Skip to main content

Innovative PACT Activated Sludge, CAPTOR Activated Sludge, Activated Bio-Filter, Vertical Loop Reactor, and PhoStrip Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Waste Treatment in the Biotechnology, Agricultural and Food Industries

Part of the book series: Handbook of Environmental Engineering ((HEE,volume 26))

Abstract

This publication introduces some selected innovative suspended growth biological processes, such as innovative PACT activated sludge, CAPTOR activated sludge, activated bio-filter, Vertical Loop Reactor, and PhoStrip processes. The authors’ introduction includes each process system’s description, modifications, applications, limitations, design criteria, performance, and some cost data, if available. Useful glossary terms, updated references, and a current 2020 cost index table are also included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ABF:

Activated bio-filters

BOD:

Biochemical oxygen demand

CAST:

CAPTOR in activated sludge treatment

CBOD:

Carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand

COD:

Chemical oxygen demand

DAF:

Dissolved air flotation

F/M ratio:

Food-to-microorganism ratio

HRT:

Hydraulic retention time, d

MF:

Membrane filters

MG:

Million gallons

MGD:

Million gallons per day

MLSS:

Mixed liquor suspended solids

NH3-N:

Ammonia nitrogen

NO2-N:

Nitrite nitrogen

NO3-N:

Nitrate nitrogen

NSFC:

National Small Flows Clearinghouse

PAC:

Powdered activated carbon

PACE:

Effluent PAC concentration, mg/L

PACI:

Influent PAC concentration, mg/L

PACR:

Mixed liquor PAC concentration in the reactor, mg/L

PACT:

Powdered Activated Carbon Treatment

SRT:

Design solids retention time, d

TKN:

Total Kjeldahl nitrogen

TSS:

Total suspended solids

UMIST:

University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology

UNIDO:

United Nations Industrial Development Organization

USACE:

US Army Corps of Engineers

USEPA:

US Environmental Protection Agency

VLR:

Vertical Loop Reactor

WRC:

British Water Research Centre

References

  1. Wang, L. K. (1989, August). New dawn in development of adsorption technologies. In The 20th Annual Meeting of the Fine Particle Society Symposium on Activated Carbon Technology, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, L. K., & Li, Y. (2004). Sequencing batch reactors. In L. K. Wang, N. C. Pereira, & Y. T. Hung (Eds.), Biological treatment processes. Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, L. K., & Kurylko, L. (1994, October). Sequencing batch liquid treatment. U. S. Patent #. 5,354,458, U. S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, L. K., Wang, P., & Clesceri, N. L. (1995). Groundwater decontamination using sequencing batch processes. Water Treatment, 10(2), 121–134.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krofta, M., Wang, L. K., & Boutroy, M. (1984). Development of a new treatment system consisting of adsorption flotation and filtration. Report #.PBS5-20940l/AS, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, L. K., & Menon, R. (2004). Membrane bioreactor. In L. K. Wang, Y. T. Hung, & N. K. Shammas (Eds.), Advanced biological treatment processes. Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, L. K. (1974, September). Removal of organic pollutants by adsorptive bubble separation processes. In 1974 Earth Environment and Resources Conference Digest of Technical Papers, 1, 74, 56-57.

    Google Scholar 

  8. WEF and ASCE. (1992). Design of municipal wastewater treatment plants. WEF Manual of Practice No 8 and ASCE Manual and Report on Engineering Practice No. 76. WEF, Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Randall, T. L., Copa, W. M., & Dietrich, M. J. (1986, October). Leachate treatment by a powdered activated carbon process. Presented at the 59th Annual Conference of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deeny, K. J., Heidman, J. A., & Condren, A. J. (1990). Performance of activated sludge powdered activated carbon/wet air regeneration systems. EPA 600/S2-90/012, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Depuydt, K., & Amundson, R. (1991, December). Solving an ash buildup challenge. Pollution Engineering, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meidl, J. A. (1991). Personal Communication from Zimpro Passavant Environmental Systems, Inc., to P. M. Sutton.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, L. K., & Wu, Z. (2004). Activated sludge processes. In L. K. Wang, N. C. Pereira, & Y. T. Hung (Eds.), Biological treatment processes. Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. USEPA. (1993). Nitrogen control. Tech. Report # EPA/625/R-93/010, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beftens, L. (1979). Powdered activated carbon in an activated sludge unit. Journal of Effluent and Water Treatment, 9, 129.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leipzig, N. A. (1980). Effectiveness of the powdered activated carbon activated sludge system in removing ammonia from an organic chemical production wastewater. In Proceedings of the 35th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN. Ann Arbor, MI, USA. pp. 889–897.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. S. Ng and M. K. Stenstrom, Nitrification in powdered-activated carbon-activated sludge process, Journal of Environmental Engineering 113, 1285 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shammas, N. K. (1986). Interaction of temperature, pH, and biomass on the nitrification process. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 58(1), 52–59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, L. K. (1989, May). Manufacturers and distributors of activated carbons and adsorption filters. Technical Report # P917-5-89-7, Zorex Corporation, Pittsfield, MA, p 33.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Editor. (2003, December). Water & wastewater products: 2004 buyer’s guide. Environmental Protection, 163p.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Editor. (2003, December). Water & wastes digest 2004 reference guide. Water & Wastes Digest, Bolingbrook, IL. 95p.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, L. K. (1975). The adsorption of dissolved organics from industrial effluents onto activated carbon. Journal of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology, 25(7), 491–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, L. K. (1976). Adsorption, coagulation and filtration make a useful treatment combination, Part I. Water and Sewage Works, 123(12), 42–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, L. K. (1977). Adsorption, coagulation and filtration make a useful treatment combination, Part II. Water and Sewage Works, 124(1), 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, L. K. (1988, March). Treatment of potable water from Seoul, Korea by Flotation, Filtration and Adsorption. PB88-200530/AS, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, 21p.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, L. K., Wang, M. H. S., & Wang, J. (1987, March). Design, operation and maintenance of the nation’s largest physicochemical waste treatment plant (Vol. 1). Report # LIR/03-87-248, Lenox Institute of Water Technology, Lenox, MA, 183p.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, L. K., Wang, M. H. S., & Wang, J. (1987, March). Design, operation and maintenance of the nation’s largest physicochemical waste treatment plant (Vol. 2). Report # LIR/03-87/249, Lenox Institute of Water Technology, Lenox, MA, 161p.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, L. K., Wang, M. H. S., & Wang, J. (1987, March). Design operation and maintenance of the nation’s largest physicochemical waste treatment plant (Vol. 3). Report # LIR/03-87/250, Lenox Institute of Water Technology, Lenox, MA, 227p.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, L. K. (1989, May). Removal of heavy metals, chlorine and synthetic organic chemicals by Adsorption. Tech. Report # P917-5-89-8, Zorex Corporation, Pittsfield, MA, 47p.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, L. K. (1989, August). Reduction of color, odor, humic acid and toxic substances by adsorption, flotation and filtration. In Annual meeting of American Institute of Chemical Engineers, symposium on design of adsorption systems for pollution control, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 18p.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, L. K. (1955, August). The state-of-the-art technologies for water treatment and management. UNIDO Training Manual # 8-8-95, United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Vienna, Austria, 145p.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Webb, C., Black, G. M., & Atkinson, B. (Eds.). (1986). Process engineering aspects of immobilized cell systems. Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tampion, J., & Tampion, M. D. (1987). Immobilized cells: Principles and applications. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Moo-Young, M. (Ed.). (1988). Bioreactor immobilized enzymes and cells-fundamentals and applications. Elsevier Applied Science.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zobell, C. E. (1943). The effect of solid surfaces upon bacterial activity. Journal of Bacteriology, 46, 39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sublette, K. L., Snider, E. H., & Sylvester, N. D. (1982). A review of the mechanism of powdered activated carbon enhancement of activated sludge treatment. Water Research, 16, 1075.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Maigetter, R. Z., & Plister, R. M. (1975). A mixed bacterial population in a continuous culture with and without kaolinite. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 21, 173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Oakley, D. (1986). The retention of biomass in fast flowing systems. In C. Webb, O. M. Black, & B. Atkinson (Eds.), Process engineering aspects of immobilised cell systems. Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wardell, J. N., Brown, C. M., Ellwood, D. C., & Williams, A. E. (1984). Bacterial growth on inert surfaces, in Continuous Culture 8: Biotechnology, Medicine and the Environment. A. C. R. Dean, D. C. Ellwood and C. G. T. Evans, Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jewell, W. J. (1983). Anaerobic attached film expanded bed fundamentals. In Y. C. Wu & E. D. Smith (Eds.), Fixed film biological process for wastewater treatment. Noyes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shimp, R. J., & Pfaender, F. K. (1982). Effects of surface area and flow rate on marine bacterial growth in activated carbon columns. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 44, 471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Weber, W. J., Jr., Pirbazari, M., & Melson, G. L. (1978). Biological growth on activated carbon: An investigation by scanning electron microscopy. Environmental Science & Technology, 12, 817.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Heukelekian, H., & Heller, A. (1940). Relations between food concentration and surface bacterial growth. Journal of Bacteriology, 40, 547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Conn, H. J., & Conn, J. E. (1940). The stimulating effect of colloids upon the growth of certain bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology, 39, 99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Harwood, J. H., & Pirt, S. J. (1972). Quantitative aspects of growth of the methane oxidizing bacterium Methylococcus capsulatus on methane in shake flask and continuous chemostat culture. The Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 35, 597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Stotzky, G. (1966). Influence of clay minerals on microorganisms. II. Effect of various clay species, homionic clays, and other particles on bacteria. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 12, 831.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Stotzky, G., & Rem, L. T. (1966). Influence of clay minerals on microorganisms. I. Montmorillonite and kaolinite on bacteria. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 12, 547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. King, D. L., & Verma, R. D. (1968). The role of particulate substances in biotic degradation of organic waste. In Proc. 23rd Purdue Ind. Waste Conf., p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Harvey, R. W., & Young, L. Y. (1980). Enumeration of particle-bound and unattached respiring bacteria in the salt marsh environment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 40(1), 156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. LeChevallier, M. W., Cawthon, C. D., & Lee, R. G. (1988). Mechanisms of bacterial survival in chlorinated drinking water. In Proc. Int. Conf. Water Wastewater Microbiology, Irvine, CA, February 8 to 11.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Marrie, T. J., & Costerton, J. W. (1981). Prolonged survival of Serratia marcescens in chlorhexidine. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 42, 1093.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Marshall, K. C. (1980). In G. Bitton & K. C. Marshall (Eds.), Adsorption of microorganisms to soils and sediments, in Adsorption of microorganisms to Surfaces. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Henry, G., Prasad, D., & Lohaza, W. (1988). Survival of indicator Bacteria during Leaching. Presented at Joint Canadian Society of Civil Engineers-American Society of Civil Engineers Natl. Conf. on environmental Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, July 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Black, G. M., & Webb, C. (1986). An immobilization technology based on biomass support particles. In C. Webb, G. M. Black, & B. Atkinson (Eds.), Process engineering aspects of immobilized cell systems. Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. USEPA. (1989). Demonstration and evaluation of the CAPTOR process for sewage treatment. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency # PB 89-118 665/AS, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  56. USEPA. (1989, February). Project summary: Demonstration and evaluation of the CAPTOR process for sewage treatment. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, # EPA/600/S2-88/060, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cooper, P. F., Walker, I., Crabtree, H. E., & Aldred, R. P. (1986). Evaluation of the CAPTOR process for uprating an overloaded sewage works. In C. Webb, G. M. Black, & B. Atkinson (Eds.), Process engineering aspects of immobilized cell systems. Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tharp, P. E., & Frymier, M. (1986). High intensity biological systems using the captivated sludge process. Presented at 59th Water Pollut. Control Fed. Conf., Los Angeles, USA, 5–9 October.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tharp, C. E. (1988). High Rate Nitrification with CAPTOR Process, report from studies conducted by S. K. Banerji and J. N. Lin, University of Missouri, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rogalla, F., & Payraudeau, M. (1987). Tertiary nitrification with fixed biomass reactors. Presented at IAWPRC Conf., Brussels, Belgium, 24–28 November.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rogalla, F., & Jarosz, J. (1982). Upgrading high load activated sludge plants with biomass support systems—Comparison of porous carriers with fixed submersible beds. Presented at 60th Water Pollut Control Fed. Conf., Philadelphia, USA, 4–7 October.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hegemann, W. (1984). A combination of the activated sludge process with fixed film biomass to increase the capacity of waste water treatment plants. Water Science and Technology, 16, 119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Richards, S. R., Davies, M., & Hastwell, C. (1986). An evaluation of the CAPTOR process: A controllable fixed film process for wastewater treatment. In C. Webb, G. M. Black, & B. Atkinson (Eds.), Process engineering aspects of immobilized cell systems. Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Boyle, W. C., & Wallace, A. T. (1986). Status of porous biomass support systems for wastewater treatment: An innovative/alternative technology assessment. Project Summary, EPA/600/S2-86/019, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  65. USEPA. (1980). Innovative and alternative Technology Assessment Manual. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/430/9-78-009, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Smith, J. W., & Khararjian, H. A. (1982). Activated fixed film biosystems in wastewater treatment. In Proceedings of First International Conference on Fixed-Film Biological Processes, Kings Island, Ohio, USA, 20–23 April.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Park, J., Takizawa, S., Katayama, H., & Ohgaki, S. (2002). Biofilter pretreatment for the control of microfiltration membrane fouling. Water Supply, 2, 2, 193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Bohn Biofilter Corp. (2004). What is Biofiltration. Retrieved from WWW.bohnbiofilter.com/html/What_is_Biofiltration_html.

  69. Water Online. (2004). Wastewater Biofilter. Retrieved from www.wateronline.com/content/productshowcase/product.asp?

  70. Waterloo Biofilter Systems. (2004). The Future of On-Site Wastewater Treatment and Disposal. Retrieved from www.waterloo-biofilter.com.

  71. Shammas, N. K. (1987). Wastewater management and reuse in housing projects. In Water Reuse Symposium IV, Implementing Water Reuse, AWWA Research Foundation, Denver, CO, USA, pp. 1363–1378, August 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Shammas, N. K. (1982, July). An allosteric kinetic model for the nitrification process. In Proc. Tenth Annual Conference of Water Supply Improvement Association, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hunter Water. (2002, June 20). Burwood beach wastewater treatment works, PDF File, Hunter Water Web Site. Retrieved from www.hunterwater.com.au/docs/reports/Burwood%20WWTW.pdf.

  74. Metcalf and Eddy. (2003). Wastewater engineering treatment and reuse (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Vesilind, A. (2003). Wastewater treatment plant design. Water Environment Federation and IWA Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  76. NSFC. (1992, September). Technical evaluation of the vertical loop reactor process technology. USEPA Project No. WWPCRE13, Office of Water, National Small Flows Clearinghouse, Morgantown, WV.

    Google Scholar 

  77. J.M. Smith & Associates. (1991, November). Technical evaluation of the vertical loop reactor process technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Brandt, R. A., Brown, E. J., & Shaw, G. B. (1989). Innovative retrofit without federal funds: Brookville, Ohio Wastewater Treatment Facilities. In 63rd Annual Meeting of the Ohio Wastewater Pollution Control Association, 16 June.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Telephone conversations and correspondence with George Smith of Envirex and miscellaneous information provided by Envirex regarding design criteria, budget costs, etc. (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Huibrestse, G. L., Smith, C. W., Thiel, D. J., & Wittmann, J. W. (1986, June 12). Introduction to the vertical loop reactor process.

    Google Scholar 

  81. City of Willard. (2004). Waste water treatment plant. Retrieved from www.willardohio.com/wwtp.htm.

  82. U.S. Filter. (2004). Envirex products, wastewater treatment-biological treatment. Retrieved from www.usfilterenvirex.com/products/wastewater/biological.html.

  83. USACE. (2020). Civil works construction cost index system manual, 110-2-1304. US. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, p. 44, (2020-Tables Revised 31 March).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Wang, L. K., Tay, J. H., Tay, S. T. L., & Hung, Y. T. (2010). Environmental bioengineering. Humana Press. 867p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  85. Wang, L. K., Shammas, N. K., Selke, W. A., & Aulenbach, D. B. (2010). Flotation technology. Humana Press, 680p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  86. Wang, L. K., Chen, J. P., Hung, Y. T., & Shammas, N. K. (2011). Membrane and desalination technologies. Humana Press, 716p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  87. Wang, L. K., & Yang, C. T. (2014). Modern water resources engineering. Humana Press, 866p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  88. Yang, C. T., & Wang, L. K. (2015). Advances in water resources engineering. Springer, 556p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  89. Wang, L. K., Yang, C. T., & Wang, M. H. S. (2016). Advances in water resources management. Springer, 569p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  90. Wang, L. K., Wang, M. H. S., Hung, Y. T., & Shammas, N. K. (2016). Natural resources and control processes. 633p.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Wang, L. K., Hung, Y. T., & Shammas, N. K. (2010). Handbook of advanced industrial and hazardous wastes treatment. CRC Press., 1378p.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Wang, L. K., Wang, M. H. S., Hung, Y. T., Shammas, N. K., & Chen, J. P. (2018). Handbook of advanced industrial and hazardous wastes management. CRC Press., 1174p.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Wang, L. K., Wang, M. H. S., Hung, Y. T., & Shammas, N. K. (2021). Environmental and natural resources engineering. Springer Nature Switzerland, 512p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  94. Wang, L. K., Wang, M. H. S., Hung, Y. T., & Shammas, N. K. (2021). Integrated natural resources management. Springer Nature Switzerland, 447p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  95. Wang, L. K., Wang, M. H. S., & Hung, Y. T. (2021). Integrated natural resources research. Springer Nature Switzerland, 651p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  96. Wang, L. K., Wang, M. H. S., Shammas, N. K., & Aulenbach, D. B. (2021). Environmental flotation engineering. Springer Nature Switzerland, 433p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  97. Wang, L. K., & Wang, M. H. S. (2022). Innovative bioreactor landfill and its leachate and landfill gas management. In L. K. Wang, M. H. S. Wang, & Y. T. Hung (Eds.), H. A. Aziz (Consul. Ed.). Solid waste engineering and management (Vol. 3, 583–614)., Springer Nature Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence K. Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: US Yearly Average Cost Index for Utilities [83]

Appendix 1: US Yearly Average Cost Index for Utilities [83]

Year

Index

Year

Index

1967

100

1995

439.72

1968

104.83

1996

445.58

1969

112.17

1997

454.99

1970

119.75

1998

459.40

1971

131.73

1999

460.16

1972

141.94

2000

468.05

1973

149.36

2001

472.18

1974

170.45

2002

486.16

1975

190.49

2003

497.40

1976

202.61

2004

563.78

1977

215.84

2005

605.47

1978

235.78

2006

645.52

1979

257.20

2007

681.88

1980

277.60

2008

741.36

1981

302.25

2009

699.70

1982

320.13

2010

720.80

1983

330.82

2011

758.79

1984

341.06

2012

769.30

1985

346.12

2013

776.44

1986

347.33

2014

791.59

1987

353.35

2015

786.32

1988

369.45

2016

782.46

1989

383.14

2017

803.93

1990

386.75

2018

841.84

1991

392.35

2019

866.18

1992

399.07

2020

867.71

1993

410.63

2021

893.02a

1994

424.91

2022

918.91a

  1. aProjected future cost index values

Glossary

Activated bio-filter (ABF)

Activated bio-filters are a recent innovation in the biological treatment field. This process consists of the series combination of an aerobic tower (bio-cell) with wood or other packing material, followed by an activated sludge aeration tank and secondary clarifier. Settled sludge from the clarifier is recycled to the top of the tower. In addition, the mixture of wastewater and recycle sludge passing through the tower is also recycled around the tower, in a similar manner to a high-rate trickling filter. No intermediate clarifier is utilized. Forward flow passes directly from the tower discharge to the aeration tank. The use of the two forms of biological treatment combines the effects of both fixed and suspended growth processes in one system. The microorganisms formed in the fixed growth phase are passed along to the suspended growth unit, whereas the suspended growth microorganisms are recycled to the top of the fixed media unit. This combination of the two processes results in the formation of a highly stable system that has excellent performance and good settling biological floc when treating wastewaters that have variable loads.

Carrier-activated sludge processes (CAPTOR and CAST systems)

There has been a substantial interest in recent years in the potential benefits of high biomass wastewater treatment. The major obstacle for achieving this has been the inability of biosolids separation in secondary clarifiers. For the most part, this has been overcome by using various forms of support media or carriers that have the ability to attach high concentrations of aerobic bacterial growth. The increase in immobilized biomass reduces the process dependence on secondary settling basins for clarification. In such hybrid systems where attached growth coexists with suspended growth, one gets more stable systems which possess the combined advantages of both fixed and suspended growth reactors.

PACT activated sludge process

The powdered activated carbon (PAC) activated sludge system is a process modification of the activated sludge process. PAC is added to the aeration tank where it is mixed with the biological solids. The mixed liquor solids are settled and separated from the treated effluent. In a gravity clarifier, polyelectrolyte will normally be added prior to the clarification step to enhance solids-liquid separation. If phosphorus removal is necessary, alum is often added at this point also. Even with polyelectrolyte addition, tertiary filtration is normally required to reduce the level of effluent suspended solids. The clarifier underflow solids are continuously returned to the aeration tank. A portion of the carbon-biomass mixture is wasted periodically to maintain the desired solids inventory in the system.

PhoStrip process

“PhoStrip” is a combined biological-chemical precipitation process based on the use of activated sludge microorganisms to transfer phosphorus from incoming wastewater to a small concentrated substream for precipitation. The activated sludge is subjected to anoxic conditions to induce phosphorus release into the substream and to provide phosphorus uptake capacity when the sludge is returned to the aeration tank. Settled wastewater is mixed with return activated sludge in the aeration tank. Under aeration, sludge microorganisms can be induced to take up dissolved phosphorus in excess of the amount required for growth. The mixed liquor then flows to the secondary clarifier where liquid effluent, now largely free of phosphorus, is separated from the sludge and discharged. A portion of the phosphorus-rich sludge is transferred from the bottom of the clarifier to a thickener-type holding tank: the phosphate stripper. The settling sludge quickly becomes anoxic and, thereupon, the organisms surrender phosphorus, which is mixed into the supernatant. The phosphorus-rich supernatant, a low-volume, high-concentration substream, is removed from the stripper and treated with lime for phosphorus precipitation. The thickened sludge, now depleted in phosphorus, is returned to the aeration tank for a new cycle.

Vertical Loop Reactor (VLR)

A Vertical Loop Reactor (VLR) is an activated sludge biological treatment process similar to an oxidation ditch. The wastewater in an oxidation ditch circulates in a horizontal loop; the water in a VLR circulates in a vertical loop around a horizontal baffle. A typical VLR consists of an 18 ft deep concrete or steel basin with a horizontal baffle extending the entire width of the reactor and most of its length. Operating basins are reported to have sidewall depths which range from approximately 10–22 ft. The length and width of the VLR are determined by the required capacity but, as a rule, the length is at least twice the width. The baffle is generally 5–11 ft below the surface of the water. Because a VLR is typically deeper than an oxidation ditch, the VLR requires less land area.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, L.K., Wang, MH.S., Shammas, N.K. (2022). Innovative PACT Activated Sludge, CAPTOR Activated Sludge, Activated Bio-Filter, Vertical Loop Reactor, and PhoStrip Processes. In: Wang, L.K., Wang, MH.S., Hung, YT. (eds) Waste Treatment in the Biotechnology, Agricultural and Food Industries. Handbook of Environmental Engineering, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03591-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics