Abstract
[Psychological theories explain judgments and decisions and specify the processes underlying them. Judgments and decisions can take into account a lot or a little information; they can be fast or slow; and they can be based on conscious thought or on routines.
Various factors can exert undesirable influences on judgments and decisions in sport. These include prior knowledge, audience noise, and the judgments and decisions of others. For example, studies in sports psychology suggest that earlier decisions of sports officials influence later decisions; that sports officials’ judgments are more severe when spectators are noisy; and that members of panels of judges are influenced by the judgments of other members.
Judgments and decisions in sport can be improved through interventions. A basic scientific understanding of the respective judgment or decision process is helpful for this purpose.]
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, K. J., & Pierce, D. A. (2009). Officiating bias: The effect of foul differential on foul calls in NCAA basketball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 686–694.
Balafoutas, L., Chowdhury, S. M., & Plessner, H. (2019). Applications of sports data to study decision making [Special Issue]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75(Part B).
Baldo, M. V. C., Ranvaud, R. D., & Morya, E. (2002). Flag errors in soccer games: The flash-lag effect brought to real life. Perception, 31, 1205–1210.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Bar-Eli, M., Avugos, S., & Raab, M. (2006). Twenty years of “hot hand” research. The hot hand phenomenon: Review and critique. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 525–553.
Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Bennis, W. M., & Pachur, T. (2006). Fast and frugal heuristic in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 611–629.
Betsch, T. (2008). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 3–22). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Betsch, T., Funke, J., & Plessner, H. (2011). Denken—Urteilen, Entscheiden, Problemlösen [Thinking—Judging, decision-making, problem-solving]. Springer.
Boen, F., Van Hoye, K., Vanden Auweele, Y., Feys, J., & Smits, T. (2008). Open feedback in gymnastic judging causes conformity bias based on informational influencing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 621–628.
Boen, F., Vanden Auweele, Y., Claes, E., Feys, J., & De Cuyper, B. (2006). The impact of open feedback on conformity among judges in rope skipping. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 577–590.
Campell, D., & Kenny, D. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. Guilford.
Cooksey, R. W. (1996). The methodology of social judgment theory. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 141–173.
Damisch, L., Mussweiler, T., & Plessner, H. (2006). Olympic medals as fruits of comparison? Assimilation and contrast in sequential performance judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 166–178.
Darwin, C. R. (1838). This is the Question Marry Not Marry [Memorandum on marriage]. (7.1838) CUL-DAR210.8.2 (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&itemID=CUL-DAR210.8.2&pageseq=1)
Darwin, E. (1882). Reminiscences of Charles Darwin’s last years. CUL-DAR210.9 (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&itemID=CUL-DAR210.9&pageseq=16
Dawes, R. M. (1998). Behavioral decision making and judgment. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 497–548). McGraw-Hill.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.
Doherty, M. E., & Kurz, E. M. (1996). Social judgment theory. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 109–140.
Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380–417.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2010). Intuition and reasoning: A dual-process perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 313–326.
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.
Fasold, F., Memmert, D., & Unkelbach, C. (2015). A theory-based intervention to prevent calibration effects in serial sport performance evaluations. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 18, 47–52.
Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2012). Working memory capacity as controlled attention in tactical decision making. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 322–344.
Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2015). Creativity and working memory capacity in sports: working memory capacity is not a limiting factor in creative decision making amongst skilled performers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 115.
Furley, P., Schweizer, G., & Bertrams, A. (2015). The two modes of an athlete: Dual-process theories in the field of sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 8, 106–124.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). Betting on one good reason. The take the best heuristic. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & The ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 75–95). Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. MIT Press.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & The ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295–314.
Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(5), 1055–1075.
Goldstein, W. M. (2004). Social judgment theory: Applying and extending Brunswik’s probabilistic functionalism. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 37–61). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Helsen, W., & Bultynck, J. B. (2004). Physical and perceptual-cognitive demands of top-class refereeing in association football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22, 179–189.
Helsen, W., Gilis, B., & Weston, M. (2006). Errors in judging “offside” in football: Test of the optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 512–528.
Hammond, K. R., Stewart, T. R., Brehmer, B., & Steinmann, D. (1975). Social judgment theory. In M. F. Kaplan & S. Schwartz (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes (pp. 271-312). New York: Academic Press.
The International Football Association Board (IFAB). (2020). The laws of the game 2020/21. IFAB.
Johnson, J. G., & Raab, M. (2003). Take the first: Option-generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 215–229.
Jones, M. V., Paul, G. C., & Erskine, J. (2002). The impact of a team’s reputation on the decisions of association football referees. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 991–1000.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., & Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Noise—A flaw in human judgment. Little, Brown Spark.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Weasley.
Mascarenhas, D. R. D., Collins, D., & Mortimer, P. W. (2002). The art of reason versus the exactness of science in elite refereeing: comments on Plessner and Betsch (2001). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 328–333.
McCord, J. (2003). Cures that harm: unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 587, 7–30.
Memmert, D., & Roca, A. (2019). Tactical creativity and decision making in sport. In A. M. Williams & R. C. Jackson (Eds.), Anticipation and decision making in sport (pp. 203–214). Routledge.
Miller, J. B. & Sanjurjo, A. (2015, July 7). A cold shower for the hot hand fallacy. IGIER Working Paper No. 518.
Miller, J. B., & Sanjurjo, A. (2016, November 16). Surprised by the gambler’s and hot hand fallacies? A truth in the law of small numbers. IGIER Working Paper No. 552.
Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472–489.
Nevill, A. M., Balmer, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (1999). Crowd influence on decisions in association football. Lancet, 353, 1416–1416.
Oudejans, R. R. D., Verheijen, R., Bakker, F. C., Gerrits, J. C., Steinbrücken, M., & Beek, P. J. (2000). Errors in judging “offside” in football. Nature, 404, 33.
Plessner, H. (1999). Expectation biases in gymnastics judging. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, 131–144.
Plessner, H., & Betsch, T. (2001). Sequential effects in important referee decisions: The case of penalties in soccer. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 23, 254–259.
Plessner, H., & Betsch, T. (2002). Refereeing in sports is supposed to be a craft, not an art. Response to Mascarenhas, Collins, and Mortimer (2002). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 334–337.
Plessner, H., Schweizer, G., Brand, R., & O’Hare, D. (2009). A multiple-cue learning approach as the basis for understanding and improving soccer referees’ decision making. In M. Raab, J. Johnson, & H. Heekeren (Eds.), Progress in brain research: Mind and motion: The bidirectional link between thought and action (pp. 151–158). Elsevier Press.
Raab, M., Bar-Eli, M., Plessner, H., & Araújo, D. (2019). The past, present and future of research on judgment and decision making in sport. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 42, 25–32.
Raab, M., Gula, B., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). The hot hand exists in Volleyball and is used for allocation decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 81–94.
Raab, M., MacMahon, C., Avugos, S., & Bar-Eli, M. (2020). The referee’s challenge: A threshold process model for decision making in sport games. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(1), 208–228.
Schwarz, W. (2011). Compensating tendencies in penalty kick decisions of referees in professional football: Evidence from the German Bundesliga 1963-2006. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29, 441–447.
Schweizer, G., Furley, P., Rost, N., & Barth, K. (2020). Reliable measurement in sport psychology: The case of performance outcome measures. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 48, 101663.
Schweizer, G., Plessner, H., & Brand, R. (2013). Establishing standards for basketball elite referees’ decisions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25, 370–375.
Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. MIT Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Unkelbach, C., & Memmert, D. (2008). Game management, context effects, and calibration: The case of yellow cards in soccer. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 95–109.
Unkelbach, C., & Memmert, D. (2010). Crowd noise as a cue in referee decisions contributes to the home advantage. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, 483–498.
Unkelbach, C., & Memmert, D. (2014). Serial position effects in evaluative judgments. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 23, 195–200.
Unkelbach, C., Ostheimer, V., Fasold, F., & Memmert, D. (2012). A calibration explanation of serial position effects in evaluative judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions, 119, 103–113.
Vanden Auweele, Y., Boen, F., De Geest, A., & Feys, F. (2004). Judging bias in synchronized swimming: Open feedback leads to non-performance-based conformity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 561–571.
Vaughn, B. K., Lee, H.-Y., & Kamata, A. (2012). Reliability. In R. C. Eklund, G. Tenenbaum, & A. Kamata (Eds.), Measurement in sport and exercise psychology. Human Kinetics.
Wigton, R. S. (1996). Social judgement theory and medical judgment. Thinking and Reasoning, 2, 175–190.
Williams, A. M., & Jackson, R. J. (Eds.). (2019). Anticipation and decision making in sport. Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schweizer, G., Plessner, H., MacMahon, C. (2023). Judgment and Decision-Making. In: SchĂĽler, J., Wegner, M., Plessner, H., Eklund, R.C. (eds) Sport and Exercise Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03921-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03921-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-03920-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-03921-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)