Abstract
The future of any investment project is undeniably linked to its economic rationalization. The chance that a project is realized depends on our ability to demonstrate the benefits that it can convey to a company. However, traditional investment evaluation must be enhanced and used carefully in the context of rationalization to reflect adequately the characteristics of modern automation systems. Nowadays, automation systems often take the form of complex, strongly related autonomous systems that are able to operate in a coordinated fashion in distributed environments. Reconfigurability is the capacity of a system designed for rapid change in structure, as well as in hardware and software components. Its objective is to quickly adjust production capacity and functionality within a part family in response to sudden changes in market or regulatory requirements. Reconfigurability of a system is a key factor affecting automation systems’ economic evaluation due to the reusability of equipment and software for the service and manufacturing of multiple products. A new method based on an analytical hierarchy process for project selection is reviewed. A brief discussion on risk and salvage consideration is included, as are emerging aspects needing further development in future rationalization techniques.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brown, S., Squire, B., Blackmon, K.: The contribution of manufacturing strategy involvement and alignment to world-class manufacturing performance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 27(3–4), 282–302 (2007)
Azemi, F., Simunovic, G., Lujic, R.: The use of advanced manufacturing technology to reduce product cost. Acta Polytech. Hung. 16(7), 115–131 (2019)
Palucha, K.: World class manufacturing model production management. Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 58, 227–234 (2012)
Hyun, Y.G., Lee, J.Y.: Trends analysis and direction of business process automations, RPA (Robotic Process Automation) in the times of convergence. J. Digit. Converg. 16(11), 313–327 (2018)
Petrillo, A., De Felice, F., Zomparelli, F.: Performance measurement for world class manufacturing: a model for the Italian automotive industry. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 30(7–8), 908–935 (2019)
Quaile, R.: What does automation cost – calculating total life-cycle costs of automated production equipment such as automotive component manufacturing systems isn’t straightforward. Manuf. Eng. 138(5), 175 (2007)
Vazquez-Bustelo, D., Avella, L., Fernandez, E.: Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes – empirical test of an integrated agile manufacturing model. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 27(12), 1303–1332 (2007)
Mills, J.J., Stevens, G.T., Huff, B., Presley, A.: Justification of robotics systems. In: Nof, S.Y. (ed.) Handbook of Industrial Robotics, pp. 675–694. Wiley, New York (1999)
Boothroyd, G., Poli, C., Murch, L.E.: Automatic Assembly. Marcel Dekker, New York (1982)
Heller, J., Chylinski, M., de Ruyter, K., Keeling, D.I., Hilken, T., Mahr, D.: Tangible service automation: decomposing the technology-enabled engagement process (TEEP) for augmented reality. J. Serv. Res. 24(1), 84 (2020)
Househ, M., Kushniruk, A., Cloutier-Fisher, D., Carleton, B.: Technology enabled knowledge exchange: development of a conceptual framework. J. Med. Syst. 35, 713–721 (2011)
Concentrix, How to engage customers through technology. Available at www.concentrix.com. Last access date 10 June 2020
Ontario College of Art and Design, OCAD, Technology-enabled learning strategy. Available at www.ocadu.ca/Assets/content/teaching-learning/TEL%20Strategy.pdf. Last access date 11 July 2020
Shi, L., Newnes, L., Culley, S., Allen, B.: Modelling, monitoring and evaluation to support automatic engineering process management. Proc. IMechE Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 232(1), 17–31 (2018)
Nof, S.Y., Wilhelm, W.E., Warnecke, H.-J.: Industrial Assembly. Chapman Hall, London (1997)
Erbe, H.H.: Quality of Service (QoS) of automation. In: Nof, S.Y. (ed.) Handbook of Automation, pp. 715–733. Springer, New York (2009)
Chen, Z., Lee, J., Qui, H.: Infotronics technologies and predictive tools for next-generation maintenance systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing. Elsevier (2004)
Berger, R., Hohwieler, E.: Service platform for web-based services. Proc. 36th CIRP Int. Semin. Manuf. Syst. Produktionstech. 29, 209–213 (2003)
Lay, G.: Is high automation a dead end? Cutbacks in production overengineering in the German industry. In: Proceedings of the 6th IFAC Symposium on Cost Oriented Automation. Elsevier, Oxford (2002)
Nnaji, B.O., Wang, Y., Kim, K.Y.: Cost effective product realization. In: Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Cost Oriented Automation. Elsevier, Oxford (2005)
Nof, S.Y., Ceroni, J., Jeong, W., Moghadam, M.: Revolutionizing Collaboration Through e-Work, e-Business, and e-Service Springer ACES Book Series. Springer (2015)
Bruns, F.W.: Hyper-bonds – distributed collaboration in mixed reality. Annu. Rev. Control. 29(1), 117–123 (2005)
Müller, D.: Designing learning spaces for mechatronics. In: Müller, D. (ed.) MARVEL – Mechatronics Training in Real and Virtual Environments Impuls, vol. 18. NA/Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung, Bremen (2005)
Erbe, H.H.: Introduction to low cost/cost effective automation. Robotica. 21(3), 219–221 (2003)
Hossein Tabatabaie, S.M., Tahami, H., Murthy, G.S.: A regional life cycle assessment and economic analysis of camelina biodiesel production in the Pacific Northwestern US. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 2389–2400 (2018)
openLCA.: Available at: www.openlca.org. Last access date 11 July 2020
Yeom, D.J., Na, E.J., Lee, M.Y., Kim, Y.J., Kim, Y.S., Cho, C.S.: Performance evaluation and life cycle cost analysis model of a gondola-type exterior wall painting robot. Sustainability. 9, 1809 (2017)
Nof, S.Y., Morel, G., Monostori, L., Molina, A., Filip, F.: From plant and logistics control to multi-enterprise collaboration. Annu. Rev. Control. 30(1), 55–68 (2006)
White, D.C.: Calculating ROI for automation projects. Emerson Process Manag. (2007). Available at www.EmersonProcess.com/solutions/Advanced Automation. Last access date 10 Aug 2020
Stevens Jr., G.T.: The Economic Analysis of Capital Expenditures for Managers and Engineers. Ginn, Needham Heights (1993)
Blank, L.T., Tarquin, A.J.: Engineering Economy, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2011)
Sullivan, W.G., Wicks, E.M., Koelling, C.P.: Engineering Economy, 17th edn. Pearson, New York (2018)
Kuzgunkaya, O., ElMaraghy, H.A.: Economic and strategic perspectives on investing in RMS and FMS. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. Syst. 19(3), 217–246 (2007)
Raouf, S.I.A., Ahmad, I. (eds.): Flexible Manufacturing-Recent Developments in FMS, Robotics, CAD/CAM, CIM. Elsevier (1985)
Jönsson, M., Andersson, C., Stal, J.E.: Relations between volume flexibility and part cost in assembly lines. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 27, 669–673 (2011)
Dagdeviren, M.: Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. J. Intell. Manuf. 19, 397–406 (2008)
Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
Acharya, V., Sharma, S.K., Gupta, S.K.: Analyzing the factors in industrial automation using analytic hierarchy process. Comput. Electr. Eng. 71, 877–886 (2018)
Wang, J.J., Yang, D.L.: Using hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Comput. Oper. Res. 34, 3691–3700 (2007)
Chen, Y., Bouferguene, A., Al-Hussein, M.: Analytic hierarchy process-simulation framework for lighting maintenance decision-making based on clustered network. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32(1) (2018)
Güngör, Z., Arikan, F.: Using fuzzy decision making system to improve quality-based investment. J. Intell. Manuf. 18, 197–207 (2007)
Brans, J.P., Vincke, P.H.: A preference ranking organization method. Manag. Sci. 31, 647–656 (1985)
Brans, J.P., Vincke, P.H., Mareschall, B.: How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 14, 228–238 (1986)
Albadvi, A., Chaharsooghi, S.K., Esfahanipour, A.: Decision making in stock trading: an application of PROMETHEE. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177, 673–683 (2007)
Kuznietsova, N., Kot, L., Kot, O.: Risks of innovative activity: economic and legal analysis. Baltic J. Econ. Stud. 6(1), 67–73 (2020)
Hassler, M.L., Andrews, D.J., Ezell, B.C., Polmateer, T.L.: Multi-perspective scenario-based preferences in enterprise risk analysis of public safety wireless broadband network. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 197 (2020)
Wang, Z., Jia, G.: Augmented sample-based approach for efficient evaluation of risk sensitivity with respect to epistemic uncertainty in distribution parameters. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 197 (2020)
MacKenzie, C.A., Hu, C.: Decision making under uncertainty for design of resilient engineered systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 197 (2018)
Hassler, M.L., Andrews, D.J., Ezell, B.C., Polmateer, T.L., Lambert, J.H.: Multi-perspective scenario-based preferences in enterprise risk analysis of public safety wireless broadband network. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 197 (2018)
Alkaraan, F.: Strategic investment decision-making practices in large manufacturing companies: a role for emergent analysis techniques? Meditari Account. Res. 28(4), 633–653 (2020)
Soares, B.A.R., Henriques, E., Ribeiro, I.: Cost analysis of alternative automated technologies for composite parts production. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57(6), 1797–1810 (2019)
Sisbot, S.: Execution and evaluation of complex industrial automation and control projects using the systems engineering approach. Syst. Eng. 14(2), 193–207 (2011)
Oztemel, E., Gursev, S.: Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J Intell. Manuf. 31, 127–182 (2020)
Santos, C., Mehrsai, A., Barros, A.C., Araújo, M., Ares, E.: Towards Industry 4.0: an overview of European strategic roadmaps. Procedia Manuf. 13, 972–979 (2017)
Becker, T., Stern, H.: Future trends in human work area design for cyber-physical production systems. Procedia CIRP. 57, 404–409 (2016)
Dombrowski, U., Richter, T., Krenkel, P.: Interdependencies of industrie 4.0 & lean production systems – a use cases analysis. Procedia Manuf. 11, 1061–1068 (2017)
Ceroni, J., Quezada, L.: Development of collaborative production systems in emerging economies. In Special Issue Based on the 19th International Conference on Production Research International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 122, no. 1 (2009)
Miranda, P.A., Garrido, R.A., Ceroni, J.A.: A collaborative approach for a strategic logistic network design problem with fleet design and customer clustering decisions. In Computers & Industrial Engineering. Special issue on Collaborative e-Work Networks in Industrial Engineering, vol. 57, no. 1 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ceroni, J.A. (2023). Economic Rationalization of Automation Projects and Quality of Service. In: Nof, S.Y. (eds) Springer Handbook of Automation. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96728-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96729-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)