Abstract
Research about prisons in the Global South has started to analyse the power dynamics between prison staff and prisoners, but it has focused mainly on men's prisons. Following decolonial and feminist, the chapter is based on the empirical data produced during an ethnography in Santa Monica, a women's prison in Lima, Peru. I argue that Santa Monica functions through a co-governance with prisoner-delegates who have the role of intermediaries or interface brokers. Moreover, I propose that prison is a site of interlegality where national law and customary law superimpose and interpenetrate in the subjects' actions and minds. Consequently, social relationships between authorities, prison staff and prisoners are defined by a hybrid legal system. I conclude with the importance of recognising different types of political and social organisations, not only as the result of errors or of failed development processes in the Global South, but also as an alternative configuration that may lead us to question how we conceptualise prison and imprisonment. In the same line, I acknowledge women prisoners are not only moulded by patriarchal structures, but also recognise the ambivalences and the possibilites of organising and engaging in semi-autonomous actions while imprisoned.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
To understand the huge increase in Latin American imprisonment in general and that in Perú in particular, scholars have insisted that it is necessary to look at the impacts of the American “War on Drugs” (Ariza and Iturralde, 2019; Diaz-Cotto, 2005; Norton-Hawk, 2010; Reynolds, 2008). As a regional phenomenon, there is a high percentage of women imprisoned for drug-related crimes. Mexico (44%), Colombia (48%) and Brazil (60.6%) also show high percentages of women imprisoned for drug-related crimes (Institute for Criminal Policy Research, 2016; WOLA, 2016). In Perú, 55% of women are imprisoned for drug-related crimes and are over-represented in this offence category in comparison to men (17%) (INPE, 2018).
- 2.
The psychologists work in Santa Mónica from Monday to Friday. Given the number of psychologists in Santa Mónica, each psychologist gives professional attention to approximately 100 prisoners. Their responsabilities include periodic psychological evaluations, group therapy, individual therapy, counselling, organisation of institutional events, creation of psychological reports for the prisoners’ trials, administration tasks and daily “emergencies”, among others. I was not able to establish the “ideal” number of prison staff needed for Santa Mónica, but taking into account the expectancy of “resocialisation” and the prison’s overcrowding, it is evident that the staff have a high rate of work overload.
- 3.
Neither do I want to homogenise the “Western prison”: arguably there are also very many different prisons in the West/North. In this case, the term is used to reference a political binary and the power relationships that have been constituted between the North and the South, Western and Non-Western.
- 4.
Women prisoners get money from their visits, from their informal work inside prison (for example, some prisoners outsource their cleaning duties, and other prisoners are contracted to do them), and work in formal labour workshops. There are two different types of labour workshops: working autonomously and working for a private company. Some prisoners engage in creating goods (shoes, clothes, bijouterie, etc.) and services (hairdressing, food, and kiosks) and selling their products inside prison and outside prison through their external connections. On the other hand, in the last years, private companies are also contracting women prisoners to produce their goods. In Santa Mónica, women work in a jean and a leather company.
- 5.
The participants mentioned different quota amounts which oscillated between 1.5 and 20 soles (USD 0.40 and USD 5.5) weekly. It is plausible that the quotas vary per block.
- 6.
El Calabozo or Meditacion (meditation) refers to solitary confinement in prison. It is interesting how penitentiary actors have different names for it which indicates opposed significances. Prisoners refer to it as El Calabozo, the pit, which symbolically associates it with an emotionally overwhelming, dark, lonely and violent space. In contrast, the authorities and staff refer to it as Meditacion, which presumes a different objective and emotional fluency. Indeed, it is symbolically intended to be a space of calm and introspective reflexivity that leads to personal transformations.
References
Aguirre, C. (2009). Cárcel y sociedad en América Latina: 1800–1940. In E. Kingman (Ed.), Historia social urbana. Espacios y flujos. FLACSO.
Aniyar de Castro, L. (1986). La delincuencia femenina en Venezuela: Ideología de la diversidad y marginalidad. In L. Aniyar de Castro (Ed.), La realidad contra los mitos: Reflexiones críticas en Criminología. Publicaciones de la Universidad del Zulia
Aniyar de Castro, L. (2002). Las mujeres infractoras: Impacto y amplificación de los efectos de la pena. Capítulo Criminológico, 30(4), 333–351.
Antillano, A. (2015). Cuando los presos mandan: Control informal dentro de la cárcel Venezolana. Espacio abierto: Cuaderno Venezolano de Sociología, 24(4), 16–39.
Antillano, A. (2017). When prisoners make the prison. Self-rule in Venezuelan prison. Prison Service Journal: Special Edition Informal Dynamics of Survival in Latin American Prisons, 229, 26–30.
Antony, C. (2007). Mujeres invisibles: las cárceles femeninas en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad, 298, 73–85.
Ariza, J., & Iturralde, M. (2019). The law of the yard: Power relations and the Prison Social Order in Colombia (work in progress). Paper presented in the Law and Society Conference, 29th of May–2nd June, Washington, DC, USA.
Azaola, E. (1995). Prisiones para mujeres: Un enfoque de género. La Ventana, 2, 35–52.
Azaola, E. (2005). Las mujeres en el sistema de justicia penal y la antropología a la que adhiero. Cuadernos de Antropología Social, 22, 11–26.
Bandyopadhyay, M. (2010). Everyday life in a prison. Orient BlackSwan.
Bandyopadhyay, M., Jefferson, A., & Ugelvik, T. (2013). Prison spaces and beyond: The potential of ethnographic zoom. Criminal Justice Matters, 91(1), 28–29.
Bex, L. (2016). Women doing life. Gender, punishment and the struggle for identity. New York University Press.
Birkbeck, C. (2011). Imprisonment and internment: Comparing penal institutions North and South. Punishment and Society, 13(3), 307–332.
Bosworth, M. (1999). Engendering resistance: Agency and power in women’s prison. Routledge.
Bosworth, M., & Kaufman, E. (2013). Gender and punishment. In J. Simon & R. Sparks. The Sage handbook of punishment and society. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247624.n10
Boutron, C., & Constant, C. (2013). Gendering transnational criminality: The case of women’s imprisonment in Peru. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 39(1), 177–195.
Britton, D. (2000). Feminism in criminology: Engendering the outlaw. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 571, 47–76.
Carlen, P. (1983). Women’s imprisonment. A study in social control. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Carter, J. H. (2014). Gothic sovereignty: Gangs and criminal community in a Honduran prison. South Atlantic Quarterly, 113(3), 475–502.
Carrington, K., Hogg, R., & Sozzo, M. (2016). Southern criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 2016(56), 1–20.
Carrington, K., Hogg, R., Scott, J., Sozzo, M., & Walters, R. (2019). Southern criminology. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Castro-Gomez, S., & Grosfoguel, R. (2007). Prólogo. Giro decolonial, teoría crítica y pensamiento heterárquico. In S. Castro-Gómez & R. Grosfoguel (Comp.), El giro decolonial: reflexiones para una diversidad epistémica más allá del capitalismo global. Siglo del Hombre Editores; Universidad Central, Instituto de Estudios Sociales Contemporáneos y Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Instituto Pensar.
Cerbini, F. (2017). From the panopticon to the anti-panopticon: The “art of government” in the prison of San Pedro (La Paz, Bolivia). Prison Service Journal: Special Edition Informal Dynamics of Survival in Latin American Prisons, 229, 31–34.
Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed. Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Columbia University Press.
Darke, S. (2013). Inmate governance in Brazilian prisons. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 52(3), 272–284.
Darke, S. (2019). Conviviality and survival. Co-producing Brazilian prison order. Palgrave Macmillan.
Darke, S., & Garces, C. (2017). Surviving in the new mass carceral zone. Prison Service Journal. Special Edition. Informal Dynamics of Survival in Latin American Prisons, 229, 2–14.
Darke, S., & Karam, M. L. (2016). Latin American prisons. In Y. Jewkes, B. Crewe, & J. Bennet (Eds.), Handbook on prisons (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
De Sousa Santos, B. (1977). The Law of the Oppressed: The construction and Reproduction of Legality in Pasargada. Law and Society Review, 12(1).
De Sousa Santos, B. (2002). Toward a new legal common sense: Law, globalization and emancipation (2nd ed.). Butterworths.
De Sousa Santos, B. (2006). The heterogeneous state and legal pluralism in Mozambique. Law and Society Review, 40(1), 39–76.
Del Olmo, R. (1998). Criminalidad y criminalización de la mujer en la región andina. Nueva Sociedad.
Diaz-Cotto. (2005). Latinas and the war of drugs in the United States, Latin America and Europe. In J. Sudbury (Ed.), Global lockdown. Race, gender, and the prison-industrial complex. Routledge.
Dussel, E. (2000). Europa, Modernidad Y Eurocentrismo. In E. Lander (Ed.), La Colonialidad Del Saber. Eurocentrismo Y Ciencias Sociales: Perspectivas Latinoamericanas. CLACSO.
Fili, A. (2013). Women in prison: Victim or resisters? Representations on agency on women’s prisons in Greece. Signs: Women, gender, and prison: National and global perspectives, 39(1), 1–26.
Galindo, M. (2015). La revolución feminista se llama Despatriarcalización. Feminista Siempre de ACSUR. Tomo: Descolonización y despatriarcalización de y desde los feminismos de Abya Yala, 27–58.
Garces, C., Martin, T., & Darke, S. (2013). Informal prison dynamics in Africa and Latin America. Criminal Justice Matters, 91(1), 26–27.
Griffiths, A. (2002). Legal pluralism. In R. Banakar & M. Travers (Eds.), An introduction to law and social theory (pp. 289–310). Hart Publishing.
Griffiths, A. (2005). Academic narratives: Models and methods in the search for meanings. In S. Falk Moore (Ed.), Law and anthropology. A reader. Blackwell.
Griffiths, A. (2011). Pursuing legal pluralism: The power of paradigms in a global world. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 64, 173–202.
Hannah-Moffatt, K. (1995). Feminine fortresses: Woman-centered prisons. The Prison Journal, 75, 135–164.
Hannah-Moffat, K. (2001). Punishment in disguise. Penal governance and federal imprisonment of women in Canada. Toronto University Press.
Hazathy, P., & Muller, M. (2016). The rebirth of the prison in Latin America: Determinants, regimes and social effects. Crime, Law and Social Change, 65, 113–135.
Heidensohn, F., & Silvestri, M. (2012). Gender and crime. In M. Maguire, R. Morga, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Howe, A. (1994). Punish and critique. Towards a feminist analysis of penalty. Routledge.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. (2016). Perú en cifras. http://www.inei.gob.pe/
Institute for Criminal Policy Research [ICPR]. (2016). World prison brief data. http://www.prisonstudies.org/world-prison-brief-data
Instituto Nacional Penitenciario [INPE]. (2018). Informe Estadístico Penitenciario 2018. http://www.inpe.gob.pe
Irwin, J. (2004). The warehouse prison: Disposal of the new dangerous class. Roxbury.
Lagarde, M. (1992). Los cautiverios de las mujeres. Madresposas, monjas, putas, presas y locas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Long, N. (1999). Th Multiple Optic of Interfase Analysis. UNESCO Background Paper on Interface Analysis.
Martin, T., Jefferson, A., & Bandyopadhyay, M. (2014). Sensing prison climates: Governance, survival and transition. Focaal, 68, 3–17.
Montero, M. (2006). Hacer para transformar. El método en la psicología comunitaria. Paidós.
Moore, S. (1973). Law and social change: The semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate subject of study. Law and Society Review, 7(4), 719–746.
Moore, S. (1978). Law as process. An anthropological approach. Routledge.
Moore, S. (2015). Legal pluralism as Omnium Gatherum. FIU Law Review, 10(1), 5–18.
Moore, L., & Scraton, P. (2014). The incarceration of women. Punishing bodies, breaking spirits. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology.
Moran, D., Pallot, J., & Piacentini, L. (2009). Lipstick, lace, and longing: Constructions of femininity inside a Russian prison. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27, 700–720.
Munro, V. (2013). Violence against women, “victimhood” and the (neo)liberal state. In M. Davies & V. Munro, The Ashgate research companion to feminist legal theory. Routledge.
Navarro, L., & Sozzo, M. (2020). Pabellones evangélicos y gobierno de las prisiones. Legados de Sykes para pensar en la construcción del orden en las prisiones de varones en la Argentina. Cuadernos de Investigación: Apuntes y Claves de Lectura sobre “La sociedad de los cautivos”, 3, 178–226.
Norton-Hawk, M. (2010). Exporting gender injustice: The impact of the U.S. war on drugs on Ecuadorian women. Critical Criminology, 18, 133–146.
Nunes, C., & Salla, F. (2017). Formal and informal controls and punishment: The production of order in the prison of Sao Paulo. Prison Service Journal: Special Edition Informal Dynamics of Survival in Latin American Prisons, 229, 19–22.
Nuñovero, L. (2019). Cuaderno de trabajo N°50. Cárceles en América Latina 2000–2018. Tendencias y Desafíos. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales de la PUCP.
Pérez Guadalupe, J. (1994). Faites y Atorrantes. Una etnografía del penal de Lurigancho. FTPCL.
Pérez Guadalupe, J. (2000). La construcción social de la realidad carcelaria: Los alcances de la organización informal en cinco cárceles latinoamericanas (Perú, Chile, Argentina, Brasil y Bolivia). Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
Pérez Guadalupe, J., & Nuñovero, L. (2019). Hacia un modelo de gestión de “cárceles ingobernables”. Paper presented 2019 Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Boston, USA, May 24–May 27, 2019.
Postema, M., Cavallaro, J., & Nagra, R. (2017). Advancing security and human rights by the controlled organisation of inmates. Prison Service Journal: Special Edition Informal Dynamics of Survival in Latin American Prisons, 229(1), 57–62.
Renzetti, C. (2018). Feminist criminology. In S. Walker & M. Dragiewicz (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical criminology (pp. 74–82). Routledge. Taylor & Francis.
Reynolds, M. (2008). The war on drugs, prison building, and Globalization: Catalysts for the global incarceration of women. NWSA Journal, 20(2), 72–95.
Sim, J. (2009). Punishment and prisons: Power and the Carceral state. Sage.
Sozzo, M. (2007). ¿Metamorfosis de la prisión? Proyecto normalizador, populismo punitivo y prisión-depósito en Argentina. Urvio. Revista Latinoamericana de Seguridad Ciudadana, 1, 88–116.
Sozzo, M. (2016). Postneoliberalismo y penalidad en América del Sur. CLACSO.
Veeken, H. (2000). Lurigancho prison: Lima’s “high school” for criminality. British Medical Journal, 320, 173–175.
Washington Office in Latin America [WOLA]. (2016). Mujeres, políticas de drogas y encarcelamiento. Una guía para la reforma de políticas en América Latina y el Caribe. http://www.oas.org/es/cim/docs/WomenDrugsIncarceration-ES.pdf
Weegels, J. (2017). Prisoner self-governance and survival in a Nicaraguan city police jail. Prison Service Journal: Special Edition Informal Dynamics of Survival in Latin American Prisons, 229, 15–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bruce, L.B. (2022). A Decolonial and Depatriarchal Approach to Women’s Imprisonment: Co-governance, Legal Pluralism and Gender at Santa Mónica Prison, Perú. In: Sozzo, M. (eds) Prisons, Inmates and Governance in Latin America. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98602-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98602-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98601-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98602-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)