Skip to main content

Uncertainty Quantification of Model Predictions Due to Fluid Flow in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of IN625

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
TMS 2022 151st Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

  • 3430 Accesses

Abstract

Computational modeling of the laser powder bed fusion process is often restricted to the conduction dominant regime whereby advective heat transfer and fluid flow can be disregarded. Under processing conditions that result in high energy densities, fluid flow driven by Marangoni effects influences the uncertainty in solidification dynamics and melt pool dimensions which affect the as-built microstructure and scan strategies development. Using a computational fluid dynamics model for melt pool predictions of Inconel 625, and applying sparse grids and interpolation techniques, the uncertainty in input parameters including thermophysical properties and the surface tension gradient can be propagated to predictions of cooling rates and melt pool geometries. Results show the uncertainty in surface tension gradient had the largest effect on melt pool dimensions, whereas uncertainty in laser absorptivity and specific heat capacity were the most influential on the solidification dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brackbill JU, Kothe DB, Zemach C (1992) A continuum method for modeling surface tension. J Comput Phys 100:335–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(92)90240-Y

  2. Svenungsson J, Choquet I, Kaplan AFH (2015) Laser welding process—a review of Keyhole welding modelling. Phys Procedia 78:182–191

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guo SH, Zou JL, Xiao RS (2020) Characterizations of welding mode transformation process during 1-μm and 10-μm laser welding. AIP Adv 10. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5132776

  4. Assuncao E, Williams S, Yapp D (2012) Interaction time and beam diameter effects on the conduction mode limit. Opt Lasers Eng 50:823–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman J, Plotkowski A, Stump B et al (2020) Sensitivity of thermal predictions to uncertain surface tension data in laser additive manufacturing.J Heat Transfer 142:122201–1–122201–13.https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047916

  6. Sahoo P, Debroy T, McNallan MJ (1988) Surface tension of binary metal-surface active solute systems under conditions relevant to welding metallurgy. Metall Trans B 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02657748

  7. Mills KC, Su YC (2006) Review of surface tension data for metallic elements and alloys: part 1—pure metals. Int Mater Rev 51:329–351

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hayashi M, Jakobsson A, Tanaka T, Seetharaman S (2003) Surface tension of the nickel-based superalloy CMSX-4. High Temp - High Press, 35–36.https://doi.org/10.1068/htjr123

  9. Li Z, Mills KC, McLean M, Mukai K (2005) Measurement of the density and surface tension of Ni-based superalloys in the liquid and mushy states. Metall Mater Trans B 36:247–254.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-005-0026-z

  10. Ricci E, Giuranno D, Novakovic R et al (2007) Density, surface tension, and viscosity of CMSX-4 ® superalloy. Int J Thermophys 28:1304–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-007-0257-0

  11. Vinet B, Schneider S, Garandet JP et al (2004) Surface tension measurements on CMSX-4 superalloy by the drop-weight and oscillating-drop methods.Int J Thermophys 25:1889–1903https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-004-7743-4

  12. Higuchi K, Fecht HJ, Wunderlich RK (2007) Surface tension and viscosity of the Ni-based superalloy CMSX-4 measured by the oscillating drop method in parabolic flight experiments. AdvEng Mater 9:349–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200600277

  13. Wells S, Plotkowski A, Krane MJM (2021) Propagation of input uncertainties in numerical simulations of laser powder bed fusion. Metall Trans B 52:3016–3031

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stoyanov M (2015) User manual: Tasmanian sparse grids. Oak Ridge: National Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stoyanov M (2018) Adaptive sparse grid construction in a context of local anisotropy and multiple hierarchical parents. In: Sparse grids and Applications - Miami 2016. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering. Springer. pp 175–199

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morrow Z, Stoyanov M (2020) A Method for dimensionally adaptive sparse trigonometric interpolation of periodic functions. SIAM J Sci Comput 42. A2436–A2460 https://doi.org/10.1137/19m1283483

  17. Stoyanov MK, Webster CG (2016) A dynamically adaptive sparse grids method for quasi-optimal interpolation of multidimensional functions. Comput Math Appl 71: 2449–2465

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stoyanov M, Lebrun-Grandie D, Burkardt J, Munster D (2013) Tasmanian. https://github.com/ORNL/TASMANIAN

  19. Carman PC (1939) Permeability of saturated sands, soils and clays. J Agric Sci 29:262–273.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600051789

  20. Carman PC (1997) Fluid flow through granular beds. Process Saf Environ Prot: Trans Inst Chem Eng, Part B 75:532–548

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kozeny J (1927) Ueber kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden. Sitzungsber Akad Wiss 136(2a), pp 271–306. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien 136

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Wells .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wells, S., Krane, M.J.M. (2022). Uncertainty Quantification of Model Predictions Due to Fluid Flow in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of IN625. In: TMS 2022 151st Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92381-5_101

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics