Skip to main content

Predatory Journals and Conferences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrity of Scientific Research

Abstract

The adjective “predatory,” referred to scientific publications, presentations, and conferences, is currently used to identify entities that prioritize self-interest at the expense of the ethical codes that rule scientific divulgation. The profit-driven behavior that predatory publishers adopt exploits the open access publishing system and is characterized by deviation from best editorial practices, lack of transparency, spread of false or misleading information and intrusive solicitation practices. The number of predatory journals and conferences is worryingly high as is the income that predatory publishers and conferences organizers are getting from these deceitful practices. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon to find scholars who try to take career and curricula advantages by joining predatory practices through the publication of articles or the acceptance of an editorial board membership. Choosing a trustable journal to publish or discerning a dependable conference organizing body is not always easy. This chapter analyzes the main characteristics of predatory publishing and examines the several distinctive features and tools that can help scholars in the process of recognizing and avoiding predatory organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Butterworth JF, Vetter TR (2019) Predatory journals undermine peer review and cheapen scholarship. Anesth Analg 128:11–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beall J (2012) Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 489:179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grudniewicz A, Moher D, Cobey KD (2019) Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. Nature 576(7786):210–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen C, Björk BC (2015) “Predatory” open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med 13:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Court rules in FTC’s favor against predatory academic publisher OMICS Group; Imposes $50.1 million judgment against defendants that made false claims and hid publishing fees. Federal Trade Commission. ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2019/04/court-rules-ftcs-favor-against-predatory-academic-publisher-omics. Accessed 6 Jun 2021

  6. Manca A, Cugusi L, Cortegiani A, Ingoglia G, Moher D, Deriu F (2020) Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding. BMJ 371:m4265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yan JR, Baldawi H, Lex JR, Simchovich G, Baisi LP, Bozzo A, Ghert M (2018) Predatory publishing in orthopaedic research. J Bone Jt Surg 100(21):e138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Manca A, Martinez G, Cugusi L, Dragone D, Dvir Z, Deriu F (2017) The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology. Neuroscience 353:166–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cortegiani A, Longhini F, Sanfilippo F, Raineri SM, Gregoretti C, Giarratano A (2019) Predatory open-access publishing in anesthesiology. Anesth Analg 128:182–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Kelly F, Fernandez N, Koyle MA (2019) Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency?—a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol 15:159.e1–159.e7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cortegiani A, Sanfilippo F, Tramarin J, Giarratano A (2019) Predatory open-access publishing in critical care medicine. J Crit Care 50:247–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cortegiani A, Garofalo E, Bruni A, Sanfilippo F, Longhini F (2019) Predatory open-access publishing in palliative and supportive care. J Pain Symptom Manag 57:e1–e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manca A, Martinez G, Cugusi L, Dragone D, Mercuro G, Deriu F (2017) Predatory open access in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 98:1051–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rupp M, Anastasopoulou L, Wintermeyer E, Malhaan D, El Khassawna T, Heiss C (2019) Predatory journals: a major threat in orthopaedic research. Int Orthop 43:509–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Forero DA, Oermann MH, Manca A, Deriu F, Mendieta-Zerón H, Dadkhah M, Bhad R, Deshpande SN, Wang W, Cifuentes MP (2018) Negative effects of “predatory” journals on global health research. Ann Glob Heal 84:584–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cortegiani A, Misseri G, Gregoretti C, Einav S, Giarratano A (2019) The challenge of the predatory open-access publishing outbreak. Eur J Anaesthesiol 36:810–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sorokowski P, Kulczycki E, Sorokowska A, Pisanski K (2017) Predatory journals recruit fake editor. Nature 543:481–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruiter-Lopez L, Lopez-Leon S, Forero DA (2019) Predatory journals: do not judge journals by their editorial board members. Med Teach 41:691–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cortegiani A, Catalisano G, Ippolito M, Giarratano A, Absalom AR, Einav S (2021) Retracted papers on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Br J Anaesth 126:e155–e156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cobey KD, Grudniewicz A, Lalu MM, Rice DB, Raffoul H, Moher D (2019) Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey. BMJ Open 9(3):e026516

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pond BB, Brown SD, Stewart DW, Roane DS, Harirforoosh S (2019) Faculty applicants’ attempt to inflate CVs using predatory journals. Am J Pharm Educ 83(1):7210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hedding DW (2019) Payouts push professors towards predatory journals. Nature 565:267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frandsen TF (2019) Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature. Learn Publ 32:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moher D, Srivastava A (2015) You are invited to submit… . BMC Med 13:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mercier E, Tardif PA, Moore L, Le Sage N, Cameron PA (2018) Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience. Postgrad Med J 94:104–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gutierrez FRS, Beall J, Forero DA (2015) Spurious alternative impact factors: the scale of the problem from an academic perspective. BioEssays 37:474–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moher D, Shamseer L, Cobey K et al (2017) Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature 549:23–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. More than 5,000 German scientists have published papers in pseudo-scientific journals. ndr.de/der_ndr/presse/More-than-5000-German-scientists-have-published-papers-in-pseudo-scientific-journals,fakescience178.html. Accessed 6 Jun 2021

  29. Bagues M, Sylos-Labini M, Zinovyeva N (2019) A walk on the wild side: ‘predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations. Res Policy 48:462–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Severin A, Low N (2019) Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases. Int J Public Health 64:1123–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Manca A, Moher D, Cugusi L, Dvir Z, Deriu F (2018) How predatory journals leak into PubMed. CMAJ 190:E1042–E1045

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Manca A, Cugusi L, Dvir Z, Deriu F (2017) PubMed should raise the bar for journal inclusion. Lancet 390:734–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cortegiani A, Ippolito M, Ingoglia G et al (2020) Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus project. F1000Research 9:415

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Cortegiani A, Manca A, Giarratano A (2020) Predatory journals and conferences: why fake counts. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 33:192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cobey KD, Lalu MM, Skidmore B, Ahmadzai N, Grudniewicz A, Moher D (2018) What is a predatory journal? A scoping review. F1000Research 7:1001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Shamseer L, Moher D, Maduekwe O, Turner L, Barbour V, Burch R, Clark J, Galipeau J, Roberts J, Shea BJ (2017) Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Med 15:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Strinzel M, Severin A, Milzow K, Egger M (2019) Blacklists and whitelists to tackle predatory publishing: a cross-sectional comparison and thematic analysis. MBio 10(3):e00411-19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cabell’s International - About. cabells.com/about. Accessed 9 Jun 2021

  39. Murphy JA (2019) Predatory publishing and the response from the scholarly community. Ser Rev 45:73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cabell’s International - About predatory reports. cabells.com/about-predatory. Accessed 9 Jun 2021

  41. Directory of Open Access Journals. doaj.org/. Accessed 7 Jun 2021

  42. Think. Check. Submit. thinkchecksubmit.org/. Accessed 7 Jun 2021

  43. Cortegiani A, Shafer SL (2018) “Think. Check. Submit.” to avoid predatory publishing. Crit Care 22:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  44. Home. DORA. sfdora.org/. Accessed 7 Jun 2021

  45. Cobey KD, De Costa E, Silva M, Mazzarello S, Stober C, Hutton B, Moher D, Clemons M (2017) Is this conference for real? Navigating presumed predatory conference invitations. J Oncol Pract 13:410–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Asadi A (2019) Invitation to speak at a conference: the tempting technique adopted by predatory conferences’ organizers. Sci Eng Ethics 25:975–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lang R, Mintz M, Krentz HB, Gill MJ (2019) An approach to conference selection and evaluation: advice to avoid “predatory” conferences. Scientometrics 118:687–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Check - Think Check Attend. thinkcheckattend.org/check/. Accessed 24 Jun 2021

  49. Think Check Attend. thinkcheckattend.org/. Accessed 24 Jun 2021

  50. Conference checker - Think Check Attend. thinkcheckattend.org/conference-checker/. Accessed 24 Jun 2021

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Dr. Antonio Corrado (experienced physician and illustrator) for providing the figure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Cortegiani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cortegiani, A., Catalisano, G., Manca, A. (2022). Predatory Journals and Conferences. In: Faintuch, J., Faintuch, S. (eds) Integrity of Scientific Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99679-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99680-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics