Abstract
Asking well-formulated, empirically answerable questions can be considered the driving feature of inquiry. In most approaches, teachers provide children with the questions to be answered, rather than inviting them to creatively generate their own questions; self-generated questions, however, can lead to a much more personally meaningful understanding of science. As an example of how questioning as a creative activity can be developed in primary school, we present a study that we carried out in a fourth-grade classroom (children aged nine to ten). We developed a learning unit on the topic of light, featuring different inquiry cycles. Specific strategies (e.g. modelling, using ‘question hands’) were adopted in order to help the children externalise, share and develop their questions, and to promote a creative process of questioning, in terms of fluency, variability and originality of the questions. The analysis of the questions generated by the children during the different inquiry cycles suggests that the approach presented here has fostered not only the children’s general curiosity, but also their ability to formulate empirically answerable questions that can effectively drive inquiry. The social aspects of the learning environment have also impacted the quantity and quality of the generated questions positively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete edition). Longman.
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29. https://my.nsta.org/resource/6335/the-many-levels-of-inquiry
Biddulph, F., Symington, D., & Osborne, R. (1986). The place of children’s questions in primary science education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 4(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514860040108
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. David McKay.
Burnard, P., Craft, A., Cremin, T., Duffy, B., Hanson, R., Keene, J., Haynes, L., & Burns, D. (2006). Documenting ‘possibility thinking’: A journey of collaborative enquiry. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760600880001
Chappell, K., Craft, A., Burnard, P., & Cremin, T. (2008). Question-posing and question-responding: The heart of ‘possibility thinking’ in the early years. Early Years, 28(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140802224477
Chin, C. (2001). Learning in science: What do students’ questions tell us about their thinking? Education Journal, 29(2), 85–103. http://hdl.handle.net/10497/4734
Chin, C. (2004). Students’ questions: Fostering a culture of inquisitiveness in science classroom. School Science Review, 86(314), 107–112. http://hdl.handle.net/10497/4741
Chin, C. (2006). Using self-questioning to promote pupils’ process skills thinking. School Science Review, 87(321), 113–122. http://hdl.handle.net/10497/4742
Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning deeply in science: An analysis and reintegration of deep approaches in two case studies of Grade 8 students. Research in Science Education, 30(2), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461627
Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2002). Posing problems for open investigations: What questions do pupils ask? Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514022000030499
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
Craft, A. (2002). Creativity and early years education: A lifewide foundation. Continuum.
Craft, A. (2007). Possibility thinking in the early years and primary classroom. In A. G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teacher (pp. 231–249). World Scientific.
Craft, A., McConnon, L., & Matthews, A. (2012). Child-initiated play and professional creativity: Enabling four-year-olds’ possibility thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.11.005
Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 515–541). Routledge.
Creative Little Scientists. (2014a). Creativity in science and mathematics education for young children: Executive summary. http://www.creative-little-scientists.eu/content/publications
Creative Little Scientists. (2014b). Recommendations to policy makers and stakeholders: Executive summary. http://www.creative-little-scientists.eu/content/publications
Cremin, T., Glauert, E., Craft, A., Compton, A., & Stylianidou, F. (2015). Creative little scientists: Exploring pedagogical synergies between inquiry-based and creative approaches in early years science. Education 3–13, 43(4), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1020655
Cuccio-Schirripa, S., & Steiner, H. E. (2000). Enhancement and analysis of science question level for middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<210::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-I
Department for Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England: Complete framework for key stages 1 to 4. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4
Di Teodoro, S., Donders, S., Kemp-Davidson, J., Robertson, P., & Schuyler, L. (2011). Asking good questions: Promoting greater understanding of mathematics through purposeful teacher and student questioning. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 12(2), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v12i2.16
Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027880200301
Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199904)36:4<411::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-E
European Commission. High Level Group on Science Education, European Commission. Science, & Economy, European Commission. Science, & Economy. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe (Vol. 22845). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/rapportrocardfinal.pdf
Harris, C. J., Phillips, R. S., & Penuel, W. R. (2012). Examining teachers’ instructional moves aimed at developing students’ ideas and questions in learner-centered science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 769–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9237-0
Herranen, J., & Aksela, M. (2019). Student-question-based inquiry in science education. Studies in Science Education, 55(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1658059
Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20072
Lord, R. (2011). Asking the right questions. Primary Science, 117, 13–15. https://www.ase.org.uk/resources/primary-science/issue-117/asking-right-questions
Millar, R. (2010). Practical work. In J. Osborne & J. Dillon (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (2nd ed., pp. 108–134). Open University Press.
Murcia, K., Pepper, C., Joubert, M., Cross, E., & Wilson, S. (2020). A framework for identifying and developing children’s creative thinking while coding with digital technologies. Issues in Educational Research, 30(4), 1395–1417. http://www.iier.org.au/iier30/murcia2.pdf
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Science and engineering for grades 6–12: Investigation and design at the center. The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
Osborne, J. (2014). Scientific practices and inquiry in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 579–599). Routledge.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, J. C., & Tsourlikaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Reinsvold, L. A., & Cochran, K. F. (2012). Power dynamics and questioning in elementary science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9235-2
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20342603
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0903_1
Shodell, M. (1995). The question-driven classroom: Student questions as course curriculum in biology. The American Biology Teacher, 57(5), 278–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449992
Stokhof, H. J. M., De Vries, B., Martens, R. L., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2017). How to guide effective student questioning: A review of teacher guidance in primary education. Review of Education, 5(2), 123–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3089
Stokhof, H., de Vries, B., Bastiaens, T., & Martens, R. (2019). Mind map our way into effective student questioning: A principle-based scenario. Research in Science Education, 49, 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9625-3
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.
Watts, M., Gould, G., & Alsop, S. (1997). Questions of understanding: Categorising pupils’ questions in science. School Science Review, 79(286), 57–63. (EJ556104). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ556104
White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding (1st ed.). Routledge.
Ethical Statement
The project was carried out in the context of an agreement between the School and the University of Padua (agreement no.: 2120/11-64966) for hosting student teachers during their master thesis internship. The data were collected and the results were disseminated in accordance with the ethical rules of the agreement; in particular, no personal or sensitive data were collected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carli, M., Fiorese, A., Pantano, O. (2022). Developing Children’s Questioning Skills for Inquiry in STEM. In: Murcia, K.J., Campbell, C., Joubert, M.M., Wilson, S. (eds) Children’s Creative Inquiry in STEM. Sociocultural Explorations of Science Education, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94724-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94724-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94723-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94724-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)