Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bad Results in Cleft Palate Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Non-Desirable Outcomes in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery

  • 382 Accesses

Abstract

Cleft palate is a common congenital pathology, and it has a great impact on the quality of life of the patient. Its form of presentation is very varied, and the prognosis of its treatment is in relation to the type of cleft palate and severity.

The first step to understand the cleft palate is its classification which allows us a better understanding on how the bad outcomes developed and how to solve them.

The present protocol for its treatment is based on the anatomical classification described by Veau and the author’s classification of severity based on the cleft palate index.

The observed bad outcomes after cleft palate surgery seem to be related to the severity of the deformity. The most important factors to consider are the degree of congenital hypoplasia, surgeon’s skill and experience, and surgical technique.

The most common bad results after cleft palate repair are: palatal fistulas, velopharyngeal insufficiency, flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, maxillary hypoplasia, and audiological disorders.

These conditions require an interdisciplinary intervention to guarantee adequate functional and anatomical repair. This chapter illustrates the different surgical methods described for treatment of the secondary cleft palate deformities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaw W, Semb G, Nelson P, Brattstrom V, Molsted K. y col. The Eurocleft project: 1996-2000: overview. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001;29(3):131–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katzel E, Basile P, Koltz P, Marcus J, Girotto J. Current surgical practices in cleft care: cleft palate repair techniques. Plast Recons Surg. 2009;124(3):899–906.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Friede H, Eenemark H. Long term evidence for favorable midfacial growth after delayed hard palate repair in UCLP patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38(4):323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lilja J, Mars M, Elander A, Enocson L, Hagberg C, et al. Analysis of dental arch relationships in Swedish unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects: 20-year longitudinal consecutive series treated with delayed hard palate closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43:606–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Malek R, Psaume J. New concept of the chronology and surgical technique on the treatment of cleft lip and palate. Results in 220 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1983;28:237–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sommerlad B. A technique for cleft palate repair. Plast Recons Surg. 2003;112(6):1542–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cutting C, Rosenbaum J, Rovati L. The technique of muscle repair in the cleft soft palate. Oper Tech Plast Surg. 1995;2:215–22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. La Rossa D, Hunenko O, Kirschner R, Low D, et al. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia modification of the Furlow double opposing z plasty: long term speech and growth results. Clin Plastic Surg. 2004;31:243–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bykowsky M, Noran S, Winger D, Losee J. The rate of oronasal fistula following primary cleft palate surgery: a meta-analysis. Cleft Palat Craniof J. 2015;52(4):e81–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen SR, Kalinowski J, LaRossa D, et al. Cleft palate fistulas: a multivariate statistical analysis of prevalence, etiology, and surgical management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:1041–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liau JY, Sadove AM, van Aalst JA. An evidence-based approach to cleft palate repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:2216–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossell-Perry P, Cáceres-Nano E, Gavino-Gutiérrez A. Associations between palatine index and cleft palate repair outcomes in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. JAMA Facial Plastic Surg. 2014;16(3):206–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levi B, Kasten S, Buchman S. Utilization of the buccal fat pad flap for congenital palate repair. Plas Recons Surg. 2009;123(3):1018–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. Premaxillary palatal flap as an aid to créate nasal floor in anterior palatal fistula closure of cleft patients. Int J Surg. 2016;30:35–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang NH. Current methods for the treatment of alveolar cleft. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44(3):188–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Vasishta SMS, Krishnan G, Rai YS, Desai A. The versatility of the tongue flap in the closure of palatal fistula. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2012;5(3):145–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bennet K, Thurston T, Vercler C, Kasten S. Harvesting the buccal fat pad does not result in aesthetic deformity in cleft patients: a retrospective analysis. Plas Recons Surg J. 2017;140(2):362–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirschner R, Cabiling D, Slemp A, Siddiqi F, Larossa D, Losee J. Repair of oronasal fistulae with acellular dermal matrices. Plas Recons Surg. 2006;118:1431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aldekhayel SA, Sinno H, Gilardino MS. Acellular dermal matrix in cleft palate repair: an evidence-based review. Plas Recons Surg J. 2012;130(1):177–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shridharani SM, Tufaro AP. A systematic review of Acelluar Dermal matrices in head and neck reconstruction. Plastic Recons Surg. 2012;130(5S-2):35S–43S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rohleder N, Loeffelbein D, Feisti W, Eddicks M, y col. Repair of oronasal fistulae by interposition of multilayered amniotic membrane allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(1):172–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeffery S, Boorman J, Dive D. Use of cartilage grafts for closure of cleft palate fistulae. Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53(7):551–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ohsumi N, Onizuka T, Ito Y. Use of a free conchal cartilage graft for closure of a palatal fistula: an experimental study and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91:433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fallah D, Baur D, Ferguson H, Helman J. Clinical application of the temporoparietal-galeal flap in closure of a chronic oronasal fistula: review of the anatomy, surgical technique, and report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(10):1228–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwabegger AH, Hubli E, Rieger M, Gassner R, Schmidt A, Ninkovic M. Role of free tissue transfer in the treatment of recalcitrant palatal fistulae among patients with cleft palate. Plast Reconnstr Surg. 2004;113(4):1131–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zemann W, Kruse A, Luebbers H, Jacobsen C, Metzier P, Obwegeser J. Microvascular tissue transfer in cleft palate patients: advocacy of the prelaminated radial free forearm flap. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(6):2006–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eufinger H, Machtens E. Microsurgical tissue transfer for rehabilitation of the patient with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39(5):560–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Duffy F. Anterolateral thigh perforator flap in palatal reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006;22:A007.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ninkovic M, Hubli EH, Schwabegger A, Anderl H. Free flap closure of recurrent palatal fistula in the cleft lip and palate patient. J Craniofac Surg. 1997;26(1):491–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Maine R, Hoffman W, Palacios-Martínez J, Corlew D, Gregory G. Comparison of fistula rates after palatoplasty for international and local surgeons on surgical missions in Ecuador with rates at a craniofacial center in the United States. Plas Recons Surg. 2012;129(2):319–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tuna E, Topcuoglu N, Ilhan B, Gencay K. Staphylococcus aureus transmission through oronasal fistula in children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Pala Craniof J. 2008;45(5):477–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Z, Fang S, Zhang Q, Chen L, et al. Analysis of complications in primary cleft lips and palate surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(3):968–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Furlow L. Cleft palate repair by double opposing Z plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78:724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rossell-Perry P. Flap necrosis after palatoplasty in patients with cleft palate. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:Article ID 516375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rossell-Perry P, Figallo-Hudtwalcker O, Vargas-Chanduvi R, Calderón-Ayvar Y, Romero-Narváez C. Risks factors leading to mucoperiosteal flap necrosis after primary palatoplasty in patients with cleft palate. J Plastic Surg Hand Surg. 2017;51(5):348–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rossell-Perry P, Cotrina-Rabanal O, Barrenechea-Tarazona L, Vargas-Chanduvi R, Paredes-Aponte L, Romero-Narváez C. Mucoperiosteal flap necrosis after primary palatoplasty in patients with cleft palate. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44(3):217–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Deshpande G, Campbell A, Jagtap R, et al. Early complications after cleft palate repair: a multivariate statistical analysis of 709 patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(5):1614–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kuwahara H, Yoshimoto S. Investigation of the cause of mucoperiosteal flap necrosis in older children and adults an anatomical perspective. J Showa Univ Soc. 2013;73(5):439–43.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sancho M, Parri F, Raigosa J, Lerena J, et al. Palatal necrosis in children. Case Report. Cir Ped. 2006;19(2):115–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rossell-Perry P, Luque-Tipula M. The Lima surgical protocol for cleft palate repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(6):1533–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rossell-Perry P, Arrascue HM. The Nasal Artery Mio Mucosal Cutaneous (NAMMC) flap in difficult palatal fistulas closure. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstr. 2012;5(3):175–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Freedlander E, Jackson IT. The fate of buccal mucosal flaps in primary palatal repair. Cleft Palate J. 1989;26(2):110–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pinborough-Zimmerman J, Canady C, Yamashiro D, Morales L. Articulation and nasality changes resulting from sustained palatal fistula Obturation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998;35(1):81–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Goiatp M, Dos Santos D, Moreno A. Prosthetic treatments for patients with oronasal communication. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(4):1445–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Reisberg D, Gold H, Dorf D. A technique for obturating palatial fistulas. Cleft Palate J. 1985;22(4):286–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rossell-Perry P. Cirugía de la fisura palatina. Lima: Ed. San Marcos; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Peterson-Falzone S, Trost-Cardamone J, Karnell M, et al. The clinician’s guide to treating cleft palate speech. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hopper RA, Cutting C, Grayson B. Cleft lip and palate. In: Thorne CH, editor. Grabb and smith plastic surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott and Williams; 2007. p. 201–25.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ysunza A, Pamplona C, Ramírez E, Molina F, Mendoza M, Silva A. Velopharyngeal surgery: a prospective randomized study of pharyngeal flaps and sphincter pharyngoplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:1401–505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Yun Shan P, Tristan de Chalain P. Incidence of oronasal fistulae and velopharyngeal insufficiency after cleft palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J. 2008;45:2.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Inman D, Thomas P, Hodgkinson P, Reid C. Oronasal fistula development and velopharyngeal insufficiency following primary cleft palate surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58:1051–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Leclerc J, Godbout A, Arteau-Gauthier I, Lacour S, Abel K, McConnell E. We can predict postpalatoplasty velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft palate patients. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(2):561–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kummer A. Cleft palate and craniofacial anomalies: effects on speech and resonance. San Diego: Singular Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lam E, Hundert S, Wilkes G. Lateral pharyngeal wall and velar movement and tailoring velopharyngeal surgery: determinants of velopharyngeal incompetence resolution in patients with cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(2):495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ma L, Shi B, Li Y, Zheng Q. Velopharyngeal function assessment in patients with cleft palate: perceptual speech assessment versus nasopharyngoscopy. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(4):1229–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kawamoto H Jr. Pharyngoplasty revisited and revised. Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;2(4):239–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Peat B, Albery E, Jones K, Pigott R. Tailoring velopharyngeal surgery: the influence of etiology and type of operation. Plast Recons Surg. 1994;93:948–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang J, Li Y, Cao X, Xian J, Tan J, Dong J. The combination of anatomy and physiology in predicting the outcomes of velopharyngeal surgery. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(7):1718–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. O’Connell B, Dobble A, Oyer S, Montiel M, Hufnagle K, Patel K, et al. The impact of adenoid size on rate of revision sphincter pharyngoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(9):2170–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Rossell-Perry P. An innovative palatoplasty for primary cleft palate repair. Plastic Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2021;9(6):e3610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ahl R, Harding-Bell A, Wharton L, Jordan A, Hall P. The Buccinator Mucomuscular flap: an in-depth analysis and evaluation of its role in the management of velopharyngeal dysfunction. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(5):e177–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mann SA, Mann RJ, Haenssler AE. An magnetic resonance imaging case study: the anatomic palate restoration concept utilizing buccal flaps in a primary palatoplasty. Plastic Reconstr Surg Global Open. 2020;8(9S):112–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Bishop A, Hong P, Bezuhly M. Autologous fat grafting for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency: state of the art. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(1):1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Sommerlad B, Mehendale F, Birch M, Sell D, Hatlee C, Harland K. Palate re-repair revisited. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39(3):295–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Furlow LT. Chapter 40Correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency by double-opposing Z-Plasty. In: Kirschner JLR, editor. Comprehensive cleft care. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies; 2009. p. 641–7.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Pet M, Marty-Grames L, Blount-Stahl M, Saltzman BS, Molter DW, Woo A. The Furlow Palatoplasty for velopharyngeal dysfunction: velopharyngeal changes, speech improvements, and where they intersect. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52(1):12–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Nayar HS, Cray JJ, MacIsaac ZM, Argenta A, Ford M, Fenton R, et al. Improving speech outcomes after failed palate repair: evaluating the safety and efficacy of conversion Furlow palatoplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(2):343–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Afrooz P, MacIsaac Z, Stephen A. A comparison of speech outcomes using radical Intravelar Veloplasty or Furlow Palatoplasty for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency associated with occult submucous cleft palate. Ann Plastic Surg. 2015;74(2):182–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Gosain A, Arneja J. Management of the black hole in velopharyngeal incompetence: combined use of a Furlow palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(5):1538–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Bohm M, Padgitt N, Tibesar R, Lander T, Sidman J. Outcomes of combined Furlow palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(2):216–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Oldenburg O, Spiehofer J, Fox H, Prib N. Performance of conventional and enhanced adaptive servoventilation (ASV) in heart failure patients with central sleep apnea who have adapted to conventional ASV. Sleep Breath. 2015;19(3):795–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kendzerska T, Gershon A, Hawker G, Tomlinson G. Obstructive sleep apnea and incident diabetes: a historical cohort study. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2014:130604084050003.

    Google Scholar 

  73. De Serves L, Deleyamnis F, Eblen L, Gruss J, Richardson M, Sie K. Results with sphincter pharyngoplasty and pharyngeal flap. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;25: 48 (1):17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Liao Y, Noordhoff M, Huang C, Chen P, Chen N, Yun C, et al. Comparison of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children with cleft palate following Furlow palatoplasty or pharyngeal flap for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41(2):152–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Liao Y, Chuang M, Chen P, Yun C, Huang C. Incidence and severity of obstructive sleep apnea following pharyngeal flap surgery in patients with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39(3):312–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Pena M, Choi S, Boyiayan M, Zalzal G. Perioperative airway complications following pharyngeal flap palatoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(9):808–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Paciello R, Kiemle I. Long term effects of pharyngeal flaps on the upper airways of subjects with velopharyngeal insufficiency. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45(4):364–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Losken A, Williams JK, Burstein FD, Malick D, Riski JE. An outcome evaluation of sphincter pharyngoplasty for the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1755–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Sie KC, Tampakopoulou DA, de Serres LM, Gruss JS, Eblen LE. Sphincter pharyngoplasty: speech outcome and complications. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:1211–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Riski J, Ruff G, Georgiade G, Barwick W, Edwards P. Evaluation of the sphincter pharyngoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;29:254.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Tsshiki N, Honjou I, Morimoto M. Effects of velopharyngeal incompetence upon speech. Cleft Palate J. 1968;5:297.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Warren D. Aerodynamic assessments and procedures to determine extent of velopharynngeal inadequacy. In: Bzoch KR, editor. Communicative disorders related to cleft lip and palate. 4th ed. Austin: Pro-ed; 1997. p. 411–37.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Karling J, Henningsson G, Larsson O, Isberg A. Comparison between two types of pharyngeal flap with regard to configuration at rest and function and speech outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;63:154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Zwittman D. Oral endoscopic comparison of velopharyngeal closure before and after pharyngeal flap surgery. Cleft Palate J. 1982;19:40.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Witt P, McKatyn T, Marsh J, Grama L. Does preexisting posterior pharyngeal wall motion drive the dynamism of sphincter pharyngoplasty? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:1457–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. San Martin de Porres University of Lima, Lima, Peru

    Percy Rossell-Perry

Authors
  1. Percy Rossell-Perry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. San Martin de Porres University of Lima, Lima, Peru

    Percy Rossell-Perry

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rossell-Perry, P. (2022). Bad Results in Cleft Palate Surgery. In: Rossell-Perry, P. (eds) Atlas of Non-Desirable Outcomes in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98400-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98400-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98399-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98400-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation