Abstract
In the diagnostic/pre-operative work-up of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea imaging plays a key role. The localization of the site(s) of the leak is the most obvious main goal of the radiologic investigation, but there are several other critical issues that a proper imaging study can address. Two are the imaging techniques mainly indicated: computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR). CT explores bony structures with fine detail, but it has low soft-tissue resolution. Conversely, MR can differentiate and characterize a wide range of soft tissues and fluids, allowing to directly visualize a CSF leakage. It is up to the radiologist to choose the imaging study (or the combination) most suitable for each specific situation. In fact, there is no standard study protocol that can fit all possible patients. Nevertheless, with just a few general indications in mind an informative exam can be obtained with relative ease.
Performing a high-quality exam, though, is just the first part of the job for the radiologist. The next step is the analysis/interpretation of the images. To meet this target, the knowledge of the etiology of the rhinorrhea is of paramount importance, since different etiologies imply different reasoning for the correct interpretation of the radiological images.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Reddy M, Baugnon K. Imaging of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and otorrhea. Radiol Clin North Am [Internet]. 2017;55(1):167–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2016.08.005.
Ommaya A, Di Chiro G, Baldwin M, Pennybacker J. Non-Taumatic cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968;31(3):214–5.
Eljazzar R, Loewenstern J, Dai JB, Shrivastava RK, Iloreta AM. Detection of CSF leaks: is there a radiologic standard of care? A systematic review detection of CSF leaks: a systematic review. World Neurosurg [Internet]. 2019;127:307–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.299.
Lloyd KM, DelGaudio JM, Hudgins PA. Imaging of skull base cerebrospinal fluid leaks in adults. Radiology. 2008;248(3):725–36.
Stone JA, Castillo M, Neelon B, Mukherji SK. Evaluation of CSF leaks: high-resolution CT compared with contrast- enhanced CT and radionuclide cisternography. Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20(4):706–12.
Mathias T, Levy J, Fatakia A, McCoul ED. Contemporary approach to the diagnosis and management of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Ochsner J [Internet]. 2016;16(2):136–42. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27303222
Alonso RC, de la Peña MJ, Caicoya AG, Rodriguez MR, Moreno EA, de Vega Fernandez VM. Spontaneous skull base meningoencephaloceles and cerebrospinal fluid fistulas. Radiographics. 2013;33(2):553–70.
Wise SK, Schlosser RJ. Evaluation of spontaneous nasal cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2007;15(1):28–34. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed8&NEWS=N&AN=2007025754
Algin O, Hakyemez B, Gokalp G, Ozcan T, Korfali E, Parlak M. The contribution of 3D-CISS and contrast-enhanced MR cisternography in detecting cerebrospinal fluid leak in patients with rhinorrhoea. Br J Radiol. 2010;83(987):225–32.
Prosser JD, Vender JR, Solares CA. Traumatic cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Otolaryngol Clin North Am [Internet]. 2011;44(4):857–73. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030666511000983
Algin O, Turkbey B. Intrathecal gadolinium-enhanced MR cisternography: a comprehensive review. Am J Neuroradiol [Internet]. 2013;34(1):14–22. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L368319071%5Cn, http://www.ajnr.org/content/34/1/14.full.pdf+html%5Cn, http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A28%5Cn, http://sfx.library.uu.nl/utrecht?sid=EMBASE&issn=01956108&id=doi:10.3174%2Faj
Schlosser RJ, Bolger WE. Nasal cerebrospinal fluid leaks: critical review and surgical considerations. Laryngoscope [Internet]. 2004;114(2):255–65. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed6&NEWS=N&AN=2004068325
Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Boll DT, Paulson EK, Ho LM, Neville AM, et al. Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? Radiographics. 2010;30(4):1037–55.
Foust AM, Nguyen XV, Prevedello L, Bourekas EC, Boulter DJ. Dual-energy CT cisternography in the evaluation of CSF leaks: a novel approach. Radiol Case Reports [Internet]. 2018;13(1):237–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2017.09.005.
Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(6):1088–95.
Eley KA, Mcintyre AG, Watt-Smith SR, Golding SJ. “Black bone” MRI: a partial flip angle technique for radiation reduction in craniofacial imaging. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1011):272–8.
Eley KA, Watt-Smith SR, Golding SJ. “Black bone” MRI: a potential alternative to CT when imaging the head and neck: report of eight clinical cases and review of the Oxford experience. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1019):1457–64.
Eley KA, Watt-Smith SR, Golding SJ. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the craniofacial skeleton with gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging (“black bone”): what is currently possible? J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(2):463–7.
Eberhardt KEW, Tomandl BF, Romstöck J, Ganslandt O, Huk WJ. MR cisternography: a new method for the diagnosis of CSF-fistulas. Skull Base Surg [Internet]. 1999;9(Suppl. 2):11. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L128196783%5Cn, http://sfx.library.uu.nl/utrecht?sid=EMBASE&issn=09387994&id=doi:&atitle=MR+cisternography%3A+a+new+method+for+the+diagnosis+of+CSF+fistulae.&stitle=Eur+Radiol&title=Eu
Selcuk H, Albayram S, Ozer H, Ulus S, Sanus GZ, Kaynar MY, et al. Intrathecal gadolinium-enhanced MR cisternography in the evaluation of CSF leakage. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(1):71–5.
Muñoz A, Hinojosa J, Esparza J. Cisternography and ventriculography gadopentate dimeglumine–enhanced MR imaging in pediatric patients: preliminary report. Am J Neuroradiol [Internet]. 2007;28(5):889–94. Available from: http://www.ajnr.org/content/28/5/889.abstract
Nacar Dogan S, Kizilkilic O, Kocak B, Isler C, Islak C, Kocer N. Intrathecal gadolinium-enhanced MR cisternography in patients with otorhinorrhea: 10-year experience of a tertiary referral center. Neuroradiology. 2018;60(5):471–7.
Arlt S, Cepek L, Rustenbeck HH, Prange H, Reimers CD. Gadolinium encephalopathy due to accidental intrathecal administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine [4]. J Neurol. 2007;254(6):810–2.
Aydin K, Terzibasioglu E, Sencer S, Sencer A, Suoglu Y, Karasu A, et al. Localization of cerebrospinal fluid leaks by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance cisternography: a 5-year single-center experience. Neurosurgery [Internet]. 2008;62(3):584–9. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000317306.39203.24.
Reeves C, Galang E, Padalia R, Tran N, Padalia D. Intrathecal injection of gadobutrol: a tale of caution. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother [Internet]. 2017;31(2):139–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2017.1313353.
Li L, Gao FQ, Zhang B, Luo BN, Yang ZY, Zhao J. Overdosage of intrathecal gadolinium and neurological response. Clin Radiol. 2008;63(9):1063–8.
Edeklev CS, Halvorsen M, Løvland G, Vatnehol SAS, Gjertsen Ø, Nedregaard B, et al. Intrathecal use of gadobutrol for glymphatic MR imaging: prospective safety study of 100 patients. Am J Neuroradiol [Internet]. 2019;40(8):1257–64. Available from: http://www.ajnr.org/content/40/8/1257.abstract
Vanhee A, Paemeleire K, Casselman J, Vanopdenbosch L. MRI with intrathecal gadolinium to detect a CSF leak: feasibility and long term safety from an open label single Centre cohort study (P4.113). Neurol Int. 2016;86(16 Suppl):P4.113. Available from: http://n.neurology.org/content/86/16_Supplement/P4.113.abstract
Gray ST, Wu AW. Pathophysiology of iatrogenic and traumatic skull base injury. Compr Tech CSF Leak Repair Skull Base Reconstr. 2012;74:12–23.
Lin DT, Lin AC. Surgical treatment of traumatic injuries of the cranial base. Otolaryngol Clin North Am [Internet]. 2013;46(5):749–57. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030666513000753
Baugnon KL, Hudgins PA. Skull base fractures and their complications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am [Internet]. 2014;24(3):439–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2014.03.001.
Idriz S, Patel JH, Ameli Renani S, Allan R, Vlahos I. CT of normal developmental and variant anatomy of the pediatric skull: distinguishing trauma from normality. Radiographics. 2015;35(5):1585–601.
Baban MIA, Hadi M, Gallo S, Zocchi J, Turri-Zanoni M, Castelnuovo P. Radiological and clinical interpretation of the patients with CSF leaks developed during or after endoscopic sinus surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(7):2827–35.
Wang EW, Vandergrift WA, Schlosser RJ. Spontaneous CSF leaks. Otolaryngol Clin North Am [Internet]. 2011;44(4):845–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2011.06.018.
Raghavan U, Majumdar S, Jones NS. Spontaneous CSF rhinorrhoea from separate defects of the anterior and middle cranial fossa. J Laryngol Otol [Internet]. 2002;116(7):546–7. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/spontaneous-csf-rhinorrhoea-from-separate-defects-of-the-anterior-and-middle-cranial-fossa/32E776D3ECFD09DE77076AFF5DE65D0D
Quint DJ, Levy R, Cornett J, Donovan C, Markert J. Spontaneous CSF fistula through a congenitally fenestrated sphenoid bone. Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 1996;166(4):952–4. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610580.
Schick B, Brors D, Prescher A. Sternberg’s canal - cause of congenital sphenoidal meningocele. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(8):430–2.
Barañano CF, Curé J, Palmer JN, Woodworth BA. Sternberg’s canal: fact or fiction? Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(2):167–71.
Woodworth BA, Prince A, Chiu AG, Cohen NA, Schlosser RJ, Bolger WE, et al. Spontaneous CSF leaks: a paradigm for definitive repair and management of intracranial hypertension. Otolaryngol Neck Surg [Internet]. 2008;138(6):715–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.02.010.
Settecase F, Harnsberger HR, Michel MA, Chapman P, Glastonbury CM. Spontaneous lateral sphenoid cephaloceles: anatomic factors contributing to pathogenesis and proposed classification. Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(4):784–9.
Aaron GP, Illing E, Lambertsen Z, Ritter M, Middlebrooks EH, Cure J, et al. Enlargement of Meckel’s cave in patients with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol [Internet]. 2017;7(4):421–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21891.
Sundararajan SH, Ramos AD, Kishore V, Michael M, Doustaly R, DeRusso F, Patsalides A. Dural venous sinus stenosis: why distinguishing intrinsic-versus-extrinsic stenosis matters. Am J Neuroradiol. 2021; https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6890.
Priddy B, Hardesty DA, Beer-Furlan A, Otto B, Prevedello DM. Cerebrospinal fluid leak rhinorrhea after systemic erlotinib chemotherapy for metastatic lung cancer: a familiar problem from an unfamiliar culprit. World Neurosurg [Internet]. 2017;108:992.e11–4. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875017314936
Lanza DC, O’Brien DA, Kennedy DW. Endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid fistulae and encephaloceles. Laryngoscope [Internet]. 1996;106(9):1119–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199609000-00015.
Castelnuovo P, Dallan I, Battaglia P, Bignami M. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: past, present and future. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267(5):649–63.
Martin TJ, Loehrl TA. Endoscopic CSF leak repair. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2007;15(1):35–9. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed8&NEWS=N&AN=2007025755
Wormald PJ, Mcdonogh M. The bath-plug closure of anterior skull base cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Am J Rhinol [Internet]. 2003;17(5):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/194589240301700508.
Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Vescan A, Prevedello D, et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(Suppl. 1):44–53.
Mattavelli D, Schreiber A, Ferrari M, Accorona R, Bolzoni Villaret A, Battaglia P, et al. Three-layer reconstruction with iliotibial tract after endoscopic resection of sinonasal tumors. World Neurosurg [Internet]. 2017;101:486–92. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875017302395
Leng LZ, Brown S, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. “Gasket-seal” watertight closure in minimal-access endoscopic cranial base surgery. Oper Neurosurg [Internet]. 2008;62(Suppl_5):ONS342-3. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000326017.84315.1f.
Wessell A, Singh A, Litvack Z. One-piece modified gasket seal technique introduction background. J Neurol Surg B. 2013;74:305–10.
Zhao D, Tao S, Zhang D, Qin M, Bao Y, Wu A. “Five-layer gasket seal” watertight closure for reconstruction of the skull base in complex bilateral traumatic intraorbital meningoencephaloceles: a case report and literature review. Brain Inj [Internet]. 2018;32(6):804–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1440631.
Kang MD, Escott E, Thomas AJ, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Kassam AB, et al. The MR imaging appearance of the vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(4):781–6.
Maroldi R, Ravanelli M, Farina D, Facchetti L, Bertagna F, Lombardi D, et al. Post-treatment evaluation of paranasal sinuses after treatment of sinonasal neoplasms. Neuroimag Clin N Am [Internet]. 2015;25(4):667–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2015.07.009.
Banu MA, Szentirmai O, Mascarenhas L, Salek AA, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Pneumocephalus patterns following endonasal endoscopic skull base surgery as predictors of postoperative CSF leaks. J Neurosurg JNS [Internet]. 2014;121(4):961–75. Available from: https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/121/4/article-p961.xml
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maroldi, R., Palumbo, G. (2022). Imaging in the Work-Up of CSF Leak. In: AlQahtani, A.A., Castelnuovo, P., Casiano, R., Carrau, R.L. (eds) CSF Rhinorrhea. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94781-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94781-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94780-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94781-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)