Skip to main content

Expanding Modeling Notations: Requirements for Creative Process Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2021)

Abstract

Creativity is a common aspect of business processes and thus needs a proper representation through process modeling notations. However, creative processes constitute highly flexible process elements, as new and unforeseeable outcome is developed. This presents a challenge for modeling languages. Current methods representing creative-intensive work are rather less able to capture creative specifics which are relevant to successfully run and manage these processes. We outline the concept of creative-intensive processes and present an example from a game design process in order to derive critical process aspects relevant for its modeling. Six aspects are detected, with first and foremost: process flexibility, as well as temporal uncertainty, experience, types of creative problems, phases of the creative process and individual criteria. By first analyzing what aspects of creative work modeling notations already cover, we further discuss which modeling extensions need to be developed to better represent creativity within business processes. We argue that a proper representation of creative work would not just improve the management of those processes, but can further enable process actors to more efficiently run these creative processes and adjust them to better fit to the creative needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eppler, M.J., Seifried, P., Röpnack, A.: Improving knowledge intensive processes through an enterprise knowledge medium. In: Meckel, M., Schmid, B.F. (Eds.) Kommunikationsmanagement im Wandel: Beiträge aus 10 Jahren, pp. 371–389. Gabler, Wiesbaden (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sonenshein, S.: Routines and creativity: from dualism to duality. Organ. Sci. 27(3), 739–758 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deken, F., Carlile, P.R., Berends, H., Lauche, K.: Generating novelty through interdependent routines: a process model of routine Work. Organ. Sci. 27(3), 659–677 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pentland, B.T., Hærem, T.: Organizational routines as patterns of action: Implications for org Behavior. Ann. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2(1), 465–487 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Runco, M.A., Jaeger, G.J.: The standard definition of creativity. Creat. Res. J. 24(1), 92–96 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karow, M., Reul, D.: Modellierung kreativitätsintensiver Prozesse – Methodische Unterstützung der Analyse und Dokumentation. In: Becker, J., Schwaderlapp, W., Seidel, S. (eds.) Management kreativitätsintensiver Prozesse: Theorien, Methoden, Software und deren Anwendung in der Fernsehindustrie, pp. 39–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21678-7_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: YAWL: yet another workflow language. Inf. Syst. 30(4), 245–275 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2004.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gottschalk, F., Van Der Aalst, W.M., Jansen-Vullers, M.H., La Rosa, M.: Configurable workflow models. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 17(2), 177–221 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. La Rosa, M., Van der Aalst, W.M., Dumas, M., Milani, F.P.: Business process variability modeling: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. CSUR 50(1), 1–45 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmelzer, H.J., Sesselmann, W.: Geschäftsprozessmanagement in der Praxis: Kunden zufrieden stellen - Produktivität steigern - Wert erhöhen. Carl Hanser Verlag (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aureli, S., Giampaoli, D., Ciambotti, M., Bontis, N.: Key factors that improve knowledge-intensive business processes which lead to competitive advantage. Bus. Process Manag. J. 25(1), 126–143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seidel, S.: A business process management perspective on creativity: creativity intensive processes. In: AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, pp. 417–423 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Obstfeld, D.: Creative projects: a less routine approach toward getting new things done. Organ. Sci. 23(6), 1571–1592 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seidel, S., Muller-Wienbergen, F., Rosemann, M.: Pockets of creativity in business processes. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 415–436 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goh, K.T., Pentland, B.T.: From actions to paths to patterning: toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines. Acad. Manage. J. 62(6), 1901–1929 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohendet, P.S., Simon, L.O.: Always playable: recombining routines for creative efficiency at ubisoft montreal’s video game studio. Organ. Sci. 27(3), 614–632 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schell, J.: The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. CRC Press, Boco Raton (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Bider, I., Jalali, A.: Agile business process development: why, how and when—applying Nonaka’s theory of knowledge transformation to business process development. IseB 14(4), 693–731 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-014-0256-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer, B.: Agile!: The Good, the Hype and the Ugly. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05155-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Amabile, T.M.: Componential theory of creativity. Harv. Bus. Sch. 12(96), 1–10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martins, E.C., Terblanche, F.: Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 6(1), 64–74 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310456337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baer, J.: The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Rev. 37(3), 165–178 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Runco, M.: Div thinking, creativity and ideation. Camb. Handb. Creat. 413–446 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cropley, A.: In praise of convergent thinking. Creat. Res. J. 18(3), 391–404 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Becker, J., Heide, T., Breuker, D., Voigt, M.: Evaluating groupware for creative group processes: the case study of CreativeFlow. In: AMCIS Proceedings, Detroit, pp. 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Botella, M., Lubart, T.: From dynamic processes to a dynamic creative process. In: Beghetto, R.A., Corazza, G.E. (eds.) Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity. CTAE, vol. 4, pp. 261–278. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Haase, J., Hoff, E.V., Hanel, P.H.P., Innes-Ker, Å.: A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creat. Res. J. 30(1), 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, Z., Bartol, K.M.: Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad. Manag. J. 53(1), 107–128 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Recker, J., Mendling, J.: The state of the art of business process management research as published in the BPM conference. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 58(1), 55–72 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0411-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cham, R.K.: Creativity management–the new challenge for business process management. In: Khullar, L., Kavishwar, S., Bhutda, P. (eds.) Enterprise Value Creation Through Creative Management Practices, Nagpur, pp. 69–79 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dittrich, K., Guérard, S., Seidl, D.: Talking about routines: the role of reflective talk in routine change. Organ. Sci. 27(3), 678–697 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Valença, G., Alves, C., Alves, V., Niu, N.: A systematic mapping study on business process variability. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 5(1), 1–21 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schonenberg, H., Mans, R., Russell, N., Mulyar, N., Aalst, W.: Process flexibility: a survey of contemporary approaches. In: Dietz, J.L.G., Albani, A., Barjis, J. (eds.) CIAO!/EOMAS -2008. LNBIP, vol. 10, pp. 16–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68644-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Sadler-Smith, E.: Wallas’ four-stage model of the creative process: more than meets the eye? Creat. Res. J. 27(4), 342–352 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1087277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Freund, J., Rücker, B.: Praxishandbuch BPMN: mit Einführung in CMMN und DMN. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Marrella. A., Lespérance, Y.: Towards a goal-oriented framework for the automatic synthesis of underspecified activities in dynamic processes. In: IEEE 6th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications, pp. 361–365 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gronau, N., Müller, C., Korf, R.: KMDL-capturing, analysing and improving knowledge-intensive business processes. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 11(4), 452–472 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vargas-Hernández, J.G.: Modeling risk and innovation management. J. Compet. Stud. 19(3/4), 45–57 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Waples, E.P., Friedrich, T.L.: Managing creative performance: important strategies for leaders of creative efforts. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 13(3), 366–385 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Byrge, C., Hansen, S.: Course in New Thinking in higher education: Enhancing creativity through the means of training, theory and workshop. Probl. Educ. 21st Century, 51(51), 18–32 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), grant number 16DII127 (Weizenbaum-Institute). We like to thank Friedrich Schadow for his in-depth input about level design within digital game design. We further like to thank Stefan Seidel and Thomas Grisold on their conceptual input during the data acquisition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Haase .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Haase, J., Thim, C., Bender, B. (2022). Expanding Modeling Notations: Requirements for Creative Process Modeling. In: Marrella, A., Weber, B. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 436. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94342-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94343-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics