Skip to main content

Carbon Sequestration and Capturing Technologies—A Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Chemical, Bio and Environmental Engineering (CHEMBIOEN 2021)

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ESE))

  • 1119 Accesses

Abstract

Carbon emissions worldwide is an issue of serious concern pertaining to its worrisome effects like global climate change, warming and ozone depletion. The natural and anthropogenic activities like forest fires, fossil fuel burning, respiration, decomposition of flora and fauna, geogenic activities and chemical changes in the rock beds, automotive and industrial exhausts, etc., all lead to an immense amount of CO2  being produced. CO2 is a greenhouse gas that traps solar heat and facilitates earth warming up to an extent of 66%. Hence, it is essentially required to reduce carbon emissions and sequester the carbon being produced effectively. Many upcoming and existing technologies are utilized for carbon-capturing such as carbon capture and storage (CCS), carbon sequestration utilizing rocks and hydrates, chemical looping separation, membrane technology, cryogenic carbon capture (CCC), absorption, and adsorption. Each one of these technologies are having its own merits and demerits and carbon capture potential. This review describes these technologies for carbon capture and reducing the carbon emission for the environmental safeguarding and combating the global warming and climate change effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd AA (2020) Carbon dioxide removal through physical adsorption using carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous adsorbents: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 8(5):104–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora V (2019) Separation and sequestration of CO2 in geological formations. Mater Sci Energy Technol 2(3):647–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu P (2015) A review of the hydrate based gas separation (HBGS) process for carbon dioxide pre combustion capture. Energy 85:261–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri G, Brunetti A, Scura F, Drioli E (2011) CO2 separation by membrane technologies: applications and potentialities. skoge/prost/proceedings.icheap10

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter L, Baxter A, Burt S (2009) Cryogenic CO2 capture as a cost-effective CO2 capture process. In: 26th Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference 2009, p 1. Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts R (2021) Met office: atmospheric CO2 now hitting 50% higher than pre-industrial levels, carbon brief-clear on climate, published on 16 March. https://www.carbonbrief.org/met-office-atmospheric-co2-now-hitting-50-higher-than-pre-industrial-levelslast. Accessed: 10 July 2021

  • Bhatta KG, Lakshminarayana (2014) Progress in hydrotalcite like compounds and metal-based oxides for CO2 capture: a review. J Cleaner Prod 103:171–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Biological Carbon Sequestration, https://climatechange.ucdavis.edu/science/carbon-sequestration/biological/. Last accessed: 26 Sept 21

  • Breeze P (2015) Carbon capture and storage. In: Breeze P (ed) Coal-fired generation. Academic Press, pp 73–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Broecks KPF, van Rijnsoever FJ, Hekkert MP (2016) Persuasiveness, importance and novelty of arguments about carbon capture and storage. Environ Sci Policy 59:58–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Pros and Cons. https://www.treehugger.com/carbon-capture-and-storage-ccs-pros-and-cons-5120005. Last accessed: 24 Sept 21

  • Chakraborty S, Jo BW (2018) Aqueous-based carbon dioxide sequestration. In: Pacheco-Torgal F, Shi C, Sanchez AP (eds) Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and structural engineering, carbon dioxide sequestration in cementitious construction materials. Woodhead Publishing, pp 39–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Wang L (2017) Posttreatment strategies for biomass conversion. In: Chen H, Wang L (2017) Technologies for biochemical conversion of biomass. Academic Press, pp 197–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow A (2014) Ocean carbon sequestration by direct injection. In: CO2 sequestration and valorization. IntechOpen

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausse M, Merel J, Meunier F (2011) Numerical parametric study on CO2 capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5(5):1206–1213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Climate Technology Centre & Network (CTCN), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) CO2 capture technologies

    Google Scholar 

  • Cryogenic Carbon Capture (2021) Our technology. SES innovation. https://sesinnovation.com/technology/carbon_capture/. Last accessed 14 June 2021

  • Cormos C-C (2017) IGCC with carbon capture and storage. In: Abraham MA (ed) Encyclopedia of sustainable technologies. Elsevier, pp 327–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Controlling Industrial Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Regulation, US federal. Centre for Climate and Energy Solutions. https://www.c2es.org/content/regulating-industrial-sector-carbon-emissions/. Accessed 15 July 2021

  • Cuéllar Franca RM, Azapagic A (2017) Life cycle environmental impacts of carbon capture, storage, and utilization. In: Abraham MA (2017) Encyclopedia of sustainable technologies. Elsevier, pp 447–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan DW, Morrissey EA (2011) The concept of geologic carbon sequestration. U.S. Geological Survey

    Google Scholar 

  • Each Countries Share of CO2 Emissions (2020) Reports & Multimedia, Union of Concerned Scientists, 12 Aug 2020. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/each-countrys-share-co2-emissions. Accessed 12 July 2021

  • Gayathri R, Mahboob S, Govindarajan M, Al-Ghanim KA, Ahmed Z, Al-Mulhm N, Vodovnik M, Vijayalakshmi S (2021) A review on biological carbon sequestration: a sustainable solution for a cleaner air environment, less pollution and lower health risks. J King Saud Univ Sci 33(2):101282

    Google Scholar 

  • He J, Liu Y, Ma Z, Deng S, Zhao R, Zhao L (2017) A literature research on the performance evaluation of hydrate-based CO2 capture and separation process. Energy Procedia 105:4090–4097

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu H (2020) Physicochemical technologies for HRPs and risk control. In: High-risk pollutants in wastewater. Elsevier, pp 169–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Sato M (2020) Global warming acceleration. Green Energy Times, 14 December 2020. https://greenenergytimes.org/2020/12/15/global-warming-acceleration-2/. Last accessed: 22 July 2021

  • He X (2018) A review of material development in the field of carbon capture and the application of membrane-based processes in power plants and energy-intensive industries. Energ Sustain Soc 8:34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • How efficient is carbon capture and storage? https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/how-efficient-carbon-capture-andstorage#:~:text=CCS%20projects%20typically%20target%2090,will%20be%20captured%20and%20stored. Last accessed: 24 Sept 2021

  • Hoff KA (2021) CO2 Capture—absorption processes. Find expertise—from ocean space to outer space. Sintef.com. https://www.sintef.no/en/expertise/sintef-industry/process-technology/co2-capture-absorption-processes/. Last accessed: 20 June 2021

  • Hu J (2018) Advanced chemical looping materials for CO2 utilization: a review. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 11(7):1187

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2005) IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. In: Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck HC, Loos M, Meyer LA (eds) Prepared by Working Group III of The intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, p 442

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson H, Svensson H (2017) Rate of absorption for CO2 absorption systems using a Wetted Wall column. Energy Procedia 114:2009–2023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MN (2019) Efficiency improvement of chemical looping combustion combined cycle power plants. Energy Technol 7(11)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaiah D (2014) Carbon dioxide removal by adsorption. J Appl Sci 14:3142–3148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lackner KS, Alissa Park A-H, Miller BG (2010) Eliminating CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants. In: Sioshansi FP (ed) Generating electricity in a carbon-constrained world. Academic Press, pp 127–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei L (2020) Carbon membranes for CO2 removal: status and perspectives from materials to processes. Chem Eng J 401:126–084

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung DYC (2014) An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:426–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X-Y (2021) Review on hydrate-based CH4 separation from low-concentration coalbed methane in China. Energy & Fuels 35(10):8494–8509

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey R (2020) Climate change: atmospheric carbon dioxide. NOAA Climate.gov, 14 Aug 2020. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxidelast. Accessed: 23 July 2021

  • Liu Z, Ciais P, Deng Z (2020) Near-real-time monitoring of global CO2 emissions reveals the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Commun 11:5172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller BG (2005) Emissions control strategies for power plants. In: Miller BG (ed) Sustainable world, coal energy systems. Academic Press, pp 283–392

    Google Scholar 

  • MohebShahrestani M, Rahimi A (2014) Evolution, fields of research, and future of chemical-looping combustion (CLC) process: a review. Environ Eng Res 19(4):299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakao S, Yogo K, Goto K, Kai T, Yamada H (2019) Introduction. In: Advanced CO2 Capture Technologies. SpringerBriefs in Energy, Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1998) Chemical Industry. Separation technologies for the industries of the future. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Naucler T, Campbell W, Ruijs J (2008) Carbon capture and storage: assessing the economics. McKinsey & Company, Climate Change Special Initiative, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, State of the Climate: Global Climate Report for July 2021, published online July 2021, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/202106. Last accessed 01 July 2021

  • Øia LE, Hansena PM, Henriksena M (2017) CO2 absorption efficiency and heat consumption measured at high gas to liquid ratios in laboratory rig. Energy Procedia 114:1273–1281

    Google Scholar 

  • Omae I (2006) Aspects of carbon dioxide utilization. Catal Today 115(1–4):33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan SY, Chiang PC (2012) CO2 capture by accelerated carbonation of alkaline wastes: a review on its principles and applications. Aerosol Air Qual Res 12(5):770–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollution: Carbon dioxide levels in atmosphere reach record high. PA Media, The Guardian, 7 Apr 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/apr/07/carbon-dioxide-levels-in-atmosphere-reach-record-high. Last accessed: 22 July 2021

  • Rabiu KO, Han L, Das DB (2017) CO2 trapping in the context of geological carbon sequestration. In: Abraham MA (ed) Encyclopedia of sustainable technologies. Elsevier, pp 461–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Rycroft M (2019) Cryogenic carbon capture for clean coal power generation. EE Publishers, 29th July, 2019, https://www.ee.co.za/article/cryogenic-carbon-capture-a-lower-energy-option-for-clean-coal-power-generation.html. Accessed 29 July 2021

  • Sabil KM (2018) Recent advances on carbon dioxide capture through a hydrate-based gas separation process. Current Opin Green Sustain Chem 11:22–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh TA, Gupta VK (2016) An overview of membrane science and technology. In: Saleh TA, Gupta VK (2016) Nanomaterial and polymer membranes. Elsevier, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith (2020) Global warming acceleration!—Hansen&Sato, Radio Ecoshock, 30 Dec 2020. https://www.ecoshock.org/2020/12/global-warming-acceleration-hansen-sato.html. Last accessed: 12 July 2021

  • Song C, Liu Q (2019) Cryogenic-based CO2 capture technologies: state-of-the-art developments and current challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 101:265–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL (2005) SORPTION | metals, encyclopedia of soils in the environment. Elsevier, pp 532–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega F (2018) Solvents for carbon dioxide capture, carbon dioxide chemistry, capture and oil recovery. IntechOpen

    Google Scholar 

  • Voitic G, Pichler B, Basile A (2018) Hydrogen production. In: Hacker V, Mitsushima S (eds) Fuel cells and hydrogen. Elsevier, pp 215–241

    Google Scholar 

  • What’s the difference between geologic and biologic carbon sequestration? https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-s-difference-between-geologic-and-biologic-carbon-sequestration?qt-news_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products. Last accessed 26 Sept 2021

  • Wilberforce T (2019) Outlook of carbon capture technology and challenges. Sci Total Environ 657:56–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisconsin Department of Health Services (2021) Carbon Di Oxide, Environmental health. Last Revised 3 June 2021. https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/chemical/carbondioxide.htm. Accessed: 22 July 2021

  • Wilberforce T (2021) Progress in carbon capture technologies. Sci Total Environ 761:143–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu C-H, Huang C-H, Tan C-S (2012) A review of CO2 capture by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol Air Qual Res 12:745–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C (2021) Absorption principle and techno-economic analysis of CO2 absorption technologies: a review. In: International symposium on energy environment and green development. IOP conference. series: earth and environmental science, vol 657, pp 012–045. IOP Publishing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Aseel Rizwan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rizwan, M.A., Singh, S. (2022). Carbon Sequestration and Capturing Technologies—A Review. In: Ratan, J.K., Sahu, D., Pandhare, N.N., Bhavanam, A. (eds) Advances in Chemical, Bio and Environmental Engineering. CHEMBIOEN 2021. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96554-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics