Skip to main content

Quality, Safety, and the Electronic Health Record (EHR)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety

Abstract

Adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) has increased markedly in response to technology advances, documentation and quality reporting mandates, and regulatory pressures. EHRs have shown promise in supporting quality and safety in surgical specialties through delivering knowledge, standardizing care, measuring compliance, and tracking quality. Evidence from systematic reviews has demonstrated that EHRs can enhance efficiency, improve the quality of surgical documentation, increase guideline adherence, reduce medication errors and adverse drug events, and improve selected clinical outcomes. Artificial intelligence techniques, such as natural language processing and machine learning, have been leveraged within EHRs to identify surgical complications, quality indicators, and safety metrics. Telemedicine and patient portals, within or in combination with EHRs, have enhanced communication between surgeons and patients, offered alternative modalities for the delivery of surgical care, and increased patient satisfaction. Implementation and maintenance of EHRs are complex endeavors, and surgeons should be integral participants in the associated workflow redesign, testing, user education, and ongoing evaluations. Effective health information technology leaders must have expertise in implementation science and management, knowledge of evolving technologies and associated regulations, and awareness of privacy and security threats. Fostering a workforce of surgeon informaticists with formal informatics training and practical clinical experience will be invaluable to surgical communities as they embrace new technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Selected Reading

  1. Irizarry T, Barton AJ. A sociotechnical approach to successful electronic health record implementation: five best practices for clinical nurse specialists. Clin Nurse Spec. 2013;27(6):283–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Aguirre RR, et al. Electronic health record implementation: a review of resources and tools. Cureus. 2019;11(9):e5649.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao J, et al. The value of the surgeon informatician. J Surg Res. 2020;252:264–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hincker A, et al. Electronic medical record interventions and recurrent perioperative antibiotic administration: a before-and-after study. Can J Anaesth. 2017;64(7):716–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Austrian JS, et al. The financial and clinical impact of an electronic health record integrated pathway in elective colon surgery. Appl Clin Inform. 2020;11(1):95–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher JC, et al. A novel approach to leveraging electronic health record data to enhance pediatric surgical quality improvement bundle process compliance. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(6):1030–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furukawa MF, et al. Electronic health record adoption and rates of in-hospital adverse events. J Patient Saf. 2020;16(2):137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson JR, Huth H, Jackson GP. Review of information technology for surgical patient care. J Surg Res. 2016;203(1):121–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Borab ZM, et al. Use of computerized clinical decision support systems to prevent venous thromboembolism in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(7):638–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Campanella P, et al. The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pub Health. 2016;26(1):60–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Romano PS, et al. Validity of selected AHRQ patient safety indicators based on VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(1):182–204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu Z, et al. Accelerating chart review using automated methods on electronic health record data for postoperative complications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2016;2016:1822–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu Z, et al. Automated detection of postoperative surgical site infections using supervised methods with electronic health record data. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:706–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Murff HJ, et al. Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing. JAMA. 2011;306(8):848–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bucher BT, et al. Use of computerized provider order entry events for postoperative complication surveillance. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(4):311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Telehealth. [cited 2021 March 14, 2021]; Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/topics/telehealth.

  17. Huang EY, et al. Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: a narrative review. Am J Surg. 2019;218(4):760–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Contreras CM, et al. Telemedicine: patient-provider clinical engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(7):1692–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sorensen MJ, et al. Telemedicine for surgical consultations - pandemic response or here to stay?: a report of public perceptions. Ann Surg. 2020;272(3):e174–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cronin RM, et al. Growth of secure messaging through a patient portal as a form of outpatient interaction across clinical specialties. Appl Clin Inform. 2015;6(2):288–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shenson JA, et al. Rapid growth in surgeons’ use of secure messaging in a patient portal. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1432–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Riera KM, et al. Care delivered by pediatric surgical specialties through patient portal messaging. J Surg Res. 2019;234:231–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson JR, et al. Complexity of medical decision-making in care provided by surgeons through patient portals. J Surg Res. 2017;214:93–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kummerow Broman K, et al. Postoperative care using a secure online patient portal: changing the (inter)face of general surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(6):1057–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Varady NH, d’Amonville S, Chen AF. Electronic patient portal use in orthopaedic surgery is associated with disparities, improved satisfaction, and lower no-show rates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(15):1336–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kachroo N, et al. Does “MyChart” benefit “my” surgery? A look at the impact of electronic patient portals on patient experience. J Urol. 2020;204(4):760–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wedd J, et al. Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in web-based patient portal usage among kidney and liver transplant recipients: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(4):e11864.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao JY, et al. Barriers, facilitators, and solutions to optimal patient portal and personal health record use: a systematic review of the literature. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017;2017:1913–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gretchen Purcell Jackson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Huang, E.Y., Jackson, G.P. (2022). Quality, Safety, and the Electronic Health Record (EHR). In: Romanelli, J.R., Dort, J.M., Kowalski, R.B., Sinha, P. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94610-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94610-4_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94609-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94610-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics