Abstract
Recently, many universities have shifted to online teaching and learning employing synchronous teaching apps. Such practice is a logical consequence to respond to the needs of students in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic; however, not much has been known about its effects on students’ experience. Particularly, given the lack of physical presence, it is worthy to explore how online teaching and learning may influence classroom interaction, students’ willingness to communicate (WTC) in second language (L2) English, and classroom enjoyment in English Medium Instruction (EMI) higher education context. This study explores students’ views and experience in relation to these three aspects by comparing online and face-to-face classes. Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were conducted with four students in an EMI taught postgraduate programme at a university in Hong Kong. These students experienced half of their courses conducted in a face-to-face mode and half in an online synchronous mode throughout an academic year. Results indicated more teacher-student interactions and heightened WTC mostly due to a lower level of anxiety. However, students reported less opportunities for peer interactions and had mixed views on classroom enjoyment. Implications are discussed in relation to how teachers can improve students’ learning experience in EMI classes conducted using online technology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
An, J., & Thomas, N. (2021). Students’ beliefs about the role of interaction for science learning and language learning in EMI science classes: Evidence from high schools in China. Linguistics and Education, 65, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100972
An, J., Macaro, E., & Childs, A. (2021). Classroom interaction in EMI high schools: Do teachers who are native speakers of English make a difference? System, 98, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102482
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002
Cao, Y., & Wei, W. (2019). Willingness to communicate from an English as an International Language (EIL) perspective: The case of Macau. System, 87, 102–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102149
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
Dewaele, J.-M., & Dewaele, L. (2018). Learner-internal and learner-external predictors of willingness to communicate in the FL classroom. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 2(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.37
Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237–274. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.5
Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety: The right and left feet of FL learning? In P. D. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 215–236). Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44(3), 449–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01114.x
Fraschini, N., & Tao, Y. (2021). Emotions in online language learning: Exploratory findings from an ab initio Korean course. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1968875
Freiermuth, M. R., & Huang, H.-C. (2012). Bringing Japan and Taiwan closer electronically: A look at an intercultural online synchronic chat task and its effect on motivation. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811423341
Kissau, S., McCullough, H., & Pyke, J. G. (2010). Leveling the playing field: The effects of online second language instruction on student willingness to communicate in French. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 277–297.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
Le, T. V., Cunningham, U., & Watson, K. (2018). The relationship between willingness to communicate and social presence in an online English language course. JALT CALL Journal, 14(1), 43–59.
Lee, J. S. (2020). The role of grit and classroom enjoyment in EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1746319
Lee, J. S., Xie, Q., & Lee, K. (2021). Informal digital learning of English and L2 willingness to communicate: Roles of emotions, gender, and educational stage. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1918699
Li, C., Jiang, G., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2018). Understanding Chinese high school students’ foreign language enjoyment: Validation of the Chinese version of the Foreign Language Enjoyment scale. System, 76, 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.06.004
Lingnan University. (2020, June 24). LU study reveals over 60% of Hong Kong university students have found online learning not as effective as face-to-face teaching during COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.ln.edu.hk/news/20200624/lu-study-reveals-over-60-of-hong-kong-university-students-have-found-online-learning-not-as-effective-as-face-to-face-teaching-during-covid-19-pandemic/
Lo, Y. Y. (2015). How much L1 is too much? Teachers’ language use in response to students’ abilities and classroom interaction in Content and Language Integrated Learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(3), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.988112
Long, M. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.x
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004027
Maleki, Z., & Pazhakh, A. (2012). The effects of pre modified input, interactionally modified input, and modified output on EFL learners’ comprehension of new vocabularies. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(1), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v1n1p128
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interactions and second language learning. Routledge.
Querol-Julián, M. (2021). How does digital context influence interaction in large live online lectures? The case of English-medium instruction. European Journal of English Studies, 25(3), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1988265
Querol-Julián, M., & Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2019). The impact of online technologies and English medium instruction on university lectures in international learning contexts: A systematic review. ESP Today, 7(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2019.7.1.1
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.
Tomita, Y., & Spada, N. (2013). Form-focused instruction and learner investment in L2 communication. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 591–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12031.x
Tsui, A. B. M., & Tavares, N. J. (2021). The technology cart and the pedagogy horse in online teaching. English Teaching and Learning, 45(1), 109–118.
United Nations. (2020, August). Policy brief: Education during COVID-19 and beyond. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/08/sg_policy_brief_covid-19_and_education_august_2020.pdf
Yip, D. Y. (2004). Questioning skills for conceptual change in science instruction. Journal of Biological Education, 38(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655905
Young, B. (2022, Jan 31). Hong Kong universities taking the chance to innovate and upskill as Covid-19 drives online and mixed-mode learning. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/special-reports/article/3163077/hong-kong-universities-taking-chance-innovate-and-upskill-covid-19
Zacharias, N. T. (2012). Qualitative research methods for second language education: A coursebook. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fung, D. (2022). Students’ Experience in Online Teaching and Learning: An Investigation into EMI Classroom Interaction, Willingness to Communicate and Classroom Enjoyment. In: Pun, J.K.H., Curle, S., Yuksel, D. (eds) The Use of Technology in English Medium Education. English Language Education, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99622-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99622-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99621-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99622-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)