Abstract
Approximately 6% of the world’s flowering plant species have specialised stamen morphologies that require mechanical stimulation (vibration) by bees in order to release pollen concealed within. This has given rise to the study of the phenomenon of buzz pollination. Although buzz pollination sits squarely within the discipline of biotremology, this link rarely has been made explicit. Our aim in this chapter is to bridge the gap that historically has existed between buzz pollination research and the discipline of biotremology. We will discuss what we know about bee-induced floral vibrations and compare them to other kinds of plant-borne vibrational signals. We will also highlight how certain experimental approaches developed by biotremology researchers have helped buzz pollination investigators better understand the complex behavioural and ecological interactions occurring between buzz pollinated plants and their bee visitors. We will then provide an overview of research methodologies for buzz pollination scientists and describe some of the more commonly used experimental approaches for recording and playback of bee-induced floral vibrations. By highlighting the many common themes existing between studies in buzz pollination and biotremology we hope to stimulate others to explore the many exciting new research avenues in this unique biotic interaction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arceo-Gómez G, Martinez ML, Parra-Tabla V, Garcıa-Franco JG (2011) Anther and stigma morphology in mirror-image flowers of Chamaecrista chamaecristoides (Fabaceae): Implications for buzz pollination. Plant Biol 13(Suppl 1):19–24
Arroyo-Correa B, Beattie C, Vallejo-Marín M (2019) Bee and floral traits affect the characteristics of the vibrations experienced by flowers during buzz-pollination. J Exp Biol. 222:jeb198176. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.198176
Bauer U, Poppinga S, Müller UK (2020) Mechanical ecology--Taking biomechanics to the field. Integr Comp Biol icaa018. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaa018
Bell PD (1980) Transmission of vibrations along plant stems: Implications for insect communication. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 88:210–216
Bennet-Clark HC (1989) Songs and the physics of sound production. In: Huber F, Moore TE, Loher W (eds) Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, London, pp 227–261
Bennet-Clark HC (1998) Size and scale effects as constraints in insect sound communication. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 353:407–419
Buchmann SL (1983) Buzz pollination in angiosperms. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, pp 73–113
Buchmann SL (1985) Bees use vibration to aid pollen collection from non-poricidal flowers. J Kansas Entomol Soc 58:517–525
Buchmann SL, Cane JH (1989) Bees assess pollen returns while sonicating Solanum flowers. Oecologia 81:289–294
Buchmann SL, Hurley JP (1978) Biophysical model for buzz pollination in Angiosperms. J Theor Biol 72:639–657
Buchmann SL, Jones CE, Colin LJ (1978) Vibratile pollination of Solanum douglasii and S. xanti (Solanaceae) in Southern California. Wasmann Journal of Biology 35:1–25
Burkart A, Lunau K, Schlindwein C (2011) Comparative bioacoustical studies on flight and buzzing of neotropical bees. Journal of Pollination Ecology 6:118–124
Cameron SA, Lozier JD, Strange JP, Koch JB, Cordes N, Solter LF, Griswold TL (2010) Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:662–667
Cardinal S, Buchmann SL, Russell AL (2018) The evolution of floral sonication, a pollen foraging behavior used by bees (Anthophila). Evolution 72:590–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13446
Casas J, Magal C, Sueur J (2007) Dispersive and non-dispersive waves through plants: Implications for arthropod vibratory communication. P Roy Soc Lond B 274:1087–1092
Cocroft RB (1996) Insect vibrational defence signals. Nature 382:679–680
Cocroft RB, De Luca PA (2006) Size-frequency relationships in insect vibrational signals. In: Drosopolous S, Claridge MF (eds) Insect Sounds and Communication: Physiology, behaviour, ecology and evolution. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 109–120
Cocroft RB, Rodrìguez RL (2005) The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. BioScience 55:323–334
Cocroft RB, Gogala M, Hill PSM, Wessel A (2014a) Fostering research progress in a rapidly growing field. In: Cocroft RB, Gogala M, Hill PSM, Wessel A (eds) Studying Vibrational Communication, vol 3. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 3–12
Cocroft RB, Hamel J, Su Q, Gibson J (2014b) Vibrational playback experiments: Challenges and solutions. In: Cocroft RB, Gogala M, Hill PSM, Wessel A (eds) Studying Vibrational Communication, vol 3. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 249–274
Čokl A, Virant-Doberlet M (2003) Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects. Annu Rev. Entomol 48:29–50
Čokl A, Virant-Doberlet M, Stritih N (2000) The structure and function of songs emitted by southern green stink bugs from Brazil, Florida, Italy and Slovenia. Physiol Entomol 25:196–205
Čokl A, Presern J, Virant-Doberlet M, Bagwell GJ, Millar JG (2004) Vibratory signals of the harlequin bug and their transmission through plants. Physiol Entomol 29:372–380
Čokl A, Zorovic M, Zunic A, Virant-Doberlet M (2005) Tuning of host plants with vibratory songs of Nezara viridula L (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J Exp Biol 208:1481–1488
Colla SR, Packer L (2008) Evidence for decline in eastern North American bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae), with special focus on Bombus affinis Cresson. Biodiversity and Conservation 17:1379–1391
Corbet SA, Huang SQ (2014) Buzz pollination in eight bumblebee-pollinated Pedicularis species: Does it involve vibration-induced triboelectric charging of pollen grains? Ann Bot 114:1665–1674. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu195
Corbet SA, Chapman H, Saville N (1988) Vibratory pollen collection and flower form: Bumble-bees on Actinidia, Symphytum, Borago and Polygonatum. Funct Ecol 2:147–155
De Luca PA (2015) Mass correlates with increased mating success for older but not younger males in thornbug treehoppers. Ann Entomol Soc Am 108:222–228
De Luca PA, Cocroft RB (2009) Age-related changes in an insect mating signal have no effect on female choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1787–1798
De Luca PA, Morris GK (1998) Courtship communication in meadow katydids: Female preference for large male vibrations. Behaviour 135:777–794
De Luca PA, Vallejo-Marín M (2013) What’s the buzz about? The ecology and evolutionary significance of buzz-pollination. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:429–435
De Luca PA, Bussière LF, Souto-Vilaros D, Goulson D, Mason AC, Vallejo-Marín M (2013) Variability in bumblebee pollination buzzes affects the quantity of pollen released from flowers. Oecologia 172:805–816
De Luca PA, Cox DA, Vallejo-Marín M (2014) Comparison of pollination and defensive buzzes in bumblebees indicates species-specific and context-dependent vibrations. Naturwissenschaften 101:331–338
De Luca PA, Giebink N, Mason AC, Papaj DR, Buchmann SL (2018) How well do acoustic recordings characterize properties of bee (Anthophila) floral sonication vibrations? Bioacoustics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2018.1511474
De Luca PA, Buchmann SL, Galen C, Mason AC, Vallejo-Marín M (2019) Does body size predict the buzz-pollination frequencies used by bees? Ecol Evol 9:4875–4887
Dierkes S, Barth FG (1995) Mechanism of signal production in the vibratory communication of the wandering spider Cupiennius getazi (Arachnida, Araneae). J Comp Physiol A 176:31–44
Dulberger R, Smith MB, Bawa KS (1994) The stigmatic orifice in Cassia, Senna, and Chamaecrista (Caesalpinaceae): Morphological variation, function during pollination, and possible adaptive significance. Am J Bot 81:1390–1396
Eberhard MJB, Metze D, Küpper SC (2019) Causes of variability in male vibratory signals and the role of female choice in Mantophasmatodea. Behav Process 166:103907
Elias DO, Lee N, Hebets EA, Mason AC (2006) Seismic signal production in a wolf spider: Parallel versus serial multi-component signals. J Exp Biol 209:1074–1084
Endler JA (2014) Foreward: The emerging field of tremology. In: Cocroft RB, Gogala M, Hill PSM, Wessel A (eds) Studying Vibrational Communication. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp vii–x
Gibson JS, Cocroft RB (2018) Vibration-guided mate searching in treehoppers: directional accuracy and sampling strategies in a complex sensory environment. J Exp Biol 221(6):jeb175083
Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botias C, Rotheray EL (2015) Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 347:1–16
Harder LD, Barclay MR (1994) The functional significance of poricial anthers and buzz pollination: controlled pollen removal from Dodecatheon. Funct Ecol 8:509–517
Hebets EA, Elias DO, Mason AC, Miller GL, Stratton GE (2008) Substrate-dependent signalling success in the wolf spider, Schizocosa retrorsa. Anim Behav 75:605–615
Henry CS (1980) The importance of low-frequency, substrate-borne sounds in lacewing communication (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 73:617–621
Henry CS, Martinez-Wells ML (2006) Testing the ability of males and females to respond to altered songs in the duetting green lacewing, Chrysoperla plorabunda (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:39–51
Henry CS, Wells MLM, Simon CM (1999) Convergent evolution of courtship songs among cryptic species of the Carnea group of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Evolution 53:1165–1179
Hill PSM (2008) Vibrational Communication in Animals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hill PSM, Wessel A (2016) Biotremology. Curr Biol 26:R187–R191
Hrncir M, Schmidt VM, Schorkopf DLP, Jarau S, Zucchi R, Barth FG (2006) Vibrating the food receivers: A direct way of signal transmission in stingless bees (Melipona seminigra). J Comp Physiol A 192:879–887
Hunt RE, Morton TL (2001) Regulation of chorusing in the vibrational communication system of the leafhopper Graminella nigrifrons. Am Zool 41:1222–1228
Hunt RE, Nault LR (1991) Roles of interplant movement, acoustic communication, and phonotaxis in mate-location behavior of the leafhopper Graminella nigrifrons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:315–320
Josephson RK, Malamud JG, Stokes DR (2000) Asynchronous muscle: A primer. J Exp Biol 203:2713–2722
Kilpinen O, Storm J (1997) Biophysics of the subgenual organ of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol A 181:309–318
King MJ (1993) Buzz foraging mechanism in bumble bees. J Apic Res 32:41–49
King MJ, Buchmann SL (1995) Bumble bee-initiated vibration release mechanism of Rhododendron pollen. Am J Bot 82:1407–1411
King MJ, Buchmann SL (1996) Sonication dispensing of pollen from Solanum laciniatum flowers. Funct Ecol 10:449–456
King MJ, Buchmann SL (2003) Floral sonication by bees: Mesosomal vibration by Bombus and Xylocopa, but not Apis (Hymenoptera: Apidae), ejects pollen from poricidal anthers. J Kansas Entomol Soc 76:295–305
King MJ, Lengoc L (1993) Vibratory pollen collection dynamics. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 36:135–140
King MJ, Buchmann SL, Spangler HG (1996) Activity of asynchronous flight muscle from two bee families during sonication (buzzing). J Exp Biol 199:2317–2321
Kumar H, Saxena KN (1985) Certain environmental factors influencing the acoustic communication in the sexual behaviour of the leafhopper Amrasca devastans (Distant) (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Appl Entomol Zool 20:199–209
Larson BM, Scheme B (1999a) The ecology of pollen limitation in buzz-pollinated Rhexia virginica (Melastomataceae). J Ecol 87:371–381
Larson BM, Scheme B (1999b) The pollination ecology of buzz-pollinated Rhexia virginica (Melastomataceae). Am J Bot 86:502–511
Macior LW (1964) Experimental study of floral ecology of Dodecatheon meadia. Am J Bot 51:96–108
Macior LW (1968) Pollination adaptation in Pedicularis groenlandica. Am J Bot 55:927–932
Marazzi B, Conti E, Endress PK (2007) Diversity in anthers and stigmas in the buzz-pollinated genus Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae). Int J Plant Sci 168:371–391
McNett GD, Cocroft RB (2008) Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers. Behav Ecol 19:650–656
McNett GD, Miles RN, Homentcovschi D, Cocroft RB (2006) A method for two-dimensional characterization of animal vibrational signals transmitted along plant stems. J Comp Physiol A 192:1245–1251
McNett GD, Luan LH, Cocroft RB (2010) Wind-induced noise alters signaler and receiver behavior in vibrational communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:2043–2051
McVean A, Field LH (1996) Communication by substratum vibration in the New Zealand tree weta, Hemideina femorata (Stenopelmatidae: Orthoptera). J Zool 239:101–122
Mesquita-Neto JN, Costa BKP, Schlindwein C (2017) Heteranthery as a solution to the demand for pollen as food and for pollination—legitimate flower visitors reject flowers without feeding anthers. Plant Biol 19:942–950
Mhatre N, Sivalinghem S, Mason AC (2018) Posture controls mechanical tuning in the black widow spider mechanosensory system. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/123456
Michael SCJ, Appel HA, Cocroft RB (2019) Methods for replicating leaf vibrations induced by insect herbivores. In: Gassmann W (ed) Plant innate immunity: methods and protocols. Humana Press, New York, pp 141–158
Michelsen A, Nocke H (1974) Biophysical aspects of sound communication in insects. Adv Insect Physiol 10:247–296
Michelsen A, Fink F, Gogala M, Traue D (1982) Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:269–281
Miklas N, Stritih N, Čokl A, Virant-Doberlet M, Renou M (2001) The influence of substrate on male responsiveness to the female calling song in Nezara viridula. J Insect Behav 14:313–332
Miles CI, Allison BE, Losinger MJ, Su QT, Miles RN (2017) Motor and mechanical bases of the courtship call of the male treehopper Umbonia crassicornis. J Exp Biol 220:1915–1924
Miranda X (2006) Substrate-borne signal repertoire and courtship jamming by adults of Ennya chrysura (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 99:374–386
Mitomi M, Ichikawaa T, Okamoto H (1984) Morphology of the vibration-producing organ in adult rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (STAL): Homoptera: Delphacidae. Appl Entomol Zool 19:407–417
Moreira GRP (1993) Reproductive biology of the stream-dwelling stonefly, Agnetina capitata (Pictet) (Plecoptera: Perlidae). Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Morgan T, Whitehorn PR, Lye GC, Vallejo-Marín M (2016) Floral sonication is an innate behaviour in bumblebees that can be fine-tuned with experience in manipulating flowers. J Insect Behav 29:233–241
Morris GK (1980) Calling display and mating behaviour of Copiphora rhinoceros Pictet (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Anim Behav 28:42–51
Nunes-Silva P, Hrncir M, Shipp L, Kevan P, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL (2013) The behaviour of Bombus impatiens (Apidae, Bombini) on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., Solanaceae) flowers: Pollination and reward perception. J Pollinat Ecol 11:33–40
Ossiannilsson F (1949) Insect drummers. A study on the morphology and function of the sound-producing organ of Swedish Homoptera Auchenorrhyncha. Opuscula Entomol Suppl X:1–146
Papaj DR, Buchmann SL, Russell AL (2017) Division of labor of anthers in heterantherous plants: flexibility of bee pollen collection behavior may serve to keep plants honest. Arthropod Plant Interactions 11:307–315
Pellissier L, Alvarez N, Guisan A (2012) Pollinators as drivers of plant distributions and assemblage into communities. In: Patiny S (ed) Evolution of plant-pollinator relationships. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 392–413
Pringle JWS (1949) The excitation and contraction of the flight muscles of insects. J Physiol (Lond) 108:226–232
Pritchard DJ, Vallejo-Marín M (2020) Floral vibrations by buzz-pollinating bees achieve higher frequency, velocity and acceleration than flight and defence vibrations. J Exp Biol. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.220541
Rebar D, Hoebel G, Rodriguez RL (2012) Vibrational playback by means of airborne stimuli. J Exp Biol 215:3513–3518
Rodrigues EV, Riguette JR, Pereira HRC, Tesch JA, Silva AG (2018) An affordable apparatus for fine-controlled emulation of buzzing frequencies of bees for the testing hypothesis in buzz interactions. Ecol Evol 8:7667–7672
Rodríguez RL, Cocroft RB (2006) Divergence in female duetting signals in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Ethology 112:1231–1238
Rodríguez RL, Sullivan LE, Cocroft RB (2004) Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Evolution 58:571–578
Rodríguez RL, Ramaswamy K, Cocroft RB (2006) Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2585–2593
Rosi-Denadai CA, Araújo PCS, de Oliveira Campos LA, Cosme L Jr, Guedes RNC (2018) Buzz-pollination in neotropical bees: genus-dependent frequencies and lack of optimal frequency for pollen release. Insect Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12602
Rovner JS, Barth FG (1981) Vibratory communication through living plants by a tropical wandering spider. Science 214:464–466
Russell AL, Golden RE, Leonard AE, Papaj DR (2015) Bees learn preferences for plant species that offer only pollen as a reward. Behav Ecol 27:731–740
Russell AL, Leonard AS, Gillette HD, Papaj DR (2016) Concealed floral rewards and the role of experience in floral sonication by bees. Anim Behav 120:83–91
Russell AL, Buchmann SL, Papaj DR (2017) How a generalist bee achieves high efficiency of pollen collection on diverse floral resources. Behav Ecol 28:991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx058
Solis-Montero L, Vallejo-Marin M (2017) Does the morphological fit between flowers and pollinators affect pollen deposition? An experimental test in a buzz-pollinated species with anther dimorphism. Ecol Evol 7:2706–2715. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2897
Speaks CE (1999) Introduction to sound: acoustics for the hearing and speech sciences. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego CA
Sueur J (2018) Sound analysis and synthesis with R. Springer, Cham, Switzerland
Sullivan-Beckers LE, Hebets EA (2014) Tactical adjustment of signalling leads to increased mating success and survival. Anim Behav 93:11–17
Switzer C, Combes S (2017) Bumblebee sonication behavior changes with plant species and environmental conditions. Apidologie 48:223–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-016-0467-1
Switzer C, Hogendoorn K, Ravi S, Combes S (2016) Shakers and head bangers: differences in sonication behavior between Australian Amegilla murrayensis (blue-banded bees) and North American Bombus impatiens (bumblebees). Arthropod Plant Interactions 10:1–8
Switzer C, Russell AL, Papaj DR, Combes SA, Hopkins R (2019) Sonicating bees demonstrate flexible pollen extraction without instrumental learning. Curr Zool. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoz013
Teppner H (2018) The first records of vibratory pollen-collection by bees. Phyton Annales Rei Botanicae 57:135–141
Tercel MP, Veronesi F, Pope TW (2018) Phylogenetic clustering of wingbeat frequency and flight-associated morphometrics across insect orders. Physiol Entomol 43:149–157
Vallejo-Marín M (2019) Buzz pollination: studying bee vibrations on flowers. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15666
Vallejo-Marín M, Da Silva EM, Sargent RD, Scheme B (2010) Trait correlates and functional signficance of heteranthery in flowering plants. New Phytol 188:418–425
Virant-Doberlet M, Čokl A (2004) Vibrational communication in insects. Neotrop Entomol 33:121–134
Wells MM, Henry CS (1992) The role of courtship songs in reproductive isolation among populations of green lacewings of the genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Evolution 46:31–42
Zeigler DD, Stewart KW (1977) Drumming behavior of eleven nearctic stonefly (Plecoptera) species. Ann Entomol Soc Am 70:495–505
Zeigler DD, Stewart KW (1985) Age effects on drumming behavior of Pteronarcella badia (Plecoptera) males. Entomol News 96:157–160
Acknowledgments
We thank Peggy Hill for inviting us to contribute to this chapter about buzz pollination and its important links to the discipline of biotremology. PAD appreciates the generosity of the University of The Bahamas for supporting this work. MVM was supported by a Leverhulme Trust Research Grant (RPG-2018-235). Kristen Brochu read an earlier version of this work and provided helpful comments that improved its clarity. This chapter was also greatly improved from the insights and suggestions offered by Peggy Hill. We dedicate this chapter to Dr. Reginald B. Cocroft, whose pioneering work examining vibrational communication in treehoppers inspired a new generation of biotremology researchers, including us. Thank you, Rex.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Luca, P.A., Vallejo-Marín, M. (2022). Blooms and Buzzing Bees: Bridging Buzz Pollination and Biotremology. In: Hill, P.S.M., Mazzoni, V., Stritih-Peljhan, N., Virant-Doberlet, M., Wessel, A. (eds) Biotremology: Physiology, Ecology, and Evolution. Animal Signals and Communication, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97419-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97419-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97418-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97419-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)