Skip to main content

Economic Rationalization of Automation Projects and Quality of Service

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Springer Handbook of Automation

Part of the book series: Springer Handbooks ((SHB))

Abstract

The future of any investment project is undeniably linked to its economic rationalization. The chance that a project is realized depends on our ability to demonstrate the benefits that it can convey to a company. However, traditional investment evaluation must be enhanced and used carefully in the context of rationalization to reflect adequately the characteristics of modern automation systems. Nowadays, automation systems often take the form of complex, strongly related autonomous systems that are able to operate in a coordinated fashion in distributed environments. Reconfigurability is the capacity of a system designed for rapid change in structure, as well as in hardware and software components. Its objective is to quickly adjust production capacity and functionality within a part family in response to sudden changes in market or regulatory requirements. Reconfigurability of a system is a key factor affecting automation systems’ economic evaluation due to the reusability of equipment and software for the service and manufacturing of multiple products. A new method based on an analytical hierarchy process for project selection is reviewed. A brief discussion on risk and salvage consideration is included, as are emerging aspects needing further development in future rationalization techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 309.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 399.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brown, S., Squire, B., Blackmon, K.: The contribution of manufacturing strategy involvement and alignment to world-class manufacturing performance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 27(3–4), 282–302 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azemi, F., Simunovic, G., Lujic, R.: The use of advanced manufacturing technology to reduce product cost. Acta Polytech. Hung. 16(7), 115–131 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Palucha, K.: World class manufacturing model production management. Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 58, 227–234 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hyun, Y.G., Lee, J.Y.: Trends analysis and direction of business process automations, RPA (Robotic Process Automation) in the times of convergence. J. Digit. Converg. 16(11), 313–327 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petrillo, A., De Felice, F., Zomparelli, F.: Performance measurement for world class manufacturing: a model for the Italian automotive industry. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 30(7–8), 908–935 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quaile, R.: What does automation cost – calculating total life-cycle costs of automated production equipment such as automotive component manufacturing systems isn’t straightforward. Manuf. Eng. 138(5), 175 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vazquez-Bustelo, D., Avella, L., Fernandez, E.: Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes – empirical test of an integrated agile manufacturing model. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 27(12), 1303–1332 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mills, J.J., Stevens, G.T., Huff, B., Presley, A.: Justification of robotics systems. In: Nof, S.Y. (ed.) Handbook of Industrial Robotics, pp. 675–694. Wiley, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boothroyd, G., Poli, C., Murch, L.E.: Automatic Assembly. Marcel Dekker, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heller, J., Chylinski, M., de Ruyter, K., Keeling, D.I., Hilken, T., Mahr, D.: Tangible service automation: decomposing the technology-enabled engagement process (TEEP) for augmented reality. J. Serv. Res. 24(1), 84 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Househ, M., Kushniruk, A., Cloutier-Fisher, D., Carleton, B.: Technology enabled knowledge exchange: development of a conceptual framework. J. Med. Syst. 35, 713–721 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Concentrix, How to engage customers through technology. Available at www.concentrix.com. Last access date 10 June 2020

  13. Ontario College of Art and Design, OCAD, Technology-enabled learning strategy. Available at www.ocadu.ca/Assets/content/teaching-learning/TEL%20Strategy.pdf. Last access date 11 July 2020

  14. Shi, L., Newnes, L., Culley, S., Allen, B.: Modelling, monitoring and evaluation to support automatic engineering process management. Proc. IMechE Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 232(1), 17–31 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nof, S.Y., Wilhelm, W.E., Warnecke, H.-J.: Industrial Assembly. Chapman Hall, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Erbe, H.H.: Quality of Service (QoS) of automation. In: Nof, S.Y. (ed.) Handbook of Automation, pp. 715–733. Springer, New York (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, Z., Lee, J., Qui, H.: Infotronics technologies and predictive tools for next-generation maintenance systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing. Elsevier (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berger, R., Hohwieler, E.: Service platform for web-based services. Proc. 36th CIRP Int. Semin. Manuf. Syst. Produktionstech. 29, 209–213 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lay, G.: Is high automation a dead end? Cutbacks in production overengineering in the German industry. In: Proceedings of the 6th IFAC Symposium on Cost Oriented Automation. Elsevier, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nnaji, B.O., Wang, Y., Kim, K.Y.: Cost effective product realization. In: Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Cost Oriented Automation. Elsevier, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nof, S.Y., Ceroni, J., Jeong, W., Moghadam, M.: Revolutionizing Collaboration Through e-Work, e-Business, and e-Service Springer ACES Book Series. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bruns, F.W.: Hyper-bonds – distributed collaboration in mixed reality. Annu. Rev. Control. 29(1), 117–123 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Müller, D.: Designing learning spaces for mechatronics. In: Müller, D. (ed.) MARVEL – Mechatronics Training in Real and Virtual Environments Impuls, vol. 18. NA/Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung, Bremen (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Erbe, H.H.: Introduction to low cost/cost effective automation. Robotica. 21(3), 219–221 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hossein Tabatabaie, S.M., Tahami, H., Murthy, G.S.: A regional life cycle assessment and economic analysis of camelina biodiesel production in the Pacific Northwestern US. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 2389–2400 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. openLCA.: Available at: www.openlca.org. Last access date 11 July 2020

  27. Yeom, D.J., Na, E.J., Lee, M.Y., Kim, Y.J., Kim, Y.S., Cho, C.S.: Performance evaluation and life cycle cost analysis model of a gondola-type exterior wall painting robot. Sustainability. 9, 1809 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nof, S.Y., Morel, G., Monostori, L., Molina, A., Filip, F.: From plant and logistics control to multi-enterprise collaboration. Annu. Rev. Control. 30(1), 55–68 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. White, D.C.: Calculating ROI for automation projects. Emerson Process Manag. (2007). Available at www.EmersonProcess.com/solutions/Advanced Automation. Last access date 10 Aug 2020

  30. Stevens Jr., G.T.: The Economic Analysis of Capital Expenditures for Managers and Engineers. Ginn, Needham Heights (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Blank, L.T., Tarquin, A.J.: Engineering Economy, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sullivan, W.G., Wicks, E.M., Koelling, C.P.: Engineering Economy, 17th edn. Pearson, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kuzgunkaya, O., ElMaraghy, H.A.: Economic and strategic perspectives on investing in RMS and FMS. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. Syst. 19(3), 217–246 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Raouf, S.I.A., Ahmad, I. (eds.): Flexible Manufacturing-Recent Developments in FMS, Robotics, CAD/CAM, CIM. Elsevier (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jönsson, M., Andersson, C., Stal, J.E.: Relations between volume flexibility and part cost in assembly lines. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 27, 669–673 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dagdeviren, M.: Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. J. Intell. Manuf. 19, 397–406 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Acharya, V., Sharma, S.K., Gupta, S.K.: Analyzing the factors in industrial automation using analytic hierarchy process. Comput. Electr. Eng. 71, 877–886 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, J.J., Yang, D.L.: Using hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Comput. Oper. Res. 34, 3691–3700 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen, Y., Bouferguene, A., Al-Hussein, M.: Analytic hierarchy process-simulation framework for lighting maintenance decision-making based on clustered network. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32(1) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Güngör, Z., Arikan, F.: Using fuzzy decision making system to improve quality-based investment. J. Intell. Manuf. 18, 197–207 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Brans, J.P., Vincke, P.H.: A preference ranking organization method. Manag. Sci. 31, 647–656 (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Brans, J.P., Vincke, P.H., Mareschall, B.: How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 14, 228–238 (1986)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Albadvi, A., Chaharsooghi, S.K., Esfahanipour, A.: Decision making in stock trading: an application of PROMETHEE. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177, 673–683 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Kuznietsova, N., Kot, L., Kot, O.: Risks of innovative activity: economic and legal analysis. Baltic J. Econ. Stud. 6(1), 67–73 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hassler, M.L., Andrews, D.J., Ezell, B.C., Polmateer, T.L.: Multi-perspective scenario-based preferences in enterprise risk analysis of public safety wireless broadband network. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 197 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, Z., Jia, G.: Augmented sample-based approach for efficient evaluation of risk sensitivity with respect to epistemic uncertainty in distribution parameters. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 197 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  48. MacKenzie, C.A., Hu, C.: Decision making under uncertainty for design of resilient engineered systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 197 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hassler, M.L., Andrews, D.J., Ezell, B.C., Polmateer, T.L., Lambert, J.H.: Multi-perspective scenario-based preferences in enterprise risk analysis of public safety wireless broadband network. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 197 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Alkaraan, F.: Strategic investment decision-making practices in large manufacturing companies: a role for emergent analysis techniques? Meditari Account. Res. 28(4), 633–653 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Soares, B.A.R., Henriques, E., Ribeiro, I.: Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts production. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57(6), 1797–1810 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sisbot, S.: Execution and evaluation of complex industrial automation and control projects using the systems engineering approach. Syst. Eng. 14(2), 193–207 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Oztemel, E., Gursev, S.: Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J Intell. Manuf. 31, 127–182 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Santos, C., Mehrsai, A., Barros, A.C., Araújo, M., Ares, E.: Towards Industry 4.0: an overview of European strategic roadmaps. Procedia Manuf. 13, 972–979 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Becker, T., Stern, H.: Future trends in human work area design for cyber-physical production systems. Procedia CIRP. 57, 404–409 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Dombrowski, U., Richter, T., Krenkel, P.: Interdependencies of industrie 4.0 & lean production systems – a use cases analysis. Procedia Manuf. 11, 1061–1068 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ceroni, J., Quezada, L.: Development of collaborative production systems in emerging economies. In Special Issue Based on the 19th International Conference on Production Research International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 122, no. 1 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Miranda, P.A., Garrido, R.A., Ceroni, J.A.: A collaborative approach for a strategic logistic network design problem with fleet design and customer clustering decisions. In Computers & Industrial Engineering. Special issue on Collaborative e-Work Networks in Industrial Engineering, vol. 57, no. 1 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Parts of Ch. 41 Quality of Service (QoS) of Automation by Heinz-Hermann Erbe from the first edition of this Handbook of Automation have been used in this chapter [16]. The author sincerely thanks Professor Erbe for the materials used in this chapter of the handbook.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José A. Ceroni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ceroni, J.A. (2023). Economic Rationalization of Automation Projects and Quality of Service. In: Nof, S.Y. (eds) Springer Handbook of Automation. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics