Abstract
Composite structures are commonly used in bridge and building construction. A typical example is a bridge deck comprising of concrete slab and steel beam girders, with shear connectors linking the concrete slab and the steel beams to form the composite effect. The behaviour of a composite structure is dependent not only on the condition of the main constituent components, namely concrete slab and the steel beams, but also on the effectiveness of the shear connectors. In fact, the influences of damage to the main components (herein called flexural damage) and damage to the shear connectors on the overall structural performance are distinctively different. Therefore it is important that damages in a composite structure be distinguished between these two types of parameters. However, not much attention has been paid in differentiating the flexural and shear connector damages in the existing damage identification literature. In this paper we will provide an overall discussion on the distinctive effects of flexural and shear-connector damages to the rigidity and its distribution in a composite beam. A vibration based approach is then presented for the identification of the mixed presence of flexural and shear-link damage parameters by means of supervised machine learning. The wavelet packet node energy (WPNE), which has been shown to be sensitive to structural changes in previous studies, is chosen as input features. Appropriate selection of the wavelet packet transformation levels in the case using a single measurement sensor, as well as using multiple sensors, are discussed. Results demonstrate that with WPNE features combined with supervised machine learning, it is possible to differentiate and identify flexural and shear-connector damages, and hence the actual structural condition, of a composite beam.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Avci O, et al (2021) A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: from traditional methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning applications. Mech Syst Signal Process. 147: p. 107077
Sun Z, Chang C (2002) Structural damage assessment based on wavelet packet transform. J Struct Eng 128(10):1354–1361
Diao YS, Li HJ, Wang Y (2006) A two-step structural damage detection approach based on wavelet packet analysis and neural network. In: 2006 International conference on machine learning and cybernetics. IEEE
Peng X-L, Hao H, Li Z-X (2012) Application of wavelet packet transform in subsea pipeline bedding condition assessment. Eng Struct 39:50–65
Chen G, Zheng Q (2018) Online chatter detection of the end milling based on wavelet packet transform and support vector machine recursive feature elimination. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(1):775–784
Yen GG, Lin K-C (2000) Wavelet packet feature extraction for vibration monitoring. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 47(3):650–667
Dietterich TG, Kong EB (1995) Machine learning bias, statistical bias, and statistical variance of decision tree algorithms. Citeseer
Mehta P et al (2019) A high-bias, low-variance introduction to machine learning for physicists. Phys Rep 810:1–124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gu, Y., Lu, Y. (2023). Assessment of Damage in Composite Beams with Wavelet Packet Node Energy Features and Machine Learning. In: Wu, Z., Nagayama, T., Dang, J., Astroza, R. (eds) Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Engineering Structures. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 224. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93236-7_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93236-7_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93235-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93236-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)