Skip to main content

The Manchester-Fothergill Operation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Insights Into Incontinence and the Pelvic Floor

Abstract

Introduction: Manchester-Fothergill procedure (MP) is a surgery that restores normal support of the uterus without removing it. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical characteristics, effectiveness and complications of the surgical treatment of cervical elongation by this technique.

Materials and methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out including 45 women who underwent the Manchester operation in our hospital from 2006 to 2017. We did a revision of the evolution 3 years after the surgery.

Results: Mean age was 47.9 years, parity 1.9 births, and average body mass index 25.8 kg/m2. The average length of the surgery was 49 min. A month after the surgery (n = 45), we found 68.8% of patients had no complications and 31.1% had minor postoperative complications. At the 6-month check-up (n = 32), 84.3% of the patients were asymptomatic. At the annual check-up (n = 34), 91.2% were asymptomatic. From the second year, all patient were asymptomatic.

Interpretation of the results: Manchester operation is a safe and fast technique not requiring admission. There were only minor short- and long-term complications which were completely solved in all cases. No cases of cervical stenosis were observed.

Conclusions: Manchester procedure showed good results and few and minor complications. This technique should be considered and offered for the treatment of uterine prolapse in selected patients who wish to keep their uterus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cooper J, Annappa M, Dracocardos D, Cooper W, Muller S, Mallen C. Prevalence of genital prolapse symptoms in primary care: a cross-sectional survey. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(4):505–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vergeldt TFM, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1559–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fothergill BWE, Edin MD. The end results of vaginal operations for genital prolapse. J Obs Gyn Brit Emp. 1921;28:251–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management. Obstet Gynecol. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. In: Maher C, editor. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013. p. CD004014.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, Kim-Fine S, Balk EM, Murphy M, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):129–146.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park YJ, Kong MK, Lee J, Kim EH, Bai SW. Manchester operation: an effective treatment for uterine prolapse caused by true cervical elongation. Yonsei Med J. 2019;60(11):1074–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh P, Lim Wei Liang B, Han HC. A retrospective observational study on the outcomes and efficacy of the Manchester procedure as a uterine-sparing surgery for uterovaginal prolapse. J Gynecol Surg. 2018;34(6):275–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oversand SH, Staff AC, Borstad E, Svenningsen R. The Manchester procedure: anatomical, subjective and sexual outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1193–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Engelbredt K, Glavind K, Kjaergaard N. Development of cervical and uterine malignancies during follow-up after Manchester-Fothergill procedure. J Gynecol Surg. 2020;36(2):60–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Marino Romero Ramírez, Gemma López Gómiz, Jordi Moreno Sánchez and Albert Font Vilamitjana contributed to the presented case and chapter. We acknowledge the contribution of Beatriu Roca Comella to this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marino Romero Ramírez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors certify that no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article exists.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 MIPS MediterraneanIncontinence Pelvic Floor Society

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Romero Ramírez, M., López Gómiz, G., Moreno Sánchez, J., Roca Comella, B., Font Vilamitjana, A. (2022). The Manchester-Fothergill Operation. In: Dökmeci, F., Rizk, D.E.E. (eds) Insights Into Incontinence and the Pelvic Floor. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94174-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94174-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94173-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94174-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics