Skip to main content

Editor’s Introduction: Digital Inclusion, Vulnerability and Associated Complexities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Vulnerable People and Digital Inclusion

Abstract

This edited collection, which is diverse in scope and context, offers an original examination of the role of digital inclusion in the welfare and social inclusion of vulnerable people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Mesch and Talmud’s (2011) and Lissitsa and Lev-On’s (2014) studies of digital inequalities between Jews and Arabs in the context of Israel.

  2. 2.

    See http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/ageing/ageing_facts/en.

  3. 3.

    https://minorityrights.org/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.ageinternational.org.uk/.

References

  • Abazov, R., & Khazbulatov, A. (2015). Ethnic minorities of central and Eastern Europe in the internet Space. A computer-assisted content analysis. Europe-Asia Studies, 67(3), 502–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, B. B. (2016). A systematic literature review on immigrants’ motivation for ICT adoption and use. International Journal of E-Adoption, 8(2), 34–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, K., & Imran, S. (2015). The digital divide and social inclusion among refugee migrants: A case in regional Australia. Information Technology & People, 28(2), 344–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M., & Perrin, A. (2017). Tech adoption climbs among older adults. Pew Research Center. Retrieved December 3, 2020, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/

  • Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, L., Cunningham, N. A., & McCombe, C. (2009). New communities, emerging content: Digital inclusion for minority language groups. State Library of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., López, G., & Lopez, M. H. (2016). Digital divide narrows for Latinos as more Spanish speakers and immigrants go online. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (Ed.). (1960). Ageing in western societies. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, D. D., Wesson, C., & Fullwood, C. (2013). Internet access by people with intellectual disabilities: Inequalities and opportunities. Future Internet, 5(3), 376–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, A., & Aricat, R. (2016). Belonging and communicating in a bounded cosmopolitanism: The role of mobile phones in the integration of transnational migrants in Singapore. Information, Communication & Society, 20(3), 482–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, A., & Jiang, Q. (2014). Investigating modern-day Talaria: Mobile phones and the mobility-impaired in Singapore. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 695–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codagnone, C., & Kluzer, S. (2011). ICT for the social and economic integration of migrants into Europe. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Luxemburg, European Commission—Joint Research Centre—Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J., Nolan, J., Seko, Y., Mancuso, K., & Ospina, A. (2011). GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community. New Media & Society, 13(7), 1161–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. (2014). A brief introduction to the social theory of ageing and ageism. Old Age Psychiatrist, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa-Velez, I., Spaaij, R., & Upham, S. (2013). We are not here to claim better services than any other: Social exclusion among men from refugee backgrounds in urban and regional Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 26(2), 163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosco, T. D., Prina, A. M., & Pera les, J., Stephan, B.C., & Brayne, C. (2013). Lay perspectives of successful ageing: A systematic review and meta-ethnography. BMJ Open, 3, e002710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotten, S. R., Anderson, W. A., & McCullough, B. M. (2012). The impact of ICT use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults. Gerontechnology, 11(2), 161–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Norton, M. I., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 267–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, E., & Henry, W. E. (1961). Growing old. Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S., Green, J., & Maxwell, H. (2017). I’ve got a mobile phone too! Hard and soft assistive technology customization and supportive call centres for people with disability. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(4), 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. (2015). The happiness industry: How the government and big business sold us well-being. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, R., & Engbersen, G. (2014). How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks, 14(4), 401–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Garip, F. (2012). Network effects and social inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 93–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information Communication & Society, 9(3), 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2016). Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics, 58, 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, C. (2014). The digital divide, inclusion and emergency response systems: A UK and EU-based analysis. Retrieved February 2, 2017, from http://www.iscram.org/legacy/ISCRAM2014/papers/p103.pdf

  • Eliassi, B. (2015). Making a Kurdistani identity in diaspora: Kurdish migrants in Sweden. In N. Sigona, A. Gamlen, G. Liberatore, & H. Gringelbach (Eds.), Diasporas reimagined: Spaces, practices and belonging (pp. 45–49). Oxfords Diasporas Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellcessor, E. (2016). Restricted access: Media, disability, and the politics of participation. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009). ICT for Integration, Social Inclusion and Economic Participation of Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities: Case Studies from Germany. European Communities. Retrieved August 28, 2016, from http://ftp.jrc.es/users/publications/public/EURdoc/EURdoc/JRC53397_TN.pdf

  • European Commission. (2011). ICT for the social and economic integration of migrants in Europe. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Spain. Retrieved August 28, 2016, from http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC63183.pdf

  • European Commission Joint Research Centre. (2015). ICT for the employability and integration of immigrants in the European Union: A qualitative analysis of a survey in Bulgaria, the Netherlands and Spain. European Union. Retrieved August 28, 2016, from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC93966/jrc93966.pdf

  • Felton, E. (2015). Migrants, refugees, and mobility: How useful are information communication technologies in the first phase of resettlement? Journal of Technologies in Society, 11(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, K. E., Bishop, A. P., Magassa, L., & Fawcett, P. (2014). Action!: Codesigning interactive technology with immigrant teens. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 345–348). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friemel, T. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media and Society, 18(2), 313–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, M., Ampofo, L., Cheesman, M., Faith, B., Iliadou, E., Issa, A., Osseiran, S., & Skleparis, D. (2016). Mapping refugee media journeys: Smartphones and social media networks. The Open University/France Médias Monde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (2009 [1963]). Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon & Shuster Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grue, J. (2016). The social meaning of disability: A reflection on categorisation, stigma and identity. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(6), 957–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, E. A., & Lachman, M. E. (2014). Everyday experiences of memory problems and control: The adaptive role of selective optimization with compensation in the context of memory decline. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22(1), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannides, T., Bailey, N., & Kaoukji, D. (2016). Voices of refugees: Information and communication needs of refugees in Greece and Germany. BBC Media Action. Retrieved January 19, 2017, from https://downloads.bbc.co.uk/mediaaction/pdf/research/voices-of-refugees-research-report.pdf

  • Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017). Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E., Piper, A. M., & Morris, M. R. (2018). From internet access to internet skills: Digital inequality among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18, 881–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society, 11(2), 239–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., Betts, L. R., & Gardner, S. E. (2015). Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 415–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, S. M., & Barrow, G. M. (2015). Aging, the individual, and society (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsaker, A., & Hargittai, E. (2018). A review of internet use among older adults. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3937–3954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynan, A., Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2014). ‘Happy and excited’: Perceptions of using digital technology and social media by young people who use augmentative and alternative communication. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30(2), 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janta, H., & Ladkin, A. (2013). In search of employment: Online technologies and Polish migrants. New Technology, Work and Employment, 28(3), 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, V. S., & Gonzalez, C. (2016). Community variations in low-income Latino families’ technology adoption and integration. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(1), 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissau, K. (2012). Structuring migrants’ political activities on the internet: A two-dimensional approach. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9), 1381–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleineidam, L., Thoma, M. V., Maercker, A., Bickel, H., Mösch, E., Hajek, A., König, H.-H., Eisele, M., Mallon, T., & Luck, T. (2019). What is successful aging? A psychometric validation study of different construct definitions. The Gerontologist, 59(4), 738–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewthwaite, S. (2014). Web accessibility standards and disability: Developing critical perspectives on accessibility. Disability and Rehabilitation 36(16): 1375–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., & Pham, B. (2016). ‘If you are a foreigner in a foreign country, you stick together’: Technologically mediated communication and acculturation of migrant students. New Media & Society, 18(10), 2171–2188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, B., & Phelan, J. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissitsa, S., Chachashvili-Bolotin, S., & Bokek-Cohen, Y. (2017). Can digital skills raise occupational prestige among ethnic minorities? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(2), 204–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissitsa, S., & Lev-On, A. (2014). Gaps close, gaps open: A repeated cross-sectional study of the scope and determinants of the ethnic digital divide. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 7(1), 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A., Kennan, M. A., Thompson, K. M., & Qayum, A. (2013). Connecting with new information landscapes: Information literacy practices of refugees. Journal of Documentation, 69(1), 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loos, E. (2013). Designing for dynamic diversity: Representing various senior citizens in digital information sources. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, 7(1), 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussier-Desrochers, D., Normand, C. L., Romero-Torres, A., Lachapelle, Y., Godin-Tremblay, V., Dupont, M., & Bilodeau, P. (2017). Bridging the digital divide for people with intellectual disability. Cyberpsychology, 11(1), 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, S. J., & Clayton, J. (2013). Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disability & Society, 28(5), 702–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madianou, M. (2016). Ambient co-presence: Transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks, 16(2), 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino, S. (2015). Making space, making place: Digital togetherness and the redefinition of migrant identities Online. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, K., Nazroo, J., & Marshall, A. (2018). Digital inclusion in later life: Cohort changes in internet use over a ten-year period in England. Ageing and Society, 39, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClimens, A., & Gordon, F. (2009). People with intellectual disabilities as bloggers: What’s social capital got to do with it anyway? Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 13(1), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCosker, A., Bossio, D., Holcombe-James, I., Davis, H., Schleser, M., & Gleeson, J. (2018). 60+ online: Engaging seniors through social media and digital stories. Social Innovation Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, F., Morris, J., & Salis, C. (2016). Aphasia in an internet age: Wider perspectives on digital inclusion. Aphasiology, 30(2–3), 112–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, G., Mano, R., & Tsamir, J. (2012). Minority status and health information search: A test of the social diversification hypothesis. Social Science & Medicine, 75(5), 854–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, G. S., & Talmud, I. (2011). Ethnic differences in internet access: The role of occupation and exposure. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 445–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T., & Berthoud, R. (1997). Ethnic minorities in Britain. Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Hamilton, A. (2012). Measuring digital citizenship: Mobile access and broadband. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2492–2528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mubarak, F. (2015). Towards a renewed understanding of the complex nerves of the digital divide. Journal of Social Inclusion, 6(1), 71–U104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen. (2012). State of the Hispanic consumer: The Hispanic market imperative. Retrieved August 25, 2015, from www.nielsen.com

  • Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mara, B., Babacan, H., & Borland, H. (2010). Sending the right message: Use and access of ICT for communicating messages of health and community wellbeing to CALD communities. Institute for Community, Ethnicity and Policy Alternatives. Victoria University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom. (2013). Ethnic minority groups and communication services. Consumer Experience Special Report-Ethnic Minority Groups and Communication Services. Ofcom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom. (2017). Adults’ media use and attitudes report. Ofcom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogunyemi, O. (2012). What newspapers, films, and television do Africans living in Britain see and read? Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS. (2012). Ethnicity and national identity in England and Wales-Office for National Statistics. Retrieved January 1, 2017, from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/articles/ethnicityandnationalidentityinenglandandwales/2012-12-11

  • Perissinotto, C. M., Stijacic Cenzer, I., & Covinsky, K. E. (2012). Loneliness in older persons: A predictor of functional decline and death. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172(14), 1078–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieger, J. (2015). The broadband digital divide and the benefits of mobile broadband for minorities. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 13(3), 373–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quan-Haase, A., Martin, K., & Schreurs, K. (2014). Not all on the same page: e-book adoption and technology exploration by seniors. Information Research, 19(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, H. A. (2018). Exploring refugees and ICTs: Innovating towards inclusion and integration in fragile environments. Centre for Frugal Innovation in Africa Working Paper Series No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. (2014). Freeways, detours, and dead ends: Search journeys among disadvantaged youth. New Media & Society, 16(2), 234–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W. H., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L., Schulz, J., Khilnani, A., Ono, H., Cotten, S. R., McClain, N., Levine, L., Chen, W., Huang, G., & Casilli, A. A. (2020). Digital inequalities in time of pandemic: COVID-19 exposure risk profiles and new forms of vulnerability. First Monday, 25(7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallafranque-St-Louis, F., & Normand, C. L. (2017). From solitude to solicitation: How people with intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder use the internet. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltes, N. (2013). Disability, identity and disclosure in the online dating environment. Disability & Society, 28(1), 96–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, D., Fisher, S., Heath, A., & Sobolewska, M. (2014). The democratic engagement of Britain’s ethnic minorities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(1), 120–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, F., Yalcin, B., & Priestley, M. (2017). Internet access for disabled people: Understanding socio-relational factors in Europe. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(1), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs, K., Quan-Haase, A., & Martin, K. (2017). Problematising the digital literacy paradox in the context of older adults’ ICT use: Aging, media discourse, and self-determination. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrambler, G. (2018). Heaping blame on shame: ‘Weaponising stigma’ for neoliberal times. The Sociological Review Monographs, 66(4), 766–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, J., Georgeson, J., Mamas, C., & Swain, J. (2015). Not the right kind of ‘digital capital’? An examination of the complex relationship between disabled students, their technologies and higher education institutions. Computers and Education, 82, 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native—Myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, D., Chen, C., Chiang, H., & Shih, M. (2012). Explore dependency syndrome on mobile phone user. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 10(5), 475–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skop, E., & Adams, P. C. (2009). Creating and inhabiting virtual places: Indian immigrants in cyberspace. National Identities, 11(2), 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, S. (2009). Offline social ties and online use of computers: A study of disabled youth and their use of ICT advances. New Media & Society, 11(5), 709–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ståsett, S. J. (2007). The ethics of vulnerability, social inclusion and social capital. Forum for Development Studies, 34(1), 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Earth Institute and Ericsson. (2016). How information and communications technology can accelerate action on the sustainable development goals: ICT and STGs final report. Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Pew Research Centre. (2015). Racial and ethnic differences in how people use mobile technology. [Online]. Retrieved October 23, 2017, from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/04/30/racial-and-ethnic-differences-in-how-people-use-mobile-technology/

  • The Pew Research Centre. (2016). Ride-hailing services are seen by minorities as a benefit to areas underserved by taxis. [Online]. Retrieved October 13, 2017, from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/07/25/ride-hailingservices-are-seen-by-minorities-as-a-benefit-to-areas-underserved-by-taxis/

  • Tsatsou, P. (2011). Digital divides revisited: What is new about divides and their research? Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 317–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsatsou, P. (2020). Digital inclusion of people with disabilities: A qualitative study of intra-disability diversity in the digital realm. In Behaviour & information technology, 39(9), 995–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsatsou, P. (2021a). Is digital inclusion fighting disability stigma? Opportunities, barriers, and recommendations. Disability & Society, 36(5), 702–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsatsou, P. (2021b). Vulnerable people’s digital inclusion: Insights into intersectionality. Information, Communication & Society. [Online First]. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1873402

  • Tsatsou, P. (2021c). Aging: The two faces of Janus in digital inclusion? International Journal of Communication, 15, 1309–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsatsou, P., Youngs, G., & Watt, Y. (2017). Literacy and identity links forging digital inclusion? Critical reflections and signposts from a qualitative study. In J. Choudrie, P. Tsatsou, & S. Kurnia (Eds.), Innovative ICT-enabled services and social inclusion (pp. 335–358). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, K. (2012, March). Telehealth and telecare for older people. Scottish Policy Now, Issue 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2007). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (n.d.). Ethnocultural characteristics. Retrieved January 19, 2021, from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sconcerns/popchar/popcharmethods.htm#E

  • Van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use among the elderly. European Journal of Communication, 30(2), 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015). Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: A longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010–2013) among the Dutch population. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 782–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deursen, A. V., & van Dijk, J. A. (2010). Measuring internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(10), 891–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroman, K. G., Arthanat, S., & Lysack, C. (2015). “Who over 65 is online?” Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. (2016). Inclusion through the digital economy. Retrieved January 19, 2017, from http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk/projects?ref=EP%2FG066019%2F1

  • Whitacre, B. (2008). Factors influencing the temporal diffusion of broadband adoption: Evidence from Oklahoma. Annals of Regional Science, 42, 661–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2011). World report on disability. World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2018, February 5). Ageing and health. Retrieved January 19, 2021, from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health

  • Williams, P., & Hennig, C. (2015). Optimising web site designs for people with learning disabilities. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 15(1), 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zickuhr, K., & Smith, A. (2012). Digital differences. Pew Research Center. Retrieved October 18, 2015, from www.pewinternet.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panayiota Tsatsou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tsatsou, P. (2022). Editor’s Introduction: Digital Inclusion, Vulnerability and Associated Complexities. In: Tsatsou, P. (eds) Vulnerable People and Digital Inclusion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94122-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics