Abstract
Adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) has increased markedly in response to technology advances, documentation and quality reporting mandates, and regulatory pressures. EHRs have shown promise in supporting quality and safety in surgical specialties through delivering knowledge, standardizing care, measuring compliance, and tracking quality. Evidence from systematic reviews has demonstrated that EHRs can enhance efficiency, improve the quality of surgical documentation, increase guideline adherence, reduce medication errors and adverse drug events, and improve selected clinical outcomes. Artificial intelligence techniques, such as natural language processing and machine learning, have been leveraged within EHRs to identify surgical complications, quality indicators, and safety metrics. Telemedicine and patient portals, within or in combination with EHRs, have enhanced communication between surgeons and patients, offered alternative modalities for the delivery of surgical care, and increased patient satisfaction. Implementation and maintenance of EHRs are complex endeavors, and surgeons should be integral participants in the associated workflow redesign, testing, user education, and ongoing evaluations. Effective health information technology leaders must have expertise in implementation science and management, knowledge of evolving technologies and associated regulations, and awareness of privacy and security threats. Fostering a workforce of surgeon informaticists with formal informatics training and practical clinical experience will be invaluable to surgical communities as they embrace new technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Selected Reading
Irizarry T, Barton AJ. A sociotechnical approach to successful electronic health record implementation: five best practices for clinical nurse specialists. Clin Nurse Spec. 2013;27(6):283–5.
Aguirre RR, et al. Electronic health record implementation: a review of resources and tools. Cureus. 2019;11(9):e5649.
Zhao J, et al. The value of the surgeon informatician. J Surg Res. 2020;252:264–71.
Hincker A, et al. Electronic medical record interventions and recurrent perioperative antibiotic administration: a before-and-after study. Can J Anaesth. 2017;64(7):716–23.
Austrian JS, et al. The financial and clinical impact of an electronic health record integrated pathway in elective colon surgery. Appl Clin Inform. 2020;11(1):95–103.
Fisher JC, et al. A novel approach to leveraging electronic health record data to enhance pediatric surgical quality improvement bundle process compliance. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(6):1030–3.
Furukawa MF, et al. Electronic health record adoption and rates of in-hospital adverse events. J Patient Saf. 2020;16(2):137–42.
Robinson JR, Huth H, Jackson GP. Review of information technology for surgical patient care. J Surg Res. 2016;203(1):121–39.
Borab ZM, et al. Use of computerized clinical decision support systems to prevent venous thromboembolism in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(7):638–45.
Campanella P, et al. The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pub Health. 2016;26(1):60–4.
Romano PS, et al. Validity of selected AHRQ patient safety indicators based on VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(1):182–204.
Hu Z, et al. Accelerating chart review using automated methods on electronic health record data for postoperative complications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2016;2016:1822–31.
Hu Z, et al. Automated detection of postoperative surgical site infections using supervised methods with electronic health record data. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:706–10.
Murff HJ, et al. Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing. JAMA. 2011;306(8):848–55.
Bucher BT, et al. Use of computerized provider order entry events for postoperative complication surveillance. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(4):311–8.
Telehealth. [cited 2021 March 14, 2021]; Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/topics/telehealth.
Huang EY, et al. Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: a narrative review. Am J Surg. 2019;218(4):760–6.
Contreras CM, et al. Telemedicine: patient-provider clinical engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(7):1692–7.
Sorensen MJ, et al. Telemedicine for surgical consultations - pandemic response or here to stay?: a report of public perceptions. Ann Surg. 2020;272(3):e174–80.
Cronin RM, et al. Growth of secure messaging through a patient portal as a form of outpatient interaction across clinical specialties. Appl Clin Inform. 2015;6(2):288–304.
Shenson JA, et al. Rapid growth in surgeons’ use of secure messaging in a patient portal. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1432–40.
Riera KM, et al. Care delivered by pediatric surgical specialties through patient portal messaging. J Surg Res. 2019;234:231–9.
Robinson JR, et al. Complexity of medical decision-making in care provided by surgeons through patient portals. J Surg Res. 2017;214:93–101.
Kummerow Broman K, et al. Postoperative care using a secure online patient portal: changing the (inter)face of general surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(6):1057–66.
Varady NH, d’Amonville S, Chen AF. Electronic patient portal use in orthopaedic surgery is associated with disparities, improved satisfaction, and lower no-show rates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(15):1336–43.
Kachroo N, et al. Does “MyChart” benefit “my” surgery? A look at the impact of electronic patient portals on patient experience. J Urol. 2020;204(4):760–8.
Wedd J, et al. Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in web-based patient portal usage among kidney and liver transplant recipients: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(4):e11864.
Zhao JY, et al. Barriers, facilitators, and solutions to optimal patient portal and personal health record use: a systematic review of the literature. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017;2017:1913–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huang, E.Y., Jackson, G.P. (2022). Quality, Safety, and the Electronic Health Record (EHR). In: Romanelli, J.R., Dort, J.M., Kowalski, R.B., Sinha, P. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94610-4_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94610-4_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94609-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94610-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)