Skip to main content

Framework for Bridge Management Systems (BMS) Using Digital Twins

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Association on Quality Control of Bridges and Structures (EUROSTRUCT 2021)

Abstract

Bridge structures have significantly long life spans; many medieval and historic bridges remain in operation in the world. The concept of bridge management contains the activities related to managing bridge inspections and condition assessment, which can be gathered into a Bridge Management System (BMS). Deterioration and failures have increased over the years in the already aging bridges; therefore, the importance of BMS to ensure safety of bridge operation and maximize investments in bridge maintenance has also increased. Digital Twin (DT) technology can be applied in the construction industry to achieve smart management through the entire life cycle of structures. Unlike the aerospace and manufacturing industries, the maturity of development of DT models in the construction industry still lags behind. In this study, a literature review was initially performed to gather knowledge on the origins of the digital twin concept and current best practice focused on bridge structures. A systematic approach for the literature review is presented in the methodology. Lastly, a framework for facility management of bridge structures using digital twins is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Khan MA (2015) Recent developments in ABC concepts. In: Khan MA (ed) Accelerated bridge construction. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 53–102. ISBN 978-0-12-407224-4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mirzaei Z, Adey BT, Klatter L, Thompson P (2014) The IABMAS bridge management committee overview of existing bridge management systems (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morgenthal G et al (2019) Framework for automated UAS-based structural condition assessment of bridges. Autom Constr 97:77–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Isailovic D, Stojanovic V, Trapp M, Richter R, Hajdin R, Döllner J (2020) Bridge damage: detection, IFC-based semantic enrichment and visualization. Autom Constr 112(103088)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Popescu C, Täljsten B, Blanksvärd T, Elfgren L (2019) 3D reconstruction of existing concrete bridges using optical methods. Struct Infrastruct Eng (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1594315

  6. Riveiro B, Jauregui DV, Arias P, Armesto J, Jiang R (2012) An innovative method for remote measurement of minimum vertical under clearance in routine bridge inspection. Autom Constr 25:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huthwohl P, Brilakis I, Borrmann A, Sacks R (2018) Integrating RC bridge defect information into BIM models. J Comput Civil Eng 32(3) (04018013):04018013–1–04018013–14

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ban F, Barazzetti L, Previtali M, Roncoroni F (2017) Historic BIM: a new repository for structural health monitoring. International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences - ISPRS archives, XLII-5/W1, pp 269–274

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cha G, Park S, Oh T (2019) A terrestrial LiDAR-based detection of shape deformation for maintenance of bridge structures. J Constr Eng Manag 145(12) (04019075):04019075–1–04019075–12

    Google Scholar 

  10. Borin P, Cavazzini F (2019) Condition assessment of RC bridges. Integrating machine learning, photogrammetry and BIM. International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences - ISPRS archives, XLII-2/W15, pp 201–208

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barazzetti L, Ban F, Brumana R, Previtali M, Roncoroni F (2016) BIM from laser scans... not just for buildings: NURBSbased parametric modeling of a medieval bridge. In: ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, III-5, pp 51–56

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stavroulaki ME, Riveiro B, Drosopoulos GA, Solla M, Koutsianitis P, Stavroulakis GE (2016) Modelling and strength evaluation of masonry bridges using terrestrial photogrammetry and finite elements. Adv Eng Softw. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Popescu C, et al (2019) Optical methods and wireless sensors for monitoring of bridges. In: IABSE symposium, Guimaraes 2019: towards a resilient built environment risk and asset management

    Google Scholar 

  14. McKenna T, Minehane M, O’Keefe B, O’Sullivan G, Ruane K (2017) Bridge information modelling (BrIM) for a listed viaduct. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers: bridge engineering (1600007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. León-Robles CA, Reinoso-Gordo JF, González-Quiñones JJ (2019) Heritage building information modeling (H-BIM) applied to a stone bridge. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 8(121)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Riveiro B, González-Jorge H, Varela M, Jauregui DV (2013) Validation of terrestrial laser scanning and photogrammetry techniques for the measurement of vertical under clearance and beam geometry in structural inspection of bridges. Measurement 46:784–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alani AM, Aboutalebi M, Kilic G (2014) Integrated health assessment strategy using NDT for reinforced concrete bridges. NDT E Int 61:80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abu Dabous S, Yaghi S, Alkass S, Moselhi O (2015) Concrete bridge deck condition assessment using IR thermography and ground penetrating radar technologies. In: 5th international/11th construction specialty conference (262)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Conde B, Ramos LF, Oliveira DV, Riveiro B, Solla M (2017) Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and three-dimensional numerical modelling: Application to Vilanova Bridge. Eng Struct 148:621–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu Y, Turkan Y (2019) BrIM and UAS for bridge inspections and management. Eng Constr Archit Manag 27(3):785–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Delgado JMD, Brilakis I, Middleton C (2016) Modelling, management, and visualization of structural performance monitoring data on BIM. In: Proceedings of the international conference on smart infrastructure and construction, ICSIC 2016, pp 543–549

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davila Delgado JM, Butler LJ, Gibbons N, Brilakis I, Elshae MZE, Middleton C (2017) Management of structural monitoring data of bridges using BIM. Bridge Eng 170(00):204–218

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sacks R et al (2018) SeeBridge as next generation bridge inspection: overview, information delivery manual and model view definition. Autom Constr 90:134–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Omer M, Margetts L, Hadi Mosleh M, Hewitt S, Parwaiz M (2019) Use of gaming technology to bring bridge inspection to the office. Struct Infrastruct Eng 15(10):1292–1307

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao Z, et al (2019) Integrating BIM and IoT for smart bridge management. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 371(022034) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Khajavi SH, Motlagh NH, Jaribion A, Werner LC, Holmstrom J (2019) Digital twin: vision, benefits, boundaries, and creation for buildings. IEEE Access 7(00):147406–147419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abu Dabous S, Yaghi S, Alkass S, Moselhi O (2017) Concrete bridge deck condition assessment using IR thermography and ground penetrating radar technologies. Autom Constr 81:340–354

    Google Scholar 

  28. McGuire B, Atadero R, Clevenger C, Ozbek M (2016) Bridge information modeling for inspection and evaluation. J Bridge Eng 21(4), (04015076)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Boddupalli C, Sadhu A, Rezazadeh Azar E, Pattyson S (2019) Improved visualization of infrastructure monitoring data using building information modeling. Struct Infrastruct Eng 15(9):1247–1263

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lu R, Brilakis I (2019) Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters. Autom Constr 105(102837)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wan C (2019) Development of a bridge management system based on the building information modeling technology. Sustainability 11(4583)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu J, Tan Y, Wang X, Wu P (2020) BIM/GIS integration for web GIS-based bridge management. Ann GIS. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2020.1743355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu Q, Xie X, Heaton J, Parlikad AK, Schooling J (2020) From BIM towards digital twin: strategy and future development for smart asset management. Stud Comput Intell 853:392–404

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cimino C, Negri E, Fumagalli L (2019) Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing. Comput Ind 113(103130)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kritzinger W, Karner M, Traar G, Henjes J, Sihn W (2018) Digital twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification. IFAC Papers Online 51–11:1016–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Andersen JE, Rex S (2019) Concrete bridge deck condition assessment using IR thermography and ground penetrating radar technologies. In: 20th congress of IABSE, New York City 2019: the evolving metropolis

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shim C-S, Dang N-S, Lon S, Jeon C-H (2019) Development of a bridge maintenance system for prestressed concrete bridges using 3D digital twin model. Struct Infrastruct Eng 15(10):1319–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ye C (2019) A digital twin of bridges for structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 12th international workshop on structural health monitoring (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out within the strategic innovation program InfraSweden2030, a joint venture by Vinnova, Formas and The Swedish Energy Agency, the work is also funded by SBUF (construction industry's organisation for research and development in Sweden) and Skanska Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa Saback de Freitas Bello .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saback de Freitas Bello, V., Popescu, C., Blanksvärd, T., Täljsten, B. (2022). Framework for Bridge Management Systems (BMS) Using Digital Twins. In: Pellegrino, C., Faleschini, F., Zanini, M.A., Matos, J.C., Casas, J.R., Strauss, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Association on Quality Control of Bridges and Structures. EUROSTRUCT 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 200. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91877-4_78

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91877-4_78

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91876-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91877-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics