
Arnheim R (1965) Art and visual perception: a pshychology of the creative eye. Univ. of Calfornia Press (1965)
Zeki S (1999) Art and the brain. J Conscious 66:76–96
Pihko E et al (2011) Experiencing art: the influence of expertise and painting abstraction level. Front Hum Neurosci 5:94
Berghman M, Hekkert P (2017) Towards a unified model of aestheric pleasure in design. New Ideas Psychol 47:136–144
Leder H et al (2004) A model of aestheric appreciation and aesthetic judgments. Br J Psychol 95:489–508
Berlyne DE (1970) Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Percept Psychophys 8:279–286
Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W (1999) The science of art. J Consciousness 6:15–51
Solso RL (1994) Cognition and the visual arts. MIT Press, Cambridge
Kunst-Wilson WR, Zajonc RB (1980) Affective discrimination stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 207:557–558
Zajonc RB (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J Personal Soc Psychol Monog Suppl 9:1–27
Zajonc RB (1984) On the primacy of affect. Am Psychol 39:117–123
Hartley J, Homa D (1981) Abstraction of stylistic concepts. J Experim Psychol Learn Memory Cognit 7: 33–46
Martindale C (1984) The pleasures of thought: a theory of cognitive hedonics. J Mind Behav 5:49–80
Loewy R (1951) Never leave well enough alone. Simon and Schuster
Madni AM (2013) Elegant system design: creative fusion of simplicity and power. Syst Eng 15:347–354
Salado A, Nilchiani R (2013) Using Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to define elegance in system architecture. Procedia Comput Sci 16:927–936
Arnheim R (1983) The power of the center: a study of composition in the visual arts. University of California Press, California
Cheng F (1991) Vide et plein, le langage pictural chinois. Editions du Seuil (1991)
Saar Y (2020) The Israeli woman behind the google logo [cited 2020 4 Aug 2020]; Available from: https://www.haaretz.com/1.5053655
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iandoli, L., Salado, A., Zollo, G. (2022). Towards a New Science of Interfaces: Bridging Art and Engineering. In: Rezaei, N., Saghazadeh, A. (eds) Thinking. Integrated Science, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04075-7_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04075-7_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04074-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04075-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)