Skip to main content

History of Family Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methodologies

Abstract

Family Science encompasses the scholarly study of families as well as applying best practices for intervention and education. Family Science programs are tied to distinct, although related, disciplines and academic units founded to address issues related to families. An exploration of the discipline across three centuries facilitates an understanding not only of the history but also the future promise of Family Science. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the history of the Family Science discipline and demonstrate how social, cultural, and academic forces shaped the study of the family. The epistemology and assumptions inherent in the discipline are a product of the context, norms, and stakeholders involved. Changes in the terminology used to describe the discipline itself (from Domestic Science to Home Economics, to Family Studies and Human Development, and finally to Family Science) indicate shifts in the theoretical conception of the discipline and the practical application of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, B. N. (1970). Isolation, function, and beyond. Journal of Marriage and Family, 32(4), 575–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. R., & Lavender-Stott, E. S. (2020). Preparing the educators who teach about families: Engaging family science in the university setting. Family Relations, 69(3), 442–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. R., Lloyd, S. A., Few, A., & l. (2009). Preface and reclaiming feminist theory, method, and praxes for family studies. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies. (pp. vii–ix & pp. 3–17). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, P. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248–261). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bane, L. (1955). The story of Isabel Bevier. Chas. A. Bennett, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, R. (1959). Race: Science and politics. The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson , V. L., Acock, A. C., Allen, K. R., Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Klein, D. M. (Eds.). (2005). Sourcebook of family theory & research. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1983). In B. H. Settles & M. L. Liprie (Eds.), [Video]. The development of women’s studies and family sociology in higher education: An interview with Jessie Bernard. University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1987). Preface and introduction. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage & the family (pp. xii–xiv). Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L. B. (2014). Making connections: Toward a transdisciplinary family science. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L. B. (2015). Enter act II: JFTR, 2014-18. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorstin, D. J. (1965). The Americans: The national experience. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, A. M. (2002). The origins of Women’s activism: New York and Boston 1797–1840. University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. M. (1995). Philosophical studies of home economics in the United States: Our practical intellectual heritage, I & II. Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, C., & Few-Demo, A. L. (2018). Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(2), 327–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, D. (2009). Challenges in FLE: Defining and promoting the profession. In D. J. Bredehoft (Ed.), Family life education: Integrating theory and practice. National Council on Family Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. T. (1964). Development of the family field of study. In H. T. Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 3–32). Rand McNally & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, C. L., & Cole, A. L. (2012). The initiation of marriage and family therapy. In R. H. Rubin & B. H. Settles (Eds.), Groves monographs on marriage and family: Vol. 2. The groves conference on marriage and family: History and impact on family science (pp. 63–86). University of Michigan Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, L. (1995). On peopleware. Yourdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, J. (1981). Contributions of the United States Office of Education to home economics teacher education. In E. M. Ray (Ed.), Home economics education: Sixty significant years (pp. 187–225). McKnight Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Labor. (1946). Women’s Bureau [Brochure].

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvall, E. M. (1957, 1967, 1971). Family development. J. B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, L. (1991). Women, family, and utopia. Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P. C. (1987). video. In B. H. Settles & M. L. Liprie (Eds.), Demography and the family: An interview with Paul C. Glick. University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravassi, S. M. (2014). Locating the family field on academia’s map: Taking the path toward intentional leadership or inadvertently following the road to perdition? In Gravassi, S. M., Wilson, S.M., Ganong, L. & Zvonkovic, A., Furthering the conversation on the future of the discipline of family science: Comments on the articles of Hamon & Smith and Hans. Family Relations, 63(3), 335–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravassi, S. M., & Gee, G. (2018). Land- Grant universities for the future: Higher education for the public good. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. S., & Lindsey, G. (1957). Theories of personality. John Wiley & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamon, R. R., & Smith, S. S. (2017). Family science as translational science: A history of the discipline. Family Relations, 66(4), 550–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hans, J. C. (2014). Whither famology? Department trends across four decades. Family Relations, 63(3), 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., & Hansen, D. A. (1964). Families under stress. In H. T. Christensen & H. T. (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 782–822). Rand McNally & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, C. L. (1942, 1958). The life of Ellen H. Richards. American Home Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, L. D., & Hearne, C. C. (1949). Cooperative extension work. Comstock Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart, W. M. (1982). Extraordinary groups: The sociology of unconventional life styles (2nd ed.). St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. (2018, November 7–10). How theory construction methods have shaped the sourcebook tradition [plenary on video]. National Council on Family Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S. (1960). Historical development of adult education movement in the United States. In M. K. Knowles (Ed.), Handbook of adult education in the United States (pp. 7–28). Adult Education Association of USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacAdoo, H. (1993). Membership structure, diversity key issues. NCFR Report, 38(4), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGavran, M. B. (1975). The role of domesticity transcended. In M. Fuller, L. M. Child, M. S. Chestnut, I. H. H. Quint, & M. Cantor (Eds.), Men, women, and issues in American history (Vol. 1, pp. 172–191). The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J. (2012). Thomas Jefferson: The art of power. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa. William Morrow & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menand, L. (2019, August 26). The Looking Glass: How cultural anthropologists redefined humanity: A brave band of scholars set out to save us from racism and sexism. The New Yorker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milardo, R. M. (2009). Editorial: Following a sociological imagination. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 1(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrill Act of 1862, 7 U.S.C. § 301 (1862). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/301

  • N.C.F.R. (2021). N.C.F.R. History. https://www.ncfr.org/about/history

  • Nash, M. A. (2019, November 8). The dark history of land-grant universities. The Washington Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, W. L. (1969). The woman movement: Feminism in the United State and England. Quadrangle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish, S. L., Saville, A. W., Swaine, J. C., & Igdalsky, L. (2016). Policies and programs for children and youth with disabilities. In J. M. Jenson & M. W. Fraser (Eds.), Social policy for children and families: A risk and resiliency perspective (3rd ed., pp. 201–226). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., Bales, R. F., with Olds, J., Zeldicth, M., Jr., & Slater, P. E. (1955). Family as socialization and interaction process. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. F. (1979). Notes from the guest editor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 4(4), 655–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537. (1896). https://www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/163us537

  • Rubin, R. H. (2012). African American families, ethnicity, and scholarship. In Groves monographs on marriage and family: Vol. 2. The groves conference on marriage and family: History and impact on family science (pp. 195–232). University of Michigan Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. H., & Settles, B. H. (2012a). Groves monographs on marriage and family: Vol. 2. The groves conference on marriage and family: History and impact on family science. University of Michigan Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. H., & Settles, B. H. (2012b). Family policy and advocacy. In R. H. Rubin & B. H. Settles (Eds.), Groves monographs on marriage and family: Vol. 2. The groves conference on marriage and family: History and impact on family science (pp. 87–105). University of Michigan Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, F. (1977). World War I intelligence testing and the development of psychology. Journal of History: Behavioral Science, 3, 274–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settles, B. H. (2005). USA families. In B. Adams & J. Trost (Eds.), Handbook of world families (pp. 560–601). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Settles, B. H., Rubin, R., & Sibbison, V. H. (2012). The groves way: History, process and family process. In R. H. Rubin & B. H. Settles (Eds.), Groves monographs on marriage and family: Vol. 2. The groves conference on marriage and family: History and impact on family science (pp. 1–38). University of Michigan Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Hughes Vocational Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 11. (1917). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/11

  • Smith-Lever Act, 7 U.S.C. 341. (1914). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/341

  • Stein, S. (2017). A colonial history of the higher education present: Rethinking land-grant institutions through processes of accumulation and relations of conquest. Critical Studies in Education, 61(2), 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, S. K., & Peterson, G. W. (Eds.). (2002). Pioneering paths in the study of families. The Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, M. B. (1983). [video]. The development of family studies in higher education: An interview with Marvin Sussman. In I. B. H. Settles & M. L. Liprie (Eds.), Demography and the family: An interview with Paul C. Glick. University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, M. B. (1987). Introduction: From the catbird seat: Observations on marriage and the family. In M. B. Sussman & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage & the family (pp. xxxi–xlii). Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, M. B., & Steinmetz, S. K. (Eds.). (1987). Handbook of marriage and the family. Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. C., & Bagd, A. (2005). The lack of explicit theory on family scholarship. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory & research (pp. 22–25). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, R. A., & Kates, A. M. (1981). The Washington Memo of the Coalition of Family Organizations, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House Conference on Families. (1980). White House Conference on Families: Listening to America’s Families, Action for the 80’s. A Summary of the Report to the President, Congress and Families of the Nation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, B. B. (1960). Contemporary theories and systems in psychology. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zvonkovic, A. (2014). The perennial problem of the field of family studies in an academic environment in constant flux: Broadening the scope of our ragtag group of starfighters. In Gravassi, S. M. Wilson, S.M., Ganong, L. & Zvonkovic, A., Furthering the conversation on the future of the discipline of family science: Comments on the articles of Hamon & Smith and Hans. Family Relations, 63(3), 335–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara H. Settles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Settles, B.H., Doneker, K.L. (2022). History of Family Science. In: Adamsons, K., Few-Demo, A.L., Proulx, C., Roy, K. (eds) Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methodologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92002-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics