Skip to main content

Teachers’ Beliefs Shift Across Year-Long Professional Development: ENA Graphs Transformation of Privately Held Beliefs Over Time

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Quantitative Ethnography (ICQE 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1522))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

While classroom teachers are continuously trying to improve their instruction to increase student learning and engagement, dissatisfaction with professional development initiatives are often reported. Researchers examined the extant professional development literature and utilized the following distinct elements in this research design: a) teacher voice; b) teacher collaboration; c) critical reflection; and d) extended professional development time. In addition, the importance of alignment between teachers’ beliefs and the focus of professional development initiatives should not be underestimated. These five elements frame this mixed method study that is undergirded by a qualitative, multi-tiered data analysis of eight data sources including assessments of teacher’s beliefs and understanding of Problem-based Learning tenets as they navigate shifts in their classroom. This study is supported by a “beliefs of practice structure” framework [1] that includes both the teachers’ professed beliefs and their enacted beliefs, or pedagogical beliefs. Epistemic Network Analysis quantified the qualitatively coded data into visual graphs depicting teacher’s beliefs of practice structures before, at the midpoint, and at the end of the study. Statistically significant differences were found between the teacher’s Pre study graphs and their Mid study graphs, as well as between the Pre and Post study graphs, substantiating shifts in beliefs of practice structures that more closely align with PBL tenets. Data analysis confirms that the professional development model and its emphasis on the critical reflection cycle emboldened novice kindergarten teachers to implement changes in their classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin, A., Park, S., Hand, B.: What happens when a teacher’s belief structure is in disequilibrium? The entangled nature of beliefs and practice. Res. Sci. Educ. 49(3), 885–920 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arastoopour, G., Swiecki, Z., Chesler, N.C., Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic network analysis as a tool for engineering design assessment. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cherubini, L.: Reforming teacher preparation: fostering critical reflection and awareness in the context of global education. Excelsior Leadersh. Teach. Learn. 3(2), 43–55 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chesler, N., Ruis, A., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Arastoopour, G., Shaffer, D.W.: A novel paradigm for engineering education: virtual internships with individualized mentoring and assessment of engineering thinking. J. Biomech. Eng. 137(2), 1–8 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crawford, B.: Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 44, 613–642 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Csanadi, A., Eagan, B., Kollar, I., Shaffer, D.W., Fischer, F.: When coding-and-counting is not enough: using epistemic network analysis (ENA) to analyze verbal data in CSCL research. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 13(4), 419–438 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9292-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dewey, J.: How We Think, 2eRev. edn. DC Heath, Lexington (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, R., Luft, J., Czerniak, C., Pea, C. (eds.): The Role of Science Teachers’ Beliefs in International Classrooms. SensePublishers, Rotterdam (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-557-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Glasser, B., Strauss, A.: The Development of Grounded Theory. Alden, Chicago (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, M.G., Leagon, M.: Teacher attitudes and beliefs: reforming practice. Handb. Res. Sci. Teach. 2, 830–847 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lave, J., Wenger., E.: Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In: Supporting Lifelong Learning, Routledge, pp. 121–136 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, K.: Critical reflection as a framework for transformative learning in teacher education. Educ. Rev. 67(2), 135–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.839546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Luft, J., Roehrig, G., Patterson, N.: Contrasting landscapes: a comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers’ practices, beliefs, and experiences. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 40(1), 77–97 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lumpe, A., Haney, J., Czerniak, C.: Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 37, 275–292 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marra, R.: Teacher beliefs: the impact of the design of constructivist learning environments on instructor epistemologies. Learn. Environ. Res. 8, 135–155 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Posnanski, T.J.: Professional development programs for elementary teachers: an analysis of teacher self-efficacy beliefs and a professional development model. J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 13(3), 189–220 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaffer, D.W., Collier, W., Ruis, A.R.: A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. J. Learn. Anal. 3(3), 9–45 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaffer, D., et al.: Epistemic network analysis: a prototype for 21st century assessment of learning. Int. J. Learn. Media 1(1), 1–21 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas, M., Liu, K.: Patterns and perspectives: a grounded analysis of prospective teacher reflection in ePortfolios. J. Technol. Teach. Educ. 20(3), 305–330 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thagard, P.: Coherence in Thought and Action. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Windschitl, M.: Inquiry projects in science teacher education: what can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?. Sci. Educ. 87(1), 112–143 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita M. Benna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Benna, A.M., Reynolds, K. (2022). Teachers’ Beliefs Shift Across Year-Long Professional Development: ENA Graphs Transformation of Privately Held Beliefs Over Time. In: Wasson, B., Zörgő, S. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1522. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93859-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93859-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93858-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93859-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics