Skip to main content

Graft Options in the Revision ACL Setting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Abstract

Graft selection in revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is of paramount importance and can be directly related to both clinical and functional outcomes. However, patient demographics including age, activity level, and previous graft choice must also be considered. An awareness of the relative advantages and disadvantages of respective graft options can assist in appropriate individualized graft selection, as well as in navigating technical difficulties in the revision scenario. While allograft may be indicated in selected cases of revision with favorable outcomes, its use in the younger, competitive athletic population has been associated with increased failure rates when compared with autograft sources, particularly with adverse chemical processing or irradiation. Ultimately, a technically well-performed ACL reconstruction is critical for early graft remodeling, function, and longer-term survivorship from reoperation, regardless of graft selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahn JH, Lee YS, Ha HC. Comparison of revision surgery with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and outcome of revision surgery between different graft materials. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1889–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Denti M, Lo Vetere D, Bait C, et al. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: causes of failure, surgical technique, and clinical results. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1896–902.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Glogovac G, Schumaier A, Grawe B. Return to sport following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2019;35:2222–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. MARS Group. Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2301–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kartus J, Movin T, Karlsson J. Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:971–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie X, Xiao Z, Li Q, et al. Increased incidence of osteoarthritis of knee joint after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts than hamstring autografts; a meta-analysis of 1,443 patients at a minimum of 5 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25:149–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shelbourne KD, Beck MB, Gray T. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with contralateral autogenous patellar tendon graft: evaluation of donor site strength and subjective results. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):648–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karns DJ, Heidt RS Jr, Holladay BR, Colosimo AJ. Case report: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:148–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liden M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Bovaller A, Karlsson J, Kartus J. The course of the patellar tendon after reharvesting its central third for ACL revision surgery: a long-term clinical and radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(11):1130–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stener S, Ejerhed L, Movin T, Sernert N, Papadogiannakis N, Kartus J. The reharvested patellar tendon has the potential for ligamentization when used for anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(6):1168–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Poehling-Monaghan K, Salem H, Ross K, Secrist E, Ciccotti M, Tjoumakaris F, Ciccotti M, Freedman K. Long-term outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of patellar tendon versus hamstring autografts. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(6):2325967117709735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grassi A, Nitri M, Moulton GM, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bondi A, Romagnoli M, Zaffagnini S. Does the type of graft affect the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B:714–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferretti A, Monaco E, Capema L, Palma T, Conteduca F. Revision ACL reconstruction using contralateral hamstrings. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(3):690–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Legnani C, Peretti G, Borgo E, Zini S, Ventrua A. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ipsi- or contralateral hamstring tendon grafts. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27(4):533–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Andernord D, Desai N, Bjornsson H, Gillen S, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K. Predictors of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 9061 patients with 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(2):295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris NL, Smith DA, Lamoreaux L, Pernell M. Central quadriceps tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 1: morphometric and biomechanical evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:23–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Xerogeanes JW, Mitchel PM, Karasev PA, Kolesov IA, Romine SE. Anatomic and morphological evaluation of the quadriceps tendon using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction: applications for anterior cruciate ligament choice and procurement. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2392–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Staubli HU, Schatzmann L, Brunner P, Ricon L, Nolte LP. Mechanical tensile properties of the quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament in young adults. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Belk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Marshall HA, Goodrich JA, McCarty EC. Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of comparative studies with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(5):1699–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hurley ET, Calvo-Gurry M, Withers D, Farrington SK, Moran R, Moran CJ. Quadriceps tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systemic review. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(5):1690–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheean AJ, Musahl V, Slone HS, Xerogeanes JW, Milinkovic D, Fink C, et al. Quadriceps tendon autograft for arthroscopic knee ligament reconstruction: use it now, use it often. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(11):698–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haner M, Bierke S, Petersen W. Anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery: ipsilateral quadriceps versus contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis autografts. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(11):2308–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaeding C, Aros B, Pedroza A, Pifel E, Amendola A, Andrish J, Dunn W, Marx R, McCarty E, Parker R, Wright R, Spindler K. Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health. 2011;3(1):73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nissen K, Eysturoy N, Nielsen T, Lind M. Allograft use results in higher re-revision rate for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(6):2325967118775381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lamblin C, Waterman B, Lubowitz J. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autografts compared with non-irradiated, non-chemically treated allografts. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(6):1113–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tejwani SG, Chen J, Funahashi TT, Love R, Maletis GB. Revision risk after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; association with graft processing techniques, patient characteristics, and graft type. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(11):2696–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nabor, D.S., Tucker, C.J., Waterman, B.R. (2022). Graft Options in the Revision ACL Setting. In: Alaia, M.J., Jones, K.J. (eds) Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96996-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96996-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96995-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96996-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics