Skip to main content

The Principlism Method Applied Utilitarianist in Mathematical Calculations for an Ethical Decision

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 22))

  • 278 Accesses

Abstract

Part of the extremely studied concept of ethical management is the ethical decision-making process within an organization designed to determine how the members of the organization should proceed in order not to violate already established ethical codes or generally accepted moral principles. In order to be able to count the morality of an action by evaluating its effects on the beneficiaries, they usually resorted to primary arithmetic calculations in which the consequences on the beneficiaries receive positive or negative values of 1, 2, 3 by reference to few moral principles or institutional rules. The model proposed by us will no longer have to choose the priority of one principle over another based on unclear criteria. We propose a model of calculations that is made by reference to moral values that are supposed to be respected in an organization and, correlatively, the impact evaluated in figures of compliance or non-compliance with these moral values. The proposed mathematical formula is complex and allows quick calculation regardless of how many variables are involved. Also, the impact is then calculated separately from a financial, intellectual, moral, educational, and psychological point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1834). Deontology: Or the science of morality. William Tait.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, C. M. (2012). Ethics Management for Public Administrators. Leading and building organizations of integrity (2nd ed.). M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. (1981). Moral thinking: Its levels, method, and point. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. (1996). Essays on bioethics. Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2018). The appearance standard: Criteria and remedies for when a mere appearance of unethical behavior is morally unacceptable. Business Ethics, 28(1), 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2019). The moral entrepreneur: A new component of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 1135–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, S. P. (1998). Ethics management: Auditing and developing the ethical content of organizations. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2021). Collective phronesis in business ethics education and managerial practice: A neo-aristotelian analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. Retrieved February 8, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04912-2.

  • Laasch, O., & Conaway, R. N. (2015). Principles of responsible management: Glocal sustainability, responsibility, ethics. Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luban, D. (2001). Law’s blindfold. In M. Davis & A. Stark (Eds.), Conflict of in terest in the professions (pp. 23–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, C. (2019). Complete guide to ethics management: An ethics toolkit for managers. Retrieved February 8, 2021, from https://managementhelp.org/businessethics/ethics-guide.htm

  • Mepham, B. (2005). The ethical matrix as a framework for teaching ethics to science students. In M. Marie (Ed.), Animal bioethics (pp. 313–327). Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mepham, B. (2015). The ethical matrix as a decision-making tool with specific reference to animal sentience. In: J. Turner (Ed.), Animals, ethics and trade, 2006. : Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., & Millar, K. (2006). Ethical matrix manual. Agricultural and forest meteorology—Agr Forest Meteorol. LEI, onderdeel van Wageningen UR, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moratis, L., Melissen, F., & Idowu, S. O. (2018). Introduction: From corporate social responsibility to sustainable business models. In L. T. Moratis, F. Melissen, & S. O. Idowu (Eds.), Sustainable business models—Principles, promise and practice. CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance (pp. 1–15). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muresan, V. (2009). Managementul eticii în organizaÈ›ii (Ethics management in organizations). [e-book] BucureÈ™ti: Ed. Universității. Retrieved February 2, 2021, through CCEA website https://www.ccea.ro/wp-content/uploads/Managementul-eticii-%C3%AEn-organiza%C5%A3ii.pdf

  • Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2010). The glass ceiling of corporate social responsibility consequences of a business case approach towards CSR. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(2), 618–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1951). Outline of a decision procedure for ethics. The Philosophical Review, 60(2), 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoica, L. A. (2013). Security in IT application in the store. Economy Informatics, 13(1). Retrieved January 22, 2021, from http://www.economyinformatics.ase.ro/content/EN13/08%20-%20Stoica.pdf

  • Takacs Haynes, K., & RaÅ¡ković, M. (2021). Living with corruption in central and Eastern Europe: Social identity and the role of moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics. Retrieved February 2, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04927-9.

  • Wilson, A. E., Darke, P. R. & Sengupta, J. (2021). Winning the battle but losing the war: Ironic effects of training consumers to detect deceptive advertising tactics. Journal of Business Ethics. Retrieved February 2, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04937-7.

  • Zheng, D., Witt, L. A., Waite, E., David, E. M., van Driel, M., & McDonald, D. P. (2015). Effects of ethical leadership on emotional exhaustion in high moral intensity situations. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 732–748, ISSN 1048–9843, Retrieved February 2, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.01.006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liviu-Adrian Stoica .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stoica, LA., Turcescu, AE. (2022). The Principlism Method Applied Utilitarianist in Mathematical Calculations for an Ethical Decision. In: Bilgin, M.H., Danis, H., Demir, E., Mustafa, G. (eds) Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94672-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics