Abstract
Both in the conventional accounts of International Relations discipline, as well as in foreign policies of various actors, the Global South has predominantly been defined with reference to a “zone of lack” which is “in need of aid and tutelage.” In recent decades, postcolonial IR approaches have problematized this representation through interrogating the reasons for and processes of its construction. While doing this, however, the postcolonial IR literature mainly focuses on the Global North actors’ discourses and practices on the Global South, and how non-core actors view their counterparts remains underexamined. Based on this gap in the literature, this study investigates whether and how Turkey, as a non-core actor in world politics, challenges or contributes to predominant representations of the Global South. As such, the study seeks to answer the question of “how do the politicians in Turkey understand the place of the Global South in world politics?” The study is structured around three sections. The first section looks at previous works done about Turkish foreign policy in the Global South. The second section presents our theoretical framework, and the selected research method. The third section analyses the discourses produced in the 2000s by political elites from both the ruling as well as the opposition political parties in Turkey about the Global South. The study concludes with discussing the implications of our findings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AKP. (2018). Cumhurbaşkanlığı Seçimleri ve Genel Seçimler Seçim Beyannamesi: Güçlü Meclis, Güçlü Hükümet, Güçlü Türkiye, Yaparsa Yine AK Parti Yapar. https://www.akparti.org.tr/media/318779/24-haziran-2018-cumhurbaskanligi-secimleri-ve-genel-secimler-secim-beyannamesi-sayfalar.pdf. Last accessed October 2021.
Akpınar, P. (2013). Turkey’s peacebuilding in Somalia: The limits of humanitarian diplomacy. Turkish Studies, 14(4), 735–757.
Aljazeera Türk. (2014, September 24). Erdoğan: Dünya 5’ten büyüktür. http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/haber/erdogan-dunya-5ten-buyuktur. Last accessed October 2021.
Apaydin, F. (2012). Overseas development aid across the global south: Lessons from the Turkish experience in Sub-Saharan Africa and Central Asia. European Journal of Development Research, 24(2), 261–228.
Arkan, Z., & Kınacıoğlu, M. (2016). Enabling “ambitious activism”: Davutoğlu’s vision of a new foreign policy identity for Turkey. Turkish Studies, 17(3), 381–405.
Barkawi, T. (2004). Connection and constitution: Locating war and culture in globalization studies. Globalizations, 1(2), 155–170.
Bayer, R., & Keyman, E. F. (2012). Turkey: An emerging hub of globalization and internationalist humanitarian actor? Globalizations, 9(1), 73–90.
Bilgin, P. (2016). The international in security, security in the international. Routledge.
Bilgin, P., & Morton, D. A. (2002). Historicizing representations of failed states: Beyond the cold-war annexation of the social science? Third World Quarterly, 23(1), 55–80.
Birgün. (2018, December 8). Erdoğan’ın “dünya 5’ten büyüktür” sözü ders kitabına girdi. https://www.birgun.net/haber/erdogan-in-dunya-5-ten-buyuktur-sozu-ders-kitabina-girdi-239497. Last accessed October 2021.
Bloomberg HT. (2019, December 19). Erdoğan: Dünya 5’ten büyüktür diyoruz. https://www.bloomberght.com/erdogan-dunya-5-ten-buyuktur-diyoruz-2242312. Last accessed October 2021.
Campbell, D. (1992). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Manchester University Press.
Çapan, Z. G. (2016). Re-writing international relations: History and theory beyond eurocentrism in Turkey. Rowman and Littlefield.
Cemalettin, H. (2014). Turkey’s humanitarian diplomacy and development co-operation. Insight Turkey, 16(1), 127–145.
Chowdhry, G., & Nair, S. (2002). Introduction: Power in a postcolonial world: Race, gender, and class in international relations. In G. Chowdhry & S. Nair (Eds.), Power, postcolonialism and international relations: Reading race, gender, and class (pp. 1–32). Routledge.
CHP. (2002). Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi Seçim Bildirgesi: Güzel Günler Göreceğiz. https://acikerisim.tbmm.gov.tr/xmlui/handle/11543/955. Last accessed October 2021.
Cumhuriyet. (2012, June 29). AKP’ye “taşeronluk” uyarısı. https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/akpye-taseronluk-uyarisi-353650. Last accessed October 2021.
Davies, D., & Boehmer, E. (2019). Postcolonialism and south-south relations. In E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh & P. Delay (Eds.), Routledge handbook of south-south relations (pp. 48–58). Routledge.
Demirtas-Bagdonas, Ö. (2014). Reading Turkey’s foreign policy on Syria: The AKP’s construction of a great power identity and the politics of grandeur. Turkish Studies, 15(1), 139–155.
Der Derian, J. (1992). Antidiplomacy: Spies, terror, speed and war. Blackwell Publishers.
Der Derian, J., & Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.) (1989). International/Intertextual relations: Postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington Books.
Dikmen-Alsancak, N., & Küçük, M. N. (2021). The what, who and where of world politics? two different conceptions of ‘the international.’ Uluslararasi İlişkiler, 18(70), 103–120.
Donelli, F., & Levaggi, A. G. (2016). Becoming global actor: The Turkish agenda for the global south. Rising Powers Quarterly, 1(2), 93–115.
Doty, R. L. (1996). Imperial encounters: The politics of representation in North-South relations. University of Minnesota Press.
Ergin, M., & Karakaya, Y. (2017). Between neo-Ottomanism and Ottomania: Navigating state-led and popular cultural representations of the past. New Perspectives on Turkey, 56, 33–59.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E., & Daley, P. (2019). Introduction: Conceptualising the global south and south-south encounters. In E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh & P. Daley (Eds.), Routledge handbook of South-South Relations (pp. 1–27). Routledge.
Gazete Duvar. (2021, April 5). Başkan seçimi ikinci tura kaldı. https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/baskan-secimi-ikinci-tura-kaldi-erdogan-ile-haber-1518264. Last accessed October 2021.
Grovogui, S. N. (2006). Beyond Eurocentrism and anarchy: Memories of international order and institutions. Palgrave MacMillan.
Grovogui, S. N. (2010). Postcolonialism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds.), International relations theories: Discipline and diversity (pp. 238–256). Oxford University Press.
Grovogui, S. N. (2011). A revolution nonetheless: The global south in international relations. Global South, 5(1), 175–190.
Haberler. (2017, April 13). Baykal: Yağma yok devletimizi yıktırmayacağız. https://www.haberler.com/baykal-yagma-yok-devletimizi-yiktirmayacagiz-1-9495999-haberi/. Last accessed October 2021.
Hobson, J. M. (2004). The eastern origins of western civilization. Cambridge University Press. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/son-dakika-cumhurbaskani-erdogan-bm-ve-uluslararasi-kurumlardaki-reform-ihtiyaci-gormezden-gelinemez-41920375. Last accessed October 2021.
Hürriyet. (2012, September 9). Kılıçdaroğlu: “Bu neyin kutlaması beyler?”. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/kilicdaroglu-bu-neyin-kutlamasi-beyler-21418933. Last accessed October 2021.
Hürriyet. (2021, October 19). Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: BM ve uluslararası kurumlardaki reform ihtiyacı görmezden gelinemez.
Independent Türkçe. (2021, May 12). Erdoğan: BM kürsüsünden yıllardır dile getirdiğimiz “Dünya 5’ten büyüktür” çağrımızın haklılığına hep birlikte şahitlik ettik. https://www.indyturk.com/node/358546#.YTH3k64k_RQ. Last accessed October 2021.
İYİP. (2018). İyi Parti Programı. https://iyiparti.org.tr/storage/img/doc/iyi-parti-guncel-parti-program.pdf. Last accessed October 2021.
Keyman, E. F., & Sazak, O. (2014). Turkey as a humanitarian state. POMEAS Policy Paper, 2, 1–14.
Kılıçdaroğlu, K. (2018, October 16). CHP Genel Başkanı Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, TBMM CHP Grup Topltantısında Konuştu. https://www.chp.org.tr/haberler/chp-genel-baskani-kemal-kilicdaroglu-tbmm-chp-grup-toplantisinda-konustu-16-ekim-2018. Last accessed October 2021.
Kılıçdaroğlu, K. (2021a, January 26). CHP Genel Başkanı Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, TBMM CHP Grup Topltantısında Konuştu. https://www.chp.org.tr/haberler/chp-genel-baskani-kemal-kilicdaroglu-tbmm-chp-grup-toplantisinda-konustu-26-ocak-2021. Last accessed October 2021.
Kılıçdaroplu, K. (2021b, August 25). CHP Genel Başkanı Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, TBMM CHP Grup Topltantısında Konuştu. https://www.chp.org.tr/haberler/chp-lideri-kilicdaroglu-ankarada-muhtarlar-stk-temsilcileri-ve-kanaat-onderleri-bulusmasinda-konustu-25-agustos-2021. Last accessed October 2021.
Kınacıoğlu, M. (2021). The rise and fall of an emerging power: Agency in Turkey’s identity-based regionalism. In B. Futak-Campbell (Ed.), Globalizing regionalism and international relations (pp. 207–232). Bristol University Press.
Korkut, U., & Civelekoglu, I. (2013). Becoming a regional power while pursuing material gains: The case of Turkish interest in Africa. International Journal, 68(1), 187–203.
Krishna, S. (2018). Postcolonialism and its relevance for international relations in a globalized world. In R. B. Persaud & A. Sajed (Eds.), Race, gender, and culture in international relations: postcolonial perspective (pp. 19–34). Routledge.
Küçük, M. N. (2018). Conceptions of ‘the international’ beyond the core: Turkey in the post-Cold War Era. Turkish Studies, 19(4), 571–592.
Laffey, M., & Weldes, J. (2004). Methodological reflections on discourse analysis. Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 28–31.
Langan, M. (2017). Virtuous power Turkey in sub-Saharan Africa: The ‘Neo-Ottoman’ challenge to the European Union. Third World Quarterly, 38(6): 1399–1414.
Levaggi, A. G., & Donelli, F. (2021). Turkey’s changing engagement with the global south. International Affairs, 97(4), 1105–1124.
Ling, L. H. M. (2002). Postcolonial international relations: Conquest and desire between Asia and the west. Palgrave Macmillan.
McLean, I., & McMillan, A. (2009). The concise Oxford dictionary of politics (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
MHP. (2018). Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi Seçim Beyannamesi: Cumhur İttifakı, Millet Aklı: Milli Diriliş, Kutlu Yükseliş. https://www.mhp.org.tr/usr_img/_mhp2007/kitaplar/24haziran2018_secim_beyannamesi_tam_web.pdf. Last accessed October 2021.
Milliyet. (2011, July 22). CHP’li Korutürk’ten AKP’nin İzlediği Politikaya Benzetme. https://www.milliyet.com.tr/siyaset/chpli-koruturkten-akp-nin-izledigi-dis-politikaya-benzetme-1417591. Last accessed October 2021.
Moore-Gilbert, B. (1997). Postcolonial Theory: contexts, practices, politics. Verso.
O’Tuathail, G., & Agnew, J. (1992). Geopolitics and discourse: Practical geopolitical reasoning in American foreign policy. Political Geography, 11(2), 190–204.
Ongur, H. O. (2015). Identifying Ottomanisms: The discursive evolution of Ottoman pasts in the Turkish presents. MES, 51(3), 416–432.
Özkan, M. (2010). What drives Turkey’s involvement in Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 37(126), 533–540.
Özkan, M. (2012). A new actor or passer-by? Political economy of Turkey’s engagement with Africa. Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies, 14(1), 113–133.
Parlar Dal, E. (Ed.) (2018). Middle powers in global governance: The rise of Turkey. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rumelili, B. (2012). Liminal identities and process of domestication and subversion in international relations. Review of International Studies, 38(2), 495–508.
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
Shapiro, M. J. 1988. The politics of representation: Writing practices in biography, photography, and policy analysis. University of Wisconsin Press.
Shilliam, R. (Ed.) (2011). International relations and non-western thought: Imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity. Routledge.
Shilliam, R. (2016). Colonial architecture or relatable hinterlands? Locke, Nandy, Fanon, and the Bandung Spirit. Constellations, 23(3), 425–435.
Slater, D. (2004). Geopolitics and the post-colonial: Rethinking North-South relations. Blackwell.
Sputnik Türkiye. (2018, May 14). Akşener’den dış politikada “yeni bir çizgi” vaadi. https://tr.sputniknews.com/20180514/aksener-dis-politika-yeni-cizgi-vaadi-1033436928.html. Last accessed October 2021.
Türk Dil Kurumu. (n.d.). https://sozluk.gov.tr/. Last accessed October 2021.
Waever, O., & Tickner, A. B. (2009). Introduction: Geocultural epistemologies. In A. B. Tickner & O. Waever (Eds.), International relations scholarship around the world (pp. 1–31). Routledge.
Wastnidge, E. (2019). Imperial grandeur and selective memory: Re-assessing neo-ottomanism in Turkish foreign and domestic politics. Middle East Critique, 28(1), 7–28.
Weldes, J., Laffey, M., Gusterson, H., & Duvall, R. (Eds.) (1999). Cultures of insecurity: States, communities, and the production of danger. University of Minnesota Press.
Yanık, L. K. (2009). The metamorphosis of metaphors of vision: “Bridging” Turkey’s location, role and identity after the end of the cold war. Geopolitics, 14(3), 531–549.
Yanık, L. K. (2011). Constructing Turkish “exceptionalism”: Discourses of liminality and hybridity in post-Cold War Turkish foreign policy. Political Geography, 30, 80–89.
Yanık, L. K. (2016). Bringing the empire back in: The gradual discovery of the Ottoman Empire in Turkish Foreign policy. Die Welt des Islams, 56: 466–488.
Zarakol, A. (2011). After defeat: how the east learned to live with the West. Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Küçük, M.N., Dikmen-Alsancak, N. (2022). Understanding the Place of the Global South Within Turkey’s View of World Order. In: Erdoğan, B., Hisarlıoğlu, F. (eds) Critical Readings of Turkey’s Foreign Policy. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97637-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97637-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97636-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97637-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)