Skip to main content

A Combined Strategy of Centralized and Decentralized Inventory Allocation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication (RelStat 2021)

Abstract

Inventory management is a science that has developed models and methods for decision-making related to the organization of logistics processes in the main functional areas of supply, production, and distribution. The results in a number of papers related to centralized and decentralized inventory allocation are debatable and require further research. Our results indicate that centralization of inventory leads to a reduction in inventory levels, but consideration of additional conditions, such as increased requirements for stock-outs and variations in demand in warehouses, lead to an adjustment in the results. It was found that approaches using the Square Root Law (SRL) to estimate inventory levels assume that the locations face the same average lead time. The proposed approach takes into account the possibility of a combined inventory management strategy that integrates the benefits of placing stock in different warehouses and allows for outcomes such as, on the one hand, the avoidance of shortages in the distribution network and, on the other hand, avoidance of unnecessary safety stocks in warehouses. The proposed approach has been tested on the basis of demand modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Romero-Silva, R., Leeuw, S.: Learning from the past to shape the future: a comprehensive text mining analysis of OR/MS. Omega 100, 102388 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sodhi, M., Tang, C., Willenson, E.: Research opportunities in preparing supply chains of essential goods for future pandemics. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1884310

  3. Barnes, S., Diaz, M., Arnaboldi, M.: Understanding panic buying during COVID-19: a text analytics approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 169, 114360 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jackson, I., Tolujevs, J., Kegenbekov, Z.: Review of inventory control models: a classification based on methods of obtaining optimal control parameters. Transp. Telecommun. 21(3), 191–202 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kiisler, A., Hilmola, O.: Modelling wholesale company’s supply chain using system dynamics. Transp. Telecommun. 21(2), 149–158 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Oesera, G., Romano, P.: An empirical examination of the assumptions of the Square Root Law for inventory centralisation and decentralisation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54(8), 2298–2319 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fu, D., Ionescu, C., Aghezzaf, E., Keyser, R.: Decentralized and centralized model predictive control to reduce the bullwhip effect in supply chain management. Comput. Ind. Eng. 73, 21–31 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, J., Yi, L., Shi, V., Chen, X.: Supplier encroachment strategy in the presence of retail strategic inventory: centralization or decentralization? Omega 98, 102213 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salcedo, C., Hernandez, A., Vilanova, R., Cuartas, J.: Inventory control of supply chains: mitigating the bullwhip effect by centralized and decentralized Internal Model Control approaches. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 224, 261–272 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmitt, A., Sun, S., Snyder, L., Shen, Z.: Centralization versus decentralization: risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions. Omega 52, 201–212 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, P., Xu, X., Shi, V., Zhu, J.: Simultaneous inventory competition and transshipment between retailers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 230, 107781 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Treiblmaier, H.: Optimal levels of (de)centralization for resilient supply chains. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 29(1), 435–455 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spirin, I., Savosina, M.: Potencial logisticheskoj integracii: Statisticheskaya ocenka vozmozhnogo rezul'tata. In: Innovacionnye tekhnologii v logistike i upravlenii cepyami postavok. ACM, Moskva (2015). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ryzhikov, Y.U.: Logistika, ocheredi i upravlenie zapasami. GUAP, Sankt-Peterburg (2011). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lukinskiy, V., Lukinskiy, V., Bazhina, D., Nikolaevskiy, N., Averina, E. (2022). A Combined Strategy of Centralized and Decentralized Inventory Allocation. In: Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I., Prentkovskis, O. (eds) Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication. RelStat 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 410. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96196-1_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics