Abstract
The article argues that the extent of surveillance has reached a critical level for democratic societies. However, the jurisprudence of the ECtHR, ECJ and German constitutional court, which never question the extent of surveillance on the structural level, rather aims to legitimize even the most far-reaching measures and thus does not offer effective ex post protection. The introduction of legislative ex ante mechanisms also does not promise to counter the current issues surrounding surveillance measures. Instead, such a mechanism could further legitimize surveillance. The article concludes that while tools to assess the level of surveillance could be helpful when they depart from the premise that the extent of surveillance must be reduced, civil society is best suited to operate and advance these tools in the general discourse.
I would like to thank all participants of the 2021 IFIP Summer School, who provided input at this tutorial. This work is funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research within the project “Privacy, Democracy and Self-Determination in the Age of Artifical Intelligence and Globalisation” (PRIDS), https://forum-privatheit.de.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rule, J.B.: “Needs” for surveillance and the movement to protect privacy. In: Ball, K., Haggerty, K.D., Lyon, D. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies, pp. 64–71. Routledge, London/New York (2014)
Lyon, D.: Surveillance society. In: Monitoring Everyday Life. Open University Press, Buckingham/Philadelphia (2001)
Zuboff, S.: Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. J. Inf. Technol. 30, 75–89 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
Orrù, E.: The European PNR framework and the changing landscape of EU-security. VerfBlog 21 December 2021. https://verfassungsblog.de/os3-pnr/
Bartram, I., Plümecke, T., Zur Nieden, A.: Extended DNA analyses: surveillance technology at the intersection of racism and sexism. Internet Policy Rev. 10(4) (2021). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1603
Buolamwini, J., Gebru, T.: Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 81, pp. 1–15 (2018). http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html
Carter, L.: Prescripted living: gender stereotypes and data-based surveillance in the UK welfare state. Internet Policy Rev. 10(4) (2021). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1593
Theilen, J.T., Baur, A., Bieker, F., Ammicht Quinn, R., Hansen, M., González Fuster, G.: Feminist data protection: an introduction. Internet Policy Rev. 10(4) (2021). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1609
Fox Cahn, A., Enzer, E.: A hollow promise: 20 years of constitutional erosion in the name of counter-terrorism. VerfBlog 13 December 2021. https://verfassungsblog.de/os3-hollow-promise/
Bieker, F.: The Right to Data Protection – Individual and Structural Dimensions of Data Protection in EU Law. T.M.C. Asser Press/Springer, The Hague (2022)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, ETS No. 005, 4 November 1950. https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=005
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, pp. 391–407. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012P%2FTXT
Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, BGBl III, 100-01. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/BJNR000010949.html
ECtHR [GC]. Judgment of 25 May 2021, Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, App. nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
Milanovic, M.: The grand normalization of mass surveillance: ECtHR grand chamber judgments in big brother watch and centrum för rättvisa. EJIL:Talk! 26 May 2021. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-grand-normalization-of-mass-surveillance-ecthr-grand-chamber-judgments-in-big-brother-watch-and-centrum-for-rattvisa/
ECtHR. Judgment of 13 September 2018, Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, App. nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15. ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
ECJ. Judgment of 8 April 2014, Case C-293/12 Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger and others. ECLI:EU:C:2014:238. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=150642&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=5249759
ECJ. Judgment of 6 October 2015, Case C-362/14 Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner. ECLI:EU:C:2015:650. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=169195&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6146191
ECJ. Opinion of 26 July 2017 Avis 1/15. ECLI:EU:C:2017:592. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=194498&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6146191
ECJ. Judgment of 21 December 2016, Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15 Tele2 Sverige. ECLI:EU:C:2016:970. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=186492&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6146191
ECJ. Judgment of 6 October 2020, Joined Cases C-511/18, C-512/18 and C-520/18 La Quadrature du Net. ECLI:EU:C:2020:791. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=232084&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6146191
ECJ. Judgment of 6 October 2020, Case C-623/17, Privacy International. ECLI:EU:C:2020:790. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=232083&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6146191
ECJ. Judgment of 2 March 2021, Case C-746/18, Prokuratuur. ECLI:EU:C:2021:152. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=238381&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6146191
Browne, S.: Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press, Durham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375302
Kalluri, P.: Don’t ask if artificial intelligence is good or fair, ask how it shifts power. Nature 583, 169 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02003-2
Costanza-Chock, S., Philip, N., Ahearn, C.: Design justice, A.I., and escape from the matrix of domination. J. Design Sci. (2018). https://doi.org/10.21428/96c8d426
Bundesverfassungsgericht. Judgment of 2 March 2010, BVerfGE 125, 260 – Vorratsdatenspeicherung. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2010/03/rs20100302_1bvr025608.html
Bundesverfassungsgericht. Judgment of 15 December 1983, BVerfGE 65, 1 (43) – Volkszählung. https://openjur.de/u/268440.html
Bundesverfassungsgericht. Decision of 20 December 2018, - 2 BvR 2377/16 -. http://www.bverfg.de/e/rk20181220_2bvr237716.html
Naarttijärvi, M.: The ‘Ketchup Effect’: The development of public Surveillance in Sweden following 9/11. VerfBlog 15 December 2021. https://verfassungsblog.de/os3-ketchup-effect/
Roßnagel, A.: Die “Überwachungs-Gesamtrechnung” – Das BVerfG und die Vorratsdatenspeicherung, NJW 1238 (2010)
Hornung, G., Schnabel, C.: Verfassungsrechtlich nicht schlechthin verboten – Das Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts in Sachen Vorratsdatenspeicherung, Deutsche Verwaltungsblätter, pp. 820–833 (2010)
Bieker, F., Bremert, B.: Rote Linien im Sand, bei Sturm: Die Überwachungs-Gesamtrechnung. FifF-Kommunikation (4), 34 (2019). https://www.fiff.de/publikationen/fiff-kommunikation/fk-jhrg-2019/fk-2019-4/fk-4-19-p34.pdf
Bieker, F., Bremert, B., Hagendorff, T.: Die Überwachungs-Gesamtrechnung, oder. Es kann nicht sein, was nicht sein darf. In: Roßnagel et al. (eds) Die Fortentwicklung des Datenschutzes, vol. 139, Springer, Wiesbaden (2018)
Adensamer, A.: Aspekte einer Überwachungs-Gesamtrechnung, FifF-Kommunikation (4), 34 (2019). https://www.fiff.de/publikationen/fiff-kommunikation/fk-jhrg-2019/fk-2019-4/fk-4-19-p25.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bieker, F. (2022). The State of Surveillance – An Overall Account of Surveillance?. In: Friedewald, M., Krenn, S., Schiering, I., Schiffner, S. (eds) Privacy and Identity Management. Between Data Protection and Security. Privacy and Identity 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 644. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99100-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99100-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99099-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99100-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)