Skip to main content

Abstract

Introduced by Dr. Ken Kizer in 2001, the concept of the “never event” has pervaded patient quality and safety initiatives over the last two decades. “Never events” are defined as egregious medical errors that should be wholly avoidable such that they never occur, for example, wrong-site surgery or leaving a foreign body in a patient. These events can not only be costly to patients, mentally, and financially, they also pose a serious burden to the healthcare system at large with some estimates exceeding $29 billion per year. In response, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has deemed many of these events “nonreimbursable,” holding hospitals accountable and driving a push for quality improvement nationally. Unfortunately, the term “never event” remains a misnomer as these errors still occur today. Significant effort is still underway to study and improve upon their prevention. Targeted protocols, evolving workplace cultures, and advancing technologies have all contributed to reducing errors since these events have been brought to light. While “never events” are still reported every year, there have been impressive strides toward their reduction, and as efforts continue, they may yet be eliminated altogether.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Never events. In: Patient safety primer. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville. 2019. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/never-events. Accessed 4 Nov 2020.

  2. Fischer JE. Never events. In: Tichansky DS, Morton J, Jones DB, editors. The SAGES manual of quality, outcomes and patient safety. Boston: Springer; 2012. p. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson JG, Abrahamson K. Your health care may kill you: medical errors. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:13–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. NEJM. 2009;360(5):491–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0810119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koleva SI. A literature review exploring common factors contributing to Never Events in surgery. J Perioper Pract. 2020;30(9):256–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750458919886182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. SRE Fact Sheet. Serious Reportable Events NQF. 2011. www.qualityforum.org. Accessed 4 Nov 2020.

  7. National Quality Forum (NQF), Serious Reportable Events In Healthcare—2011 update: a consensus report, Washington, DC: NQF; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. List of SREs. National Quality Forum, Washington, DC. 2020. http://www.qualityforum.org/Topics/SREs/List_of_SREs.aspx#sre1. Accessed 18 Oct 2020.

  9. Variability of State Reporting of Adverse Events. National Quality Forum, Washington, DC. 2011. http://www.qualityforum.org/Topics/SREs/List_of_SREs.aspx#sre1. Accessed 18 Oct 2020.

  10. CMS.gov: CMS improves patient safety for Medicare and Medicaid services by addressing never events. Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services, Baltimore. 2008. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/cms-improves-patient-safety-medicare-and-medicaid-addressing-never-events. Accessed 14 Nov 2020.

  11. Lembitz A, Clarke TJ. Clarifying “never events and introducing” always events. Patient Saf Surg. 2009;3:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. CMS.gov: Hospital-acquired conditions. Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services, Baltimore. 2020. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service-payment/hospitalacqcond/hospital-acquired_conditions. Accessed 14 Nov 2020.

  13. Cassidy A. Health policy brief: medicare’s hospital-acquired condition reduction program. Health Aff 2015. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20150806.512738/full/healthpolicybrief_142.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2020.

  14. Fehlberg EA, Lucero RJ, Weaver MT, McDaniel AM, Chandler AM, Richey PA, et al. Impact of the CMS no-pay policy on hospital-acquired fall prevention related practice patterns. Innov Aging. 2018;1(3):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. AHRQ national scorecard on hospital-acquired conditions updated baseline rates and preliminary results 2014–2017. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville. Accessed 14 Nov 2020. 2019. https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/pfp/hacreport-2019.pdf.

  16. CMS.gov: Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program. Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services, Baltimore. 2017. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalRHQDAPU. Accessed 14 Nov 2020.

  17. Lawton EJ, Sheetz KH, Ryan AM. Improving the hospital-acquired condition reduction program through rulemaking. JAMA Health Forum. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0416.

  18. CMS.gov: Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program. Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services, Baltimore. 2020. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/HAC-Reduction-Program. Accessed 14 Nov 2020.

  19. WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery 2009: Safe surgery saves lives. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK143243/.

  20. The WHO safer surgery checklist time out procedure revisited: strategies to optimise compliance and safety. Int J Surg. 2019;69:19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.07.006.

  21. Geraghty A, Ferguson L, McIlhenny C, Bowie P. Incidence of wrong-site surgery list errors for a 2-year period in a single national health service board. J Patient Saf. 2020;16:79–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Henshaw DS, Turner JD, Dobson SW, Jaffe JD, Reynolds JW, Edwards CJ, Weller RS. Preprocedural Checklist for Regional Anesthesia: Impact on the Incidence of Wrong Site Nerve Blockade (an 8-Year Perspective). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44:201–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2018-000033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dommaraju S, Siewert B, OʼBryan B, Swedeen S, Appel E, Nakhaei M, Camacho A, Brook OR. Impact of preprocedure time-out checklist for computed tomography-guided procedures on workflow and patient safety. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019;43:892–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000940.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pikkel D, Sharabi-Nov A, Pikkel J. The importance of side marking in preventing surgical site errors. Int Risk Saf Med. 2014;26:133–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-140621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vachhani JA, Klopfenstein JD. Incidence of neurosurgical wrong-site surgery before and after implementation of the universal protocol. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(4):590–5. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318283c9ea.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Moseley G, Oborski Y, Mayorchak Y, Yau L-A, Flynn P. Ink transfer in pre-operative marking: a patient safety issue? ANZ J Surg. 2020;90:187–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Edlin JC, Kanagasabay R. Risk of operating on the wrong site: how to avoid a never event. BMJ Case Reports 2018 (May 7, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017-223704.

  28. Cullan DB, Wongworawat MD. Sterility of the surgical site marking between the ink and the epidermis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:319–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rooney J, Khoo OKS, Higgs AR, Small TJ, Bell S. Surgical site marking does not affect sterility. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:688–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04618.x.d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Odgaard A, Laursen MB, Gromov K, Troelsen A, Kristensen PW, Schrøder H, Madsen F, Overgaard S. Mismatch ‘never events’ in hip and knee arthroplasty: a cohort and intervention study. Bone Joint J. 2019;101B:960–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. DeVine JG, Chutkan N, Gloystein D, Jackson K. An update on wrong-site spine surgery. Global Spine J. 2020;10:41S–4S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219846911.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Steelman VM, Shaw C, Shine L, Hardy-Fairbanks AJ. Retained surgical sponges: a descriptive study of 319 occurrences and contributing factors from 2012 to 2017. Patient Saf Surg. 2018;12:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-018-0166-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Steelman VM, Schaapveld AG, Storm HE, Perkhounkova Y, Shane DM. The effect of radiofrequency technology on time spent searching for surgical sponges and associated costs. AORN J. 2019;109:718–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.12698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Etherington N, Wu M, Cheng-Boivin O, Larrigan S, Boet S. Interprofessional communication in the operating room: a narrative review to advance research and practice. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth. 2019;66:1251–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01413-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lear R, Godfrey AD, Riga C, Norton C, Vincent C, Bicknell CD. Surgeons’ perceptions of the causes of preventable harm in arterial surgery: a mixed-methods study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54:778–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Freundlich RE, Bulka CM, Wanderer JP, Rothman BS, Sandberg WS, Ehrenfeld JM. Prospective investigation of the operating room time-out process. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:725–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jones N. Tune-in and time-out: toward surgeon-led prevention of ‘never’ Events. J Patient Saf. 2019;15:e36–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjali A. Gresens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gresens, A.A., Tatum, J.A. (2022). Never Events in Surgery. In: Romanelli, J.R., Dort, J.M., Kowalski, R.B., Sinha, P. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94610-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94610-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94609-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94610-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics