Skip to main content

Designing an Automated Assembly Workplace in a Simulation Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Manufacturing III (MANUFACTURING 2022)

Abstract

Assembly is the most complex stage of the production process. This stage not only affects the quality and reliability of products, but also the ongoing production time, labor productivity and efficiency of the entire system. Therefore, any changes or improvements to the assembly phase need to be thoroughly tested before their implementation. This paper suggests a solution for the transition from manual to automated assembly using simulation. For this purpose, the manual assembly of cam switches is chosen. The focus is then on designing the automated workplace for the cam switches assembly. One of the key points of this paper is the use of simulation as a tool for production solutions. Using the method of quantifying assembly tasks complexity, the tasks which are suitable for further automation are defined, and the appropriate level of automation is defined too. Then the automated workplace is modelled in Tecnomatix Plant Simulation. The solution presented in this paper is relevant for process and production managers involved in planning a new assembly line or redesigning an existing one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rewers, P., Trojanowska, J., Diakun, J., et al.: A study of priority rules for a levelled production plan. In: Advances in Manufacturing, Manufacturing 2017, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 111–120. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6

  2. Varela, M.L.R., et al.: Collaborative paradigm for single-machine scheduling under just-in-time principles: total holding-tardiness cost problem. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 9(1), 90–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.24425/119404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E., De Sanctis, I., Mazzuto, G., Paciarotti, C.: The automation of an assembly system: a business process re-engineering (BPR) perspective. In: 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management, pp. 371–377, Seville, Spain (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rüssmann, M., et al.: Industry 4.0: the future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kuric, I., Kandera, M., Klarák, J., Ivanov, V., Więcek, D.: Visual product inspection based on deep learning methods. In: Tonkonogyi, V., et al. (eds.) InterPartner 2019. LNME, pp. 148–156. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40724-7_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunal, M.: Simulation and the fourth industrial revolution. In: Gunal, M.M. (ed.) Simulation for Industry 4.0. SSAM, pp. 1–17. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04137-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Zidek, K., Pitel, J., Adamek, M., Lazorik, P., Hosovsky, A.: Digital Twin of experimental smart manufacturing assembly system for Industry 4.0 concept. Sustainability 12(9), 3658 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gunal, M., Karatas, M.: Industry 4.0, digitisation in manufacturing, and simulation: a review of the literature. In: Gunal, M.M. (ed.) Simulation for Industry 4.0. SSAM, pp. 19–37. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04137-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bortolini, M., Faccio, M., Galizia, F.G., Gamberi, M., Pilati, F.: Adaptive automation assembly systems in the Industry 4.0 era: a reference framework and full–scale prototype. Appl. Sci. 11(3), 1256 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosati, G., Faccio, M., Carli, A., Rossi, A.: Fully flexible assembly systems (F-FAS): a new concept in flexible automation. Assem. Autom. 33(1), 8–21 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gunal, M.: Simulation for the better: the future in industry 4.0. In: Gunal, M.M. (ed.) Simulation for Industry 4.0. SSAM, pp. 275–283. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04137-3_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Abramova, I.G., Pronichev, N.D., Abramov, D.A., Korotenkova, T.N.: Simulation modelling of the organization of production processes of machine-building enterprises in the instrumental environment Tecnomatix Plant Simulation: laboratory practice. Samara State Aerospace University, Samara (2014). (Original in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zidek, K., et al.: CNN training using 3D virtual models for assisted assembly with mixed reality and collaborative robots. Appl. Sci. Basel 11(9), 4269 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lien, T.K.: Manual assembly. In: Laperrière, L., Reinhart, G. (eds.) The International Academy for Production Engineering. CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Malik, A.A., Bilberg, A.: Collaborative robots in assembly: a practical approach for tasks distribution. In: 52nd CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Procedia CIRP, vol. 81, pp. 665–670. Elsevier B.V. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fedorko, G., Molnar, V., Vasil, M., Hanzl, J.: Application of the Tecnomatix Plant Simulation program to modelling the handling of ocean containers using the AGV system. Naše more 65(4), 230–236 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lazar, I., Husar, J.: Validation of the serviceability of the manufacturing system using simulation. J. Effi. Responsib. Educ. Sci. 5(4), 252–261 (2012). https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2012.050407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Daneshjo, N., Malega, P.: Proposal of the reworking station model using Plant Simulation. TEM J. Technol. 10(1), 197–203 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaščak, J., et al.: Design of an atypical construction of equipment for additive manufacturing with a conceptual solution of a printhead intended for the use of recycled plastic materials. Appl. Sci. 11, 2928 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11072928

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-19-0590, by the projects KEGA 055TUKE-4/2020 granted by the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kateryna Kovbasiuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kovbasiuk, K., Balog, M., Židek, K. (2022). Designing an Automated Assembly Workplace in a Simulation Environment. In: Trojanowska, J., Kujawińska, A., Machado, J., Pavlenko, I. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing III. MANUFACTURING 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99310-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99310-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99309-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99310-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics