Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science ((APESS,volume 34))

  • 395 Accesses

Abstract

The term ‘Anthropocene’ was promulgated by Paul J. Crutzen in 2000. Anthropogenic threats to human survival posed by the atom bomb and global climate change began in the new geological epoch of the Anthropocene. They require a joint approach within the framework of holistic peace ecology and a transformative strategy towards an ecological peace policy. Since 1945 Sub-Saharan Africa has experienced many violent conflicts and human-induced disasters. Due to population growth, the demand for water, agricultural land and food supplies will increase, while there may be an even greater shortage of food supplies and jobs by 2100. These climate-related environmental scarcities may result in new forms of violent climate conflicts. Tipping points in the climate system may trigger geopolitical conflicts. This chapter summarises the key ecological challenges which Africa has faced since 1945, reviews the conflicts Africa has experienced, and assesses their implications for peace research and environmental studies in Africa and the limited work on the connections between the two fields of research. This text discusses the relevance of a peace ecology approach and the need for an ecological peace policy for Africa and reflects on the need to rethink and integrate research and action in Africa in the Anthropocene.

PD Dr. Hans Günter Brauch, chairman of AFES-PRESS; chairman of the board of the Hans Günter Brauch Foundation on Peace and Ecology in the Anthropocene (HGBS), and editor of this Anthropocene (APESS) book series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This text addresses two themes the author has been working on for some time and thus builds on several previous texts that were authored and co-authored on ‘peace ecology’ and the ‘Anthropocene’ (Brauch 2012, 2014, 2016, 2016a; Brauch et al. 2011, 2015; Brauch/Oswald Spring 2011, 2015; Brauch et al. (2016); Crutzen/Brauch 2016; Oswald Spring et al. 2009, 2014a). This chapter builds on Brauch (2021), the copyright of which the author retained. Additional new texts on these themes by this author are in preparation and will be published in the years to come.

  2. 2.

    I appreciate the constructive comments on a first draft of 25 April 2021 received from Dr Hans Happes (Germany), former headmaster of a grammar school (Nikolaus-Kistner-Gymnasium), who has been working in Sumbawanga (Tanzania) since his retirement; the co-editors of this book, Dr Kiyala Jean Chrysostome (Democratic Republic of Congo) and Prof. Dr Geoff Thomas Harris (Australia), both of the Durban Institute of Technology, Durban, South Africa; Prof. Dr Jürgen Scheffran, Geography Department, Hamburg University and Head of CLISEC; Prof. Em. Dr Michael Brzoska, Hamburg University, former Director of the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy, Hamburg University (ISFH); Prof. Em. Nils Petter Gleditsch, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), Norway; Prof. Em. Dr Peter Wallensteen, Uppsala University, Sweden.

  3. 3.

    See Keal (1983), Kissinger (2014), Ikenberry (1999, 2011), Mazarr et al. (2016), Parmar (2018).

  4. 4.

    See: Bourantonis/Wiener (1995), Volgy/Imwalle (1995), Westad (2007) Jackson/O’Malley (2018), Conca (2015); “List of proxy wars”, at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_proxy_wars; “Proxy Wars in Africa”, at: https://www.academia.edu/Documents/in/Proxy_Wars_in_Africa; (Manyok 2008): “War of Proxy, Legacies of the Cold War on the Third World Countries: The Case of Congo and Angola”, at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292368497_War_of_Proxy_Legaciesof_the_Cold_War_on_the_Third_World_Countries_The_Case_of_Congo_and_Angola (11 June 2021).

  5. 5.

    Freund (1984), Birmingham (1995), Clapham (2020).

  6. 6.

    See: Die Bundesregierung (2021): “Climate Change Act 2021: Intergenerational contract for the climate”; at: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/klimaschutz/climate-change-act-2021-1913970 (8 June 2021).

  7. 7.

    For an annual overview of global military expenditure, see: “SIPRI Military Expenditure Database”, at: https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex. This database “contains consistent time series on the military spending of countries for the period 1949–2020”.

  8. 8.

    Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) was a British political philosopher who, in International Relations, is considered a pioneer of modern realist thinking, which is influenced by the role of military and economic power.

  9. 9.

    This text addresses two themes the author has been working on for some time and thus builds on several previous texts that were authored and co-authored on ‘peace ecology’ and the ‘Anthropocene’ (Brauch 2014, 2016, 2017; Brauch et al. 2011, 2015, 2016; Brauch/Oswald Spring 2011, 2015, 2017; Crutzen/Brauch 2016; Oswald Spring et al. 2009, 2014, 2014a). Additional new texts by this author are in preparation and will be published in the years to come.

  10. 10.

    The concept of ‘geoecology’ was introduced by Huggett (1995). In 2021, many geography departments, primarily in Central and Eastern Europe, are offering Bachelors and Masters degree courses in geoecology.

  11. 11.

    The Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC is scheduled to be released between October 2021 (WG 1) and October 2022 (WG II, WG III, Synthesis Report) and may be accessed here: https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar6/ (8 June 2021).

  12. 12.

    ‘Geoecology’ is a concept formulated by Huggett (1995) within physical geography. The proposal of ‘political geoecology’ is to combine approaches in physical and human geography or between the natural and the social sciences, while ‘peace ecology’ is an approach that proposes integrating ecological approaches with research programmes in the social sciences and peace studies.

  13. 13.

    See: Oswald Spring/Brauch/Tidball 2014; Brauch/Oswald Spring/Bennett/Serrano Oswald 2016; Oswald Spring/Brauch/Serrano Oswald/Bennett 2016; Brauch/Oswald Spring/Collins/Serrano Oswald 2018; Oswald Spring/Brauch 2021.

  14. 14.

    See: Fachkommission Fluchtursachen (2021: 181–215): at: fk-fluchtursachen@bmz.bund.de.

  15. 15.

    The Commission on Environment, Economic and Social Policy of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) addresses “the integration of natural resource management in conflict prevention, mitigation, resolution, and recovery to build resilience in communities affected by conflict” that are “cross-cutting and relevant in all areas of conservation, sustainable development and security”. This IUCN’s commission works on these five areas: 1. social conflicts and peace, 2. security and peace, 3. ecological conflicts and peace, 4. peacebuilding, and 5. conflict resolution. See at: https://www.iucn.org/commissions/commission-environmental-economic-and-social-policy/our-work/environment-and-peace (11 April 2021).

  16. 16.

    For an overview with many sources, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_peacebuilding (11 April 2021). See also the websites on environmental peacebuilding, at: https://www.epmooc.org/ (11 April 2021).

  17. 17.

    For a summary of the emerging debate by Lesley Evans Ogden on “Environmental peacebuilding”, see: BioScience, 68,3 (March 2018): 157–163.

  18. 18.

    See Florian Krampe, summary of PhD thesis at Uppsala University, at: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A945418&dswid=-1351 (11 April 2021).

  19. 19.

    See Mark Notaras (UNU), at: https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/building-peace-through-environmental-conservation (11 April 2021).

  20. 20.

    In SIPRI’s research programme “climate change and environmental degradation are already impacting peace and security in diverse ways. At the same time, the change needed to transition to lower-carbon, greener economies is fraught with risks, but also offers many opportunities to contribute to more peaceful, sustainable societies. Environment of Peace will synthesize the best available evidence on environmental change and its societal impacts. It will present new insights on the risks, challenges and promising solutions. And it will illuminate pathways for policy and action. The initiative will release a major report in 2022, marking 50 years since the landmark United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (the Stockholm Conference). See at: https://www.sipri.org/research/peace-and-development/environment-peace (11 April 2021).

  21. 21.

    On 22 September 2020 the US Institute of Peace presented: “The new Ecological Threat Register (ETR), produced by the Institute for Economics and Peace, [that] synthesizes and visualizes data on environmental indicators to estimate which countries, regions, and areas are most vulnerable to environment-induced conflict. In particular, the ETR underscores that 141 countries are vulnerable to ecological threats, and that approximately 1.2 billion people could be displaced globally by ecological disasters in the next 30 years. On September 22, USIP and the Institute for Economics and Peace examined the inaugural Ecological Threat Register, as experts explored the nexus between conflict and climate change and considered strategies for boosting resilience to climate-induced insecurity.” See at: https://www.usip.org/events/ecological-threats-peace (11 April 2021).

  22. 22.

    See: “Making Peace with Nature”, at: https://www.dw.com/en/making-peace-with-nature/a-56615328 (11 April 2021). This UNEP (2019) report Global Environmental Outlook 2019 – Healthy Planet – Healthy People (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) says “A new UN blueprint offers an integrated ‘peace plan’ to tackle three interlinked environmental emergencies – the climate crisis, biodiversity loss and pollution – that cannot be solved in isolation.” See UNEP’s GEO-6 (Nairobi 2019) report https://www.unep.org/resources/global-environment-outlook-6, which suggests a holistic approach:

    Fifth, environmental policy is necessary but inadequate by itself to address systemic ecological problems, solutions to which require a more holistic approach. Current (inter)national policies are not on track to address the key environmental challenges effectively and equitably, in line with the aspirations of the SDGs. Environmental considerations need to be integrated into all policy areas, such that the potential and actual implications for natural resources and the environment are robustly included in policies for economic growth, technological development and urban design, so that there is effective long-term decoupling between economic growth, resource use and environmental degradation. Climate mitigation needs to be accompanied by policy for the equitable adaptation to committed climate change. Policies will only be effective if they are well designed, involving clear goals and flexible mixes of policy, including monitoring, instruments aimed at achieving them […] and when access to judicial remedies are available […]. Such a holistic approach need not require additional economic costs.

  23. 23.

    Latour (2014); for an English translation, see: https://www.cairn.info/revue-revue-juridique-de-l-environnement-2014-1-page-51.htm (11 April 2021).

  24. 24.

    ‘Material footprint’ refers to the amount of raw materials extracted from Planet Earth to meet human needs. See: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2017/goal-12/.

  25. 25.

    The UNDP HDR (2020: 244) defined the planetary-pressures adjusted HDI (PHDI) as a: “Planetary pressures-adjusted HDI (PHDI): HDI value adjusted by the level of carbon dioxide emissions and material footprint per capita to account for excessive human pressures on the planet. It should be seen as an incentive for transformation. See technical note at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/phdi_tn.pdf for details on how the PHDI is calculated.”

  26. 26.

    For information on changes in the working age of the population, 1950–2100, see: UNPD (2019): 20.

  27. 27.

    See at: https://ucdp.uu.se/downloads/charts/ (15 April 2021).

  28. 28.

    See: Joint paper by the Commission and the Secretary-General/High Representative concerning “Climate change and international security” presented to the European Council, Brussels, 3 March 2008; at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/reports/99387.pdf; Press Conference by Security Council President, 4 April 2007; at: https://www.un.org/press/en/2007/070404_Parry.doc.htm; UN Security Council, SC/9000, 5663rd meeting, 17 April 2007: “Security Council holds first-ever debate on impact of climate change on peace, security, hearing 50 speakers”; at: https://www.un.org/press/en/2007/sc9000.doc.htm; UN, 2007: “Security Council Holds First-Ever Debate on Impact of Climate Change on Peace, Security, Hearing over 50 Speakers, UN Security Council, 5663rd Meeting, 17 April 2007”; at: https://www.un.org/press/en/2007/sc9000.doc.htm; UN (2009): “Climate change and its possible security implications”. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/63/281 (New York: United Nations General Assembly, 11 June); UN (2009a), (2010), (2011): “Informal Thematic Debate on Human Security”; at: http://www.un.org/en/ga/president/65/initiatives/HumanSecurity.html

  29. 29.

    See the figure: Scope of the expert assessment – Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict. Source Mach et al. (2019: 193–197).

  30. 30.

    Collective thematic scope of special issue contributions. Source von Uexkull und Buhaug (2021), 58,1: 3–17.

  31. 31.

    Scheffran (2020: 19-48); Balbo, Rothe, Scheffran (2020: 287–296); van Baalen, Mobjörk (2018: 547–575); von Uexkull, Pettersson (2018: 953–968); Kamta, Schilling, Scheffran (2021: 27); Kogoui Kamta, Schilling/Scheffran (2020: 6830); Kamta et al. (2020: 95–104); Marie, Yirga, Haile, et al. (2021); Schilling, Hertig, Tramblay, Scheffran (2020: 15); Shaaban, Scheffran, Böhner, Elsobki (2019: 4); Noagah Bukhari, Sow, Scheffran (2019: 161-185); Schilling, Locham, Scheffran (2018: 571-600); Solomon, Birhane Gordon, et al. (2018: 284–290); Evadzi, Scheffran, Zorita, Hünicke (2018: 183-197).

  32. 32.

    Swain, Bali, Swain Anders, Krampe (2011); Cabot (2017).

  33. 33.

    Brauch (2021): 111–114, Boulding/Kenneth (1978, 1989), Boulding/Elise (1988, 1992, 2000), Oswald Spring (2008a).

  34. 34.

    Brauch (2021): 114–115; Westing (1976, 2003, 2013, 2013a).

  35. 35.

    This section relies on Oswald Spring et al. (2016: Chapter 43).

  36. 36.

    SDGs; at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (15 June 2021).

  37. 37.

    UN’s Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development; at: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.

  38. 38.

    See: “01 Background Note: Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want”; at: https://au.int/sites/default/files/documents/33126-doc-01_background_note.pdf .

  39. 39.

    See: Share of fatalities from natural disasters by continent 2019. Source: M. Szmigiera, Statistica (30 March 2021), at: http://www.statista.com/statistics/273890/countries-with-the-most-fatalities-from-natural-disasters/ (18 April 2021).

  40. 40.

    See EMDAT, at: https://www.emdat.be/ (20 April 2021).

  41. 41.

    See: PreventionWeb; at: https://www.preventionweb.net/english/ (20 April 2021).

  42. 42.

    See: “CO2 emissions (kt) – Sub-Saharan Africa”. Source: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States; at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.KT?locations=ZG (14 June 2020).

References

  • Adano Wario, Roban; Daudi, Faruma, 2012: Links between climate change, conflict and governance in Africa, Institute for Security Studies Paper (Pretoria: ISS).

    Google Scholar 

  • African Union Commission, 2015: African Peace and Security Architecture. APSA Roadmap 2016-2020 (Addis Abbaba: African Union Commission, Peace and Security Department): 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amster, Randall, 2014: Peace Ecology (Boulder, CO: Paradigm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Badash, Lawrence, 2009: A Nuclear Winter’s Tale. Science and Politics in the 1980s (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbo, Andrea L.; Rothe, Delf; Scheffran, Jürgen, 2020: “The Anthropocene: an opportunity for transdisciplinary and inclusive science?”, in: Brzoska, Michael; Scheffran, Jürgen (Eds.): Climate Change, Security Risks, and Violent Conflicts. Essays from Integrated Climate Research in Hamburg (Hamburg: Hamburg University Press): 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedick, Richard Elliot, 1998: Ozone Diplomacy - New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet, Enlarged Edition (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, Susanne; Lax, Gregor; Crutzen, Paul J.; Lelieveld, Jos; Pöschl, Ulrich: Brauch, Hans Günter (Eds.), 2022: Paul J. Crutzen and the Anthropocene – A New Earth’s Epoch (Cham: Springer International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, David, 1995: The Decolonization of Africa (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bob, Urmilla; Bronkhorst, Salome (Eds.), 2014: Conflict Sensitive adaptation to climate change in Africa (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Elise, 1988: Building a Global Civic Culture: Education for an Interdependent World (New York, NY: Teachers College Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Elise (Ed.), 1992: New Agendas for Peace Research: Conflict and Security Re-examined (Boulder, Co: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Elise, 2000: Cultures of Peace: The Hidden Side of History (New York: Syracuse University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, J. Russell (Ed.), 2017: Elise Boulding: A Pioneer in Peace Research, Peacemaking, Feminism and the Family: From a Quaker Perspective, with a Foreword by Betty Reardon and a Preface by Úrsula Oswald Spring (Cham – Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, J. Russell (Ed.), 2017a: Elise Boulding: Writings on Peace Research, Peacemaking and the Future (Cham – Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, J. Russell (Ed.), 2017b: Elise Boulding: Writings on Feminism, the Family and Quakerism (Cham – Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, J. Russell (Ed.), 2017c: Elise Boulding: Autobiographical Writings and Selections from Unpublished Journals and Letters (Cham Boulding, Kenneth E. 1966: “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth”, in: Jarrett, H. (Ed.): Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth E., 1978: Ecodynamics (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding. Elise. 1989: One Small Plot of Heaven: Reflections on Family Life by a Quaker Sociologist (Philadelphia, PA: Pendle Hill Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourantonis, Dimitris; Wiener, Jarrod (Eds.), 1995: The United Nations in the New World Order: The World Organization at Fifty (London: Macmillan)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2002: “Climate Change, Environmental Stress and Conflict: AFES-PRESS Report for the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety”, in: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (Ed.): Climate Change and Conflict: Can Climate Change Impacts Increase Conflict Potentials? What is the Relevance of this Issue for the International Process on Climate Change? (Berlin: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2002): 9–112; at: http://www.afes-press.de/pdf/Brauch_ClimateChange_BMU.pdf.

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2009: “Securitizing Global Environmental Change”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Ursula; Grin, John; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Krummenacher, Heinz (Eds.), 2009: Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag): 65–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2011: “Global Climate Change Impacts for the Mediterranean in the 21st Century: Challenges for Human and Environmental Security”, in: Hans Günter Brauch, Úrsula Oswald Spring, Czeslaw Mesjasz, John Grin, Patricia Kameri-Mbote, Béchir Chourou, Pal Dunay, Jörn Birkmann (Eds.): Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security – Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag, 2011): 485–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2012: “Environmental Security”, in: Juergensmeyer, Mark; Anheier, Helmut K. (Eds.): Encyclopedia of Global Studies (London: Sage, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2014: “From Climate Change and Security Impacts to Sustainability Transition: Two Policy Debates and Scientific Discourses”, in: Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter; Tidball, Keith G. (Eds): Expanding Peace Ecology: Peace, Security, Sustainability, Equity and Gender (Cham: Springer International Publishing): 33-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2016: “Historical Times and Turning Points in a Turbulent Century: 1914, 1945, 1989 and 2014?”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Bennett, Juliet; Serrano Oswald, Serena Eréndira (Eds.): Addressing Global Environmental Challenges from a Peace Ecology Perspective (Cham – Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer International Publishers): 11–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2016a: “Building Sustainable Peace by Moving Toward Sustainability Transition”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Bennett, Juliet; Serrano Oswald, Serena Eréndira (Eds.): Addressing Global Environmental Challenges from a Peace Ecology Perspective (Cham – Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer International Publishers): 145–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2016b: “Conceptualizing Sustainable Peace in the Anthropocene: A Challenge and Task for an Emerging Political Geoecology and Peace Ecology”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran; Jürgen (Eds.): Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Cham – Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer): 187–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2019: “Sustainable Peace Through Sustainability Transition as Trans-formative Science: A Peace Ecology Perspective in the Anthropocene”, Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Ursula (Eds.): Climate Change, Disasters, Sustainability Transition and Peace in the Anthropocene (Cham: Springer International Publishing): 175-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2021: “Peace Ecology in the Anthropocene”, in: Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter (Eds.): Decolonising Conflicts, Security, Peace, Gender, Environment and Development in the Anthropocene (Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2022: “The Anthropocene Concept in the Natural and Social Sciences, the Humanities and Law – A Bibliometric Analysis and a Qualitative Interpretation (2000-2020)”, in: Benner, Susanne; Lax, Gregor; Crutzen, Paul J.; Lelieveld, Jos; Pöschl, Ulrich; Brauch, Hans Günter (Eds.): Paul J. Crutzen and the Anthropocene – A New Earth’s Epoch (Cham: Springer International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, 2023: “The Anthropocene in the Social Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis of Political Science, International Relations, Political Theory, Environment, Ecology Security, Gender Studies and Peace Research”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter (Ed.): Rethinking Politics, Policy and Polity in the Anthropocene (Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Dalby, Simon; Oswald Spring, Úrsula, 2011: “Political Geoecology for the Anthropocene”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Chourou, Béchir; Dunay, Pal; Birkmann, Jörn (Eds.): Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security – Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag): 1453-1486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Dalby, Simon; Oswald Spring, Úrsula, 2015: “Political Geoecology for the Anthropocene” [in Chinese], in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Cheng, Liu (Eds.): Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security – Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks [in Chinese] (Nanjing: PR China: Nanjing Press Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula, 2011: “Introduction: Coping with Global Environmental Change in the Anthropocene”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Chourou, Béchir; Dunay, Pal; Birkmann, Jörn (Eds.): Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security – Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks (Berlin Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag, 2011): 31-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula, 2016: “Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace: Scientific and Policy Context, Scientific Concepts and Dimensions”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran; Jürgen (Eds.): Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Cham: Springer International Publishing):‏ 3-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula, 2018: Climate Change, Disasters, Sustainability Transition and Peace in the Anthropocene (Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Bennett, Juliet; Serrano Oswald, Serena Eréndira (Eds.): Addressing Global Environmental Challenges from a Peace Ecology Perspective (Cham – Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer International Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Ursula; Grin, John; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Krummenacher, Heinz (Eds.), 2009: Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran, Jürgen, (Eds.), 2016: Handbook of Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Dunay, Pal; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Liotta, P.H. (Eds.), 2008: Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter; Scheffran, Jürgen, 2012: “Introduction: Climate Change, Human Security, and Violent Conflict in the Anthropocene”, in: Scheffran, Jürgen; Brzoska, Michael; Brauch, Hans Günter: Link, Michael; Schilling, Janpeter (Eds.), 2012: Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict: Challenges for Societal Stability (Berlin—Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag): 3-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland Commission (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987, 1988: Our Common Future. The World Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzoska, Michael, 2020: “ Klimawandel und Gewaltkonflikte aus sozialwissenschaftlicher Perspektive“, in: S+F: Sicherheit und Frieden - Security and Peace, 38,4: 200-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzoska, Michael; Scheffran, Jürgen (Eds.), 2020: Climate Change, Security Risks, and Violent Conflicts. Essays from Integrated Climate Research in Hamburg (Hamburg: Hamburg University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabot, Charlene, 2017: Climate Change, Security Risks and Conflict Reduction in Africa: A Case Study of Farmer-Herder Conflicts over Natural Resources in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana and Burkina Faso (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Baiping; Fæste, Lars; Jacobsen, Rune; Teck Kong, Ming; Lu, Dylan: Palme, Thomas, 2020: “How China Can Achieve Carbon Neutrality by 2060” (14 December); at: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/how-china-can-achieve-carbon-neutrality-by-2060 (23 April 2021).

  • Clapham, Christopher, 2020: “Decolonising African Studies?”, in: Journal of Modern African Studies, 58,1: 137-153

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca, Ken, 1994: “In the Name of Sustainability: Peace Studies and Environmental Discourse”, in: Käkonen, Jyrki (Ed.): Green Security or Militarized Environment (Dartmouth: Aldershot): 7-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca, Ken, 2002: “The Case for Environmental Peacemaking”, in: Conca, Ken; Dabelko, Geoffrey (Eds.): Environmental Peacemaking (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press): 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca, Ken, 2015: An Unfinished Foundation: The United Nations and Global Environmental Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, Paul J., 2002: “Geology of Mankind”, in: Nature, 415,3 (January): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, Paul J., 2011: “The Anthropocene: A Geology of Mankind”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Chourou, Béchir; Dunay, Pal; Birkmann, Jörn (Eds.), 2011: Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security – Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks (Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag): 3-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, Paul J.; Birks, John W., 1982: “The Atmosphere After a Nuclear War: Twilight at Noon”, in: Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 11 (January): 114-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, Paul J.; Brauch, Hans Günter (Eds.), 2016: Paul J. Crutzen: A Pioneer on Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Change in the Anthropocene (Cham: Springer International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, Paul J.; Stoermer, Eugene F., 2000: “The Anthropocene”, in: IGBP Newsletter, 41-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, Simon, 2020: Anthropocene Geopolitics: Globalization, Security, Sustainability Politics and Public Policy (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Ian, 2020: “7. Armed conflicts and peace-processes in Sub-Saharan Africa”, in: SIPRI (ed.): SIPRI Yearbook 2020 – Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Stockholm: SIPRI – Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press): 171-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU [European Commission; Council], 2008: Climate Change and International Security. Doc 7249/08 (Brussels: European Commission, 14 March).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 2019: “2050 long-term strategy”; at: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2050_en (23 April 2020). With links to relevant EU documents.

  • European Union, 2019: Going Climate Neutral by 2050 (Luxembourg, Publications Office of the EU).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evadzi, P.I.K.; Scheffran, J.; Zorita, E.; Hünicke, B. 2018: “Awareness of sea-level response under climate change on the coast of Ghana”, in: Journal of Coastal Conservation, 22,1: 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans Ogden, Lesley, 2018: “Environmental peacebuilding”, in: BioScience, 68,3 (March): 157-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fachkommission Fluchtursachen, 2021: Krisen vorbeugen, Perspektiven schaffen, Menschen schützen: Bericht der Fachkommission Fluchtursachen der Bundesregierung (Bonn: Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, Bill, 1984: “The Decolonisation of Africa, 1940–1960”, in: Freund, Bill: The Making of Contemporary Africa (London: Palgrave): 191-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan, 1969: “Violence, peace, and peace research”, in: Journal of Peace Research, 6,3: 167-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göpel, Maja, 2017: The Great Mindshift: Why We Need a New Economic Paradigm for Sustainability Transformations (Cham – New York – Heidelberg – Dordrecht – London: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • HIIC [Heidelberg Institute on International Conflict Research], 2021: Conflict Barometer 2020: Disputes, non-violent crises, violent crises, limited wars and wars (Heidelberg: HIIK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggett, Richard John, 1995: Geoecology. An Evolutionary Approach (London – New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDMC (Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre), 2020: Internal Displacement 2020: Mid-Year Update (Geneva: IDMC).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDMC (Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre), 2020a. “Global Internal Displacement Database.” Geneva; at: https://www.internal-displacement.org/database (25 November 2020).

  • Ide, Tobias, 2017: “Space, Discourse and Environmental Peacebuilding”, in: Third World Quarterly, 38,3: 544-562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, Tobias, 2018, 2019: “The Impact of Environmental Cooperation on Peacemaking: Definitions, Mechanisms, and Empirical Evidence”, in: International Studies Review, 21,3 (September): 327–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, Tobias, 2018a: “Does Environmental Peacemaking between States Work? Insights on Cooperative Environmental Agreements and Reconciliation in International Rivalries”, in: Journal of Peace Research, 55,3: 351-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, Tobias, 2019: Environmental Peacemaking and Environmental Peacebuilding in International Politics, CLISEC Working Paper 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, Tobias, 2019a: “The Impact of Environmental Cooperation on Peacemaking: Definitions, Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence”, in: International Studies Review, 21,3: 327-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, Tobias, 2020: “Environmental Peacebuilding”, in: Oxford Bibliographies in International Relations; doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0290.

  • Ide, Tobias; Bruch, Carl; Carius, Alexander; Conca, Ken; Dabelko, Geoffrey D.; Matthew, Richard; Weinthal, Erika, 2021: “The Past and Future(s) of Environmental Peacebuilding”, in: International Affairs, 97,1: 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, Tobias; Detges, Adrien, 2018: “International Water Cooperation and Environmental Peacemaking”, in: Global Environmental Politics, 18,4: 63-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, Tobias; Sümer, Vakur; Aldehoff, Larissa M., 2018: Environmental Peacebuilding in the Middle East, in: Swain, Ashok; Öjendal, Joakim (Eds.): Routledge Handbook on Environmental Conflict and Peacebuilding (London: Routledge): 175-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. John, 1999: “Liberal Hegemony and the Future of American Postwar Order”, in: Paul, T. V.; Hall, John A. (Eds.): International Order and the Future of World Politics, (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. John, 2011: Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1990: Climate Change: The IPCC Impacts Assessment (Geneva: WMO; UNEP; IPCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1996: Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change: Contributions of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1997: The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press); also at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/wg1/.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2011: Special Report: Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2012: Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press); at: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report: Summary for Policymakers (Geneva: IPCC); at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018: Global Warming of 1.5°C (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2019: The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2019a: Climate Change and Land (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2019b: Methodology Report: 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2020: Methodology Report on Short-lived Climate Forcers Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2021: AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, The Working Group I contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press, July); at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022: AR6 Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability The Working Group II contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press, February); at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-ii/.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022a: AR6 Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. The Working Group III contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022b: AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2022 (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press, October).

    Google Scholar 

  • IISS (International Institute on Strategic Studies), 2020: The Armed Conflict Survey. The worldwide review of political, military and humanitarian trends in current conflicts (London: IISS, published by Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • IISS (International Institute on Strategic Studies), 2020a: Strategic Survey. The Annual Assessment of Geopolitics (London: IISS, published by Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • ISSC (International Social Science Council), 2012: Transformative Cornerstones of Social Science Research for Global Change (Paris: International Social Science Council).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Simon; O'Malley, Alanna, 2018: The Institution of International Order: From the League of Nations to the United Nations (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamta, Frederic; Azadi, Hossein; Scheffran, Jürgen, 2020: “The Root Causes of the Crisis in Northeast Nigeria: Historical, Socioeconomic and Environmental Dimensions”, in: Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,11,3: 95-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamta, Frederic Noel; Schilling, Janpeter; Scheffran, Jürgen, 2021: “Water Resources, Forced Migration and Tensions with Host Communities in the Nigerian Part of the Lake Chad Basin”, in: Resources, 10,4: 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keal, Paul, 1983: “World War II and Plans for Post-War Order. In: Unspoken Rules and Superpower Dominance”, in: Keal, Paul: Unspoken Rules And Superpower Dominance (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, Henry, 2014: World Order (New York: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogoui Kamta, Frederic Noel; Schilling, Janpeter; Scheffran, Jürgen, 2020: “Insecurity, Resource Scarcity, and Migration to Camps of Internally Displaced Persons in Northeast Nigeria”, in: Sustainability. 12,17: 6830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyrou, Christos, 2007: “Peace Ecology: An Emerging Paradigm in Peace Studies”, in: The International Journal of Peace Studies, 12,2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno, 2014: “War and peace in an age of ecological conflicts”, in: Revue juridique de l’environnement, 2014/1, 39: 51-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Billon, Philippe; Duffy, Rosaleen, 2018, 2019: “Conflict Ecologies: Connecting Political Ecology and Peace and Conflict Studies”, in: Journal of Political Ecology, 24: 239-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, Timothy; Held, Hermann; Kriegler, Elmar; Hall, Jim W.; Lucht, Wolfgang; Rahmstorf, Stefan; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, 2008: “Tipping Elements in the Earth’s Climate System”, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS), 105,6 (12 February): 1,786-1,793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, Timothy; Rockström, Johan; Gaffney, Owen; Rahmstorf, Stefan; Richardson, Katherine; Steffen, Will; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, 2019: “Climate tipping points — too risky to bet against”, in: Nature, 575 (28 November): 592-595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, Katharine J.; Kraan, Carolien M.; Adger, W. Neil; Buhaug, Halvard; Burke, Marshall; Fearon, James D.; Field, Christopher B.; Hendrix, Cullen S.; Maystadt, Jean-Francois; O'Loughlin, John; Roessler, Philip; Scheffran, Jürgen; Schultz, Kenneth A.; von Uexkull, Nina, 2019: Climate as risk factor for conflict”, in: Nature571, 7764: 193-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marie, M.; Yirga, F.; Haile, M.; Ehteshammajd, S.; Azadi, J.; Scheffran, J., 2021: “Time-Series Trend Analysis and Farmer Perceptions of Rainfall and Temperature in Northwestern Ethiopia”, in: Environment Development and Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazarr, Michael J.; Priebe, Miranda; Radin, Andrew; Stuth Cevallos, Astrid, 2016: Understanding the Current International Order (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation).

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, John R.; Engelke, Peter, 2014: The Great Acceleration; An Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945 (Cambridge, MA – London: The Belknap Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Mary Lee, 2005: Elise Boulding: A Life in the Cause of Peace (Jefferson, NC: McFarland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niang, I.; Ruppel, O.C.; Abdrabo, M.A.; Essel, A.; Lennard, C.; Padgham, J.; Urquhart, P., 2014: “Africa”, in: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Barros, V.R., C.B. Field, D.J. Dokken, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)] (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press): 1199-1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noagah Bukari, Kaderi; Sow, Papa; Scheffran, Jürgen, 2019: “Real or Hyped? Linkages Between Environmental / Climate Change and Conflicts – The Case of Farmers and Fulani Pastoralists in Ghana”, in: Behnassi, Mohamed; Gupta, Himangana; Pollmann, Olaf (Eds.): Human and Environmental Security in the Era of Global Risks: Perspectives from Africa, Asia and the Pacific Islands (Cham: Springer International Publishing): 161-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula 2020: Earth at Risk in the 21st Century: Rethinking Peace, Environment, Gender, and Human, Water, Health, Food, Energy Security, and Migration (Cham: Springer International Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula, 2008: “Sustainable Development”, in: De Rivera, Joe (Ed.): Culture of Peace (New York: Springer-Verlag): 211-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula, 2008a: “Peace and Environment: Towards a Sustainable Peace as Seen from the South”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Dunay, Pal; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Liotta, P.H. (Eds.): Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag): 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter; Serrano Oswald, S.E.; Bennett, Juliet (Eds.), 2016: Regional Ecological Challenges for Peace in Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and Asia Pacific Perspective (Cham: Springer International Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter (Eds.), 2021: Decolonising Conflicts, Security, Peace, Gender, Environment and Development in the Anthropocene (Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter; Dalby, Simon, 2009: “Linking the Anthropocene, HUGE and HESP in a Fourth Phase of Human, Environmental and Gender Security and Peace Research”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Krummenacher, Heinz (Eds.): Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag): 1277–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter; Scheffran, Jürgen, 2016: “Sustainability Transition with Sustainable Peace: Key Messages and Scientific Outlook”, in: Hans Günter Brauch, Úrsula Oswald Spring, John Grin, Jürgen Scheffran (Eds.): Handbook of Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer-Verlag): 887–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter; Tidball, Keith G. (Eds.), 2014: Expanding Peace Ecology: Peace, Security, Sustainability, Equity and Gender: Perspectives of IPRA’s Ecology and Peace Commission (Heidelberg – Dordrecht – London – New York: Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter; Tidball, Keith G., 2014a: “Expanding Peace Ecology: Peace, Security, Sustainability, Equity and Gender”, in: Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter; Tidball, Keith G. (Eds.): Expanding Peace Ecology: Peace, Security, Sustainability, Equity and Gender: Perspectives of IPRA’s Ecology and Peace Commission (Heidelberg – Dordrecht – London – New York: Springer-Verlag): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, Inderjeet, 2018: “The US-led liberal order: imperialism by another name?”, in: International Affairs, 94,1: 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffran, Jürgen, 2020: “Climate change and weather extremes as risk multipliers: Tipping points, cascading events, and societal instability”, in: Brzoska, Michael; Scheffran, Jürgen (Eds.): Climate Change, Security Risks, and Violent Conflicts. Essays from Integrated Climate Research in Hamburg (Hamburg: Hamburg University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffran, Jürgen; Brzoska, Michael; Brauch, Hans Günter: Link, Michael; Schilling, Janpeter (Eds.), 2012: Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict: Challenges for Societal Stability (Berlin—Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffran, Jürgen; Link, Peter Michael; Schilling, Janpeter, 2019: “Climate and Conflict in Africa”, in: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press): Online publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, J.; Hertig, E.; Tramblay, Y.; Scheffran, J., 2020: “Climate change vulnerability, water resources and social implications in North Africa”, in: Regional Environmental Change 20,1: 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, J.; Locham, R.; Scheffran, J., 2018: “A local to global perspective on oil and wind exploitation, resource governance and conflict in Northern Kenya”, in: Conflict, Security & Development, 18,6: 571-600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneidewind, Uwe; Singer-Brodowski, Mandy; Augenstein, Karoline, 2016: “Transformative Science for Sustainability Transitions”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran, Jürgen (Eds.): Handbook of Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer-Verlag): 123-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaaban, M.; Scheffran, J.; Böhner, J.; Elsobki, M.S.,2019: “A dynamic sustainability analysis of energy landscapes in Egypt”, in: Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 22, 1: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, N.; Birhane E.; Gordon, C.; Haile, M.; Taheri, F.; Azadi, H.; Scheffran, J.,2018: “Environmental impacts and causes of conflict in the Horn of Africa: A review”, in: Earth-Science Reviews,177: 284–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W.; Richardson, K.; Rockström, J. et al., 2020: “The emergence and evolution of Earth System Science”, in: Nat Rev Earth Environ, 1, 54–63; at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-019-0005-6.

  • Stone, Madeleine, 2021: “Biden wants to cut U.S. climate pollution in half—here’s how” (22 April); at: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/biden-wants-to-cut-us-climate-pollution-in-half-heres-how (23 April)

  • STRN, 2016: “Exploring Transition Research as Transformative Science - IST Conference 2016 in Wuppertal”, at: https://wupperinst.org/en/a/wi/a/s/ad/3253.

  • Swain, Ashok; Bali, Ranjula; Swain Anders, Themnér; Krampe, Florian, 2011: Climate Change and the Risk of Violent Conflicts in Southern Africa (Pretoria: Global Crisis Solutions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swilling, Mark, 2016: “Preparing for Global Transition: Implications of the Work of the International Resource Panel”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Scheffran, Jürgen (Eds.): Handbook of Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace (Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer-Verlag): 391-418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sygna, Linda; O’Brien, Karen; Wolf, Johanna (Eds.), 2013: A Changing Environment for Human Security. Transformative Approaches to Research, Policy and Action (London – New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN, 2009a: Climate change and its possible security implications. Report of the Secretary-General. A/64/350 of 11 September 2009 (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN, 2010: Human Security - Report of the Secretary-General. A/64/701 of 8 May 2010 (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP, 1994: Human Development Report 1994: New Dimensions of Human Security (New York: UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP, 2005: Human Development Report 2005: International cooperation at a crossroads: Aid, trade and security in an unequal world (New York: UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP, 2006: Human Development Report 2006: Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis (New York: UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP, 2007/2008: Human Development Report 2007: Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world (New York: UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP, 2014: Human Development Report 2014: Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience (New York: UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP, 2020: Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene (New York: UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme), 2016: GEO-6 Global Environmental Outlook (Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme), 2016a: Regional Assessment for Africa (Nairobi: UNEP).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme), 2019: Global Environmental Outlook (GEO 6) - Healthy Planet – Healthy People (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNPD (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Populations Division), 2019: World Populations Prospects 2019 (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNPD (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Populations Division), 2021: World Populations Prospects 2021 (New York: United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  • US National Science Board, 2007: Enhancing Support of Transformative Research at the National Science Foundation (Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, 7 May).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Baalen, Sebastian: Mobjörk, Malin., 2018: “Climate Change and Violent Conflict in East Africa: Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Research to Probe the Mechanisms”, in: International Studies Review, 20, 4 ( December): 547–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volgy, Thomas J.; Imwalle, Lawrence E., 1995: “Hegemonic and Bipolar Perspectives on the New World Order”, in: American Journal of Political Science, 39,4 (Nov.): 819–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Soest, Christian, 2020: “A Heated Debate: Climate Change and Conflict in Africa”, in: GIGA Focus, No. 2 (April):

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Uexkull, Nina: Pettersson, Therese, 2018: “Issues and Actors in African Nonstate Conflicts: A New Data Set.” International Interactions, 44.5: 953–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Uexkull, Nina; Buhaug, Halvard, 2021: “Security Implications of Climate Change: A Decade of Scientific Progress”, in: Journal of Peace Research, 58,1: 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (German Advisory Council on Climate Change), 2007, 2008: Climate Change as a Security Risk (Berlin: WBGU).

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (German Advisory Council on Climate Change), 2011: World in Transition – A Social Contract for Sustainability (Berlin: WBGU, 2011: 21–23, 321–356).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westad, Odd Arne, 2007: The Global Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, Arthur H., 1976: Ecological Consequences of the Second Indochina War (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, Arthur H., 2003: “Environmental Dimension of the Gulf War”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Liotta, P.H.; Marquina, Antonio; Rogers, Paul F.; Selim, Mohammad El-Sayed (Eds.): Security and Environment in the Mediterranean: Conceptualising Security and Environmental Conflicts (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York – Hong Kong – London – Milan – Paris – Tokyo: Springer-Verlag): 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, Arthur H., 2013: Arthur H. Westing: Pioneer on the Environmental Impact of War. (Heidelberg – Dordrecht – London – New York: Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westing, Arthur H., 2013a: Texts on Environmental and Comprehensive Security (Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O., 1988: Consilience (New York: Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO (World Meteorological Organisation), 2020: Climate in Africa in 2019 (Geneva: WMO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanda, Pius; Bronkhorst, Salome, 2011: Climate change and conflict: Conflict-sensitive climate change adaptation in Africa, Policy & Practice Brief (Durban: ACCORD).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Günter Brauch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brauch, H.G. (2022). Peace Ecology in the Anthropocene for Africa. In: Kiyala, J.C.K., Harris, G.T. (eds) Civil Society and Peacebuilding in Sub-Saharan Africa in the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95179-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics