Abstract
Graft selection in revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is of paramount importance and can be directly related to both clinical and functional outcomes. However, patient demographics including age, activity level, and previous graft choice must also be considered. An awareness of the relative advantages and disadvantages of respective graft options can assist in appropriate individualized graft selection, as well as in navigating technical difficulties in the revision scenario. While allograft may be indicated in selected cases of revision with favorable outcomes, its use in the younger, competitive athletic population has been associated with increased failure rates when compared with autograft sources, particularly with adverse chemical processing or irradiation. Ultimately, a technically well-performed ACL reconstruction is critical for early graft remodeling, function, and longer-term survivorship from reoperation, regardless of graft selection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahn JH, Lee YS, Ha HC. Comparison of revision surgery with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and outcome of revision surgery between different graft materials. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1889–95.
Denti M, Lo Vetere D, Bait C, et al. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: causes of failure, surgical technique, and clinical results. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1896–902.
Glogovac G, Schumaier A, Grawe B. Return to sport following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2019;35:2222–30.
MARS Group. Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2301–10.
Kartus J, Movin T, Karlsson J. Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:971–80.
Xie X, Xiao Z, Li Q, et al. Increased incidence of osteoarthritis of knee joint after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts than hamstring autografts; a meta-analysis of 1,443 patients at a minimum of 5 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25:149–59.
Shelbourne KD, Beck MB, Gray T. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with contralateral autogenous patellar tendon graft: evaluation of donor site strength and subjective results. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):648–53.
Karns DJ, Heidt RS Jr, Holladay BR, Colosimo AJ. Case report: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:148–51.
Liden M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Bovaller A, Karlsson J, Kartus J. The course of the patellar tendon after reharvesting its central third for ACL revision surgery: a long-term clinical and radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(11):1130–8.
Stener S, Ejerhed L, Movin T, Sernert N, Papadogiannakis N, Kartus J. The reharvested patellar tendon has the potential for ligamentization when used for anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(6):1168–74.
Poehling-Monaghan K, Salem H, Ross K, Secrist E, Ciccotti M, Tjoumakaris F, Ciccotti M, Freedman K. Long-term outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of patellar tendon versus hamstring autografts. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(6):2325967117709735.
Grassi A, Nitri M, Moulton GM, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bondi A, Romagnoli M, Zaffagnini S. Does the type of graft affect the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B:714–23.
Ferretti A, Monaco E, Capema L, Palma T, Conteduca F. Revision ACL reconstruction using contralateral hamstrings. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(3):690–5.
Legnani C, Peretti G, Borgo E, Zini S, Ventrua A. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ipsi- or contralateral hamstring tendon grafts. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27(4):533–7.
Andernord D, Desai N, Bjornsson H, Gillen S, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K. Predictors of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 9061 patients with 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(2):295–302.
Harris NL, Smith DA, Lamoreaux L, Pernell M. Central quadriceps tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 1: morphometric and biomechanical evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:23–8.
Xerogeanes JW, Mitchel PM, Karasev PA, Kolesov IA, Romine SE. Anatomic and morphological evaluation of the quadriceps tendon using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction: applications for anterior cruciate ligament choice and procurement. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2392–9.
Staubli HU, Schatzmann L, Brunner P, Ricon L, Nolte LP. Mechanical tensile properties of the quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament in young adults. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:27–34.
Belk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Marshall HA, Goodrich JA, McCarty EC. Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of comparative studies with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(5):1699–707.
Hurley ET, Calvo-Gurry M, Withers D, Farrington SK, Moran R, Moran CJ. Quadriceps tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systemic review. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(5):1690–8.
Sheean AJ, Musahl V, Slone HS, Xerogeanes JW, Milinkovic D, Fink C, et al. Quadriceps tendon autograft for arthroscopic knee ligament reconstruction: use it now, use it often. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(11):698–701.
Haner M, Bierke S, Petersen W. Anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery: ipsilateral quadriceps versus contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis autografts. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(11):2308–17.
Kaeding C, Aros B, Pedroza A, Pifel E, Amendola A, Andrish J, Dunn W, Marx R, McCarty E, Parker R, Wright R, Spindler K. Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health. 2011;3(1):73–81.
Nissen K, Eysturoy N, Nielsen T, Lind M. Allograft use results in higher re-revision rate for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(6):2325967118775381.
Lamblin C, Waterman B, Lubowitz J. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autografts compared with non-irradiated, non-chemically treated allografts. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(6):1113–22.
Tejwani SG, Chen J, Funahashi TT, Love R, Maletis GB. Revision risk after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; association with graft processing techniques, patient characteristics, and graft type. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(11):2696–705.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nabor, D.S., Tucker, C.J., Waterman, B.R. (2022). Graft Options in the Revision ACL Setting. In: Alaia, M.J., Jones, K.J. (eds) Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96996-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96996-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96995-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96996-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)