Skip to main content

The Detection of Conversation Patterns in South African Political Tweets Through Social Network Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence Research (SACAIR 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1551))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 724 Accesses

Abstract

Within complex societies, social communities are distinguishable based on social interactions. The interactions can be between members or communities and can range from simple conversations between family members and friends to complex interactions that represent the flow of money, information, or power. In our modern digital society, social media platforms present unique opportunities to study social networks through social network analysis (SNA). Social media platforms are usually representative of a specific user group, and Twitter, a microblogging platform, is characterised by the fast distribution of news and often provocative opinions, as well as social mobilizing, which makes it popular for political interactions. The nature of Twitter generates a valuable SNA data source for investigating political conversations and communities, and in related research, specific archetypal conversation patterns between communities were identified that allow for unique interpretations of conversations about a topic. This paper reports on a study where social network analysis (SNA) was performed on Twitter data about political events in 2021 in South Africa. The purpose was to determine which distinct conversation patterns could be detected in datasets collected, as well as what could be derived from these patterns given the South African political landscape and perceptions. The results indicate that conversations in the South African political landscape are less polarized than expected. Conversations often manifest broadcast patterns from key influencers in addition to tight crowds or community clusters. Tight crowds or community clusters indicate intense conversation across communities that exhibits diverse opinions and perspectives on a topic. The results may be of value for researchers that aim to understand social media conversations within the South African society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The hashtag lists are depicted exactly as they appear in the tweets with the same capitalisations. Twitter users aims to use similar hashtag lists when the mention, reply or retweet.

References

  1. Fu, X., Jar-Der, L., Boos, M.: Social Network Analysis: Interdisciplinary Approaches and Case Studies. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315369594

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott, J., Carrington, P.J. (eds.): The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. SAGE, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hanna, R., Rohm, A., Crittenden, V.L.: We’re all connected: the power of the social media ecosystem. Bus. Horiz. 54, 265–273 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perrin, A.: Social media usage: 2005–2015. Pew Research Center (2015). https://www.secretintelligenceservice.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/PI_2015-10-08_Social-Networking-Usage-2005-2015_FINAL.pdf

  5. Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus. Horiz. 53, 59–68 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schivinski, B., Dabrowski, D.: The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands. J. Market. Commun. 22, 189–214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2013.871323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wellman, B. (ed.): Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities. Westview Press, Boulder (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khan, G.F.: Seven Layers of Social Media Analytics: Mining Business Insights from Social Media Text, Actions, Networks, Hyperlinks, Apps, Search Engine, and Location Data. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Leipzig (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tichy, N.M.: Social network analysis for organizations. Acad. Manage. Rev. 4, 507–519 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kietzmann, J.H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I.P., Silvestre, B.S.: Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Bus. Horiz. 54, 241–251 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Green, S., Perrin, A.: Social media update 2016. Pew Research Center (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weller, K.: Trying to understand social media users and usage: the forgotten features of social media platforms. Online Inf. Rev. 40, 256–264 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2015-0299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. The Evolution of Social Media: How Did It Begin and Where Could It Go Next? https://online.maryville.edu/blog/evolution-social-media/. Accessed 07 Sept 2021

  14. Walton, J.: Twitter vs. Facebook vs. Instagram: What’s the Difference? (2021). https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/100215/twitter-vs-facebook-vs-instagram-who-target-audience.asp

  15. Adamic, L.A., Glance, N.: The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided They Blog. 8 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bennett, W.L.: The personalization of politics: political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 644, 20–39 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trottier, D.: Social Media, Politics and the State: Protests, Revolutions, Riots, Crime and Policing in the Age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Routledge (2014). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764832

  18. Allen, K.: Social media, riots and consequences (2021). https://issafrica.org/iss-today/social-media-riots-and-consequences

  19. Karombo, T.: South Africa goes after social media as it cracks down on looting and protests. https://qz.com/africa/2033328/south-africa-to-monitor-social-media-as-protests-rock-the-country/. Accessed 07 Sept 2021

  20. Makhafola, G.: #UnrestSA: Two more alleged instigators arrested, including one who ran popular Twitter account (2021). https://www.news24.com/news24/southafrica/news/unrestsa-two-more-alleged-instigators-arrested-including-one-who-ran-popular-twitter-account-20210829

  21. Twitter. https://twitter.com/home. Accessed 20 June 2020

  22. Kane, G.C., Alavi, M., Labianca, G. (Joe), Borgatti, S.P.: What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. MISQ. 38, 274–304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.13

  23. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G.: Notions of position in social network analysis. Sociol. Methodol. 22, 1 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/270991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hansen, D.L., et al.: Do You know the way to SNA? A process model for analyzing and visualizing social media data. In: International Conference on Social Informatics, p. 10. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rainie, H., Wellman, B.: Networked: The New Social Operating System. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Rodrigues, E.M., Milic-Frayling, N., Smith, M., Shneiderman, B., Hansen, D.: Group-in-a-box layout for multi-faceted analysis of communities. In: 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 354–361. IEEE, Boston (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.139

  28. Clauset, A., Newman, M.E.J., Moore, C.: Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys. Rev. E 70 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111

  29. Woma, J.: Comparisons of Community Detection Algorithms in the YouTube Network. Stanford University, Stanford (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Social Media Research Foundation. https://www.smrfoundation.org/. Accessed 30 June 2020

  31. Fay, D.: NodeXL: Network Overview, Discovery and Exploration in Excel. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/nodexl-network-overview-discovery-and-exploration-in-excel/. Accessed 30 June 2020

  32. Hansen, D.L., Schneiderman, B., Smith, M.A.: Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Smith, M., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., Himelboim, I.: Conversational Archetypes: Six Conversation and Group Network Structures in Twitter. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/02/20/part-2-conversational-archetypes-six-conversation-and-group-network-structures-in-twitter/. Accessed 08 Sept 2021

  34. Himelboim, I., Smith, M.A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., Espina, C.: Classifying twitter topic-networks using social network analysis. Soc. Media Soc. 3, 205630511769154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691545

  35. Smith, M.A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., Himelboim, I.: Mapping Twitter Topic Networks: From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters. https://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/20/mapping-twitter-topic-networks-from-polarized-crowds-to-community-clusters/. Accessed 19 Sept 2019

  36. Smith, M.A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., Himelboim, I.: Part 2: Conversational Archetypes: Six Conversation and Group Network Structures in Twitter. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/02/20/part-2-conversational-archetypes-six-conversation-and-group-network-structures-in-twitter/. Accessed 02 Aug 2021

  37. Ndwandwe, Z.: The myth of South African nationality. https://africasacountry.com/2020/10/the-myth-of-south-african-nationality. Accessed 01 Sept 2021

  38. Seemela, M.: “#PutSouthAfricaFirst shouldn’t be used to hate anybody,” says Cassper. https://www.timeslive.co.za/tshisa-live/tshisa-live/2020-10-19-putsouthafricafirst-shouldnt-be-used-to-hate-anybody-says-cassper/. Accessed 01 Sept 2021

  39. Tabane, R.: ANALYSIS | Will the governing party ride out the ‘Voetsek, ANC’ storm? https://www.news24.com/citypress/politics/analysis-will-the-governing-party-ride-out-the-voetsek-anc-storm-20200827-2. Accessed 20 Sept 2021

  40. Lindeque, B.: #VoetsekANC has been trending for over a week now... and this response. https://www.goodthingsguy.com/opinion/voetsekanc-has-been-trending-for-over-a-week-now-and-this-response-is-pretty-funny/. Accessed 20 Sept 2021

  41. Haffajee, F.: Covid-19 – The 150 Days report (Part 1): Fix South Africa or fix the ANC – Ramaphosa can’t do both. https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-08-10-fix-south-africa-or-fix-the-anc-ramaphosa-cant-do-both/. Accessed 20 Sept 2021

  42. IOL Reporter: LIVE UPDATES: #SouthAfricaIsBurning – Shock as widespread looting rages on. https://www.msn.com/en-xl/africa/other/live-updates-southafricaisburning-shock-as-widespread-looting-rages-on/ar-AAM8uI3. Accessed 20 Sept 2021

  43. Lechman, A.: Ramaphosa’s words falls on deaf ears as looting continued in SA - Sunday World. https://sundayworld.co.za/breaking-news/ramaphosas-words-falls-on-deaf-ears-as-looting-continued-in-sa/. Accessed 20 Sept 2021

  44. Mokoka, M.: Meet the Instigators: The Twitter accounts of the RET Forces Network that Incited Violence and Demanded Zuma’s Release. Centre for Analytics and Behavioural Change (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fruchterman, T.M.J., Reingold, E.M.: Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw. Pract. Exper. 21, 1129–1164 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102

  46. Maré, G.: Race, democracy and opposition in South African politics: as other a way as possible. Democratization 8, 85–102 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/714000182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Seekings, J.: The continuing salience of race: discrimination and diversity in South Africa. J. Contemp. Afr. Stud. 26, 1–25 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/02589000701782612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ndlovu, N.: ‘A nation that laughs together, stays together’: deconstructing humour on twitter during the national lockdown in South Africa. In: Mpofu, S. (ed.) Digital Humour in the Covid-19 Pandemic, pp. 191–212. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79279-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurona Gerber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gerber, A. (2022). The Detection of Conversation Patterns in South African Political Tweets Through Social Network Analysis. In: Jembere, E., Gerber, A.J., Viriri, S., Pillay, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence Research. SACAIR 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1551. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95070-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95070-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95069-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-95070-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics