Skip to main content

Why Do Traditional Project Management Methods Hinder the Competitiveness of the Construction Industry?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ensuring Sustainability

Abstract

Traditional project management methods are no longer able to foster the competitiveness of construction companies. Variability and uncertainty within the construction projects put both efficiency and productivity into jeopardy. Additionally, the present scenario that construction firms need to confront in Spain is determined by systemic factors (globalization and the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis); within this context, the production approach must shift from increasing revenues to enhancing competitiveness. To that end, the industry should embrace a new management paradigm. The new model should encourage cooperation among the different parties (owners, design team, contractors). Still, at the same time, it needs to take into account that activities interdependence is a critical factor when it comes to production planning and control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andi A (2004) Appropriate allocation of contingency using risk analysis methodology. Civil Eng Dimension 6(1):40–48

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ballard G (1999) Work structuring. Lean Construction Institute White Paper, vol 5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ballard HG (2000) The last planner system of production control, Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ballard G (2005) Construction: one type of project production system. In: 13th international group for lean construction conference: proceedings. International Group on Lean Construction, p 29

    Google Scholar 

  5. Creedy GD 2006 Risk factors leading to cost overrun in the delivery of highway construction projects, Tesis doctoral. Queensland University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  6. Economics O (2015) A global forecast for the construction industry to 2030

    Google Scholar 

  7. Howell GA (1999) What is lean construction-1999. In: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference of the international group for lean construction (IGLC 7), Berkeley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. NASFA; COAA, APPA; AGC; AIA (2010) Integrated project delivery for public and private owners

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pakkala P (2002) Innovative project delivery methods for infrastructure. Finish Road Enterprise

    Google Scholar 

  10. Russell MM, Hsiang SM, Liu M, Wambeke B (2012) Causes of time buffer in construction project task durations. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the international group for lean construction (IGLC 20), San Diego, USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Slauson NP (2005) The effectiveness of the construction contract. AACE Int Trans; ABI/INFORM Complete pg. PM121

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith JP, Ribkowski Z (2012) Literature review on trust and current construction industry trends. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the international group for lean construction (IGLC 20), San Diego, USA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomsen C et al (2010) Managing integrated project delivery. Informe. CMAA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Underwood J, Khosrowshahi F (2012) ICT expenditure and trends in the UK construction industry in facing the challenges of the global economic crisis. J Inf Technol Constr 17:26–42

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vieira A, Cachadinha N (2011) Lean Construction—how reducing waste can contribute to sustainability. World in Progress Ed.2. Soares da Costa

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wambeke BW, Hsiang SM, Liu M (2011) Causes of variation in construction project task starting times and duration. J Constr Eng Manag 137(9):663–677

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work has been supported by the Madrid Government (Comunidad de Madrid-Spain) under the Multiannual Agreement with UC3M in the line of Excellence of University Professors (EPUC3M20), and in the context of the VPRICIT (Regional Programme of Research and Technological Innovation).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. I. Ortiz-Gonzalez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ortiz-Gonzalez, J.I., Duran-Heras, A., Castilla-Alcala, G. (2022). Why Do Traditional Project Management Methods Hinder the Competitiveness of the Construction Industry?. In: Avilés-Palacios, C., Gutierrez, M. (eds) Ensuring Sustainability. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95967-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95967-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95966-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-95967-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics