Skip to main content

Perspectives on the Applicability of Nexus Thinking to Private Protected Areas: A Case Study of Mokolodi Nature Reserve, Botswana

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Southern African Perspectives on Sustainable Tourism Management

Part of the book series: Geographies of Tourism and Global Change ((GTGC))

  • 332 Accesses

Abstract

Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) has gained international attention for reconciling common pool resource management with the needs and aspirations of the local people. In Botswana, CBNRM was introduced in the late 1980s through the support of USAID. This marked a paradigm shift towards the management and utilisation of public protected resources. The strategy generated socio-economic and ecological benefits to once marginalised communities, improving livelihoods and biodiversity conservation. Despite CBNRM achievements, its applicability is limited to common-pool resources. There is a dearth of literature indicating how the CBNRM principle has been applied to privately owned resources surrounded by communities and their commons, hence the search for models that recognised and forged mutually beneficial linkages for sustainable co-existence of the common and private property resource management regimes. This is particularly important considering that the prospects of protected conservation area ecotourism – private or communal – revolve around building mutually shared beneficial linkages. The chapter establishes stakeholders’ perceptions on the opportunities and challenges of applying Nexus Thinking (NT) to the relationship among conservation, ecotourism and local livelihoods with respect to a privately owned Mokolodi Nature Reserve (MNR) in Botswana. It is thus conceptualised that conservation, livelihoods and ecotourism form a complex system linked by multiple interacting components (see Fig. 11.1). Data was collected from the stakeholders to MNR using key informant interviews. The study found out that mutually beneficial linkages existed between the MNR as a protected area and the local community. The noted key perceptions include: interactive, promote collective thinking, and empower the local community. On the contrary, few informants perceived NT model rather abstract and required further assessment to refine it. Nonetheless, the NT model as an interactive and innovative framework can deliberately or by design be used in the management of privately protected resources for sustainable socio-economic and ecological benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, W. M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., & Wolmer, W. (2004). Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science, 306(5699), 1146–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. (2005). Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management, 35(6), 703–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arntzen, J., Buzwani, B., Setlhogile, T., Kgathi, D., & Motsolapheko, M. (2007). Community-based resource management, rural livelihoods and environmental sustainability. Centre for Applied Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazilian, M., Rogner, H., Howells, M., Hermann, S., Arent, D., Gielen, D., & Tol, R. S. (2011). Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7896–7906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, D., Gain, A., & Rouillard, J. (2015). Water governance in a comparative perspective: From IWRM to a ‘nexus’ approach? Water Alternatives, 8(1), 753–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, M., & Phillips, A. (2000). Landscape stewardship: New directions in conservation of nature and culture. The George Wright Forum, 17(1), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizikova, L., Roy, D., Swanson, D., Venema, H. D., & McCandless, M. (2013). The water-energy-food security nexus: Towards a practical planning and decision-support framework for landscape investment and risk management. International Institute for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P. (2006). Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development, 34(11), 1942–1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSO. (2011). 2011 Botswana population and housing census. Statistics Botswana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistics Office (CSO). (2018). Population and housing census 2011: Analytical report. www.cso.gov.bw/cso

  • Christian, M., Fernandez-Stark, K., Ahmed, G., & Gereffi, G. (2011). The tourism global value chain: Economic upgrading and workforce development. Skills for Upgrading, 276–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotti, R., & Misrahi, T. (2017). The travel and tourism competitiveness report 2017: Paving the way for a more sustainable and inclusive future. World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper, R. (2005). Approaches to globalisation and inequality within the international system. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorges, P. A., & Reilly, B. K. (2009). The realities of community-based natural resource management and biodiversity conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability, 1, 734–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Botswana (GoB). (2001). Botswana national atlas. Government Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Botswana (GoB). (2007). Community based natural resources management policy. Government paper N0. 2 of 2007. Government Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenfeldt, D. (2010). The next nexus: Environmental ethics, water management and climate change. Water Alternatives, 3(3), 575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius, C., & Collins, S. (2007). Community based natural resources management governing the commons. Water Policy, 9, 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoole, A. F. (2008). Community-based conservation and protected areas in Namibia: Social-ecological linkages for biodiversity. Thesis, University of Manitoba, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, K., & Pittock, J. (2012). The energy-water nexus: Managing the links between energy and water for a sustainable future. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 31. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss1/art31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., & Anderson, J. (1993). Conducting interorganisational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1633–1651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laderchi, C. R., Saith, R., & Stewart, F. (2003). Does it matter that we do not agree on the definition of poverty? A comparison of four approaches. Oxford Development Studies, 31(3), 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leck, H., Conway, D., Bradshaw, M., & Rees, J. (2015). Tracing the water–energy–food nexus: Description, theory and practice. Geography Compass, 9(8), 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matseketsa, G., Chibememe, G., Muboko, N., Gandiwa, E., & Takarinda, K. (2018). Towards an understanding of conservation-based costs, benefits, and attitudes of local people living adjacent to Save Valley Conservancy, Zimbabwe. Scientifica. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6741439

  • Mbaiwa, J. E. (2011). The effects of tourism development on the sustainable utilisation of natural resources in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(3), 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbaiwa, J. E., Stronza, A., & Kreuter, U. (2011). From collaboration to conservation: Insights from the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Society and Natural Resources, 24, 400–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbaiwa, J. E., Mbaiwa, T., & Siphambe, G. (2019). The community-based natural resource management programme in southern Africa–promise or peril? The case of Botswana. In M. Mkono (Ed.), Positive tourism in Africa (pp. 11–22). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mokolodi Wildlife Foundation. (2010). Mokolodi: Wild dogs visits Mokolodi, local fires test Mokolodi differences. Mokolodi Nature Reserve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokolodi Wildlife Foundation. (2016). Mokolodi 2016–17 annual review: Adapting in maturity. Mokolodi Nature Reserve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mopelwa, G., & Blignaut, J. (2014). The Okavango Delta: The value of tourism. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 9(1), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moswete, N., & Thapa, B. (2018). Local communities, CBOs/trusts, and People–Park relationships: A case study of the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, Botswana. The George Wright Forum, 35(1), 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphree, M. W. (1998). Congruent objectives, competing interests and strategic compromise: Concepts and process in the evolution of Zimbabwe's CAMPFIRE Programme: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, Helen, Georgia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutandwa, E., & Gadzirayi, C. T. (2007). Impact of community-based approaches to wildlife management: Case study of the CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(4), 336–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyaupane, G. P., & Poudel, S. (2011). Linkages among biodiversity, livelihood, and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1344–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phuthego, T., & Chanda, R. (2004). Traditional ecological knowledge and community-based natural resource management: Lessons from a Botswana wildlife management area. Applied Geography, 24(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., Abell, R., Brooks, T. M., Gittleman, J. L., Joppa, L. N., & Sexton, J. O. (2014). The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science, 344(6187), 124–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabaloi, B. (2006). Potential of tourism for economic development in Bostwana: And application for SAM multiplier analysis. Unpublished, MA Thesis, Department of Economics, University of Botswana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I. (1989). Society: A brief introduction. Worth-Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlossberg, S., Chase, M. J., & Sutcliffe, R. (2019). Evidence of a growing elephant poaching problem in Botswana. Current Biology Report, 29, 2222–2228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoons, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36, 171–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebele, L. S. (2010). Community-based tourism ventures, benefits and challenges: Khama rhino sanctuary trust, central district, Botswana. Tourism Management, 31(1), 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyman, S. (2013). Household spending patterns and flow ecotourism income into communities around Liwonde National Park, Malawi. Development Southern Africa, 30(4–5), 640–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, A., & Rihoy, E. (1995). The commons without a tragedy? Strategies for community based natural resource management in Southern Africa. In A review of lessons and experiences from natural resources management programme in Botswana, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Lusaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. T. (2013). Protected areas, tourism and rural community livelihoods in Botswana. Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suich, H., Howe, C., & Mace, G. (2015). Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A review of the empirical links. Ecosystem Services, 12, 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swatuk, L. A. (2005). From “project” to “context”: Community-based naural resource management in Botswana. Global Environmental polotics, 5(3), 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNWTO (United Nations World Tourism Organization). (2018). Tourism highlights. e-unwto.org. Accessed Jan 2022.

  • Water-Energy-Food. (2012). Water security: The water-food-energy-climate nexus. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTTC (World Travel & Tourism Council). (2009). Travel & tourism economic impact: Executive, summary, 2009. London, UK. Retrieved from: http://www.wttc.org/bin/pdf/original_pdf_file/exec_summary_2009.pdf

  • World Bank. (2020). The World Bank in Botswana. The World Bank partners with the government to promote private sector-led, jobs-intensive growth, strengthen human and physical assets, and support effective resource management. Retrieved from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/botswana/overview

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi N. Moswete .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maradza, J., Chanda, R., Moswete, N.N. (2022). Perspectives on the Applicability of Nexus Thinking to Private Protected Areas: A Case Study of Mokolodi Nature Reserve, Botswana. In: Saarinen, J., Lubbe, B., Moswete, N.N. (eds) Southern African Perspectives on Sustainable Tourism Management. Geographies of Tourism and Global Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99435-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99435-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99434-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99435-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics