Skip to main content

Biomechanical Assessment of Selected Motion and Cognitive Exercises in the “Neuroforma” Rehabilitation System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovations in Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

The aim of the study was the biomechanical assessment of selected motor and cognitive exercises carried out with the use of the Neuroforma rehabilitation system. The selected parameters of the kinematics of the upper limbs’ movements during exercises with the Neuroforma system were compared with the kinematics of the movement of selected activities used in daily living. The reference group consisted of 17 adults without any musculoskeletal disorders. For the reference group, studies of the kinematics of the movement of the upper limbs were carried out using the Xsens system. Tasks performed during these activities included actions such as drinking from a cup or lifting an object on a platform. The study of the kinematics of movement of selected cognitive-motor exercises (“Paths”, “Track”) with the Neuroforma system was carried out for one healthy adult. It has been shown that the maximum value of angles and ranges of motion in the shoulder and elbow joints during exercise in the Neuroforma system is higher than in the analyzed everyday activities. Moreover, the values of the analyzed kinematic parameters do not increase linearly with the increase made in the levels of the analyzed exercises. The type and level of exercise in the system should be selected by the doctor/physiotherapist individually on the basis of the patient’s mobility capabilities, based on medical knowledge and a biomechanical assessment of movements made for specific exercises and their levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adomavičienė A, Daunoravičienė K, Kubilius R, Varžaitytė L, Raistenskis J (2019) Influence of new technologies on post-stroke rehabilitation: a comparison of Armeo spring to the kinect system. Medicina (Kaunas) 55(4):98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aizawa J, Masuda T, Koyama T, Nakamaru K, Isozaki K, Okawa A, Morita S (2010) Three-dimensional motion of the upper extremity joints during various activities of daily living. J Biomech 43:2915–2922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Borrego A, Latorre J, Llorens R, Alcañiz M, Noé E (2016) Feasibility of a walking virtual reality system for rehabilitation: objective and subjective parameters. J Neuroeng Rehabil 13(1):68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cano Porras D, Siemonsma P, Inzelberg R, Zeilig G, Plotnik M (2018) Advantages of virtual reality in the rehabilitation of balance and gait: systematic review. Neurology 90(22):1017–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chanpimol S, Seamon B, Hernandez H, Harris-Love M, Blackman MR (2017) Using Xbox kinect motion capture technology to improve clinical rehabilitation outcomes for balance and cardiovascular health in an individual with chronic TBI. Arch physiother 7:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Amorim J, Leite RC, Brizola R, Yonamine CY (2018) Virtual reality therapy for rehabilitation of balance in the elderly: a systematic review and META-analysis. Adv Rheumatol (London, England) 58(1):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gieser S, Becker E, Makedon F (2013) Using CAVE in physical rehabilitation exercises for rheumatoid arthritis. In: ACM international conference proceeding series. https://doi.org/10.1145/2504335.2504367

  8. Guzik-Kopyto A, Michnik R, Wodarski P, Chuchnowska I (2016) Determination of loads in the joints of the upper limb during activities of daily living. In: Piętka E, Badura P, Kawa J, Wieclawek W (eds) Information technologies in medicine 5th international conference ITIB 2016, Kamień Śląski, Poland, 20–22 June 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 472. Springer, Cham, pp 99–108

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harkema SJ, Schmidt-Read M, Lorenz DJ, Edgerton VR, Behrman AL (2012) Balance and ambulation improvements in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury using locomotor training-based rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93(9):1508–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hussain N, Murphy MA, Sunnerhagen KS (2018) Upper limb kinematics in stroke and healthy controls using target-to-target task in virtual reality. Front Neurol 9:300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kyung K, Won-Kyung S, Jeongsu L, Hwi-Young L, Dae-Sung P, Byung-Woo K, Jongbae K (2014) Kinematic analysis of upper extremity movement during drinking in hemiplegic subjects. Clin Biomech 29:248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Magermans DJ, Chadwick EKJ, Veeger HEJ, van der Helm FCT (2005) Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living. Clin Biomech 20:591–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mekbib DB, Han J, Zhang L, Fang S, Jiang H, Zhu J, Roe AW, Xu D (2020) Virtual reality therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Brain Inj 34(4):456–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park DS, Lee DG, Lee K, Lee G (2017) Effects of virtual reality training using Xbox kinect on motor function in stroke survivors: a preliminary study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Diseases Off J Natl Stroke Assoc 26(10):2313–2319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stryla W, Banas A (2016) The use of virtual reality technologies during physiotherapy of the paretic upper limb in patients after ischemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosci 6:3

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sveistrup H (2004) Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil 1(1):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trincado-Alonso F, Dimbwadyo-Terrer I, de los Reyes-Guzmán A, López-Monteagudo P, Bernal-Sahún A, Gil-Agudo Á (2014) Kinematic metrics based on the virtual reality system Toyra as an assessment of the upper limb rehabilitation in people with spinal cord injury. BioMed Res Int 904985 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wodarski P, Jurkojć J, Polechoński J, Bieniek A, Chrzan M, Michnik R, Gzik M (2020) Assessment of gait stability and preferred walking speed in virtual reality. Acta Bioeng Biomech 22(1):127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. https://www.neuroforma.pl/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarzyna Nowakowska-Lipiec .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guzik-Kopyto, A., Nowakowska-Lipiec, K., Szaflik, P., Nowicka, O., Michnik, R. (2023). Biomechanical Assessment of Selected Motion and Cognitive Exercises in the “Neuroforma” Rehabilitation System. In: Gzik, M., Paszenda, Z., Piętka, E., Tkacz, E., Milewski, K., Jurkojć, J. (eds) Innovations in Biomedical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 409. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99112-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99112-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99111-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99112-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics