Skip to main content

Interface Analysis Criteria for Mobile Devices: A Systematic Mapping

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI-COLLAB 2021)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the digitization process. Interface design and human-computer interaction become political tools in this context, which can guarantee quality in the experience of users of mobile devices, reducing these social distances. In this study a systematic mapping was executed to clarify the outlines of criteria that are commonly evaluated on mobile device interfaces in the light of the literature, trying to emphasize more specific aspects, investigating the heuristics, metrics, and recommendations described in each study. This mapping identified 65 heuristics, which were divided into four groups: Usability, User Experience, Accessibility, and Aesthetics. Further research is needed to investigate how to structure the heuristics in a way that facilitates understanding, consultation, and the evaluation processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Airtable – https://airtable.com/.

  2. 2.

    Miro – https://miro.com/.

References

  1. Iivari, N., Sharma, S., Ventä-Olkkonen, L.: Digital transformation of everyday life–How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care? Int. J. Inf. Manag. 1(55), 102183 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., Mattsson, M.: Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), 12 June 2008, pp. 1–10 (2008). https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.8

  3. Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews 33(2004), 1–26. Keele University, Keele (2004). ISSN:1353-7776

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dermeval, D., Coelho, J.A., Bittencourt, I.I.: Mapeamento sistemático e revisao sistemática da literatura em informática na educaçao. In: Jaques, P.A., Pimentel, M., Siqueira, Sean, Bittencourt, I.G. (eds.) Metodologia de Pesquisa em Informática na Educação: Abordagem Quantitativa de Pesquisa. SBC, Porto Alegre (2019). https://metodologia.ceie-br.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/livro2_cap3.pdf

  5. Mickalowski, K., Mickelson, M., Keltgen, J.: Apple’s iPhone launch: a case study in effective marketing. Bus. Rev. 9(2), 283–288 (2008). https://5y1.org/download/0e13f6d318da37175441054f0af0f177.pdf

  6. Abubakar, H.I., Hashim, N.L., Hussain, A.: Usability evaluation model for mobile banking applications interface: model evaluation process using experts’ panel. J. Telecommun. Electron. Comput. Eng. (JTEC). 8(10), 53–57 (2016). e-ISSN: 2289-8131

    Google Scholar 

  7. Inal, Y.: Heuristic-based user interface evaluation of the mobile centralized doctor appointment system: a case study. Electron. Libr. (2019). ISSN: 0264-0473

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ivanc, D., Vasiu, R., Onita, M.: Usability evaluation of a lms mobile web interface. In: Skersys, T., Butleris, R., Butkiene, R. (eds.) ICIST 2012. CCIS, vol. 319, pp. 348–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33308-8_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Lumsden, J., MacLean, R.: A comparison of pseudo-paper and paper prototyping methods for mobile evaluations. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5333, pp. 538–547. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Machado Neto, O., Pimentel, M.D.: Heuristics for the assessment of interfaces of mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web, pp. 93–96 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2526188.2526237

  11. Nayebi, F., Desharnais, J.M., Abran, A.: The state of the art of mobile application usability evaluation. In: 2012 25th IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2012.6334930

  12. Omar, K., Rapp, B., Gómez, J.M.: Heuristic evaluation checklist for mobile ERP user interfaces. In: 2016 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS), pp. 180–185. IEEE (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/IACS.2016.7476107

  13. Orlandini, G., Castadelli, G., Presumido Braccialli, L.: Ergonomics and usability in sound dimension: evaluation of a haptic and acoustic interface application for mobile devices. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2014. LNCS, vol. 8518, pp. 193–202. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07626-3_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pathak, A., Kumazawa, I.: Usability evaluation of touch panel-based mobile device on user interface with multimodal feedback. In: IEEE-International Conference on Advances in Engineering, Science and Management (ICAESM-2012), pp. 703–708. IEEE (2012). e-ISBN: 978-81-909042-2-3

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soui, M., Chouchane, M., Gasmi, I., Mkaouer, M.W.: PLAIN: PLugin for predicting the usAbility of Mobile User INterface. In: VISIGRAPP (1: GRAPP), pp. 127–136 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5220/0006171201270136

  16. Wang, S., Li, B., Zhu, Y.: Comprehensive evaluation of usability at the mobile end interface. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2019 Jul 1, vol. 573, no. 1, p. 012037. IOP Publishing (2019). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/573/1/012037/meta

  17. Yáñez, G.R., Cascado, C.D., Sevillano, J.L.: Heuristic evaluation on mobile interfaces: a new checklist. Sci. World J. 1, 2014 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/434326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arrue, M., Vigo, M., Abascal, J.: Automatic evaluation of mobile web accessibility. In: Stephanidis, C., Pieper, M. (eds.) UI4ALL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4397, pp. 244–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71025-7_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Carvalho, L.P., Ferreira, L.P., Freire, A.P.: Accessibility evaluation of rich internet applications interface components for mobile screen readers. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 181–186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2851613.2851680

  20. De Barros, A.C., Leitão, R., Ribeiro, J.: Design and evaluation of a mobile user interface for older adults: navigation, interaction and visual design recommendations. Procedia Comput. Sci. 1(27), 369–378 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kobayashi, M., Hiyama, A., Miura, T., Asakawa, C., Hirose, M., Ifukube, T.: Elderly user evaluation of mobile touchscreen interactions. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6946, pp. 83–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23774-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Nathan, S.S., Hussain, A., Hashim, N.L.: Usability evaluation of DEAF mobile application interface: a systematic review. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 13(2), 291–297 (2018). ISSN 1816-949X

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rezae, M., Chen, N., McMeekin, D., Tan, T., Krishna, A., Lee, H.: The evaluation of a mobile user interface for people on the autism spectrum: an eye movement study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1(142), 102462 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruzic L., Harrington C. N., Sanford J. A. Design and evaluation of mobile interfaces for an aging population. InProc. 10th Int. Conf. Adv. Comput.-Hum. Interact.(ACHI) 2017 Mar (pp. 305–309). Recovered from: https://www.thinkmind.org/download.php?articleid=achi_2017_15_10_28016

  25. Smaradottir B., Håland J., Martinez S. Accessibility of Mobile Devices for Visually Impaired Users: An Evaluation of the Screen-Reader VoiceOver. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2017 Jan 1;245:1381-. Recovered from: https://europepmc.org/article/med/29295460

  26. Muslim E., Lestari R. A., Hazmy A. I., Alvina S. User interface evaluation of mobile application krl access using user experience approach. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2019 Apr 1 (Vol. 508, No. 1, p. 012110). IOP Publishing. Recovered from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/508/1/012110/meta

  27. Veldsman A., van Greunen D. Comparative usability evaluation of a mobile health app. In2017 IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa) 2017 May 30 (pp. 1–8). IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.23919/ISTAFRICA.2017.8102383

  28. Zamri K. Y., Al Subhi N. N. 10 user interface elements for mobile learning application development. In2015 International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL) 2015 Nov 19 (pp. 44–50). IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCTL.2015.7359551

  29. Ines, G., Makram, S., Mabrouka, C., Mourad, A.: Evaluation of mobile interfaces as an optimization problem. Procedia computer science. 1(112), 235–248 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miniukovich, A., De Angeli, A.: Visual impressions of mobile app interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational 26 Oct 2014, pp. 31–40 (2014). ISBN: 978-1-4503-2542-4

    Google Scholar 

  31. Warfel, T., Maurer, D.: Card sorting: a definitive guide. Boxes and arrows (2004). http://www.iimagineservicedesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Card-sorting-a-definitive-guide-%C2%AB-Boxes-and-Arrows.pdf

  32. Vaz, F.R., Carvalho, C.L.: Visualização de informações. Universidade Federal de Goiás (2004). https://ww2.inf.ufg.br/sites/default/files/uploads/relatorios-tecnicos/RT-INF_003-04.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karina Sousa de Paula Santos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sousa de Paula Santos, K., Frango Silveira, I. (2021). Interface Analysis Criteria for Mobile Devices: A Systematic Mapping. In: Ruiz, P.H., Agredo-Delgado, V., Kawamoto, A.L.S. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. HCI-COLLAB 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1478. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92325-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92325-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92324-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92325-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics