Skip to main content

Perineal Defects: A Colorectal Surgeon’s Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perineal Reconstruction
  • 265 Accesses

Abstract

Perineal defects are created for a wide range of indications in colorectal surgery, and their size, shape, and depth and the tissues they involve require significant tailoring to the patient. Relatively smaller perineal wounds involving only skin and subcutaneous incisions without surgery to remove the anal canal, low rectum, and pelvic floor are used to treat conditions such as anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), very early squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, anal warts, and benign conditions such as chronic anal fissures. In such cases, a local advancement flap (such as a V-Y) may be used. The focus of this chapter, however, is the larger perineal wounds such as those created in abdominoperineal resections that involve the removal of the anus, anal canal, and rectum, with variable amounts of adjacent pelvic floor muscles, subcutaneous fat, and skin depending on the indication for surgery (tumor type and size).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vieira P, Tayyab M, Nasir I, Fernandez L, Domingos H, Cunha J, Heald RJ, Figueiredo N, Parvaiz A. A standardized approach in robotic abdominoperineal excision - a video vignette. Color Dis. 2019;21(8):976; PMID: 31062480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang X, Wu Q, Hu T, Gu C, Bi L, Wang Z. Laparoscopic versus conventional open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(5):526–39; PMID: 29406806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986;1(8496):1479–82; PMID: 2425199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hawkins AT, Albutt K, Wise PE, Alavi K, Sudan R, Kaiser AM, Bordeianou L, Continuing Education Committee of the SSAT. Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer in the twenty-first century: indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(8):1477–87; PMID: 29663303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown WE, Koh CE, Badgery-Parker T, Solomon MJ. Validation of MRI and surgical decision making to predict a complete resection in pelvic Exenteration for recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(2):144–51; PMID: 28059910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Manegold P, Taukert J, Neeff H, Fichtner-Feigl S, Thomusch O. The minimum distal resection margin in rectal cancer surgery and its impact on local recurrence - a retrospective cohort analysis. Int J Surg. 2019;69:77–83; PMID: 31362126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Musters GD, Klaver CEL, Bosker RJI, Burger JWA, van Duijvendijk P, van Etten B, van Geloven AAW, de Graaf EJR, Hoff C, Leijtens JWA, Rutten HJT, Singh B, Vuylsteke RJCLM, de Wilt JHW, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (the BIOPEX-study). Ann Surg. 2017;265(6):1074–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Foster JD, Tou S, Curtis NJ, Smart NJ, Acheson A, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Watts A, Singh B, Francis NK. Closure of the perineal defect after abdominoperineal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma - ACPGBI position statement. Color Dis. 2018;20(Suppl 5):5–23; PMID: 30182511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Choudry U, Harris D. Perineal wound complications, risk factors, and outcome after abdominoperineal resections. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(2):209–13; PMID: 22868300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ledebo A, Bock D, Prytz M, Haglind E, Angenete E. Urogenital function 3 years after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Color Dis. 2018;20(6):O123–34; PMID: 29679517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hellinga J, Khoe PC, van Etten B, Hemmer PH, Havenga K, Stenekes MW, Eltahir Y. Fasciocutaneous lotus petal flap for perineal wound reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision: application for reconstruction of the pelvic floor and creation of a neovagina. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(12):4073–9; PMID: 27338743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beyond TME. Collaborative. Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes. Br J Surg. 2013;100(8):1009–14; PMID: 23754654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zampino MG, Magni E, Ravenda PS, Cella CA, Bonomo G, Della Vigna P, Galdy S, Spada F, Varano GM, Mauri G, Fazio N, Orsi F. Treatments for colorectal liver metastases: a new focus on a familiar concept. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;108:154–63; PMID: 27931834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Keller DS, Lawrence JK, Delaney CP. Prone jackknife position is not necessary to achieve a cylindrical abdominoperineal resection: demonstration of the lithotomy position. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(2):251; PMID: 24401888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lau YC, Jongerius K, Wakeman C, Heriot AG, Solomon MJ, Sagar PM, Tekkis PP, Frizelle FA. Influence of the level of sacrectomy on survival in patients with locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2019;106(4):484–90; PMID: 30648734.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishikawa S, Yokogawa H, Sato T, Hirokawa E, Ichioka S, Nakatsuka T. Gluteal fold flap for pelvic and perineal reconstruction following total pelvic exenteration. JPRAS Open. 2018;19:45–9; PMID: 32158851.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omer Aziz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aziz, O. (2023). Perineal Defects: A Colorectal Surgeon’s Perspective. In: Kosutic, D. (eds) Perineal Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97691-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97691-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97690-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97691-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics