Skip to main content

Optical and Electrochemical Characterisation of Carbon Anodes with Varying Porosity and Coke Quality

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Light Metals 2022

Abstract

The performance of carbon anodes in aluminium production will depend on both the coke quality (impurities, structure) and the physical properties of the anode (density, permeability, electric resistivity). Here, a set of industrial anodes of different porosity and permeability, and a set of pilot-scale anodes of different calcined petrol cokes (CPC) were evaluated with respect to the anode potential, voltage oscillations, and double-layer capacitance. Electrochemical characterisation of anodes with different permeability showed that the voltage oscillations due to CO2 bubble formation on the horizontal anode surface was inversely correlated to the permeability, with the highest oscillations observed for dense anodes. Evaluating pilot-scale anodes with different source CPC (1.4–5.5 wt% S), no significant differences were observed for the overpotential in the absence of bubbles. The anode made from isotropic coke showed a significantly higher double-layer capacitance than the anisotropic anodes, indicating better wetting properties towards the electrolyte.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Thonstad J et al. (2001) Aluminium Electrolysis: Fundamentals of the Hall-Héroult Process. Aluminium-Verlag, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kvande H, Haupin W (2000) Cell Voltage in Aluminum Electrolysis: A Practical Approach. JOM 52(2):31–37

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards L (2015) The History and Future Challenges of Calcined Petroleum Coke Production and Use in Aluminum Smelting. JOM 67(2):308–321

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards L et al. (2012) Evolution of Anode Grade Coke Quality. In: Suarez, CE (ed) Light Metals 2012. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society; Springer, pp 1204–1212

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jones SS, Hildebrandt RD (1979) Influence of High-Sulfur Cokes on Anode Performance. In: Peterson, WS (ed) Light Metals 1979. Metallurgical Society of AIME, pp 553–574

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tran KN et al. (2009) Influence of Sulfur and Metal Microconstituents on the Reactivity of Carbon Anodes. Energy Fuels, 23(4):1909–1924

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eidet T (1997) Reactions on Carbon Anodes in Aluminium Electrolysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  8. Houston GJ, Øye HA (1985) Consumption of anode carbon during aluminium electrolysis. I-III. Aluminium 61:251–254, 346–349, 426, 428

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards L et al. (2009) Use of Shot Coke as an Anode Raw Material. In: Bearne, G (ed) Light Metals 2009. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society; Wiley, pp 985–990

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sommerseth C (2016) The Effect of Production Parameters on the Performance of Carbon Anodes for Aluminium Production. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thorne RJ et al. (2015) Correlation between Coke Type, Microstructure and Anodic Reaction Overpotential in Aluminium Electrolysis. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162(12):E296–E307

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thorne RJ et al. (2015) Bubble Evolution and Anode Surface Properties in Aluminium Electrolysis. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162(8):E104–E114

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gebarowski W et al. (2017) Effect of Coke Properties on the Bubble Formation at the Anodes During Aluminium Electrolysis in Laboratory Scale. In: Ratvik, AP (ed) Light Metals 2017. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society; Springer, pp 1203–1211

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gebarowski W et al. (2016) Interfacial Boundary between Carbon Anodes and Molten Salt Electrolyte. In: Williams, E (ed) Light Metals 2016. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society; Springer, pp 883–888

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thorne RJ et al. (2014) Understanding Anode Overpotential. In: Grandfield, J (ed) Light Metals 2014. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society; Wiley, pp 1213–1217

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kiss LI, Poncsák S (2002) Effect of the Bubble Growth Mechanism on the Spectrum of Voltage Fluctuations in the Reduction Cell. In: Schneider, WA (ed) Light Metals 2002. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society; pp 217–223

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kisza A, Thonstad J, Eidet T (1996) An Impedance Study of the Kinetics and Mechanism of the Anodic Reaction on Graphite Anodes in Saturated Cryolite-Alumina Melts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 143(6):1840–1847

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jahrsengene G et al. (2019) Reactivity of Coke in Relation to Sulfur Level and Microstructure. In: Chesonis, C (ed) Light Metals 2019. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society; Springer, pp 1247–1253

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jahrsengene G et al. (2018) A XANES Study of Sulfur Speciation and Reactivity in Cokes for Anodes Used in Aluminum Production. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 49(3):1434–1443

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jahrsengene G et al. (2019) An EXAFS and XANES Study of V, Ni, and Fe Speciation in Cokes for Anodes Used in Aluminum Production. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 50(6):2969–2981

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harrington DA, Conway BE (1987) ac Impedance of Faradaic Reactions Involving Electrosorbed Intermediates—I. Kinetic theory. Electrochim. Acta 32(12):1703–1712

    Google Scholar 

  22. Orazem M et al. (2013) Dielectric Properties of Materials Showing Constant-Phase-Element (CPE) Impedance Response. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160:C215–C225

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jarek S, Thonstad J (1987) Double-layer capacitance and polarization potential of baked carbon anodes in cryolite-alumina melts. J. Appl. Electrochem. 17(6):1203–1212

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sommerseth C et al. (2016) Electrochemical Reactivity and Wetting Properties of Anodes Made from Anisotropic and Isotropic Cokes. In: Williams, E (ed) Light Metals 2016. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society; Springer,  pp 865–870

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sommerseth C et al. (2019) Electrochemical Behaviour of Carbon Anodes Produced with Different Mixing Temperatures and Baking Levels—A Laboratory Study. In: Chesonis, C (ed) Light Metals 2019. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society; Springer, pp 1311–1318

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gøril Jahrsengene .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jahrsengene, G., Farahani, M.F., Linga, H., Svensson, AM. (2022). Optical and Electrochemical Characterisation of Carbon Anodes with Varying Porosity and Coke Quality. In: Eskin, D. (eds) Light Metals 2022. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92529-1_111

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics