Skip to main content

The Impact of Mobile Phone Brand Personality on Brand Equity Among Albanian Consumers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brand, Label, and Product Intelligence

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

  • 458 Accesses

Abstract

Consumers buy the product or brand because of the meaning they have in the social context. Furthermore, the choice of a product or brand by the consumer is a cause of social behavior rather than a result. Consumers’ feelings about themselves are often reflected in the brands they choose. One way to build a relationship between the brand and the consumer is by creating a brand personality that is as attractive as possible. This means combining human characteristics with the brand in order to make the brand as attractive to the consumer as possible. This is because personality is a set of traits such as kindness, neighborliness and responsibility, which make a person special and distinct. Numerous studies have focused on how the personality of a brand enables a consumer to express themselves, their ideal self or specific dimensions of themselves by using a brand. The telecommunications industry has been facing significant changes in regulation, technology, and customer demand. Mobile phones, as the industry’s biggest revenue generators and the most used communication tools of the twenty-first century, have revolutionized the mode of communication and have made people attached to their phones. One of the reasons for this could be the fact that mobile phones are an all in one tool, including the integration of a digital camera, music and video players, a calendar, a calculator, a game console. The purpose of this paper is to study the relationship that exists between brand personality dimensions and brand equity for the mobile phone brands. The results of indicators for each mobile phone brand, such as the dimensions of sincerity, competence, excitement, sophistication and ruggedness will determine the impact on brand equity. In the present research paper, the mobile phone market in Albania is represented by four important brands such as iPhone (Apple), Xiaomi, Huawei, Samsung Galaxy. There were analysed 344 samples. Following research, it resulted that the dimensions of sincerity, competence and sophistication have the greatest impact on brand equity of mobile phones and the dimension of excitement and ruggedness have the least impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, D. (1996). Measuring brand equity, across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, D. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biel, A. L. (1993). Converting image into equity. In D. Aaker & A. Biel (Eds.), Brand equity and advertising. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdwell, A. E. (1964, January). A study of the influence of image congruence on consumer choice. Journal of Business, 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. F., & Lui, C. M. (2004). Positive brand extension trial and choice of parent brand. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(1), 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K. H., Yu, J. E., Choi, M. G.‚ & Shin, J. I. (2015). The effects of CSR on customer satisfaction and loyalty in China: The moderating role of corporate image. Journal of Economic Business Management, 3(5), 542–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolich, I. J. (1969, February). Congruence relationships between self images and product brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankinson, G., & Cowking, P. (1993). Branding in action: Cases and strategies for profitable brand management marketing for professionals, (pp. 220–221). McGraw-Hill marketing for professionals. ISBN: 0077078128, 9780077078126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leckie, C., Nyadzayo, M. W., & Johnson, L. W. (2016). Antecedents of consumer brand engagement and brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(5–6), 558–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucia, M., Harley, K., Wayne, D. H., & Bettina, N. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing, 75, 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K. (1988). Self-concept and product choice: An integrated perspective. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K., Peterson, M., & Kleiser, S. B. 1999. Marketing research: A state-of-the-art review and directions for the twenty-first century. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 160–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, P. (1957, February). Motivation in advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitta, D. A., & Katsanis, L. (1995). Understanding brand equity for successful brand extension. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyle, I., & Panajoti, V. (2013, May 24–25). Brand personality as important element in creating strong brand equity. The 1st International Conference on “Research and Education—Challenges Towards the Future” (ICRAE2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, J., & Tong, X. (2015). Brand personality and brand equity: evidence from the sportswear industry. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(2), 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan, C. (2005). The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, J. H., & Plank, R. E. (2002). Measuring brand equity: An evaluation of a consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10, 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winchester, M., & Romaniuk, J. (2008). Negative brand beliefs and brand usage. International Journal of Market Research, 50(3), 355–375.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irma Shyle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shyle, I. (2022). The Impact of Mobile Phone Brand Personality on Brand Equity Among Albanian Consumers. In: Kaswengi, J., Ingarao, A. (eds) Brand, Label, and Product Intelligence. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95809-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics