Skip to main content

Using Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction to Reshape the Assessments Structure of a Fundamental First-Year Course

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Science (DSIC 2021)

Abstract

In this paper, a group a students taking a fundamental first-year course are scrutinized, where the method of assessment had to suddenly change from physically writing semester tests and examinations on campus, to applying Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction to introduce continuous assessment in 2020. Educational environments are continuously evolving to increase the quality of teaching, learning and assessments with classes that have huge numbers. Academic Information Management (AIM 101), with 1000 students in 2020, made the transition to continuous assessment and the resulting data from the assessments clearly indicate that, not only do students perform better over the course of the semester and in the semester tests, they also attempt the assignments and tests more frequently, leading to an overall increase in distinctions obtained for the course. It was subsequently decided to keep the course online in future and to continue using continuous assessments. Future research will look at different learning styles of students taking fundamental courses and the role of lifelong learning in these courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Government SA: Improving education, training and innovation. In: Education Do. South Africa (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pellegrino, J.W., Chudowsky, N., Glaser, R.: National research council. Committee on the Foundations of A. Knowing what students know: the science and design of educational assessment. National Academy Press, Washington (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prinsloo, T., Singh, P.: COVID-19: leapfrogging 8,000 students from face-to-face to online learning in three weeks. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 48(1), 9 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kalu, F., Dyjur, P.: Creating a culture of continuous assessment to improve student learning through curriculum review. New Direct. Teach. Learn. 155, 47–54 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferreira, D.J., Da Silva, H.C., Melo, T.F.N., Ambrósio, A.P.: Investigation of continuous assessment of correctness in introductory programming. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 20(3), 182–194 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cengage. Cengage Learning: SAM: Skills Assessment Manger United Kingdom2021. http://www.cengage.com/sam/. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  7. Machajewski, S.: Gamification strategies in a hybrid exemplary college course. Int. J. Educ. Technol. 4, 1–16 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pudaruth, S., Moloo, R.K., Chiniah, A., Sungkur, R., Nagowah, L., Kishnah, S.: The impact of continuous assessments on the final marks of computer science modules at the university of mauritius (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nagandla, K., Gupta, E.D., Motilal, T., Teng, C.L., Gangadaran, S.: Performance of medical students in final professional examination: can in-course continuous assessments predict students at risk? Natl. Med. J. India 31(5), 293–295 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Assad, A.R., Asim, M.A., Heitham, M.M., Muntaser, M.A., Mohammed, A.M.: Students’ perceptions toward continuous assessment in anatomy courses. J. Med. Sci. Health [Internet] 3(2), 5–8 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moore, M.G.: Theory of Transactional Distance. Routledge (1997). http://www.aged.tamu.edu/research/readings/Distance/1997MooreTransDistance.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  12. Merrill, M.D.: First principles of instruction. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 50(3), 43–59 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore, M.G.: Handbook of Distance Education, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Simarmata, J., Djohar, A., Purba, J., Juanda, E.A.: Joint workshop of KP. In: 2nd International Conference on Mathematics STE, et al. Design of a Blended Learning Environment Based on Merrill’s Principles. Journal of Physics, Conference Series, vol. 954, no. 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lo, C.K., Lie, C.W., Hew, K.F.: Applying “first principles of instruction” as a design theory of the flipped classroom: findings from a collective study of four secondary school subjects. Comput. Educ. 118, 150–165 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tu, W., Snyder, M.M.: Developing conceptual understanding in a statistics course: Merrill’s first principles and real data at work. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 65(3), 579–595 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pariksha Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Singh, P., Bheemraj, K., Harangee, J., Prinsloo, T. (2022). Using Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction to Reshape the Assessments Structure of a Fundamental First-Year Course. In: Antipova, T. (eds) Digital Science. DSIC 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 381. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93677-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics