Abstract
The field of Information Systems (IS) is characterised by a number of properties that combine to create particular challenges for teaching and learning. These properties include its close ties with rapidly advancing digital technology, its interdisciplinary nature and its general lack of a strong, broadly agreed-upon theoretical core. In the present study, I undertake an autoethnographic investigation of five key challenges for teaching in IS which result from one or more of these properties. To provide theoretical scaffolding for the investigation I adopt Weick’s theory of sensemaking and apply it to investigate both my own and my students’ processes of sensemaking. I propose that to effectively navigate these challenges and prepare students for careers in IS, lecturers should aim to develop their students’ technical and social skills sets such that they are able to navigate the uncertainty and ambiguity that characterise socio-technical systems in practice. To this end, I outline the strategies I have adopted in my attempts to achieve this aim.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackoff, R.: From data to wisdom. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 16, 3–9 (1989)
Moriarty, J.: Autoethnography. In: Analytical Autoethnodrama. BVER, pp. 37–52. SensePublishers, Rotterdam (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-890-9_4
Alter, S.: Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(5), 448–469 (2008)
Alter, S.: Work system theory: overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14(2), 72–121 (2013)
Alter, S.: Sociotechnical systems through a work system lens: a possible path for reconciling system conceptualizations, business realities, and humanist values in IS development. In: Conference on Advanced Information System Engineering, pp. 1–15 (2015)
Avgerou, C., Siemer, J., Bjørn Andersen, N.: The academic field of information systems in Europe. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 8(2), 136–153 (1999)
Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57(8), 1033–1045 (2006)
Bawden, D.: Organised complexity, meaning and understanding: an approach to a unified view of information for information science. Aslib Proc. 59(4/5), 307–327 (2007)
Carnegie, D.: How to Win Friends and Influence People. Simon and Schuster, New York (1936)
Carvalho, J.A.: Information system? Which one do you mean? In: Falkenberg, E.D., Lyytinen, K., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A. (eds.) Information System Concepts: An Integrated Discipline Emerging. ITIFIP, vol. 36, pp. 259–277. Springer, Boston (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35500-9_22
Checkland, P., Holwell, S.: Information, Systems and Information Systems, Making Sense of the Field. Wiley, Chichester (1998)
Culnan, M.J.: The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972–1982: a co-citation analysis. Manage. Sci. 32(2), 156–172 (1986)
Ellis, C., Adams, T.E., Bochner, A.P.: Autoethnography: an overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 36(4 (138)), 273–290 (2011). https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032294
Etherington, T.R.: Seven simple suggestions to be a better teacher sooner: experiences of a nearly new lecturer. Preprint, PeerJ Preprints, September 2018. https://peerj.com/preprints/27185v1
Fitzgerald, B., Adam, F.: The status of the IS field: historical perspective and practical orientation. Inf. Res. 5(4), 1–17 (2000)
Gonzalez-Calvo, G., Arias-Carballal, M.: Effects from audit culture and neoliberalism on university teaching: an autoethnographic perspective. Ethnogr. Educ. 13(4), 413–427 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2017.1347885
Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual performance. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19(2), 213–236 (1995)
Hay, I.: Letter to a new university teacher. HERDSA News 24, 15–17 (2002)
Hay, I., Bartlett-Trafford, J., Chang, T.C., Kneale, P., Szili, G.: Advice and reflections for a university teacher beginning an academic career. J. Geogr. High. Educ. 37(4), 578–594 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2013.828276
King, J.L., Lyytinen, K.: Reach and Grasp. MIS Q. 28(4), 539–551 (2004)
Leach, E.: The fractured “I”: an autoethnographic account of a part-time doctoral student’s experience with scholarly identity formation. Qual. Inq. 27(3–4), 381–384 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420918895
Lourens, H.: Superscripting the academy: the difference narrative of a disabled academic. Disabil. Soc. 1–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1794798
Muncey, T.: Doing Autoethnography. Int. J. Qual. Methods 4(1), 69–86 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690500400105
Segal, G.Z.: Getting There: A Book of Mentors. Harry N. Abrams, New York (2015)
Sia, S.K., Soh, C.: An assessment of package–organisation misalignment: institutional and ontological structures. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 16(5), 568–583 (2007)
Soh, C., Sia, S.: An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package-organisation misalignments. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 13(4), 375–397 (2004)
Stonier, T.: Information and the Internal Structure of the Universe: An Exploration into Information Physics. Springer-Verlag, London (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3265-3
Strong, D.M., Volkoff, O.: Understanding organization-enterprise system fit: a path to theorizing the information technology artifact. MIS Q. 34(4), 731–756 (2010)
The Joint ACM/AIS IS 2020 Task Force: IS2020 Competency Model for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems (Initial Draft) (2020). https://is2020.hosting2.acm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/IS-2020-Draft-August-2020.pdf
Topi, H., et al.: IS 2010: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 26 (2010). https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol26/iss1/18
Wall, S.: An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. Int. J. Qual. Methods 5(2), 146–160 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500205
Weaver, W.: Some recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication. In: The Mathematical Theory of Communication, pp. 1–16. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois (1949)
Weick, K.E.: The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Adm. Sci. Q. 38(4), 628 (1993)
Weick, K.: The non-traditional quality of organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1), 116–124 (1991)
Weick, K.: Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)
Weick, K.: Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ. Sci. 9(5), 543–555 (1998)
Wilkinson, C.: Imposter syndrome and the accidental academic: an autoethnographic account. Int. J. Acad. Dev. 25(4), 363–374 (2020)
Zins, C.: Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 58(4), 479–493 (2007)
Zwiers, V.: The Business Analyst: Information Technology’s Paradigm Shift. Juta and Company Ltd., Cape Town (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
le Roux, D.B. (2022). Ten Years in the Trenches of a Doubtful Science: An Autoethnographic Investigation of Five Challenges of Teaching in Information Systems. In: Leung, W.S., Coetzee, M., Coulter, D., Cotterrell, D. (eds) ICT Education. SACLA 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1461. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95003-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95003-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95002-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-95003-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)