Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Geotechnical Engineers in Sustainable Construction Processes: A Regard to Soil-Structure Interaction Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Development Approaches

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 243))

  • 246 Accesses

Abstract

Sustainability-related issues became more and more important in these last decades owing to the increasing awareness in modern societies of the limitedness of the resources at the global planetary scale. Environmental resources, in particular, play a key role in this perspective since (i) they are hardly recoverable and (ii) their uncontrolled consumption may trigger complex chains of events, with potentially catastrophic consequences. In technological advanced societies like ours, the Engineering contribution is essential to correctly deal with these problems, and engineers (both scientists and practitioners) cannot disregard these topics. With reference to Built Environment, the contribution of Geotechnical Engineers can in particular give relevant positive benefits, since Geotechnical works very often involve large (or very large) soil volumes, and are in general conceived as long-lasting (if not permanent) interventions. In the paper, with specific reference to soil-structure interaction problems, some general considerations are presented, by putting in evidence the contribution that Geotechnical Engineers can give to the design process, since its early stages. Several examples of recent case studies will be reviewed, with reference to the protection of historic and cultural heritage, to slope stabilizing interventions, to the protection of strategic infrastructures like buried pipelines, in particular by employing innovative upscaling approaches based on the “macroelement” concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brown RL (1981) Building a sustainable society. Norton, New York, W.W

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brundtland GH (1987) Our common future: report of the World Commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basu D, Misra A, Puppala AJ (2015) Sustainability and geotechnical engineering: Perspectives and review. Can Geotech J 52(1):96–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, VII I(2):1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Storesund R, Messe J, Kim Y (2008) Life cycle impacts for concrete retaining walls vs. bioengineered slopes. Proc Geo Congr 2008 Geotech Spec Publ No. 178 109(310):875–882. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/40971

  6. Spaulding C, Masse F, La Brozzi J (2008) Ground improvement technologies for a sustainable world. Proc Geo Congr 2008 Geotech Spec Publ No. 178 111(310):891–898. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/40971

  7. Holt DGA, Jefferson I, Braithwaite PA, Chapman DN (2009) Embedding sustainability into geotechnics. Part A: Methodology. Proc Inst Civ Eng 163(3):127–135. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.2010.163.3.127

  8. Holt DGA (2011) Sustainable assessment for geotechnical projects. Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  9. Long JCS, Amadei B, Bardet J-P, Christian JT, Glaser SD, Goodings DJ, Kavazanjian E, Major DW, Mitchell JK et al (2009) Geological and geotechnical engineering in the new millennium: opportunities for research and technological innovation. Report of the Committee on Geological and Geotechnical Engineering in the New Millennium; Opportunities for Research and Technological Innovation, Committee on Geological and Geotechnical Engineering, National Research Council, The National Academic Press, Washington, D.C. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11558.html

  10. Pantelidou H, Nicholson D, Gaba A (2012) Sustainable geotechnics. Man Geotech Eng, vol 1. Institute of Civil Engineers, UK

    Google Scholar 

  11. Iai S (ed) (2011) Towards global sustainability. Springer, In Geotechnics and earthquake geotechnics towards global sustainability

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amorosi A (2020) The contribution of constitutive modelling to sustainable geotechnical engineering: examples and open issues. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica 2:5–25

    Google Scholar 

  13. Montrasio L, Nova R (1988) Assestamenti di una fondazione modello sotto carico inclinato: risultati sperimentali e modellazione matematica. Riv Ital Di Geotec 22(1):35–49

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nova R, Montrasio L (1991) Settlements of shallow foundations on sand. Géotechnique 41(2):243–256. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1991.41.2.243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Butterfield R, Gottardi G (1994) A complete three-dimensional failure envelope for shallow footings on sand. Gètechnique 44(1):181–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Butterfield R, Houlsby GT, Gottardi G (1997) Standardized sign conventions and notation for generally loaded foundations. Géotechnique 47(5):1051–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gottardi G, Houlsby GT, Butterfield R (1999) Plastic response of circular footings on sand under general planar loading. Géotchnique 49(4):453–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cremer C, Pecker A, Davenne L (2001) Cyclic macro-element for soil-structure interac-tion: material and geometrical non-linearities. Int J Numer An-Alytical Methods Geomech 25(13):1257–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cremer C, Pecker A, Davenne L (2002) Modelling of nonlinear dynamic behavior of a shal-low strip foundation with macro-element. J Earthquake Eng 06:175–211

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bienen B, Byrne BW, Houlsby GT, Cassidy MJ (2006) Investigating six-degree-of-freedom loading of shallow foundation on sand. Géotechnique 56(6):367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gourvenec S (2007) Shape effects on the capacity of rectangular footings under general loading. Géotechnique 57(8):637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gouvernec S (2007) Failure envelopes for offshore shallow foundations under general loading. Géotechnique 57(9):715–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grange S (2008) Modélisation simplifiée 3D de l’interaction sol-structure: application au génie parasismique. PhD Thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble - INPG, 2008. Français

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grange S, Kotronis P, Mazars J (2008) A macro-element for a circular foundation to simu-late 3D soil-structure interaction. Int J Num Anal Meth Geomech 32:1205–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. di Prisco C, Nova R, Sibilia A (2003) Shallow footing under cyclic loading: experimental behaviour and constitutive modelling. In: Maugeri M, Nova R (eds) Geotechnical analysis of the seismic vulnerability of historical monuments, Patron, Bologna, pp 99–122

    Google Scholar 

  26. di Prisco C, Massimino MR, Maugeri M, Nicolosi N, Nova R (2006) Cyclic numerical analyses of Noto Cathedral: soil-structure interaction modelling. Riv Ital Di Geo-Tec 2:49–64

    Google Scholar 

  27. di Prisco C, Vecchiotti M (2006) A rheological model for the description of boulder impacts on granular strata. Géotechnique 56(7):469–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Paolucci R (1997) Simplified evaluation of earthquake-induced permanent displacements of shallow foundations. J Earthquake Eng 1(3):563–579

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paolucci R, Pecker A (1997) Seismic bearing capacity of shallow strip foundations on dry soils. Soils Found 37:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Figini R (2010) Non-linear dynamic soil-structure interaction: application to seismic analy-sis and design of structures on shallow foundations. PhD Thesis, Department of Structural Engineering, Politecnico di Milano

    Google Scholar 

  31. Figini R, Paolucci R, Chatzigogos C (2012) A macro-element model for non-linear soil-shallow foundation-structure interaction under seismic loads: Theoretical development and experimental validation on large scale tests. Earthq Eng Struct Dy-Namics 41(3):475–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Salciarini D, Tamagnini C (2009) A hypoplastic macroelement model for shallow founda-tions under monotonic and cyclic loads. Acta Geotech 4(3):163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Niemunis A, Herle I (1997) Hypoplastic model for cohesionless soils with elastic strain range. Mech Cohes Frict Mater 2:279–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Galli A (2020) Macroelement approaches for geotechnical problems: a promising design framework? Riv Ital Di Geotec 2020(2):26–49

    Google Scholar 

  35. Magnani R (2014) La Missione segreta di Leonardo da Vinci, vol. 1 (in Italian) Asciano, Italy: Io sono edizioni

    Google Scholar 

  36. Galli A, Martinelli P (2016) Experimental characterization and numerical investigation on the Azzone Visconti bridge in Lecco (Italy). Procedia Eng 158:158–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Martinelli P, Galli A, Barazzetti L, Colombo M, Felicetti R, Previtali M, Roncoroni F, Scola M, di Prisco M (2018) Bearing capacity assessment of a 14th century arch bridge in Lecco (Italy). Int J Arch Herit 12(2):237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zani G, Martinelli P, Galli A, Gentile C, di Prisco M (2019) Seismic assessment of a 14th-century Stone Arch Bridge: role of soil-structure interaction. J Bridg Eng 24(7)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zani G, Martinelli P, Galli A, di Prisco M (2020) Three-dimensional modelling of a multi-span masonry arch bridge: Influence of soil compressibility on the structural response under vertical static loads Engineering Structures 221:110998

    Google Scholar 

  40. Galli A, di Prisco C (2013) Displacement-based design procedure for slope-stabilizing piles. Can Geotech J 50(1):41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Galli A, Maiorano RMS, di Prisco C, Aversa S (2017) Design of slope-stabilizing piles: from ultimate limit state approaches to displacement based methods. Riv Ital Di Geotec 51(3):77–93

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kourkoulis R, Gelagoti F, Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G (2012) Hybrid method for analysis and design of slope stabilizing piles. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 138(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Galli A, Bassani A (2018) Innovative performance-based design of slope stabilizing piles for a railway embankment. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 22(1):99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cocchetti G, di Prisco C, Galli A, Nova R (2009) Soil-pipeline interaction along unstable slopes: a coupled three-dimensional approach. Part 1: Theoretical formulation. Can Ge-Otechnical J 46(11):1289–1304

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cocchetti G, di Prisco C, Galli A (2009) Soil-pipeline interaction along unstable slopes: a coupled three-dimensional approach. Part 2: Numerical analyses. Can Ge-Otechnical J 46(11):1305–1321

    Google Scholar 

  46. Galli A (2005) Mechanical interaction between buried pipelined and landslides: small scale experimental analyses, numerical modelling and case studies. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Structural Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Andrea Galli

Authors
  1. Andrea Galli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Galli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Management in the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Elham Maghsoudi Nia

  2. Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, MAHSA University, Jenjarom, Selangor, Malaysia

    Iman Farshchi

  3. School of Strategic and Global Studies Building, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Lin Yola

  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia

    Mokhtar Awang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Galli, A. (2022). The Role of Geotechnical Engineers in Sustainable Construction Processes: A Regard to Soil-Structure Interaction Problems. In: Nia, E.M., Farshchi, I., Yola, L., Awang, M. (eds) Sustainable Development Approaches. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 243. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99979-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99979-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99978-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99979-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation