Skip to main content

A Comparison of Input Devices for Gaming: Are Gamepads Still Useful in PC Environment?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI 2021)

Abstract

As the PC has emerged as a new video game platform since its rapid performance progress, the cross-platform compatibility has grown to prominence for developers and designers. Besides, the number of users who want to use their gamepads, which is the conventional input devices of video game consoles, has been gradually increasing. This study was designed to compare the performance and usability of two input devices, the gamepad and the keyboard-mouse setup, the traditional setup used by most PC users, by task type and difficulty level. The goal of this study is to explore the interface design guidelines for each device. In this study, we measured the reaction time for the performance and the perceived workload for usability. The results indicated that the keyboard-mouse setup showed higher performance than the gamepad in general, and that the difference by the difficulty level was intensified in the physical task group. However, this tendency was not found in the cognitive task group. The keyboard-mouse setup also showed lower mental demand and physical demand than the gamepad. This result suggests that designers should not require too many simultaneous inputs when designing interfaces for gamepads, and that users should understand the characteristics of each device, in order to choose the one appropriate for their intended goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Clement, J.: Market size of the video games industry in the United States from 2010 to 2021. Statista (2021). https://www.statista.com/statistics/246892/value-of-the-video-game-market-in-the-us/

  2. Feldman, S.: What Is the Game Console’s Future? Statista (2019). https://www.statista.com/chart/17465/video-game-console/

  3. Valve. Controller Gaming on PC. Steamcommunity (2018). https://steamcommunity.com/games/593110/announcements/detail/1712946892833213377

  4. Limperos, A.M., Schmierbach, M.G., Kegerise, A.D., Dardis, F.E.: Gaming across different consoles: exploring the influence of control scheme on game-player enjoyment. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Network. 14(6), 345–350 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardoso, J.C.: Comparison of gesture, gamepad, and gaze-based locomotion for VR worlds. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 319–320 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rupp, M.A., Oppold, P., McConnell, D.S.: Comparing the performance, workload, and usability of a gamepad and joystick in a complex task. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1775–1779. SAGE Publications, Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ali, M., Cardona-Rivera, R.E.: Comparing gamepad and naturally-mapped controller effects on perceived virtual reality experiences. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2020, pp. 1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ortega, F.R., Williams, A.S., Tarre, K., Barreto, A., Rishe, N.: 3D travel comparison study between multi-touch and GamePad. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 36(18), 1699–1713 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mustaquim, M.M., Nyström, T.: Video game control dimensionality analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment, pp. 1–8 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Advances in Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 139–183. North-Holland (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statisctics for Windows (Version 26.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY (2019). https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunsun A. Hong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hong, Y.A., Peck, S.O., Lee, I.M. (2022). A Comparison of Input Devices for Gaming: Are Gamepads Still Useful in PC Environment?. In: Kim, JH., Singh, M., Khan, J., Tiwary, U.S., Sur, M., Singh, D. (eds) Intelligent Human Computer Interaction. IHCI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13184. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98404-5_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98404-5_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98403-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98404-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics