Skip to main content

Rare Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sinonasal and Skull Base Malignancies

Abstract

The sinonasal and skull base regions give rise to a diverse range of benign and malignant neoplasms, many of which are remarkably rare. This diversity in part makes sinonasal tract pathology one of the more challenging areas of head and neck surgical pathology. Not uncommonly, ancillary testing is required to distinguish a suspected diagnosis from its mimickers, highlighting the importance of generous biopsy material. The most recent WHO classification of head and neck tumors has more fully characterized a number of sinonasal neoplasms in comparison to prior editions due to advances in understanding of their underlying genetic mechanisms. This chapter focuses on rare sinonasal and skull base neoplasms, with an emphasis on pertinent diagnostic morphologic features and attention to ancillary testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shanmugaratnam K, et al. Teratoid carcinosarcoma of the paranasal sinuses. Pathology. 1983;15(4):413–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Heffner DK, Hyams VJ. Teratocarcinosarcoma (malignant teratoma?) of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses A clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Cancer. 1984;53(10):2140–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pai SA, et al. Teratocarcinosarcoma of the paranasal sinuses: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol. 1998;29(7):718–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Salem F, et al. Teratocarcinosarcoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: report of 3 cases with assessment for chromosome 12p status. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(4):605–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Misra P, et al. Management of sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma: a systematic review. Am J Otolaryngol. 2014;35(1):5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith SL, et al. Sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma of the head and neck: a report of 10 patients treated at a single institution and comparison with reported series. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(6):592–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, et al. Sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma ("mixed olfactory neuroblastoma-craniopharyngioma") presenting with syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone. Clin Neuropathol. 2000;19(2):63–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shah AA, et al. SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract: a potentially under-recognized form of sinonasal adenocarcinoma with occasional yolk sac tumor-like features. Head Neck Pathol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-019-01065-7.

  9. Rooper LM, et al. Recurrent loss of SMARCA4 in sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang Z, Uppaluri R, Lewis JS Jr. Ethmoid sinus mass. Sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(4):389–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis JT, et al. Low-grade sinonasal sarcoma with neural and myogenic features: a clinicopathologic analysis of 28 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(4):517–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang X, et al. Recurrent PAX3-MAML3 fusion in biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(7):666–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chitguppi C, et al. Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma-case report and review of clinicopathological features and diagnostic modalities. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019;80(1):51–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Loarer F, et al. Clinicopathologic and molecular features of a series of 41 biphenotypic sinonasal sarcomas expanding their molecular spectrum. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43(6):747–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cannon RB, et al. Imaging and outcomes for a new entity: low-grade sinonasal sarcoma with neural and myogenic features. J Neurol Surg Rep. 2017;78(1):e15–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miglani A, et al. Imaging characteristics and clinical outcomes of biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019;4(5):484–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fritchie KJ, et al. Fusion gene profile of biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma: an analysis of 44 cases. Histopathology. 2016;69(6):930–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jo VY, et al. Expression of PAX3 distinguishes biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma from histologic mimics. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(10):1275–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gross J, Fritchie K. Soft tissue special issue: biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma: a review with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Head Neck Pathol. 2020;14(1):33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rooper LM, et al. Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma: an expanded immunoprofile including consistent nuclear beta-catenin positivity and absence of SOX10 expression. Hum Pathol. 2016;55:44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Compton ML, Cates JMM. Evidence-based tumor staging of skeletal chondrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44(1):111–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koch BB, et al. National cancer database report on chondrosarcoma of the head and neck. Head Neck. 2000;22(4):408–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ellis MA, Gerry DR, Byrd JK. Head and neck chondrosarcomas: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Head Neck. 2016;38(9):1359–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Suster D, Hung YP, Nielsen GP. Differential diagnosis of cartilaginous lesions of bone. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144(1):71–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Almefty K, et al. Chordoma and chondrosarcoma: similar, but quite different, skull base tumors. Cancer. 2007;110(11):2457–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ma X, et al. The differences between intracranial mesenchymal chondrosarcoma and conventional chondrosarcoma in clinical features and outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:e1078–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Awad M, Gogos AJ, Kaye AH. Skull base chondrosarcoma. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;24:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, ed. Soft tissue and bone tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: IARC Press, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Simon F, et al. Surgery and protontherapy in grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: a comparative retrospective study. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0208786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Holtzman AL, et al. Proton therapy for skull-base chondrosarcoma, a single-institution outcomes study. J Neuro-Oncol. 2019;142(3):557–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Guan X, et al. The preliminary results of proton and carbon ion therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skull base and cervical spine. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14(1):206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bloch OG, et al. Cranial chondrosarcoma and recurrence. Skull Base. 2010;20(3):149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bohman LE, et al. Skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma: influence of clinical and demographic factors on prognosis: a SEER analysis. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(5):806–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chambers KJ, et al. Incidence and survival patterns of cranial chordoma in the United States. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(5):1097–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bakker SH, et al. Chordoma: a systematic review of the epidemiology and clinical prognostic factors predicting progression-free and overall survival. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(12):3043–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Williams BJ, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of chordoma. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2013;11(6):726–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Liang WS, et al. Identification of therapeutic targets in chordoma through comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analyses. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2018;4(6)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vujovic S, et al. Brachyury, a crucial regulator of notochordal development, is a novel biomarker for chordomas. J Pathol. 2006;209(2):157–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Oakley GJ, Fuhrer K, Seethala RR. Brachyury, SOX-9, and podoplanin, new markers in the skull base chordoma vs chondrosarcoma differential: a tissue microarray-based comparative analysis. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(12):1461–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Stacchiotti S, et al. Best practices for the management of local-regional recurrent chordoma: a position paper by the Chordoma Global Consensus Group. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(6):1230–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Di Maio S, et al. Novel targeted therapies in chordoma: an update. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:873–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takashi Takata PJS. WHO classification of head and neck tumours. 4th ed. WHO - OMS - In IARC,. Lyon; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hellquist H, French CA, Bishop JA, Coca-Pelaz A, Propst EJ, Paiva Correia A, et al. NUT midline carcinoma of the larynx: an international series and review of the literature. Histopathology. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13143.

  44. Agaimy A, Fonseca I, Martins C, Thway K, Barrette R, Harrington KJ, et al. NUT carcinoma of the salivary glands: clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of 3 cases and a survey of NUT expression in salivary gland carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001046.

  45. Chau NG, Hurwitz S, Mitchell CM, Aserlind A, Grunfeld N, Kaplan L, et al. Intensive treatment and survival outcomes in NUT midline carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30242.

  46. French C. NUT midline carcinoma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3659.

  47. Haack H, Johnson LA, Fry CJ, Crosby K, Polakiewicz RD, Stelow EB, et al. Diagnosis of NUT midline carcinoma using a NUT-specific monoclonal antibody. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009; https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e318198d666.

  48. Bauer DE, Mitchell CM, Strait KM, Lathan CS, Stelow EB, Lüer SC, et al. Clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes of NUT midline carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1153.

  49. Filippakopoulos P, Qi J, Picaud S, Shen Y, Smith WB, Fedorov O, et al. Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains. Nature. 2010; https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09504.

  50. Stathis A, Zucca E, Bekradda M, Gomez-Roca C, Delord JP, de Rouge TLM, et al. Clinical response of carcinomas harboring the BRD4–NUT oncoprotein to the targeted bromodomain inhibitor OTX015/MK-8628. Cancer Discov. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1335.

  51. Maher OM, Christensen AM, Yedururi S, Bell D, Tarek N. Histone deacetylase inhibitor for NUT midline carcinoma. Pediatric Blood Cancer. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25350.

  52. Schwartz BE, Hofer MD, Lemieux ME, Bauer DE, Cameron MJ, West NH, et al. Differentiation of NUT midline carcinoma by epigenomic reprogramming. Cancer Res. 2011; https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3513.

  53. Agaimy A, Koch M, Lell M, Semrau S, Dudek W, Wachter DL, et al. SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient sinonasal basaloid carcinoma: a novel member of the expanding family of SMARCB1-deficient neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000236.

  54. Bishop JA, Antonescu CR, Westra WH. SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient carcinomas of the sinonasal tract. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000285.

  55. Neves-Silva R, Almeida LY, Silveira HA, Colturato CBN, Duarte A, Ferrisse TM, et al. SMARCB1 (INI-1) and NUT immunoexpression in a large series of head and neck carcinomas in a Brazilian reference center. Head Neck. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26008.

  56. Agaimy A, Weichert W. SMARCA4-deficient Sinonasal Carcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-017-0783-4.

  57. Kakkar A, Antony VM, Pramanik R, Sakthivel P, Singh CA, Jain D. SMARCB1 (INI1)–deficient sinonasal carcinoma: a series of 13 cases with assessment of histologic patterns. Hum Pathol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2018.08.008.

  58. Bell D, Hanna EY, Agaimy A, Weissferdt A. Reappraisal of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: SMARCB1 (INI1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma: a single-institution experience. Virchows Archiv. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1853-1.

  59. Zamecnik M, Rychnovsky J, Syrovatka J. Sinonasal SMARCB1 (INI1) deficient carcinoma with yolk sac tumor differentiation: report of a case and comparison with INI1 expression in gonadal germ cell tumors. Int J Surg Pathol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896917741549.

  60. Agaimy A, Hartmann A, Antonescu CR, Chiosea SI, El-Mofty SK, Geddert H, et al. SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000797.

  61. McHugh KE, Policarpio-Nicolas MLC. Metastatic SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA): a potential diagnostic pitfall and review of the literature. Acta Cytologica. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1159/000500351.

  62. Wasserman JK, Dickson BC, Perez-Ordonez B, de Almeida JR, Irish JC, Weinreb I. INI1 (SMARCB1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma: a clinicopathologic report of 2 cases. Head Neck Pathol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-016-0752-3.

  63. Bishop JA, Ogawa T, Stelow EB, Moskaluk CA, Koch WM, Pai SI, Westra WH. Human papillomavirus-related carcinoma with adenoid cystic-like features: a peculiar variant of head and neck cancer restricted to the sinonasal tract. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e31827b1cd6.

  64. Bishop JA, Andreasen S, Hang J-F, Bullock MJ, Chen TY, Franchi A, et al. HPV-related multiphenotypic Sinonasal carcinoma HPV-related carcinoma with adenoid cystic carcinoma-like features. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;

    Google Scholar 

  65. Adamane SA, Mittal N, Teni T, Pawar S, Waghole R, Bal M. Human papillomavirus-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma with unique HPV type 52 association: a case report with review of literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-018-0969-4.

  66. Chouake RJ, Cohen M, Iloreta AM. Case report: HPV-related carcinoma with adenoid cystic-like features of the sinonasal tract. Laryngoscope. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26957.

  67. Rodarte AI, Parikh AS, Gadkaree SK, Lehmann AE, Faquin WC, Holbrook EH, Lin DT. Human papillomavirus related multiphenotypic Sinonasal carcinoma: report of a case with early and progressive metastatic disease. J Neurol Surg Rep. 2019;80(4):e41–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Shah AA, Lamarre ED, Bishop JA. Human papillomavirus-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma: a case report documenting the potential for very late tumor recurrence. Head Neck Pathol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-018-0895-5.

  69. Hwang SJI, Ok S, Lee HM, Lee E, Park IH. Human papillomavirus-related carcinoma with adenoid cystic-like features of the inferior turbinate: a case report. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2014.07.005.

  70. Bishop JA, Guo TW, Smith DF, Wang H, Ogawa T, Pai SI, Westra WH. Human papillomavirus-related carcinomas of the sinonasal tract. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182698673.

  71. Laco J, Sieglová K, Vošmiková H, Dundr P, Němejcová K, Michálek J, et al. The presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA transcripts in a subset of sinonasal carcinomas is evidence of involvement of HPV in its etiopathogenesis. Virchows Arch. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1812-x.

  72. Thompson ED, Stelow EB, Mills SE, Westra WH, Bishop JA. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the head and neck: a clinicopathologic series of 10 cases with an emphasis on HPV status. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000580.

  73. Likhacheva A, Rosenthal D, Hanna E, Kupferman M, Demonte F, El-Naggar A. Sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma: impact of differentiation status on response and outcome. Head Neck Oncol. 2011; https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-32.

  74. Franchi A, Rocchetta D, Palomba A, Innocenti DRD, Castiglione F, Spinelli G. Primary combined neuroendocrine and squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus: report of a case with immunohistochemical and molecular characterization. Head Neck Pathol. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-013-0513-5.

  75. Vasan NR, Medina JE, Canfield VA, Gillies EM. Sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma in association with siadh. Head Neck. 2004; https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10345.

  76. Mitchell EH, Diaz A, Yilmaz T, Roberts D, Levine N, Demonte F, et al. Multimodality treatment for sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma. Head Neck. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21940.

  77. Rooper LM, Bishop JA, Westra WH. INSM1 is a sensitive and specific marker of neuroendocrine differentiation in head and neck tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001037.

  78. Zur KB, Brandwein M, Wang B, Som P, Gordon R, Urken ML. Primary description of a new entity, renal cell-like carcinoma of the nasal cavity: Van meegeren in the house of vermeer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.4.441.

  79. Kubik M, Barasch N, Choby G, Seethala R, Snyderman C. Sinonasal renal cell-like carcinoma: case report and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-016-0774-x.

  80. Bastier PL, Dunion D, De Bonnecaze G, Serrano E, De Gabory L. Renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the sinonasal cavity: a review and report of 8 cases. Ear Nose Throat J. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1177/014556131809700902.

  81. Storck K, Hadi UM, d., Simpson, R., Ramer, M., & Brandwein-Gensler, M. Sinonasal renal cell-like adenocarcinoma: a report on four patients. Head Neck Pathol. 2008; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-008-0047-4.

  82. Shen T, Shi Q, Velosa C, Bai S, Thompson L, Simpson R, et al. Sinonasal renal cell-like adenocarcinomas: robust carbonic anhydrase expression. Human Pathol. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2015.06.017.

  83. Wu J, Fang Q, He YJ, Chen WX, Qi YK, Ding J. Local recurrence of sinonasal renal cell-like adenocarcinoma: a CARE compliant case report. Medicine (United States). 2019; https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014533.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly R. Magliocca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Magliocca, K.R., Griffith, C.C. (2022). Rare Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumors. In: Saba, N.F., Lin, D.T. (eds) Sinonasal and Skull Base Malignancies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97618-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97618-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97617-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97618-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics