Skip to main content

Individual Identity, Collective Identity and Human Dignity. What Are the Best Models to Accommodate Different Identities?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethnic Diversity, Plural Democracy and Human Dignity

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 99))

  • 209 Accesses

Abstract

The contribution addresses the different theoretical and multidisciplinary approaches and questions of individualism/abstract citizenship and collectivism/substantial citizenship and corresponding individual and collective identities, politics of recognition, liberal and communitarian perspectives, and recent developments within the stream of liberal multiculturalism. Moreover, this article deals with different models, constitutional arrangements and international human rights law provisions that give priority either to individuals or to collectives. Human dignity as a value has been used as a foundation for both the individual and the collective, arguing that not only individuals have a moral worth and dignity but also the collective has a moral worth and dignity, and consequently they both entail human right(s). Additionally, the article analyses the principle of equality and non-discrimination as mechanisms for equal political and legal recognition of individuals, but also of groups and collectives, regardless of their identity. Collective rights have been constitutional rights within multinational states, whether in the form of federalism or other forms of territorial, fiscal autonomy, non-territorial cultural autonomy, affirmative actions, quotas, veto mechanism, etc. The contribution ends with what, in my view, better frames arguments in the debate of political and legal recognition between the collectives and the individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more on the debate between the essentialist and constructivist concepts, see Mesić (2006), pp. 288ff.

  2. 2.

    Kalanj (2008), p. 40.

  3. 3.

    Golubović (2007), p. 505.

  4. 4.

    Kalanj (2008), pp. 41–42.

  5. 5.

    Kalanj (2008), p. 42.

  6. 6.

    Golubović (2007), pp. 505–506.

  7. 7.

    Kukathas (2002), p. 196.

  8. 8.

    Sakamoto (2002), p. 379.

  9. 9.

    Marko (2009), p. 29.

  10. 10.

    Sakamoto (2002), p. 45.

  11. 11.

    Fraser (2000), p. 109.

  12. 12.

    Ibidem.

  13. 13.

    Ibidem.

  14. 14.

    Ibidem.

  15. 15.

    Ibidem.

  16. 16.

    Ibidem.

  17. 17.

    Ibidem.

  18. 18.

    Fraser (2000), p. 110.

  19. 19.

    Ibidem.

  20. 20.

    Kymlicka (2009), p. 366.

  21. 21.

    Ibidem.

  22. 22.

    Kymlicka (2009), p. 367.

  23. 23.

    Ibidem.

  24. 24.

    Ibidem.

  25. 25.

    Ibidem.

  26. 26.

    Ibidem.

  27. 27.

    Ibidem.

  28. 28.

    Loretoni (2006), pp. 127–144.

  29. 29.

    Upbringing and education refer here to the development of individuals who are capable of understanding themselves in the context of his/her culture, but also taking a critical stance to their identity, changing it, treating others as equals, and choosing to confirm or partly/completely change their identity. However, we should keep in mind that such systems of upbringing and education do not exist in all cultures. Some cultures constitute and maintain identity through a negative relation to the other or, to borrow from Schmitt, through a friend-enemy relation. This mode of identity construction hinders the development of a rational individual capable of taking a critical stance. Instead, it creates individuals trapped in their own identity framework.

  30. 30.

    Taylor (1994), p. 25.

  31. 31.

    For example, the indigenous and colonized peoples being portrayed as uncivilised and inferior.

  32. 32.

    Taylor (1994), pp. 26–27.

  33. 33.

    Taylor (1994), p. 30.

  34. 34.

    Taylor (1994), p. 31.

  35. 35.

    Taylor (1994), p. 32.

  36. 36.

    Ibidem.

  37. 37.

    Taylor (1994), p. 36.

  38. 38.

    Walzer (1994), pp. 99–103.

  39. 39.

    Taylor (1994), p. 38.

  40. 40.

    Taylor (1994), p. 40.

  41. 41.

    Ibidem.

  42. 42.

    Taylor (1994), pp. 41–42.

  43. 43.

    Walzer (1994), pp. 99–103.

  44. 44.

    Walzer (1994), p. 99.

  45. 45.

    Raz (1988).

  46. 46.

    Raz (2005), p. 192.

  47. 47.

    Raz (2005), p. 196.

  48. 48.

    Kymlicka (2009), p. 371.

  49. 49.

    Ibidem.

  50. 50.

    Raz (2005), p. 208.

  51. 51.

    Ibidem.

  52. 52.

    Ibidem.

  53. 53.

    Faso (2007), p. 708.

  54. 54.

    Kymlicka (2009), p. 405.

  55. 55.

    Mezey (2015), p. 39.

  56. 56.

    Mezey (2015), p. 48.

  57. 57.

    I use the term collective in a broader sense to include groups with strong cohesive elements, such as ethnic or religious groups, but also groups bound together by less potent cohesive elements, such as women, persons with developmental disabilities, sexual and gender minorities etc.

  58. 58.

    Arneson (2013).

  59. 59.

    Ibidem.

  60. 60.

    Anderson (2012), Chapter 1, para. 2.

  61. 61.

    Ibidem.

  62. 62.

    Anderson (2012), Chapter 3, para. 4.

  63. 63.

    Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 18: Non-discrimination (1989), para 1. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/TBSearch.aspx?Lang=en&TreatyID=8&DocTypeID=11.

  64. 64.

    See also the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171, Arts 2.1, 14, 24 and 26; the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Art. 2.2; the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (signed 7 March 1966, entered into force 4 January 1969) 660 UNTS 195, Arts 1, 2, 4 and 5; the Convention on the Rights of the Child (signed 20 November 1989, entered into force 2 September 1990) 1577 UNTS 3. Art. 2; the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, (signed 18 December 1979, entered into force 3 September 1981) 1249 UNTS 13, Arts 2, 3, 4 and 15; the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (signed 13 December 2006, entered into force on 3 May 2008) 2515 UNTS 3. Arts 3, 4, 5 and 12.

  65. 65.

    International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), Art. 26.

  66. 66.

    American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (signed April 1948, entered into force 2 May 1948) https://www.cidh.oas.org/Basicos/English/Basic2.american%20Declaration.htm.

  67. 67.

    African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (adopted 27 June 1981, entered into force 21 October 1986) 1520 UNTS 217 (Banjul Charter) https://au.int/sites/default/files/treaties/36390-treaty-0011_-_african_charter_on_human_and_peoples_rights_e.pdf.

  68. 68.

    American Convention on Human Rights (signed 22 November 1969, entered into force 18 July 1978) 1144 UNTS 123 (Pact of San José) https://www.cidh.oas.org/basicos/english/basic3.american%20convention.htm.

  69. 69.

    The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (adopted 5 August 1990) https://www.cidh.oas.org/basicos/english/basic3.american%20convention.htm.

  70. 70.

    European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (adopted 4 November 1950, entered into force 4 September 1953).

  71. 71.

    Human Rights Committee (1989), para. 10.

  72. 72.

    See also: Human Rights Committee (1989), para. 10; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979), Art. 4.

  73. 73.

    Constitution of India (1949, last rev. 2019), Art. 15.4. https://www.constituteproject.org/.

  74. 74.

    Constitution of Nepal (2015), Art. 18.3. https://www.constituteproject.org/.

  75. 75.

    Constitution of Nepal (2015), Art. 18.4.

  76. 76.

    Constitution of Barbados (1966, last rev. 2020), Art. 23.2. https://www.constituteproject.org/.

  77. 77.

    Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-15.html.

  78. 78.

    Chartrand (2001), p. 7.

  79. 79.

    Ibidem.

  80. 80.

    Chartrand (2001), p. 8.

  81. 81.

    Ibidem.

  82. 82.

    Chartrand (2001), p. 13; Constitution Act (1982). Section 35 https://indigenousfoundations.arts.ubc.ca/constitution_act_1982_section_35/.

  83. 83.

    Levy (1997), p. 22.

  84. 84.

    Levy (1997), p. 24.

  85. 85.

    Merdzanovic (2015), p. 107.

  86. 86.

    Merdzanovic (2015), p. 108.

  87. 87.

    Merdzanovic (2015), pp. 114–116.

  88. 88.

    Merdzanovic (2015), p. 115.

  89. 89.

    Ibidem.

  90. 90.

    See Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1995, amend. 2009), Art. IV.3.e. http://www.ohr.int/ohr-dept/legal/laws-of-bih/pdf/001%20-%20Constitutions/BH/BH%20CONSTITUTION%20.pdf.

  91. 91.

    Merdzanovic (2015), p. 115.

  92. 92.

    Ibidem.

  93. 93.

    Ibidem.

  94. 94.

    Ibidem.

  95. 95.

    United Nations Declaration on The Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wpcontent/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf.

  96. 96.

    Chartrand (2001), p. 6.

  97. 97.

    Ibidem.

  98. 98.

    Ibidem.

References

  • Anderson E (2012) Egalitarianism. In: Estlund D (ed) The Oxford handbook of political philosophy (epub). OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneson R (2013) Egalitarianism. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Summer 2013. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/egalitarianism/

  • Chartrand LN (2001) Shorter article: re-conceptualizing equality: a place for indigenous political identity. Windsor Yearb Access Just 19:243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Faso G (2007) Istorija filozofije prava. CID, Univerzitet Mediteran, Podgorica

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (2000) Rethinking recognition. New Left Rev 3:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubović Z (2007) Antropologija. Službeni glasnik, Beograd

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalanj R (2008) Modernizacija i identitet. Politička kultura, Zagreb

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukathas C (2002) Postoje li kulturna prava? In: Divjak S (ed) Nacija, kultura i građanstvo. Službeni list, Beograd, pp 191–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka W (2009) Savremena politička filozofija. Nova srpska politička misao, Beograd

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy TJ (1997) Classifying cultural rights. In: Shapiro I, Kymlicka W (eds) Ethnicity and group rights. Nomos XXXIX, New York, London, pp 22–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Loretoni A (2006) Identitet i priznanje. In: Ceruti F (ed) Identitet i politika. Politička kultura, Zagreb, pp 127–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Marko D (2009) Zar na Zapadu postoji neki drugi Bog? Media plan institute, Sarajevo

    Google Scholar 

  • Merdzanovic A (2015) Democracy by Decree. Prospects and limits of imposed consociational democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ibidem Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesić M (2006) Multikulturalizam: društveni i teorijski izazovi. Školska knjiga, Zagreb

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezey N (2015) Mapping a cultural studies of law. In: Sarat A, Ewick P (eds) The handbook of law and society. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 39–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (1988) The morality of freedom. OUP, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (2005) Etika u javnom domenu: ogledi iz moralnosti prava i politike. CID, Podgorica

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto R (2002) Japan, hibridnost i stvaranje kolonijalističkog diskursa. In: Divjak S (ed) Nacija, kultura i građanstvo. Službeni list, Beograd, pp 379–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1994) The politics of recognition. In: Gutmann A (ed) Multiculturalisam. Princetone University Press, New Jersey, pp 25–73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer M (1994) Comment. In: Gutmann A (ed) Multiculturalism. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp 99–103

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damir Banović .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Banović, D. (2022). Individual Identity, Collective Identity and Human Dignity. What Are the Best Models to Accommodate Different Identities?. In: Krešić, M., Banović, D., Sampedro, A.C., Pleps, J. (eds) Ethnic Diversity, Plural Democracy and Human Dignity. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 99. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97917-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97917-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97916-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97917-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics