Skip to main content

Topological Quantum Field Theory and the Emergence of Physical Space–Time from Geometry. New Insights into the Interactions Between Geometry and Physics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Electrons to Elephants and Elections

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

  • 1009 Accesses

Abstract

This paper aims at reviewing various topics and different issues related essentially to topological quantum field theories and string theory. We present recent work and discuss new ideas and results from these topics. We focus on the subject of the geometric and topological structures and invariants, which enriched in a remarkable way relativistic and quantum field theory in the last century, starting from Einstein’s general relativity until string theory. In the last three decades, new and deep developments in this direction have emerged from theoretical physics. We stress the crucial fact that many physical phenomena, at the quantum and at the cosmological level as well, appear to be related to deep geometrical and topological invariants, and furthermore that they are effects which emerge, in a sense, from the geometric structure of space–time. Topological quantum field theory (TQFT) arisen in the eighties as a new relation between mathematics and physics, and appears as a very rich and promising research program in theoretical physics. Two conceptual points appear to be very significant in TQFT, and likely promising for physics. The first is the assumption of an effective correlation between knots and link invariants and the physical observables and states of quantum field theories and gauge theories. The second is, on the one hand, the idea of the fuzziness of space–time and of its emergence from the dynamical fluctuations of physical phenomena, on the other, the idea of the geometric and topological nature of physical process at different scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Finite groups are spacial cases of compact Lie groups. For example, the rotation group SO(3) of the three-dimensional Euclidean space or the gauge group U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3) of the Standard Model in elementary particle physics are compact Lie groups.

  2. 2.

    Recall that if A is an involutive algebra over the complex numbers C, then a Fredholm module over A consists of an involutive representation of A on a Hilbert space H, together with a self-adjoint operator F, of square 1 and such that the commutator [F, a] is a compact operator for all aA.

  3. 3.

    A good example is quantum gravity in 3-dimensional space–time. Classicaly, Einstein’s equations predict qualitatively very different phenomena depending on the dimension of space–time. If space–time has 4 or more dimensions, Einstein’s equations imply that the metric has local degrees of freedom. In other words, the curvature of space–time at a given point is not completely determined by the flow of energy and momentum through that point: it is an independent variable in its own right. For example, even in the vacuum, where the energy–momentum tensor vanishes, localized ripples of curvature can propagate in the form of gravitational radiation. In 3-dimensional space–time, hovewer, Einstein’s equations suffice to completely determine the curvature at a given point of space-tume in terms of the flow of energy and momentum through that point. We thus say that metric has no local degrees of freedom. In particular, in the vacuum the metric is flat, so every small patch of empty space–time looks exactley like every other.

References

  • Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2004). Background independent quantum gravity: A status report. Class Quant Grav, 21, 53–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah, A. (1989). Topological quantum field theories. Publ Math Inst Hautes Etudes Sci, 68, 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah, M. (1988). “New invariants of three-and four-dimensional manifolds,” in The Mathematical Heritage of Hermann Weyl, O. Wells, Jr. (Ed.), Proc Symp Pure Math AMS, 48, 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah (1990). The geometry and physics of knots, Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baez, J., & Muniain, J. P. (1994). Gauge fields, knots and gravity, World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boi, L. (2004a). Geometrical and topological foundations of theoretical physics: from gauge theories to string program. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 34, 1066–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boi, L. (2004b). Theories of space-time in modern physics. Synthese, 139(3), 429–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boi, L. (2006a). “From riemannian geometry to Einstein’s general relativity theory and beyond: Space-time structures, geometrization and unification,” in Proceedings of the Albert Einstein’s century international conference, J.-M. Alimi & A. Füzfa (Eds.) (pp. 1066–1075), American Institute of Physics Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boi, L. (2006b). “Mathematical knot theory,” in Encyclopedia of mathematical physics, J.-P. Françoise, G. Naber & T. S. Sun (Eds.), Elsevier, 399–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boi, L. (2009a). Clifford geometric algebra, spin manifolds, and groups action in mathematics and physics. Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras, 19(3), 611–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boi, L. (2009b). Ideas of geometrization, invariants of low-dimensional manifolds, and topological quantum field theories. International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 6(5), 701–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boi, L. (2011). The quantum vacuum. A scientific and philosophical concept: From electrodynamics to string theory and the geometry of the microscopic world, The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boi, L. (2019a). Some mathematical, epistemological and historical reflections on the relationship between geometry and reality, space-time theory and the geometrization of theoretical physics, from Riemann to Weyl and beyond. Foundations of Science, 24(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boi, L., H. (2019b). “Weyl’s deep insights into the mathematical and physical world. His important contribution to the philosophy of space, time and matter,” in Weyl and the Problem of Space, C. Lobo & B. Julien (Eds.) (pp. 231–263), Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, J. P., & Lawson, H. B. (1982). Yang-Mills theory: Its physical origins and differential geometric aspects. In S.-T. Yau (Ed.), Seminar on differential geometry (pp. 395–421). Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. T. (1997). Conceptual developments of 20th century physics. Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carfora, M. (2011). “Quantum gravity and quantum geometry,” in New trends in geometry. Their role in the natural and life sciences, in C. Bartocci, L. Boi, & C. Sinigaglia (Eds.) (pp. 17–33), Imperial College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, W. K. (1876). On the space-theory of matter. Cambridge Philosophical Society Proceedings, 2, 157–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, W.K. (1968). Mathematical papers (1882), new edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (1985). Aspects of symmetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connes, A., & Chamseddine, A. H. (2006). Inner fluctuations of the spectral action. Journal of Geometry and Physics, 57, 1–21.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Connes, A. (1994). Noncommutative geometry. Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Connes, A. (1996). Gravity coupled with matter and the foundation of non-commutative geometry. Comm Math Phys, 182, 155–176.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Connes, A. (1995). Noncommutative geometry and reality. Journal of Mathematics and Physics, 36, 6194–6231.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Connes, A., & Landi, G. (2001). Noncommutative manifolds, the instanton algebra and isospectral deformations. Comm. Math. Phys., 221, 141–159.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, S. K. (1983). An application of gauge theory to the topology of four manifolds. Journal of Differential Geometry, 18, 269–287.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, S. K. (1990). Polynomials invariants for smooth four-manifolds. Topology, 29, 257–315.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gromov, M., & Lawson, H. B., Jr. (1983). Positive scalar curvature and Dirac operator on complete Riemannian manifolds. Publ. Math. IHÉS, 58, 295–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromov, M. (1985). Pseudo-holomorphic curves in symplectic manifolds. Inventiones Mathematicae, 82, 307–347.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. (1930). The physical principles of the quantum theory. University of Chicago Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Isham, D. (1988). “Topological and global aspects of quantum field theory,” in Relativity, groups and topology II, in B.S. DeWitt & R. Stora (Eds.), (pp. 1059–1290).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S., & Vafa, C. (1997). Matter from geometry. Nuclear Physics B, 497, 146–154.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Labastida, J. M. F., & Lozano, C. (1989). “Lectures on topological quantum field theory”, in Trends in theoretical physics, (Eds). H. Falomir, R. Gamboa & F. Schaposnik (Eds.) AIP, CP 419, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landi, G. (1999). An introduction to noncommutative spaces and their geometries. Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Manin, Y. I. (1988). Gauge field theory and complex geometry. Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marino, M. (2005). Chern–Simons theory and topological strings. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77, 675–720.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1977). The twistor programme. Reports in Mathem Physics, 12, 65–76.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (2004). The road to reality. A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. Vintage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regge, T. (1992). “Physics and differential geometry,” in 1830–1930: A century of geometry, in L. Boi, D. Flament & J.-M. Salanskis (Eds.), Lecture notes in physics, (Vol. 402, pp. 270–272), Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemann, B. (1990). “Über die hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen” (Habilitationsarbeit, Göttingen, 1854), in Gesammelte mathematische werke (new edition edited by R. Narasimhan) (pp. 304–319), Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1954). Quelques propriétés globales des variétés différentiables. Comment Math Helv, 28, 17–86.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, W. P. (1997). Three-dimensional geometry and topology. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turaev, V. (1994). Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds. de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vafa, C. (1998). “Geometric physics”, in Documenta mathematica, Extra Volume ICM, I, 537–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1929). Elektron und gravitation. Zeitschrift Für Physik, 56, 330–352.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1918). Gravitation und Elektrizität. Sitz Ber Königl Preuss Akad Wiss Berlin, 26, 465–480.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1928). Gruppentheorie und quantenmechanik. Hirzel.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Witten, E. (1995). String theory dynamics in various dimensions. Nuclear Physics B, 443, 85–126.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Witten, E. (1988). Topological quantum field theory. Comm Math Phys, 117, 353–386.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Witten, E. (1994). Monopoles and four-manifolds. Mathematical Research Letters, 1(6), 769–796.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. T., & Yang, C. N. (1975). Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields. Phys. Rev. D, 12(12), 3845–3857.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. N., & Mills, R. L. (1954). Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance. Physical Review, 96(1), 191–195.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. N. (1977). Magnetic Monopoles, fiber bundles, and gauge fields. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 294, 86–97.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, E. (2011). Quantum field theory III: Gauge theory—a bridge between mathematicains and physicits. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Boi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boi, L. (2022). Topological Quantum Field Theory and the Emergence of Physical Space–Time from Geometry. New Insights into the Interactions Between Geometry and Physics. In: Wuppuluri, S., Stewart, I. (eds) From Electrons to Elephants and Elections. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92192-7_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics