Skip to main content

On the Selection of Random Field Evaluation Points in the p-MLQMC Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods (MCQMC 2020)

Abstract

Engineering problems are often characterized by significant uncertainty in their material parameters. A typical example coming from geotechnical engineering is the slope stability problem where the soil’s cohesion is modeled as a random field. An efficient manner to account for this uncertainty is the novel sampling method called p-refined Multilevel Quasi-Monte Carlo (p-MLQMC). The p-MLQMC method uses a hierarchy of p-refined finite element meshes combined with a deterministic Quasi-Monte Carlo sampling rule. This combination yields a significant computational cost reduction with respect to classic Multilevel Monte Carlo. However, in previous work, not enough consideration was given to how to incorporate the uncertainty, modeled as a random field, in the finite element model with the p-MLQMC method. In the present work we investigate how this can be adequately achieved by means of the integration point method. We therefore investigate how the evaluation points of the random field are to be selected in order to obtain a variance reduction over the levels. We consider three different approaches. These approaches will be benchmarked on a slope stability problem in terms of computational runtime. We find that for a given tolerance the local nested approach yields a speedup up to a factor five with respect to the non-nested approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blondeel, P., Robbe, P., Van hoorickx, C., François, S., Lombaert, G., Vandewalle, S.: p-refined multilevel Quasi-Monte Carlo for Galerkin finite element methods with applications in civil engineering. Algorithms 13(5) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/a13050110, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/13/5/110

  2. de Borst, R., Crisfield, M.A., Remmers, J.J.C.: Non Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures. Wiley, U.K. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burkardt, J.: Matlab implementation of Wandzura rule (2007). Online https://people.math.sc.edu/Burkardt/m_src/triangle_wandzura_rule/triangle_wandzura_rule.html. Accessed 01 Oct 2020

  4. Cliffe, K.A., Giles, M.B., Scheichl, R., Teckentrup, A.L.: Multilevel Monte Carlo methods and applications to elliptic PDEs with random coefficients. Comput. Vis. Sci. 14(1), 3 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00791-011-0160-x

  5. Dunavant, D.A.: High degree efficient symmetrical Gaussian quadrature rules for the triangle. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 21(6), 1129–1148 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620210612

  6. Geuzaine, C., Remacle, J.F.: Gmsh: A 3-d finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 79(11), 1309–1331 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2579

  7. Giles, M.B.: Multilevel Monte Carlo path simulation. Oper. Res. 56(3), 607–617 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1070.0496

  8. Giles, M.B.: Multilevel Monte Carlo methods. Acta Num. 24, 259–328 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S096249291500001X

  9. Giles, M.B., Waterhouse, B.J.: Multilevel Quasi-Monte Carlo path simulation. Rad. Ser. Comput. App. 8, 1–18 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuo, F.: Lattice rule generating vectors (2007). Online https://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~fkuo/lattice/index.html and https://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~fkuo/lattice/lattice-32001-1024-1048576.3600. Accessed 12 Apr 2019

  11. Li, C., Kiureghian, A.D.: Optimal discretization of random fields. J. Eng. Mech. 119(6), 1136–1154 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1993)119:6(1136)

  12. MATLAB: version 9.2.0 (R2017a). The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matthies, H.G., Brenner, C.E., Bucher, C.G., Guedes Soares, C.: Uncertainties in probabilistic numerical analysis of structures and solids-stochastic finite elements. Struct. Saf. 19(3), 283–336 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robbe, P.: Gaussianrandomfields.jl (2017). Online https://github.com/PieterjanRobbe/GaussianRandomFields.jl. Accessed 05 Nov 2020

  15. Robbe, P.: Multilevelestimators.jl (2018). Online https://github.com/PieterjanRobbe/MultilevelEstimators.jl. Accessed 05 Nov 2020

  16. Wandzurat, S., Xiao, H.: Symmetric quadrature rules on a triangle. Comput. Math. Appl. 45(12), 1829–1840 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(03)90004-6

  17. Whenham, V., De Vos, M., Legrand, C., Charlier, R., Maertens, J., Verbrugge, J.C.: Influence of soil suction on trench stability. In: Schanz, T. (ed.) Experimental Unsaturated Soil Mechanics, pp. 495–501. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the Research Council of KU Leuven through project C16/17/008 “Efficient methods for large-scale PDE-constrained optimization in the presence of uncertainty and complex technological constraints”. The computational resources and services used in this work were provided by the VSC (Flemish Supercomputer Center), funded by the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO) and the Flemish Government—department EWI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Blondeel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Blondeel, P., Robbe, P., François, S., Lombaert, G., Vandewalle, S. (2022). On the Selection of Random Field Evaluation Points in the p-MLQMC Method. In: Keller, A. (eds) Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods. MCQMC 2020. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 387. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98319-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics