Abstract
Current trends indicate that Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tools are going to be extremely important for companies in the forthcoming years. New laws and standards are increasingly taking environmental aspects into account but, for non-experts in LCA, it can be difficult to find software suited to their studies. This paper aims to analyze the ability of simplified LCA software to combine a simple and convenient interface with relevant and exploitable results. This work tries to show which LCA tools are usable in preliminary analysis performed by non-experts like students in mechanical engineering or designers. Various assessments were studied with different tools: ArtoACV, Ecodesign Studio, Bilan Produit, and Umberto LCA+. An evaluation grid was drawn up to compare the tools according to objective and non-objective criteria. The case studies were carried out separately in order to remain as objective as possible. In this paper, the studies were made by two students in the first year of a Master’s degree in mechanical engineering at INSA Toulouse. This paper shows that the four software packages enable a preliminary LCA to be finalized and propose graphs and tables for a better understanding of results. Even though tools generally allow the users to reach the same conclusions, some parameters persist that can strongly influence the result. Designers should keep in mind that results may not be consistent for their projects and may depend strongly on the hypothesis of the study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Clusel, F.: L’ACV comme outil de reconception et de conduite du changement. Technique de l’ingénieur, Ref. 0240, pp. 1–3 (2014). https://www-techniques-ingenieur-fr.gorgone.univ-toulouse.fr/fiche-pratique/innovation-th10/deployer-l-innovation-dt30/download/0240/l-acv-comme-outil-de-reconception-et-de-conduite-du-changement.html
Klöpffer, W.: Life cycle assessment. Environmen. Sci. Pollut. Res. 4(4), 223–228 (1997)
Guinee, J.B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., et al.: Life Cycle Assessment: Past, Present, and Future (2011)
Deng, C., et al.: Integration and optimization of LCA and LCC to eco-balance for mechanical product design. In: 2008 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, pp. 1085-1090. IEEE (2008)
Shi, J., Wang, Y., Fan, S., Ma, Q., Jin, H.: An integrated environment and cost assessment method based on LCA and LCC for mechanical product manufacturing. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 24(1), 64–77 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1497-x
Rousseaux, P.: Analyse du Cycle de Vie (ACV). Technique de l’ingénieur. Ref. G5500 V1, pp.2–4 (2005). https://www-techniques-ingenieur-fr.gorgone.univ-toulouse.fr/base-documentaire/42552210-environnement-et-construction/download/g5500/analyse-du-cycle-de-vie-acv.html
Finkbeiner, M., Inaba, A., Tan, R., Christiansen, K., Klüppel, H.-J.: The New International Standards for Life Cycle Assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11(2), 80–85 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.02.002
Finnveden, G., et al.: Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 91(1), 1–21 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018
Guo, M., Murphy, R.J.: LCA data quality: sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 435, 230–243 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.006
Cappelli, F., Delogu, M., Pierini, M.: Integration of LCA and EcoDesign guideline in a virtual cad framework. In: Proceedings of LCE, pp. 185–188 (2006)
Marosky, N., Dose, J., Fleischer, G., et al.: Challenges of data transfer between CAD and LCA software tools. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management. University of Zurich, Irchel, Switzerland (2007)
Chen, Z., Tao, J., Suiran, Y.: A feature-based CAD-LCA software integration approach for eco-design. Procedia CIRP 61, 721–726 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.228
ARTOGREEN Homepage. http://www.artogreen.com/
Base IMPACT Homepage. http://www.base-impacts.ademe.fr/
ECOdesign Studio Homepage. https://www.ecodesign-studio.com/
Ifu Hamburg Homepage. https://www.ifu.com/en/umberto
Martínez, E., Blanco, J., Jiménez, E., Saenz-Díez, J.C., Sanz, S.F.J.: Comparative evaluation of life cycle impact assessment software tools through a wind turbine case study. Renew. Energy 74, 237–246 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.004
Sylcat Homepage. https://sylcat.eu/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pongérard, M., San Augustin, F., Paredes, M. (2022). Comparison of Tools for Simplified Life Cycle Assessment in Mechanical Engineering. In: Cavas Martínez, F., Peris-Fajarnes, G., Morer Camo, P., Lengua Lengua, I., Defez García, B. (eds) Advances in Design Engineering II. INGEGRAF 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92426-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92426-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92425-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92426-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)