Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trusting Your Own Eyes: Visual Constructions, Proofs, and Fallacies in Mathematics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics

  • 1454 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses how human biological capability of seeing contributes to the cognitive development of mathematical thinking. Thus, the phenomenon of visualization in mathematics, viewed as practice of handling visual and spatial information with the aid of physical artefacts, diagrams drawn on paper and mental imagery, is examined. It is stressed that visual mental images rely on all human senses; they develop through perception, action, and language, along with the process of conceptualization of mathematical objects. The latter are considered as distinct from the physical objects, from which their properties are abstracted and generalized. One can study mathematical objects through their various semiotic representations, including visual images. Examples of geometric constructions and reasoning with figures in the Euclidean plane are provided. They reveal a possibility of finding and comparing multiple solutions with the aim of noticing new mathematical relations. These examples also illustrate that working with visual material requires and supports the development of mathematical knowledge. This includes knowledge of mathematical properties of figure’s elements and detection of underlying structure. As well, the study of non-Euclidean geometries, while significantly relying on mathematical formalism, calls for supporting visual aid. Geometrical solutions emerge through refocus of viewer’s attention from the external, visual features to internal logical characteristics of the figures. Examples of visual fallacies and paradoxes based on unfaithful images further support the idea of the importance of logical analysis of figures. They necessitate an alternative verification of what could be visually perceived as trustworthy, and call for a rigorous deductive approach in mathematics. While the role of figures in formal proofs may be disputed, visual imagery often empowers work on mathematical discovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, R. D., & Victor, M. (1993). Principles of neurology (5th edn). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. University of California Press. https://www.scribd.com/document/162427567/ARNHEIM-Visual-Thinking

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Leung, L. Y. L., Mariotti, M. A., & Stevenson, I. (2012). Experimental approaches to theoretical thinking: Artefacts and proofs. In G. Hanna & M. De Villiers (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education. The 19th ICMI study (pp. 97–146). Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (2000). Ancient instruments in the mathematics classroom. In J. Fauvel & J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education: The ICMI Study (pp. 343–351). Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J., & Etchemendy, J. (1996). Visual information and valid reasoning. In G. Allwein & J. Barwise (Eds.), Logical reasoning with diagrams. Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. J. (1983). Space and geometry. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, W., & Kirsch, A. (1991). Pre-formal proving: Examples and reflections. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(2), 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borwein, P., & Jorgenson, L. (2001). Visible structures in number theory. American Mathematical Monthly, 108, 897–911.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R. (1999). Philosophy of mathematics: An introduction to the world of proofs and pictures. Routledge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, W. (2007). How Mathematicians think. Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 564–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casselman, B. (2000). Pictures and proofs. Notices of the AMS, 47, 1257–1266.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • CodeParade. (2020, June 26). Non-Euclidean geometry explained - Hyperbolica Devlog #1 [Video]. YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQo_S3yNa2w

  • Danesi, M. (2002). The Puzzle instinct. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. J. (1993). Visual theorems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers, M. (1999). Rethinking proof with Geometer’s Sketchpad. Key Curriculum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diezmann, C. M. (2005). Primary students’ knowledge of the properties of spatially-oriented diagrams. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th PME international conference (Vol. 2, pp. 281–288).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler, W. (1995). Mathematical objects, representations and imagery. In R. Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (NATO ASI series F: Advanced educational technology) (pp. 82–94). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, T. (1991). On the status of visual reasoning in mathematics and mathematics education. In: Furinghetti, F. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Assisi (Vol. 1, pp. 33–48).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Holton (Ed.), The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level: An ICMI Study (Series: New ICMI study series) (Vol. 7, pp. 273–280). Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., & Lewin, P. (1986). Reflective abstraction and mathematics education: The genetic decomposition of induction and compactness. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 5, 55–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., Michael, A., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS-based analysis: Part 2. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, D. (2012). M.C. Escher’s use of the Poincaré models of hyperbolic geometry. In C. Bruter (Ed.), Mathematics and modern art. Springer proceedings in mathematics (Vol. 18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24497-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1/2), 103–131, Semiotic perspectives in mathematics education: A PME special issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erismann, T., & Kohler, I. (1950). Die Umkehrbrille und das aufrechte Sehen. Institut für den Wissenschaftlichen Film (Göttingen). https://doi.org/10.3203/IWF/W-63. Accessed 21 Apr 2021.

  • Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M., & Barner, D. (2012). Representing exact number visually using mental abacus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 134–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel’s Horn. (2021, January 23). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabriel%27s_Horn

  • Giaquinto, M. (1992). Visualization as a means of geometrical discovery. Mind and Language, 7, 382–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaquinto, M. (2007). Visual thinking in mathematics. Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Giaquinto, M. (2020). The epistemology of visual thinking in mathematics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2020 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/epistemology-visual-thinking/

  • Gravina, M. (2008). Drawing in movement and insights for the proof process. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 18(5–6), 564–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic. The Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 115–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J. S. (1949). The psychology of invention in the mathematics field. Princeton University Press, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, G., & Sidoli, N. (2007). Visualisation and proof: A brief survey of philosophical perspectives. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39, 73–78, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D.W., & Taimina, D. (2005/2020). Experiencing geometry: Euclidean and Non-Euclidean with history. Prentice Hall. https://projecteuclid.org/ebooks/books-by-independent-authors/Experiencing-Geometry/toc/10.3792/euclid/9781429799850. Accessed 21 Apr 2021.

  • Jackson, A. (2002). The world of blind mathematicians. Notices of the AMS, 49(10), 1246–1251.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jamnik, M. (2001). Mathematical reasoning with diagrams. CSLI Publications.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1787/1998). Critique of pure reason. Trans. by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch Snowflake. (2021, April 20). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_snowflake

  • Koichu, B. (2010). On the relationships between (relatively) advanced mathematical knowledge and (relatively) advanced problem-solving behaviours. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(2), 257–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondratieva, M. (2009a). Geometrical Sophisms and understanding of mathematical proofs. In F.-L. Lin, H. Feng-Jui, G. Hanna, & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 19 conference proceedings: Proof and proving in mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 3–8). National Taiwan Normal University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondratieva, M. (2009b). Understanding mathematics through resolution of paradoxes. In B. Sriraman, V. Freiman, & N. Lirette-Pitre (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity, creativity, and learning: Mathematics with literature, paradoxes, history, technology, and modeling (pp. 61–74). Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondratieva, M. (2011a). Geometry as a key component in the education of a skillful designer. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 5(6), 337–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondratieva, M. (2011b). The promise of interconnecting problems for enriching students' experiences in mathematics. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Special Issue on Mathematics Giftedness, 8(1–2), 355–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondratieva, M. (2011c). Basic geometric configurations and teaching Euclidian geometry. Learning and Teaching Mathematics, 10, 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondratieva, M. (2013a). Geometrical constructions in dynamic and interactive learning environment. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(3), 50–63. Special Issue: Dynamic and Interactive Learning Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondratieva, M. (2013b). Multiple proofs and in-service teachers’ training. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 156–165). Middle East Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondratieva, M., & Bergsten, C. (2021). Secondary school mathematics students exploring the connectedness of mathematics: The case of the Parabola and its Tangent in a dynamic geometry environment. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 18(1–2), 183–209. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol18/iss1/13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondratieva, M. F., & Radu, O. G. (2009). Fostering connections between the verbal, algebraic, and geometric representations of basic planar curves for students’ success in the study of mathematics. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 6(1–2), 213–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leron, U., & Zaslavsky, O. (2009). Generic proving: Reflections on scope and method. In F.-L. Lin, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Hanna, & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI study 19: Proof and proving in mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 53–58). The Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1962). From association to structure. Psychological Review, 69, 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. (2001). A diagrammatic formal system for Euclidean geometry (Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, E. (2014). Visualization in mathematics and mathematics education. In M. N. Fried & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Mathematics & mathematics education: Searching for common (pp. 193–220). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, E., & Iannone, P. (2003). Mathematicians on concept image construction: Single ‘landscape’ vs ‘your own tailor-made brain version’. In N. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. Zillox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th PME international conference (Vol. 3, pp. 365–372).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1993). Proofs without words. MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Order-5 Square Tiling. (2021, February 2). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order-5_square_tiling

  • Palais, R. S. (1999). The visualization of mathematics: Toward a mathematical exploratorium. Notices of the AMS, 46(6), 647–658.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Peitgen, H.-O., & Richter, P. H. (1986). The beauty of fractals. Images of complex dynamical systems. Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose Stairs. (2021, March 28). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_stairs

  • Penrose Triangle. (2021, March 23). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_triangle

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1971). Mental imagery and the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics: Emergence from psychology. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 205–235). Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written: A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerman, H. (2017, March 21). Non-euclidean virtual reality [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztsi0CLxmjw

  • Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S.-J., Lemon, O., & Mumma, J. (2013). Diagrams. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2013 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/diagrams/.

  • Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrodzki, M. (2020). Illustrations of non-Euclidean geometry in virtual reality. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343441981_Illustrations_of_non-Euclidean_geometry_in_virtual_reality. Accessed 21 Apr 2021.

  • Sorensen, H. K. (2010). Exploratory experimentation in experimental mathematics: A glimpse at the PSLQ algorithm. In B. Lowe & T. Muller (Eds.), PhiMSAMP. Philosophy of mathematics: Sociological aspects and mathematical practice. Texts in Philosophy (Vol. 11, pp. 341–360). London: College Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sossinski, A. (1999). Noeuds: Genèse d’une Théorie Mathématique. Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stylianou, D. (2001). On the reluctance to visualize in mathematics: Is the picture changing? In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th PME International Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 225–232).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. O. (2008). The transition to formal thinking in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. O. (2013). How humans learn to think mathematically. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565202.

  • Tall, D. O., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. O., Yevdokimov, O., Koichu, B., Whiteley, W., Kondratieva, M., & Cheng, Y.-H. (2012). The cognitive development of proof. In G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education. The 19th ICMI study (pp. 13–50). Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Totten, J. (2007). Problems of the week, Ottawa, ATOM: CMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, E. C. (2009). Operative proof in elementary mathematics. In F.-L. Lin, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Hanna, & M. DeVilliers (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI study 19: Proof and proving in mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 251–256). National Taiwan Normal University press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education and the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland (MUN), St. John’s, NL, Canada

    Margo Kondratieva

Authors
  1. Margo Kondratieva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margo Kondratieva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Anthropology, Victoria College, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Marcel Danesi

Section Editor information

  1. School of Computer and Electrical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel

    Dan Vilenchik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kondratieva, M. (2022). Trusting Your Own Eyes: Visual Constructions, Proofs, and Fallacies in Mathematics. In: Danesi, M. (eds) Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03945-4_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation