Skip to main content

Third Parties Information

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information as a Driver of Sustainable Finance

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance ((SIF))

  • 909 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter covers the issue of Non-Financial information (NFI) under different perspectives. Starting from the eugenics of NFI, useful to clarify the difference among different typologies of NFI (e.g., ESG scorings, ratings, and opinions), moving to the business models behind the ESG data sourcing, up to the potential use and significance of ESG scoring and ratings. Supported by a literature review, the chapter is useful to scholars, professionals, and policymakers willing to better understand which kind of NFI they need and for which purpose, showing the road ahead to improve the reliability and comparability of NFI, as well as the integration between financial and non-financial accounting frameworks.

The chapter is the result of a common work of the authors; nevertheless, it can be attributed to Mario La Torre paragraph 5.1, to Mavie Cardi paragraph 5.2, to Jacopo Schettini paragraph 5.3 and to Elena Olmedo paragraph 5.4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Auer, B. R., & Schuhmacher, F. (2016). Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 59, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannier, C., Bofinger, Y., & Rock, B. (2019). Doing safe by doing good: ESG investing and corporate social responsibility in the U.S. and Europe (CFS Working Paper Series 621).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2019). Aggregate confusion: The divergence in ESG ratings (MIT Sloan Research Papers 5822-19).

    Google Scholar 

  • Billio, M., Hristova, I., Latino, C., & Pelizzon, L. (2020). Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance (SAFE Working Paper 284)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boffo, R., Marshall, C., & Patalano, R. (2020). ESG investing: Environmental pillar scoring and reporting. OECD Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Boffo, R., & Patalano, R. (2020). ESG investing: Practices, progress and challenges. OECD Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogi, M., & Lagasio, V. (2019). Environmental, social, and governance and company profitability: Are financial intermediaries different? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 576–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, T., Bauer, R., & Orlitzky, M. (2016). Sustainable development and financial markets: Old paths and new avenues. Business & Society, 55(3), 303–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capelle-Blancard, G., & Petit, A. (2019). Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 543–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul S. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597–1614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, D., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2019). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings (Working paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, J., Jo, H., & Na, H. (2018). Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry? Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 549–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, D. S.,Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez-Cañamero, B., Bishara, T., Otegi-Olaso, J. R., Minguez, R., & Fernández, J. M. (2020). Measurement of corporate social responsibility: A review of corporate sustainability indexes, rankings and ratings. Sustainability, 12(5), 2153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225–3268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfleitner, G., Halbritter, G., & Nguyen, G. (2015). Measuring the level and risk of corporate responsibility. An empirical comparison of different ESG rating approaches. Journal of Asset Management, 16(7), 450–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2019). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernandez-Izquierdo, M. Á., Ferrero-Ferrero. I., Rivera-Lirio, J. M. & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2019). Rating the raters: Evaluating how ESG rating agencies integrate sustainability principles. Sustainability, 11(3), 915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escrig‐Olmedo, E., Muñoz‐Torres, M. J., Fernández‐Izquierdo, M. Á., & Rivera‐Lirio, J. M. (2017a). Measuring corporate environmental performance: A methodology for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 142–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escrig-Olmedo, E., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á. (2017b). Integrating multiple ESG investors’ preferences into sustainable investment: A fuzzy multicriteria methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1334–1345.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority). (2019). Final report—Guidelines on disclosure requirements applicable to credit ratings. ESMA 33–9–320. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma33-9-320_final_report_guidelines_on_disclosure_requirements_applicable_to_credit_rating_agencies.pdf

  • European Commission. (2018). Action plan: Financing sustainable growth. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0097&from=EN

  • European Commission. (2020). Study on sustainability-related ratings, data and research. European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d7d85036-509c-11eb-b59f-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-183474104

  • Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., Krueger, P., & Schmidt, P. S. (2019). ESG rating disagreement and stock returns (Swiss Finance Institute Research Papers 19-67).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, J., Riedl, E. J., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Market reaction to mandatory nonfinancial disclosure. Management Science, 65(7), 3061–3084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henke, H. M. (2016). The effect of social screening on bond mutual fund performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 67, 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1053–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G., Bartosch, J., & Avetisyan, E. (2019). Mandatory non-fnancial disclosure and its influence on CSR: An international comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juravle, C., & Lewis, A. (2008). Identifying impediments to SRI in Europe: A review of the practitioner and academic literature. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(3), 285–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, T. (2019). ESG research in the information age. Truevalue Labs

    Google Scholar 

  • La Torre, M., Mango, F., Cafaro, A., & Leo, S. (2020). Does the ESG index affect stock return? Evidence from the Eurostoxx50. Sustainability 12(16), 6387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latino, C., Pelizzon, L., & Rzeźnik, A. (2021). The power of ESG ratings on stock markets (SAFE Working Paper 310).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, J. P., Wang, C., & Yeung, I. (2019). Investor sentiment for corporate social performance. The Accounting Review, 94(4), 401–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzutilo, F., Mariani, M., Caragnano, A., & Zito, M. (2020). Dealing with carbon risk and the cost of debt: Evidence from the European market. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(4), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., & Hardeck, I. J. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics, 86(8), 867–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schettini, G. J. (2005). An overall view of the rating activities on Italy carried out by AEI standard ethics, Notizie di Politeia. Rivista di Etica e Scelte Pubbliche, 2005, XXI, 78. Le Prospettive Della Responsabilitá Sociale In Europa. Studi, Ricerche e Casi, Emilio D’Orazio (edited by), (pp. 255–274).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schettini, G. J., & Schettini, G. L. (Eds.). (2002). Etica, futuro e finanza. Il Sole 24Ore, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B., & Witteveen, E. (2021). Shocks, stocks and ratings: The financial community response to global environmental and health controversies. Global Environmental Change, 68, 102245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1991, April). Money and Value: on the ethics and economics of finance. Paolo Baffi lectures on Money and Finance, Banca d’Italia, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafeim, G. (2018). Public sentiment and the price of corporate sustainability. Financial Analysts Journal, 76(2), 26–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafeim, G., & Yoon. A. (2021). Stock price reactions to ESG News: The role of ESG ratings and disagreement (Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper 21-079).

    Google Scholar 

  • Starks, L. T., Venkat, P., & Zhu, Q. (2017). Corporate ESG profiles and investor horizons. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3049943

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario La Torre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

La Torre, M., Elena, E., Cardi, M., Schettini Gherardini, J. (2022). Third Parties Information. In: Linciano, N., Soccorso, P., Guagliano, C. (eds) Information as a Driver of Sustainable Finance. Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93768-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93768-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93767-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93768-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics