Skip to main content

The Right to Food and the Essential Promotion of Personal Autonomy: The ‘How’ Matters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics of Charitable Food

Abstract

Given the EU’s current campaign to reduce food waste, the redistribution of unsaleable food via food charities is reaching a level that was unknown barely a decade ago. While acknowledging that gestures of compassion and solidarity are a feature of every society, this chapter looks at food redistribution from the perspective of human rights. The human right to food is not, according to the United Nations, a right to be fed, but a right to feed oneself in a regular and autonomous way, in accordance with personal needs and choices. Recognising and implementing this right implies removing those obstacles that hinder people’s access to the food they need. In the wealthier regions of the world such as the European Union, where 180 kg of food per person are wasted every year, it is incomprehensible that a quarter of the population live under the minimum income threshold. Many factors explain the paradox behind the EU statistics relating to food waste and food deprivation; what is inexplicable is the inaction and the lack of commitment demonstrated by institutions that claim to “have benefited citizens by working for peace and prosperity”. EU food is supposed to meet some of the world’s highest quality standards, but many Europeans simply do not have the purchasing power necessary to enjoy that food.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, B. A. (1981). Social justice in the liberal state. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, P., & Tomasevski, K. (Eds.). (1984). The right to food. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo Aparicio, A., & Escajedo San-Epifanio, L. (2015). Edible but unsalable food: Ethical and legal challenges in the EU. In E. D. Dumitras, I. M. Jitea, & S. Aerts (Eds.), Know your food. Food ethics and innovation (pp. 407–413). Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. (2010). Solidarity and the Commission’s ‘renewed social agenda’. In M. Ross & Y. Borgmann-Prebil (Eds.), Promoting solidarity in the European Union (pp. 73–105). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D. (1995). What future for economic and social rights? Political Studies, 4, 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch-Geertsema, V. (2010). Defining and measuring homelessness in Europe. In E. O’Sullivan, V. Busch-Geertsema, D. Quifars, & N. Pleace (Eds.), Homelessness research in Europe (pp. 19–39). FEANTSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch-Geertsema, V., Culhane, D., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2016). Developing a global framework for conceptualising and measuring homelessness. Habitat International, 5, 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caritas Europa. (2014). The European crisis and its human cost. https://www.caritas.eu/the-european-crisis-and-its-human-cost/

  • Caritas Europa. (2015). Poverty and inequalities on the rise. https://www.caritas.eu/poverty-inequalities-rise/

  • Christensen, C. (1978). The right to food: How to guarantee. Alternatives, IV(1978–1979), 181–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauwaert, S., & Shöman, I. (2013). The protection of fundamental social rights in times of crisis: A trade union battlefield. Arbeitsvölkerrecht, 239–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtis, C. (2007). The right to food as justiciable right: Challenges and strategies. In A. von Bogdandy, & R. Wolfrum (Eds.). Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 11, 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Schutter, O., & Cordes, K. Y. (Eds.). (2011). Accounting for hunger. The right to food in the era of globalisation. Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal human rights in theory and practice (3rd ed.). Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (2006). Is democracy possible here? Principles of a new political debate. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elmes, M. B., Mendoza-Abarca, K., & Hersh, R. (2016). Food banking, ethical sense making, and social innovation in an era of growing hunger in the United States. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(5), 122–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escajedo San-Epifanio, L. (2012). El derecho humano al alimento: principios constitucionales para un orden agroalimentario global. In Constitución y democracia: ayer y hoy, Libro Homenaje a Antonio Torres del Moral (Vol. 2, pp. 2039–2058). Universitas Editores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escajedo San-Epifanio, L. (2015). Challenging food governance models: Analyzing the food citizen and the emerging food constitutionalism from an EU Perspective. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(3), 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escajedo San-Epifanio, L. (2016). The politics of food waste and food poverty in the EU: Some ethical reflections. In A. I. Olsson, S. M. Araújo, & M. F. Vieira (Eds.), Food futures: Ethics, science and culture (pp. 360–368). Wageningen Academic Publisher.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Esteve Pardo, J. (2013). La nueva relación entre el Estado y la sociedad. Aproximación al transfondo de la crisis. Marcial Pons.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. COM(2011) 571 final. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/com-2011-571-roadmap-to

  • European Commission. (2014). Tacking stock of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable, inclusive growth 2014. DOC COM (2014), 130 final/2. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/taking-stock-europe-2020-strategy-smart-sustainable-and-inclusive-growth_en

  • European Commission. (2015). Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the circular economy. COM/ 2015/ 0614 final. https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/com-2015-0614-final

  • European Commission. (2016). Working document to prepare EU guidelines on food donation. DG SANCO, June 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2012). European Parliament resolution of 19 January 2012 on how to avoid food wastage: Strategies for a more efficient food chain in the EU (2011/2175(INI)). Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2012-0014+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN

  • Fédération Européenne d’Associations Nationales Travaillant avec les Sans-Abri AISBL (FEANTSA). (n.d.). ETHOS – European typology of homelessness and housing exclusion. https://www.feantsa.org/download/en-16822651433655843804.pdf

  • García Cotarelo, R. (1988). Proceso histórico del bienestar: la consolidación del Estado del bienestar. Documentación Social, 71, 17–38. ISSN 0417-8106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, P. (2005). The commodity question: New thinking on old problems (Human development report office, occasional paper 13). United Nations Development Programme. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2005_gibbon_peter_13.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerris, M., & Gaiani, S. (2015). Values in the trash: Ethical aspects of food waste. In L. Escajedo & M. de Renobales (Eds.), Envisioning a future without food waste and food poverty: Societal challenges (pp. 53–62).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gysing, C. (1999). Der Schutz des Existenzminimums in der Schweiz. Helbing and Lichtenhahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • González Vaqué, L. (2018). La transparencia y la sostenibilidad de la determinación del riesgo en la cadena alimentaria de la UE: Propuesta de la Comisión para modificar el Reglamento (CE) núm. 178/2002, Unión Europea Aranzadi, ISSN 1579-0452, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, C. (2007). Globalisation and labour rights: The conflict between core labour rights and international economic law. Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, S., & Raimmondos-Moller, P. (1999). Altruism, trade policy and the optimality of foreign aid. In K. L. Gupta (Ed.), Foreign aid: New perspectives (pp. 21–35). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T., & Heasman, M. (2015). Food wars: The global battle for mouths, minds and markets. Earthscan, Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lissel, E. (2015). Food laws and labelling as a contributor to food waste. In L. Escajedo San Epifanio & M. de Renobales (Eds.), Envisioning a future without food waste and food poverty: Societal challenges (pp. 47–52). Wageningen.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maroney, T. A. (2009). Emotional common sense and constitutional law. Vanderbilt Law Review, 62, 851.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connel, P. (2012). Vindicating socio-economic rights. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poppendieck, J. (1998). Sweet charity? Emergency food and the end of entitlement. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riches, G., & Silvasti, T. (Eds.). (2014). First World hunger revisited. Food charity or the right to food? Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, C. (2007). Food insecurity as market failure. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition, 1(4), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanish Senate. (2018). Ponencia de estudio sobre el desperdicio alimentario. Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales, D12_257_2044. Accessed at: www. senado.es.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, P. (1985). The right to food in historical perspective. Food Policy, 10(4), 306–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, P. (2006). Justiciability of the right to food: Interdisciplinary, transversal character and conflicts. In M. Borghi & P. Postiglione Blommenstein (Eds.), The right to adequate food and access to justice. Bruyland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, R. C. (2004). The second Bill of Rights: FDR’s unfinished revolution and why we need it more than ever. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. H. (1995). Common sense and fact-finding: Cultural reason in judicial decisions. Legal Studies, 19, 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • UDHR (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights, GA Res 217A (III), UN GAOR, UN Doc A/810

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2014). Prevention and reduction of food and drink waste in businesses and households. Guidance for governments, local authorities, businesses and other organisations, Version 1.0. https://wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/Prevention%20and%20reduction%20of%20food%20and%20drink%20waste%20in%20business%20and%20households.pdf

  • United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (UN-OHCHR). (1966). International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights (ICESCR). Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI) of December 1966, entry into force 3 January 1976, in accordance with article 27. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx

  • United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (UN-OHCHR). (1999). CESCR General Comment No. 12: The right to adequate food (art. 11). E/C.12/1999/5.https://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838c11.html

  • Vlaholias, E. G., Thompson, K., Every, D., & Dawson, D. (2015). Reducing food waste through charity: Exploring the giving and receiving of redistributed food. In L. Escajedo San-Epifanio & M. de Renobales (Eds.), Envisioning a future without food waste and food poverty. Societal challenges (pp. 271–278). Wageningen.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vorley, W. (2003). Food Inc: Corporate concentration from farm to consumer. UK Food Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolvers, A., Tappe, O., Salverda, T., & Schwarz, T. (2015). Introduction. In T. Salverda, O. Tappe, & A. Hollington (Eds.), Concepts of the Global South. Voices from around the world. Global South Studies Center, University of Köln. https://www.academia.edu/26813836/Concepts_of_the_Global_South_Voices_from_Around_the_World_

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. (2003). Le droit à l’alimentation. Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was developed as part of the multidisciplinary group URBAN ELIKA – Studies on Food and Society (Universidad del País Vasco/EHU) and the Basque University System Research Group on Multilevel Governance (Principal Investigator: Alberto López Basaguren).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leire Escajedo San-Epifanio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

San-Epifanio, L.E. (2022). The Right to Food and the Essential Promotion of Personal Autonomy: The ‘How’ Matters. In: Escajedo San-Epifanio, L., Rebato Ochoa, E.M. (eds) Ethics of Charitable Food. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93600-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics