Skip to main content

Delineation and Monitoring of Wetlands Using Time Series Earth Observation Data and Machine Learning Algorithm: A Case Study in Upper Ganga River Stretch

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geospatial Technologies for Resources Planning and Management

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 115))

  • 535 Accesses

Abstract

Wetlands are unique and valuable ecosystems and are the traditional zones between land and water. They are considered to be one of the most important resources on the earth. The rapid loss of wetlands during the past decades necessitates continuous monitoring of wetlands with respect to its hydrological changes, vegetation, soil etc. The Ramsar Convention of wetland conservation plays a significant role in outlining the internationally important wetlands and the efficient measures for their protection. The present study focused on the delineation and monitoring of wetlands situated in the upper Ganga River stretch, a potential Ramsar site in Uttar Pradesh using Sentinel 2A and Landsat satellite images. Periodical monitoring and change analysis of Ramsar wetland and its environment was studied at decadal scale during the period 1991 to 2019. Machine learning-based classification approach Random Forest classifier was used for extraction of surface water bodies and wetland classification. The overall accuracy and overall kappa coefficient of the classified data is nearly 80% or above in all the years of study, while kappa coefficient ranges between 0.77 and 0.92 for all study years. Further, seasonal turbidity of water was assessed temporally based on the spectral index such as Normalized Differential Turbidity Index using satellite data. The sewage discharge between Anupsahar and Narora towns, industrial activities, non-point source pollution of runoff due to fertilizers and pesticides are some of the important factors that led to increased turbidity levels. Further, intensive agricultural practices at the riverbank side and cultivation in the riverbed areas also act a major cause for wetland loss or degradation in the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akar Ö, Güngör O (2012) Classification of multispectral images using Random Forest algorithm. J Geodesy Geoinformation 1(2):105–112. https://doi.org/10.9733/jgg.241212.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangira T, Alfieri SM, Menenti M, van Niekerk A (2019) Comparing thresholding with machine learning classifiers for mapping complex water. Remote Sens 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11111351

  • Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (eds) (2008) Climate change and water. Technical paper of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, p 210

    Google Scholar 

  • Belgiu M, Drăgu L (2016) Random forest in remote sensing: a review of applications and future directions. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens 114:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bid S, Siddique G (2019) Identification of seasonal variation of water turbidity using NDTI method in Panchet Hill Dam, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 5:1179–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00609-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forest. Mach Learn 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez BL, Riordan K, Powell R, Miller N, Nowels M (2009) Improving wetland characterization with multi-sensor, multi-temporal SAR and optical/infrared data fusion. Adv Geosci Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.5772/8327

  • Congedo L (2016) Semi-automatic classification plugin documentation. Release 4(0.1):29

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, Laroe ET (2005) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Water Encycl https://doi.org/10.1002/047147844x.sw2162

  • Dam PH (2020) Identification of seasonal variation of water turbidity using NDTI method in Identification of seasonal variation of water turbidity using NDTI method in Panchet Hill Dam. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00609-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith H, Amerasinghe P, Huber-Lee A (2005) The effects of agricultural irrigation on wetland ecosystems in developing countries: a literature review. Agriculture 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant AL (2015) The challenges of remote monitoring of wetlands. Remote Sens 7:10938–10950. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70810938

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Garg A, Joshi B (2015) Ecosystem sustenance of upper Ganga Ramsar site through phytoremediation. Geophytology 45(2):175–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Das A (2020) Wetland conversion risk assessment of East Kolkata Wetland: a Ramsar site using random forest and support vector machine model. J Cleaner Prod 275:123475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo M, Li J, Sheng C, Xu J, Wu L (2017) A review of wetland remote sensing. Sensors (basel, Switzerland) 17(4):777. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040777

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Islam M, Sado K (2006) Analyses of ASTER and Spectroradiometer data with in-situ measurements for turbidity and transparency study of lake Abashri. Int J Geoinf 2:31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MS, Islamia JM, Islamia JM (2013) Quantifying land use land cover change along upper Ganga river ( Brijghat to Narora Stretch). Using Landsat TM Geogr 60(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavi S, Salehi B, Granger J, Amani M, Brisco B, Huang W (2018) Remote sensing for wetland classification: a comprehensive review. Giscience Remote Sens 55(5):623–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2017.1419602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell AE, Warner TA, Fang F (2018) Implementation of machine-learning classification in remote sensing: an applied review sensing: an applied review. Int J Remote Sens 39(9):2784–2817. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1433343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer A, Lopez R (2011) Use of remote sensing to support forest and wetlands policies in the USA. Remote Sens 3:1211–1233

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy TVR, Patel JG, Panigrahy S, Parihar JS (2013) National wetland atlas: wetlands of international importance under Ramsar convention. SAC/EPSA/ABHG/NWIA/ATLAS/38/2013, Space Applications Centre (ISRO). Ahmedabad, India, pp 230–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar Convention Secretariat (2016) An introduction to the convention on wetlands, 7th ed. (previously The Ramsar Convention Manual). Gland, Switzerland, p 107

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar (2005) Information sheet on Ramsar wetlands—upper Ganga River. Ramsar, 1–14. Retrieved from https://rsis.ramsar.org/RISapp/files/RISrep/IN1574RIS.pdf

  • Rebelo L-M, Finlayson M, Nagabhatla N (2008) Remote sensing and GIS for wetland inventory, mapping and change analysis. J Environ Manag 90:2144–2153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Galiano VF, Ghimire B, Rogan J, Chica-Olmo M, Rigol-Sanchez JP (2012) An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens 67(1):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.11.002

  • Sinha R, Saxena S, Singh M (2017) Protocols for riverine wetland mapping and classification using remote sensing and GIS. Current Sci 112(7):1544–1552. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v112/i07/1544-1552

  • Wania R, Melton JR, Hodson EL, Poulter B, Ringeval B, Spahni R, Bohn T, Avis CA, Chen G, Eliseev AV, Hopcroft PO, Kaplan JO (2013) Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: methodology of a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP). Geoscientific Model Dev 6:617–641. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-617-2013

  • WII-GACMC (2017) Aquatic Fauna of Ganga river: status and conservation. Ganga aqualife conservation monitoring centre. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF-NMCG (2019) Conserving wetlands in the Ganga basin, Recommendations From the national workshop contents. World wild fund for nature-India & national mission for clean Ganga, p 12–47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akash Goyal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Goyal, A., Upreti, M., Chowdary, V.M., Jha, C.S. (2022). Delineation and Monitoring of Wetlands Using Time Series Earth Observation Data and Machine Learning Algorithm: A Case Study in Upper Ganga River Stretch. In: Jha, C.S., Pandey, A., Chowdary, V., Singh, V. (eds) Geospatial Technologies for Resources Planning and Management. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 115. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98981-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics